Skip to content

The Efficiency of the Hair2Go Device: A Prospective, Open, Label Study With Before-After Design

The Efficiency of the Hair2Go Device: A Prospective, Open, Label Study With Before-After Design

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01348776
Enrollment
87
Registered
2011-05-05
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2013-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hair Removal

Keywords

hair reduction, hair removal, hair clearance

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine efficiency of Hair2Go device for short-term and long-term removal of unwanted hair adjunctive to shaving using a before-after study design.

Detailed description

This study is a multicenter study, designed to determine the efficacy of the Hair2Go hair removal device and to compare the extent of hair removal with and without maintenance treatments. Preferably, two anatomical regions to be treated will be selected including the axilla and either the legs (calves) or forearms. The size of the area treated will be approximately 5x5 cm2. Additional areas including the face can be treated according to the subject's request with the PI's discretion but are not mandatory. Subjects will be provided with the device and will be instructed as to the method of usage. The subjects will be expected to self-administer the treatment at the clinic in a simulated home environment. The duration of the treatment session is approximately 30-60 minutes. Each of the selected anatomical regions (both left and right sides) will be treated with either low, medium, or high Elōs energy level according to the PI's discretion. However all anatomical regions except for the axilla will be treated with either low or medium elōs energy levels only. Only the axilla will be treated up to an energy of 4J//cm2 A defined area of 5x5 cm2cm2 in the leg will not be treated and will serve as a reference for the temporal changes in hair growth that might be subject to factors, including fluctuations in hormone levels. Both sides (left and right) of the same anatomical region will receive the basic treatments. One side will receive 3 additional maintenance treatments in 4 week intervals (Maintenance vs No maintenance side) until the end of the experiment. More specifically, the study includes up to 11 visits at the clinic: initial consultation, 7 basic treatments in 1 week intervals followed in one side by 3 maintenance treatments, each 4 weeks apart. Follow ups will be conducted at 4 and 12 weeks after the last basic treatment.

Interventions

Treatment with Hair2Go Device 7 times every week with maintenance treatments once a month for 3 months

Sponsors

Syneron Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Healthy males and females, between 18 and 65 years of age. 2. Subject has Black or dark brown terminal hairs in the areas to be treated. 3. Terminal hair density requirement of greater than 15 hairs within the hair count site (3x3 cm area) as determined by manual hair count performed by the study investigator. 4. Willing to sign informed consent. 5. Willing to follow the treatment schedule and post treatment follow-up. 6. Willingness to have photographs of the treated area taken that may be used for marketing and educational presentation and/or publications 7. Willingness to avoid excessive sun exposure two weeks prior to treatments

Exclusion criteria

Skin and Hair 1. Subjects with white, red, light brown and/ or blonde hairs in the areas to be treated. 2. A history of keloidal scarring (hypertrophic scars or keloids). 3. Active dermatologic lesion or infection in the treatment site. 4. Subject has permanent tattoos or makeup in the treatment area. 5. Recently tanned in the area to be treated and/or unable or unlikely to refrain from tanning during the study. 6. Subject has disease related to photosensitivity, such as porphyria, polymorphic light eruption, solar urticaria, lupus, etc 7. Subject has a history of herpes outbreak in the area of treatment, unless receiving preventative treatment from physician Other Medical Conditions 8. Pregnant, planning to become pregnant, hormone fluctuations and/or breast feeding during the experiment. 9. Subjects with Diabetes (Type I or II) or other systemic or metabolic condition 10. Subject has an active electrical implant anywhere in the body, such as a pacemaker, an internal defibrillator, insulin pump, incontinence device, etc. 11. Subject suffers from epilepsy. 12. Subject has active cancer, or has a history of skin cancer or any other cancer in the area to be treated, including presence of malignant or pre-malignant pigmented lesions. 13. Subject received radiation therapy or chemotherapy treatments with the past 3 months. 14. Subject has known anticoagulative or thromboembolic condition or is on any form of anticoagulation treatment. 15. Subject has a history of immunosuppressant/immune deficiency disorders (including HIV infection or AIDS) or currently using immunosuppressive medications. 16. Subject has any other condition which in the physician's opinion would make it unsafe for the subject to be treated. Medication/treatments 17. Subject had rotating type tweezer epilator treatment, or waxing within the last 3 weeks 18. Subject had electrolysis treatment within the last 6 months over the treatment area. 19. Subject had any type of professional intense pulsed light (IPL), laser or RF hair removal in the treatment site within the last 6 months. 20. Subject is taking medication known to induce photosensitivity, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, tetracyclines, phenothiazines, thiazide diuretics, sulfonylureas, sulfonamides, Dacarbazine(DTIC), fluorouracil, vinblastine, and griseofulvin within 4 weeks of therapy. 21. Subject has been taking Accutane® within 6 months of therapy. 22. Subject has been on steroid regimen during the last three months. 23. Subject is on Gold therapy (for arthritis treatment).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hair Clearance 1 Month After Last Treatment3 months (1 month after 7 weekly treatments)Hair clearance = the percent of hair cleared from baseline to endpoint.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hair Clearance at 3-month (Final) Follow up5 months (3 months after 7 weekly treatments)Hair clearance = %hair cleared from baseline to endpoint after 7 weekly treatments with or without additional 2 monthly maintenance treatments.
Occurrence of Anticipated Effects on SkinUp to 19 weeksAs with other IPL devices, subjects were informed that they should expect some sense of warmth, tingling, or itching, when the device was applied. This was anticipated to be mild to moderate. Subjects could also expect transient erythema and edema at the treatment site that usually disappears within 24 hours.
Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following Treatments1, 3, 7 weeks (basic weekly treatment 1, 3, and 7), and 5 months (maintenance monthly treatment#3)Gathering information about the tolerability of the procedure following weekly treatments 1, 3, 7 and maintenance treatment 3 by asking subjects to rate the tolerability of the procedure based on 5 point pain scale (no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain, Intolerable \[had to stop treatment\]) . The distribution of the tolerability level is based on the analysis of the areas treated and not on the number of participants since each participant was treated on more than one area. Therefore the number of treated areas exceeds the number of participants and the unit of measurement is % treated areas that were rated.
Subject Satisfaction5 months (final follow up)Gathering information about the subject satisfaction from the hair removal procedure based on 5 point satisfaction scale.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment was conducted in a medical clinic. The recruitment continued from April to October 2011.

Pre-assignment details

3 subjects were found not eligible and 1 withdrew the informed consent before beginning treatments.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hair2Go (Me)
Subjects treated with the Hair2Go (Me) Device
87
Total87

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHair2Go (Me)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
87 Participants
Age Continuous36.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Region of Enrollment
United States
87 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
79 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 87
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 87

Outcome results

Primary

Hair Clearance 1 Month After Last Treatment

Hair clearance = the percent of hair cleared from baseline to endpoint.

Time frame: 3 months (1 month after 7 weekly treatments)

Population: Sample size was discussed with the FDA during a pre-IDE meeting.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Hair Clearance 1 Month After Last Treatment56.83 %baseline hair countStandard Deviation 42.96
Hair2Go (Mē) no Maintenance SideHair Clearance 1 Month After Last Treatment54.08 %baseline hair countStandard Deviation 41.21
Secondary

Hair Clearance at 3-month (Final) Follow up

Hair clearance = %hair cleared from baseline to endpoint after 7 weekly treatments with or without additional 2 monthly maintenance treatments.

Time frame: 5 months (3 months after 7 weekly treatments)

Population: All areas with photos that allowed reliable hair counting were included for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Hair Clearance at 3-month (Final) Follow up58.3 %baseline hair countStandard Error 37.4
Hair2Go (Mē) no Maintenance SideHair Clearance at 3-month (Final) Follow up44.2 %baseline hair countStandard Error 38.4
Secondary

Occurrence of Anticipated Effects on Skin

As with other IPL devices, subjects were informed that they should expect some sense of warmth, tingling, or itching, when the device was applied. This was anticipated to be mild to moderate. Subjects could also expect transient erythema and edema at the treatment site that usually disappears within 24 hours.

Time frame: Up to 19 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Occurrence of Anticipated Effects on SkinErythema20 Number of reports
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Occurrence of Anticipated Effects on SkinPruritis2 Number of reports
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Occurrence of Anticipated Effects on SkinEdema2 Number of reports
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Occurrence of Anticipated Effects on SkinInflammation2 Number of reports
Secondary

Subject Satisfaction

Gathering information about the subject satisfaction from the hair removal procedure based on 5 point satisfaction scale.

Time frame: 5 months (final follow up)

Population: Two subjects did not report on satisfaction.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Subject SatisfactionVery satisfied31 participants
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Subject SatisfactionSatisfied33 participants
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Subject SatisfactionSlightly satisfied9 participants
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Subject SatisfactionNo opinion4 participants
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Subject SatisfactionUnsatisfied8 participants
Secondary

Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following Treatments

Gathering information about the tolerability of the procedure following weekly treatments 1, 3, 7 and maintenance treatment 3 by asking subjects to rate the tolerability of the procedure based on 5 point pain scale (no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain, Intolerable \[had to stop treatment\]) . The distribution of the tolerability level is based on the analysis of the areas treated and not on the number of participants since each participant was treated on more than one area. Therefore the number of treated areas exceeds the number of participants and the unit of measurement is % treated areas that were rated.

Time frame: 1, 3, 7 weeks (basic weekly treatment 1, 3, and 7), and 5 months (maintenance monthly treatment#3)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsMild Pain13.86 % treated areas
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsIntolerable (had to stop treatment)0 % treated areas
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsSevere Pain0 % treated areas
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsNo Pain83.13 % treated areas
Hair2Go (Mē) Maintenance Side (Before Maintenance Tx)Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsModerate Pain3.01 % treated areas
Hair2Go (Mē) no Maintenance SideTolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsNo Pain91.52 % treated areas
Hair2Go (Mē) no Maintenance SideTolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsModerate Pain0 % treated areas
Hair2Go (Mē) no Maintenance SideTolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsSevere Pain0 % treated areas
Hair2Go (Mē) no Maintenance SideTolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsIntolerable (had to stop treatment)0 % treated areas
Hair2Go (Mē) no Maintenance SideTolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsMild Pain8.48 % treated areas
Treatment #7Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsIntolerable (had to stop treatment)0 % treated areas
Treatment #7Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsMild Pain8.48 % treated areas
Treatment #7Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsNo Pain89.09 % treated areas
Treatment #7Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsModerate Pain2.42 % treated areas
Treatment #7Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsSevere Pain0 % treated areas
Maintenance Treatment #3Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsModerate Pain1.37 % treated areas
Maintenance Treatment #3Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsIntolerable (had to stop treatment)0 % treated areas
Maintenance Treatment #3Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsSevere Pain0 % treated areas
Maintenance Treatment #3Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsMild Pain11.64 % treated areas
Maintenance Treatment #3Tolerability Level of the Procedure Following TreatmentsNo Pain86.99 % treated areas

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026