Skip to content

Alfentanil Versus Remifentanil in Patient-controlled Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

Alfentanil vs Remifentanil in Patient-controlled Sedation During ERCP.A Randomized Double-blind Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01350037
Enrollment
81
Registered
2011-05-09
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2009-09-30
Last updated
2012-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biliary Tract Diseases, Pancreatic Diseases

Keywords

patient-controlled sedation, propofol, alfentanil, remifentanil, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Brief summary

Self-administration of propofol and opioid mixture by the patient him- or herself (patient-controlled sedation, PCS) could be successful alternative to the anesthesiologists-managed deep sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, it is not known which opioid would be the most suitable for PCS. The aim of this double-blind study was to compare remifentanil and alfentanil in PCS during ERCP.

Detailed description

Deep sedation with propofol has been suggested necessary for successful performance of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Airway obstruction, hypoventilation and hypoxemia occurs in deeply sedated patients with a high incidence of 12-30%.As a result of frequent hypoxemia events, deep sedation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.Careful monitoring of vital signs and involving of anesthesia-trained personal are recommended for deeply sedated patients.Self-administration of propofol by the patient him- or herself (patient-controlled sedation, PCS)could be a safer way to use propofol without the presence of an anesthesiologist. In comparison to the anesthesiologists managed deep sedation the main advantages of PCS are reduced consumption of anesthetics and faster recovery.A combination of propofol and different opioids is widely used for PCS however, it is not known which opioid would be the most suitable one. Remifentanil is a potent opioid with ultra short duration of action and usually administered as a constant infusion. The elimination half-life of alfentanil is 8-32 minutes being about 3 times longer, than that of remifentanil. Both opioids have been evaluated previously in PCS but comparative studies are lacking. This study was carried out in order to compare remifentanil and alfentanil in PCS during ERCP in terms of propofol consumption, sedation levels, endoscopist´s and patient's satisfaction. The investigators also sought information about frequency of sedation related complications associated with the different opioids.

Interventions

DRUGalfentanil

Alfentanil is a potent but short-acting synthetic opioid analgesic drug, used for anaesthesia in surgery. It is an analogue of fentanyl with around 1/10 the potency of fentanyl and around 1/3 of the duration of action, but with an onset of effects 4x faster than fentanyl.It is an OP3 mu-agonist.Alfentanil is administered by the parenteral (injected) route for fast onset of effects and precise control of dosage.

DRUGremifentanil

Remifentanil is a potent ultra short-acting synthetic opioid analgesic drug. It is given to patients during surgery to relieve pain and as an adjunct to an anaesthetic. Remifentanil is used for sedation as well as combined with other medications for use in general anesthesia. The use of remifentanil has made possible the use of high dose opioid and low dose hypnotic anesthesia, due to synergism between remifentanil and various hypnotic drugs and volatile anesthetics.It is administered in the form remifentanil hydrochloride and in adults is given as an intravenous infusion in doses ranging from 0.1 microgram per kilogram per minute to 0.5 (µg/kg)/min.

Sponsors

Helsinki University Central Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* elective ERCP patients

Exclusion criteria

* allergy to propofol or opioid analgesics, drug addiction, inability to co-operate, ASA class greater than 3, or patient's refusal.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
consumption of propofol and opioidone day
vital signsone dayHeart rate (HR), electrocardiogram (ECG), breathing rate, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), end tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) constant monitoring. Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP)measuring at 5 min intervals.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
sedation levelsone dayModified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (MOAA/S) score
pain intensityone dayNumeric range scale
patient´s and endoscopist´s satisfaction with sedationone day
incidence of nauseaone day

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026