Skip to content

Study Cyclosporine (CsA) Versus Tacrolimus (Tacro) After Campath Induction in Kidney Transplantation

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing CsA Versus Tacro After Campath Induction In Kidney Transplant Recipients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01346397
Acronym
RSCS-Campath
Enrollment
170
Registered
2011-05-03
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2016-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Graft Rejection, Chronic Allograft Nephropathy, Polyomavirus-related Transplant Nephropathy

Keywords

rejection, survival, alemtuzumab, cyclosporine, tacrolimus

Brief summary

After alemtuzumab induction, followed with kidney transplantation, patients will be randomly assigned to receive either tacrolimus or cyclosporine microemulsion in combination with mycophenolates. Patients will be followed including protocol biopsy at 1, 12, 36, 60 month posttransplant, regular nuclein acid testing (NAT) for cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and BK virus (BKV) in urine and blood. The investigation is undertaken to clarify the reason for equal survival rates for patients on cyclosporine and tacrolimus despite the lower rejection rate on tacrolimus.

Detailed description

Special attention will be paid to the epidemiology of virus infections behind one year post transplant. Very limited data are available on this issue and there is suspicion that tacrolimus patients suffer more hard with viruses like CMV, EBV, BKV. These viruses can induce graft nephropathy and threat to the life of the recipient.

Interventions

after alemtuzumab, cyclosporine or tacrolimus was administered

Sponsors

Russian Scientific Center of Surgery
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* first kidney allograft recipients * alemtuzumab induction

Exclusion criteria

* CNI intolerance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Survival5 yearsin cyclosporine group 96.4 +/- 2.8%; in tacrolimus group 96.3 +/- 3.4%
Graft Survival5 yearsin cyclosporine group 84.6 +/- 5.8%; in tacrolimus group 86.2 +/- 4.1%

Countries

Russia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cyclosporine Group
cyclosporine group - after alemtuzumab induction cyclosporine was administered
85
Tacrolimus Group
tacrolimus group - after alemtuzumab induction tacrolimus was administered cyclosporine or tacrolimus: after alemtuzumab, cyclosporine or tacrolimus was administered
85
Total170

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCyclosporine GroupTacrolimus GroupTotal
Age, Continuous19 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Deceased donor kidney transplant recipients28 participants21 participants49 participants
Gender
Female
33 participants35 participants68 participants
Gender
Male
52 participants40 participants92 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 8512 / 85
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 8512 / 85

Outcome results

Primary

Graft Survival

in cyclosporine group 84.6 +/- 5.8%; in tacrolimus group 86.2 +/- 4.1%

Time frame: 5 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cyclosporine GroupGraft Survival84.6 percentage of participants
Tacrolimus GroupGraft Survival86.2 percentage of participants
Primary

Patient Survival

in cyclosporine group 96.4 +/- 2.8%; in tacrolimus group 96.3 +/- 3.4%

Time frame: 5 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cyclosporine GroupPatient Survival96.4 percentage of participants
Tacrolimus GroupPatient Survival96.3 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026