Skip to content

Preservation of Ovarian Function After Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

A Phase II Trial of GnRH Agonist for the Preservation of Ovarian Function After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01343368
Enrollment
19
Registered
2011-04-28
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2017-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Hodgkin Disease, Multiple Myeloma, Myeloproliferative Disorders, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Keywords

Post-menarchal

Brief summary

Women undergoing myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (MA HCT) will receive GnRH agonist leuprolide. Women undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic (RIC) HCT will be observed.

Detailed description

This study is to use gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist leuprolide prior myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation to prevent ovarian dysfunction in post-menarchal women. The primary objective is to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on the incidence of ovarian failure. The secondary objectives are * to determine how effective GnRH agonists are at suppressing menses during * to determine the incidence and timing of resumption of menstrual cycles after HCT * to determine the incidence and timing of resumption of normal FSH and LH levels after HCT * to determine the incidence of normal AMH levels after HCT * to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on immune reconstitution after HCT * to assess the safety and tolerability of GnRH agonists in the context of HCT A total of 47 patients will be accrued in this study.

Interventions

DRUGLeuprolide

Long-acting leuprolide 11.25 mg intramuscularly (IM) pre-transplant (HCT) and 3 months post-HCT PLUS Short-acting leuprolide 0.2 mg subcutaneously (SQ) daily for 14 days

BIOLOGICALhematopoietic cell transplant

Conventional bone marrow transplant regimen.

BIOLOGICALreduced intensity allogeneic HCT

A reduced-intensity conditioning transplant is a bone marrow or cord blood transplant (also called a BMT) that uses less intense treatment to prepare for transplant than a standard transplant does. While a standard transplant uses the pre-transplant treatment to destroy most of the disease cells, a reduced-intensity transplant relies on the donor's immune cells to fight disease.

Sponsors

Minnesota Medical Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Interventional Arm: * Eligible for myeloablative allogenic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) * Post-menarchal female \< or = 50 years of age * Normal antimullerian hormone (AMH) level and/or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)/leuprolide (LH) levels for age/stage of puberty * Those women who have an FSH \> 40 IU/L and whose diagnosis of malignancy and whose chemotherapy treatment was within 12 weeks of enrollment are still eligible if they had normal menstrual cycles pre-diagnosis. * Observational Arm: * Eligible for reduced intensity allogeneic HCT * Post-menarchal female ≤ 50 years of age * Normal AMH level and/or FSH/LH for age/stage of puberty * Those women who an FSH \>40 IU/L and whose diagnosis of malignancy and chemotherapy treatment was within 12 weeks of enrollment are still eligible if they had normal menstrual cycles pre-diagnosis.

Exclusion criteria

* All Arms: * History of ovarian cancer * Surgical resection of one or both ovaries. Prior hysterectomy is allowed as long as the ovaries are intact. * Use of GnRH agonist in last 12 months will exclude patients if lab results are not available to demonstrate adequate ovarian function prior to initiation of GnRH therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Number of Patients With Ovarian FailureThrough Day 180 Post TransplantComparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Ovarian failure rate is based on FSH measured at 180 days after HCT; to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on the incidence of ovarian failure (i.e. FSH \>40 IU/L) after transplant.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) LevelsBaselineComparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.
Comparison of Number of Patients Who Resumed Menstrual CyclesDay 365 Post TransplantComparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who resumed menses after hematopoietic cell transplant
Comparison of Lutineizing Hormone (LH) LevelsBaselineComparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Comparison of Number of Patients Who Stopped Menstrual BleedingFrom Baseline Through Day 365Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who stopped menstrual bleeding; to determine how the effect of GnRH agonists are at suppressing menses during hematopoietic cell transplant
Comparison of Leuprolide Hormone (LH) Levels2 yearsComparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After TransplantDay Prior to TransplantComparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average AMH levels after receiving transplant.
Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) LevelsDay 100Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Interventional - Received Leuprolide
Long-acting leuprolide 11.25 mg intramuscularly (IM) pre-HCT and 3 months post-HCT PLUS Short-acting leuprolide 0.2 mg subcutaneously (SQ) daily for 14 days for patients who undergo myeloablative allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Leuprolide: Long-acting leuprolide 11.25 mg intramuscularly (IM) pre-transplant (HCT) and 3 months post-HCT PLUS Short-acting leuprolide 0.2 mg subcutaneously (SQ) daily for 14 days hematopoietic cell transplant: Conventional bone marrow transplant regimen.
7
Observational Arm
Women undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic HCT will be observed. Progestin contraceptives, Norethindrone acetate, and any other hormone methods can be used according to the prescription guidelines except for GnRH agonists to suppress menses. reduced intensity allogeneic HCT: A reduced-intensity conditioning transplant is a bone marrow or cord blood transplant (also called a BMT) that uses less intense treatment to prepare for transplant than a standard transplant does. While a standard transplant uses the pre-transplant treatment to destroy most of the disease cells, a reduced-intensity transplant relies on the donor's immune cells to fight disease.
10
Total17

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventional - Received LeuprolideObservational ArmTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
2 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants10 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 70 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of Number of Patients With Ovarian Failure

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Ovarian failure rate is based on FSH measured at 180 days after HCT; to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on the incidence of ovarian failure (i.e. FSH \>40 IU/L) after transplant.

Time frame: Through Day 180 Post Transplant

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Number of Patients With Ovarian Failure3 Participants
Observational ArmComparison of Number of Patients With Ovarian Failure1 Participants
Secondary

Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average AMH levels after receiving transplant.

Time frame: Day 180 after Transplant

Population: Four patients on the Observational and 10 patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up AMH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant0.08 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average AMH levels after receiving transplant.

Time frame: Day Prior to Transplant

Population: Six patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up AMH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant0.6 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.9
Observational ArmComparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant6.4 ng/mlStandard Deviation 7.7
Secondary

Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels9.3 IU/LStandard Deviation 8
Observational ArmComparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels4.4 IU/LStandard Deviation 1.7
Secondary

Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.

Time frame: Day 100

Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. One patient on the Interventional arm and 7 on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels18.4 IU/LStandard Deviation 19.5
Observational ArmComparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels9.1 IU/LStandard Deviation 12.7
Secondary

Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. All 7 patients on the Interventional arm and 8 patients on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Observational ArmComparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels7.1 IU/LStandard Deviation 4.6
Secondary

Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. Three patients on the Interventional arm and 8 patients on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels61.5 IU/LStandard Deviation 97.6
Observational ArmComparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels48.8 IU/LStandard Deviation 84.5
Secondary

Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.

Time frame: Day 180

Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. One patient on the Interventional arm and 7 on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels47.0 IU/LStandard Deviation 40.1
Observational ArmComparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels4.7 IU/LStandard Deviation 4.7
Secondary

Comparison of Leuprolide Hormone (LH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. All 7 patients on the Interventional arm and 8 patients on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Observational ArmComparison of Leuprolide Hormone (LH) Levels5.6 IU/LStandard Deviation 4.3
Secondary

Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.

Time frame: Day 100

Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up LH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. One patient on the Interventional arm and 7 on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels2.4 IU/LStandard Deviation 2.7
Observational ArmComparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels6.4 IU/LStandard Deviation 7.7
Secondary

Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up LH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. Three patients on the Interventional arm and 8 patients on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels31.9 IU/LStandard Deviation 36.1
Observational ArmComparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels27.8 IU/LStandard Deviation 41.6
Secondary

Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.

Time frame: Day 180

Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up LH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. One patient on the Interventional arm and 7 on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels31.1 IU/LStandard Deviation 32
Observational ArmComparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels4.3 IU/LStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Comparison of Lutineizing Hormone (LH) Levels

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up LH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Lutineizing Hormone (LH) Levels19.8 IU/LStandard Deviation 30.2
Observational ArmComparison of Lutineizing Hormone (LH) Levels6.8 IU/LStandard Deviation 7.6
Secondary

Comparison of Number of Patients Who Resumed Menstrual Cycles

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who resumed menses after hematopoietic cell transplant

Time frame: Day 365 Post Transplant

Population: Only 6 of the 10 patients that started on the Observational Arm were evaluable. The 2 patients were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Number of Patients Who Resumed Menstrual Cycles2 Participants
Observational ArmComparison of Number of Patients Who Resumed Menstrual Cycles4 Participants
Secondary

Comparison of Number of Patients Who Stopped Menstrual Bleeding

Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who stopped menstrual bleeding; to determine how the effect of GnRH agonists are at suppressing menses during hematopoietic cell transplant

Time frame: From Baseline Through Day 365

Population: Five patients on the Interventional arm and 10 patients on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up by Day 365.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interventional - Received LeuprolideComparison of Number of Patients Who Stopped Menstrual Bleeding2 Participants
Observational ArmComparison of Number of Patients Who Stopped Menstrual Bleeding0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026