Skip to content

Special Investigation in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (HOPEFUL III Study), a Follow-up Survey of Study P12-069

An Extended Observational Study (P12-707: HOPEFUL III Study) of Follow-up Survey (P12-069: HOPEFUL II Study) of the Study of Adalimumab (D2E7) for Prevention of Joint Destruction in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan (M06-859)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01346501
Enrollment
172
Registered
2011-05-03
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2016-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis

Brief summary

The main objective of this study was to determine the ability to maintain response after discontinuation of adalimumab treatment and the secondary objective was to determine radiographic progression in participants participating in the study, including the percentage who displayed minimal progression.

Detailed description

This was a two-arm, multi-center, Post Marketing Observational Study (PMOS) conducted in Japanese participants with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) who continued the one year observational period of study P12-069 (HOPEFUL II study; NCT01163292) and provided informed consent to participate in study P12-707 (HOPEFUL III study; NCT01346501), after completion of study M06-859 (HOPEFUL I study; NCT00870467). The study P12-707 provided an additional two years of observation for those participants who participated in study P12-069.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants with RA who continued the one year observational period of study P12-069 and provided informed consent to participate in study P12-707.

Exclusion criteria

Participants with RA who used biological agents other than adalimumab in the one year observational period of study P12-069.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 - C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score < 3.2 After Discontinuation of Adalimumab TreatmentAt Week 0, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78, Week 104, Week 130, and Week 156The DAS28-CRP, a combined index that measured Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) disease activity, was calculated based on the number of tender joint count (28 joints), the number of swollen joint count (28 joints), overall disease activity (using visual analog scale (VAS)), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-Reactive protein (CRP). The DAS28-CRP scores ranged from 0 (no disease activity) to 9 (maximal disease activity); decrease in DAS28-CRP score indicated improvement of disease. In participants who discontinued treatment with adalimumab after sustained low disease activity (defined as DAS28-CRP score \<3.2) in study M06-859, the percentage of participants who maintained DAS28-CRP score \< 3.2 without disease flare (defined as DAS28-CRP score ≥ 3.2) during studies P12-069 and P12-707 was calculated.
Percentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)At Week 0, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78, Week 104, Week 130, Week 156, Week 182, and Week 208MMP-3, a proteolytic enzyme that plays a pivotal role in joint destruction in RA was assessed during the study. MMP-3 serum level \< 121 ng/mL in men and \< 59.7 ng/mL in women was considered as the normal value. Data are presented as the percentage of participants with MMP-3 serum level greater than the normal value.
Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreAt Week 0, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78, Week 104, Week 130, Week 156, Week 182, and Week 208The HAQ score was a participant-reported questionnaire that measured quality of life in terms of physical function of participants with rheumatoid arthritis. It consisted of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past seven days using the following response categories (score): without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). The scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score from 0 to 3, where 0-1 represented mild disability and 2-3 represented severe disability. Data are presented as mean HAQ score +/- standard deviation with negative scores indicating improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 1.53 yearsThe mTSS, a method of assessing radiographs, was used to evaluate the level of joint destruction by disease. Digitized X-rays of hands and feet were obtained and scored on a scale ranging from 0 \[no damage\] to 5 \[complete collapse or total destruction of joint\] for erosion and 0 \[no damage\] to 4 \[complete luxation of joint\] for joint space narrowing. The scores on each task were summed and averaged to derive the total mTSS score ranging from 0 \[normal\] to 380 \[maximal disease\]. Large positive change in mTSS indicated disease progression; small positive/no change indicated slowing/halting of disease progression. The mTSS score ≤ 0.5 was defined as minimal radiographic progression. Data are presented as the percentage of the participants with mTSS ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 1.5 at the end of third year of the observation period (at Week 104 of P12-707).
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions and Serious Adverse Drug ReactionsFrom signing of informed consent until withdrawal of participant or starting a new biologic agent or up to approximately 2 yearsAdverse drug reactions (serious and non-serious) are adverse events for which the causal relationship between adalimumab and the event could not be ruled out. Adverse event was defined as any untoward or unintended medical occurrences (including abnormal laboratory findings), signs/symptoms, or diseases of the participant receiving adalimumab, regardless of causality of adalimumab treatment. Data are presented as percentage of participants.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Adalimumab
Participants with RA who continued adalimumab treatment after completion of study M06-859, participated in the observational period of studies P12-069 and P12-707.
79
Non-adalimumab
Participants with RA who discontinued adalimumab treatment after completion of study M06-859, participated in the observational period of studies P12-069 and P12-707.
93
Total172

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyInitiated Other Biological Agents31
Overall StudyOther812

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdalimumabNon-adalimumabTotal
Age, Continuous56.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
55.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
55.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
66 Participants75 Participants141 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants18 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 799 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 791 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score

The HAQ score was a participant-reported questionnaire that measured quality of life in terms of physical function of participants with rheumatoid arthritis. It consisted of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past seven days using the following response categories (score): without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). The scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score from 0 to 3, where 0-1 represented mild disability and 2-3 represented severe disability. Data are presented as mean HAQ score +/- standard deviation with negative scores indicating improvement.

Time frame: At Week 0, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78, Week 104, Week 130, Week 156, Week 182, and Week 208

Population: The effectiveness analysis set was defined as all participants who had evaluable HAQ score during studies P12-069 and P12-707.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 26 (N=72, 82)0.48 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 130 (N=30, 44)0.18 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 78 (N=45, 48)0.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 156 (N=28, 51)0.17 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 520.27 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 182 (N=26, 33)0.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 104 (N=55, 62)0.21 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 208 (N=24, 39)0.12 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 01.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 208 (N=24, 39)0.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 01.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 26 (N=72, 82)0.42 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 520.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 78 (N=45, 48)0.18 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 104 (N=55, 62)0.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 130 (N=30, 44)0.16 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 156 (N=28, 51)0.30 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Non-adalimumabMean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ScoreWeek 182 (N=26, 33)0.26 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 - C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score < 3.2 After Discontinuation of Adalimumab Treatment

The DAS28-CRP, a combined index that measured Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) disease activity, was calculated based on the number of tender joint count (28 joints), the number of swollen joint count (28 joints), overall disease activity (using visual analog scale (VAS)), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-Reactive protein (CRP). The DAS28-CRP scores ranged from 0 (no disease activity) to 9 (maximal disease activity); decrease in DAS28-CRP score indicated improvement of disease. In participants who discontinued treatment with adalimumab after sustained low disease activity (defined as DAS28-CRP score \<3.2) in study M06-859, the percentage of participants who maintained DAS28-CRP score \< 3.2 without disease flare (defined as DAS28-CRP score ≥ 3.2) during studies P12-069 and P12-707 was calculated.

Time frame: At Week 0, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78, Week 104, Week 130, and Week 156

Population: The effectiveness analysis set was defined as all participants who had evaluable DAS28-CRP score during studies P12-069 and P12-707.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 - C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score < 3.2 After Discontinuation of Adalimumab TreatmentWeek 0100.0 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 - C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score < 3.2 After Discontinuation of Adalimumab TreatmentWeek 2677.9 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 - C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score < 3.2 After Discontinuation of Adalimumab TreatmentWeek 5271.4 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 - C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score < 3.2 After Discontinuation of Adalimumab TreatmentWeek 7863.6 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 - C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score < 3.2 After Discontinuation of Adalimumab TreatmentWeek 10458.4 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 - C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score < 3.2 After Discontinuation of Adalimumab TreatmentWeek 13054.5 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 - C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score < 3.2 After Discontinuation of Adalimumab TreatmentWeek 15645.5 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)

MMP-3, a proteolytic enzyme that plays a pivotal role in joint destruction in RA was assessed during the study. MMP-3 serum level \< 121 ng/mL in men and \< 59.7 ng/mL in women was considered as the normal value. Data are presented as the percentage of participants with MMP-3 serum level greater than the normal value.

Time frame: At Week 0, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78, Week 104, Week 130, Week 156, Week 182, and Week 208

Population: The effectiveness analysis set was defined as all participants who had evaluable MMP-3 score during studies P12-069 and P12-707.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 130 (N=40, 46)25.0 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 78 (N=62, 57)38.7 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 156 (N=38, 52)28.9 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 5237.7 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 182 (N=35, 38)20.0 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 208 (N=32, 43)18.8 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 104 (N=58, 66)19.0 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 079.2 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 26 (N=77, 83)53.2 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 182 (N=35, 38)23.7 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 26 (N=77, 83)38.6 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 5227.4 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 78 (N=62, 57)36.8 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 104 (N=58, 66)42.4 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 130 (N=40, 46)32.6 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 156 (N=38, 52)32.7 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 208 (N=32, 43)30.2 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Positive Serum Level of Matrix Metalloprotease-3 (MMP-3)Week 067.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions and Serious Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse drug reactions (serious and non-serious) are adverse events for which the causal relationship between adalimumab and the event could not be ruled out. Adverse event was defined as any untoward or unintended medical occurrences (including abnormal laboratory findings), signs/symptoms, or diseases of the participant receiving adalimumab, regardless of causality of adalimumab treatment. Data are presented as percentage of participants.

Time frame: From signing of informed consent until withdrawal of participant or starting a new biologic agent or up to approximately 2 years

Population: Safety was assessed in participants who received adalimumab in the observation period of studies P12-069 and P12-707, in routine clinical practice. Refer 'reporting group description' for the definition of safety analysis set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions and Serious Adverse Drug ReactionsAdverse Drug Reactions16 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions and Serious Adverse Drug ReactionsSerious Adverse Drug Reactions2 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions and Serious Adverse Drug ReactionsAdverse Drug Reactions2 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions and Serious Adverse Drug ReactionsSerious Adverse Drug Reactions0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 1.5

The mTSS, a method of assessing radiographs, was used to evaluate the level of joint destruction by disease. Digitized X-rays of hands and feet were obtained and scored on a scale ranging from 0 \[no damage\] to 5 \[complete collapse or total destruction of joint\] for erosion and 0 \[no damage\] to 4 \[complete luxation of joint\] for joint space narrowing. The scores on each task were summed and averaged to derive the total mTSS score ranging from 0 \[normal\] to 380 \[maximal disease\]. Large positive change in mTSS indicated disease progression; small positive/no change indicated slowing/halting of disease progression. The mTSS score ≤ 0.5 was defined as minimal radiographic progression. Data are presented as the percentage of the participants with mTSS ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 1.5 at the end of third year of the observation period (at Week 104 of P12-707).

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The effectiveness analysis set was defined as all participants who had evaluable mTSS score during studies P12-069 and P12-707.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 1.5mTSS ≤ 0.566.2 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 1.5mTSS ≤ 1.583.1 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 1.5mTSS ≤ 0.555.7 Percentage of participants
Non-adalimumabPercentage of Participants With Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 1.5mTSS ≤ 1.567.2 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026