Early Inflammatory Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Peer support, Peer mentoring, Peer counselling, Arthritis, Inflammatory arthritis, Early inflammatory arthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis, Chronic disease
Brief summary
Peer support (including informational, emotional, appraisal support) has been shown to help persons with chronic conditions. The goal of this research is to examine the impact of early peer support on the health and quality of life of individuals with early inflammatory arthritis (EIA). The investigators hypothesize that early peer support will result in improved use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) or biologic treatment, self-efficacy, coping efficacy, social support, health-related quality of life, self-management, and disease activity score as well as reduced anxiety for individuals with EIA within two years of their diagnosis. In this study, persons with IA will be trained as peer mentors using a training program developed for a pilot study. Individuals with EIA will be randomized to receive either peer support program or standard care. Peer mentors will be paired with a person with EIA to provide one-on-one support (face-to-face or telephone) once a week for approximately 30 minutes over a 12-week period. All standard care participants will receive the peer mentoring intervention at the end of study. Both groups will be evaluated using self-administered questionnaires and clinical assessments, and results of the two groups will be compared. This information will be used to design a larger study.
Detailed description
Background: The investigators are proposing to examine the effectiveness of a peer support program, the aim of which is to assist individuals with early inflammatory arthritis (EIA) to receive the education and support they need to make decisions to manage their disease. Peer support (including informational, emotional, appraisal support) has been shown to assist persons with chronic conditions and may address challenges with receiving timely and proper treatment in persons with EIA. Purpose: The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the effectiveness of peer support to improve the health and quality of life of individuals with EIA. The investigators hypothesize that early peer support will result in improved use of treatment, self-efficacy, coping efficacy, social support, health-related quality of life, self-management, and disease activity score, as well as reduced anxiety for individuals with EIA within two years of their diagnosis. Methods: This proposal builds on a pilot study, currently underway, to develop and evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a peer support intervention for persons with EIA. The proposed effectiveness study will employ a RCT design with a wait list control group. Individuals with IA (diagnosis 2 or more years) will be trained as peer mentors using the revised pilot study training program. Peer mentors will be matched with a person newly diagnosed with IA to provide one-on-one support (face-to-face or telephone) over a 12-week period. Individuals with EIA will be recruited from rheumatology clinics at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Mount Sinai Hospital. Individuals with EIA will be randomized to either intervention or standard care (wait list). All standard care participants with EIA will receive the peer mentoring program at the end of study period; their outcomes will be also be evaluated. Both intervention and standard care participants will complete clinical assessments and self-administered questionnaires before and after (immediate post-program and 3-month follow-up) study completion to evaluate use of treatment, self-efficacy, coping efficacy, social support, health-related quality of life, anxiety, self-management, and disease activity count. Implication: The study aims to improve the education and support for patients with EIA. The data from this study will be used to further refine the intervention and study design to be subsequently submitted for further effectiveness testing in a larger scale RCT.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALOne-on-one peer support
The peer support intervention will take the form of a one-on-one peer mentoring program, using a mutually agreed upon method of communication between each pair of peer mentor and EIA participant (either by telephone or face-to-face meeting at a neutral public location). The research team will pair trained peer mentors and individuals with EIA as closely as possible based on such characteristics as sex, age, working status, and specific disease/type of IA. Peer mentors will be responsible to initiate and maintain contact with individuals with EIA. Individuals with EIA and peer mentors will be asked to have contact once a week for 30 minutes during the 12-week study period. Meetings/ interactions will not be prescribed; rather they will be defined by the individual with EIA. Peer mentors will provide support based on the needs of the individual they are mentoring. As such the nature of each interaction is likely to vary among pairs and from one interaction to the next.
BEHAVIORALStandard of care
Standard of care is at the discretion of the treating rheumatologist. In addition to information and patient education about the underlying disease process provided at the time of diagnosis, it may include referral to allied health professionals (e.g., physiotherapist, occupational therapist, podiatrist, social worker). This may be via referral to The Arthritis Society or directly to individual practitioners. In addition, it may include referral to voluntary support programs in the community (e.g., Arthritis Self-Management Program).
Sponsors
Canadian Rheumatology Association
Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada
The Arthritis Society, Canada
Unity Health Toronto
University of Toronto
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* EIA disease (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis) duration 6 - 52 weeks * At least 3 swollen joints, assessed by the treating rheumatologist, OR Positive compression test for the metacarpophalangeal joints, OR Positive compression test for the metatarsophalangeal joints, OR At least 30 minutes of morning stiffness (Lineker et al., 1999) * Prescription of a DMARD/biologic by the treating rheumatologist * Ability to speak, understand, read and write English without the aid of a secondary support person * Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
• Diagnosis of osteoarthritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus, DM neuropathy or trauma
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Use of orally administered DMARD or biologic treatment | 0 months (baseline), immediate post-program, 3 months post-program | Use of orally administered DMARD or biologic treatment in individuals with EIA as determined indirectly through the modified Morisky scale for medication adherence |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Health-related quality of life | 0 months (baseline), immediate post-program, 3 months post-program | Health-related quality of life as measured by the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales, 2nd edition (AIMS2 |
| Anxiety | 0 months (baseline), immediate post-program, 3 months post-program | Anxiety is measured by the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales, 2nd edition (AIMS2), dimension sub score for anxiety |
| Coping-efficacy | 0 months (baseline), immediate post-program, 3 months post-program | Coping-efficacy as assessed using a measure developed by Gignac et al. (2000) |
| Self-efficacy | 0 months (baseline), immediate post-program, 3 months post-program | Self-efficacy using Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale (SES) |
| Self-management | 0 months (baseline), immediate post-program, 3 months post-program | Self-management as evaluated using Patient Activation Measure (PAM) to measure the knowledge, skills, and confidence aspects of self management |
| Disease activity | 0 months (baseline), immediate post-program, 3 months post-program | Disease activity as assessed using the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): A rheumatologist from the research team will conduct clinical assessments for CDAI score, which is a propensity score for disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. It accounts for upper extremity tender and swollen joints, and patient and evaluator impressions of disease progression |
| Social support | 0 months (baseline), immediate post-program, 3 months post-program | Social support as measured by Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS) |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed