Skip to content

HIBA-Institutional Registry of Amyloidosis

Institutional Registry of Amyloidosis (Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01347047
Acronym
RIA-HIBA
Enrollment
500
Registered
2011-05-04
Start date
2011-04-01
Completion date
2026-07-01
Last updated
2026-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyloidosis

Keywords

Amyloidosis, Known or Suspected, rare diseases

Brief summary

1. Creating a population-based registry system Amyloidosis prospective epidemiological survey * risk factors * diagnosis * prognosis * treatment * monitoring * survival 2. Describe the occurrence of amyloidosis in the population of HIBA, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. 3. Describe the characteristics of clinical presentation, evolution and predisposing factors of amyloidosis.

Detailed description

Amyloidosis is a systemic disease that is usually a result of misfolded proteins in the form of amorphous fibrillar material in various tissues and can cause progressive dysfunction of the same. The prevalence of amyloidosis varies depending on the population concerned and the type of amyloid. While prevalence in the general population is unknown, according to estimates by the Mayo Clinic this prevalence is 1 in 90 666% in the U.S. In England this disease generated about 0.0084% (1367 / 16232579) of all hospital visits between April 2008 and April 2009. The most common clinical manifestations include cardiac disease, renal and liver function, but it may vary widely depending on the type of amyloidosis, the organ infected and extent of the deposits. Amyloid infiltration can produce signs and symptoms that may be very similar to other rheumatic diseases. This may suggest potential clinical polymorphic underdiagnosis due to low clinical suspicion. The registries are organized systems of systematic data collection of a large number of patients quickly and efficiently on a particular disease at a given time. The main difficulty of the registries is the guarantee of the quality of their data. The main objectives of the registry are: 1. Understand risk factors and prognosis. 2. Evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic comparison with current standards. 3. Advance knowledge of the disease to optimize the assessment, treatment and monitoring of patients. 4. Analyze the effectiveness of new therapies. 5. Studying differences between populations. 6. Quickly estimate the morbidity, mortality and resource utilization associated with a disease entity. 7. Examine the course of a disease 8. Formulate novel hypotheses for further prospective studies. Currently, there are registries for patients with transthyretin amyloidosis (TAHOS), global registry of transplant patients with familial amyloid poly neuropathy. Also, there are indirect registries such as the kidney transplant, heart transplant, among others. The investigators found no data on the prevalence or incidence, evolution and prognosis of amyloidosis in our country. There are no existing records of national Amyloidosis in Latin America that could describe the behavior of this disease in our environment. Because it is a chronic disease with amyloid infiltration and can produce signs and symptoms that may be very similar to other rheumatic diseases, this clinic potentially poliform, may suggest underestimation of low clinical suspicion. As there is no cure, some patients may persist symptomatic despite adequate therapy, that is why it is important the creation of a monitoring system to generate data on the evolution and prognosis. The data registries can be used to develop new treatment guidelines and recommendations, also to inform and educate physicians on the management of this disease. The Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires is a center of high complexity of derivation of this type of pathology and due to the fact that the hospital, that has a private health insurance system (HIBA's health plan \[plan de salud, PS\], gives the unique opportunity denominators for the generation of a population on their affiliates, therefore the investigators propose to make a Institutional Registry of Amyloidosis.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Lead SponsorOTHER
Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires
CollaboratorOTHER
Austral University, Argentina
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital de Alta Complejidad en Red
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín
CollaboratorOTHER
HOSPITAL BRITANICO DE BUENOS AIRES
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Privado de Rosario
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centro de Educación Medica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno
CollaboratorOTHER
La Fundacion Favaloro para la Investigacion y la Docencia Medica
CollaboratorOTHER
Sanatorio Anchorena
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centro Médico Uruguayo, Uruguay
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Clínica Foianini, Bolivia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Observational model
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Cases of amyloidosis are captured by electronic medical records whenever the physician register amyloidosis as a patient diagnosis, and/or there is amyloidosis in a biopsy specimen and/or requests for the following studies of an adult patient: plasma kappa and lambda light-chain concentrations, the kappa: lambda ratio, transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, or cardiovascular magnetic resonance examination or pyrophosphate scintigraphy From the possible cases included in the IRA, a prospective review of the electronics health records was performed to confirm the presence of amyloidosis \*\*Inclusion Criteria: 1 AND (2 or 3) 1. Patients over 18 years: 2. Confirmed amyloidosis: Proof of deposit of amyloid pathology by tissue biopsy in abdominal fat, bone marrow, rectum or organ involved (eg, kidney, liver, sural nerve) 3. Clinically compatible case of Amyloidosis : *

Exclusion criteria

Refusal to participate in the study or the informed consent process by the patient or legal representative or refusal to consent to participate in the study in the case of minors.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Epidemiologic characteristicsFrom inclusion date (daignosis) until the date of death from any cause or date of last follow up(if not dead) assessed up to 10 yearsSurvival anual
From treatment to folow up, annualyat baselineBaseline description
Treatment patternsFrom diagnosis, evaluated after every line of treatment or annualy up to 10 yearsType of treatment, duration, adverse events, completition

Countries

Argentina

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMaría Lourdes Posadas-Martínez, MD

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRElsa Nucifora, MD

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRDiego Hernan Giunta, MD

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRDorotea Fantl, MD

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRGustavo Greloni, MD

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRMaria Adela Aguirre, MD

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRCesar Antonio Belziti, MD

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRPatricia Sorroche

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRSoledad Saez

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRErika Brulc, MD

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRDiego Perez de Arenaza, MD

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIREugenia Villanueva, MD

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRMarcelina Carretero, MD

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCarolina María Petit Cwirko, MD

Clinica Foianini, Santa Cruz, Bolivia

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPablo Young, MD

Hospital Británico, Buenos Aires, Argentina

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGisela Streitenberger, MD

Hospital de Alta Complejidad El Cruce Nestor Kirchner, Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRLuciana Leon Cejas, MD

Hospital Británico, Buenos Aires, Argentina

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORVeronica Volberg, MD

Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSergio Juan Baratta, MD

Hospital Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJuan Pablo Costabel, MD

Instituto cardiovascular Buenos Aires, Argentina

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCarlos Dumont Dunayevich, MD

Hospital Privado de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAlejandro Quiroga, MD

Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_CHAIRAdrian Fernandez, MD

Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJosefina Parodi, MD

Anchorena, Buenos Aires, Argentina

STUDY_DIRECTORFranco Leoni, MD

Médica Uruguaya, Uruguay

STUDY_DIRECTOREduardo Ortuño Campos, MD

Hospital Universitarios Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJorge Thierer, MD

CEMIC, , Buenos Aires, Argentina

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 22, 2026