Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Hodgkin Disease, Multiple Myeloma, Myeloproliferative Disorders, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Conditions
Keywords
Post-menarchal
Brief summary
Women undergoing myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (MA HCT) will receive GnRH agonist leuprolide. Women undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic (RIC) HCT will be observed.
Detailed description
This study is to use gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist leuprolide prior myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation to prevent ovarian dysfunction in post-menarchal women. The primary objective is to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on the incidence of ovarian failure. The secondary objectives are * to determine how effective GnRH agonists are at suppressing menses during * to determine the incidence and timing of resumption of menstrual cycles after HCT * to determine the incidence and timing of resumption of normal FSH and LH levels after HCT * to determine the incidence of normal AMH levels after HCT * to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on immune reconstitution after HCT * to assess the safety and tolerability of GnRH agonists in the context of HCT A total of 47 patients will be accrued in this study.
Interventions
Long-acting leuprolide 11.25 mg intramuscularly (IM) pre-transplant (HCT) and 3 months post-HCT PLUS Short-acting leuprolide 0.2 mg subcutaneously (SQ) daily for 14 days
Conventional bone marrow transplant regimen.
A reduced-intensity conditioning transplant is a bone marrow or cord blood transplant (also called a BMT) that uses less intense treatment to prepare for transplant than a standard transplant does. While a standard transplant uses the pre-transplant treatment to destroy most of the disease cells, a reduced-intensity transplant relies on the donor's immune cells to fight disease.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Interventional Arm: * Eligible for myeloablative allogenic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) * Post-menarchal female \< or = 50 years of age * Normal antimullerian hormone (AMH) level and/or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)/leuprolide (LH) levels for age/stage of puberty * Those women who have an FSH \> 40 IU/L and whose diagnosis of malignancy and whose chemotherapy treatment was within 12 weeks of enrollment are still eligible if they had normal menstrual cycles pre-diagnosis. * Observational Arm: * Eligible for reduced intensity allogeneic HCT * Post-menarchal female ≤ 50 years of age * Normal AMH level and/or FSH/LH for age/stage of puberty * Those women who an FSH \>40 IU/L and whose diagnosis of malignancy and chemotherapy treatment was within 12 weeks of enrollment are still eligible if they had normal menstrual cycles pre-diagnosis.
Exclusion criteria
* All Arms: * History of ovarian cancer * Surgical resection of one or both ovaries. Prior hysterectomy is allowed as long as the ovaries are intact. * Use of GnRH agonist in last 12 months will exclude patients if lab results are not available to demonstrate adequate ovarian function prior to initiation of GnRH therapy.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Number of Patients With Ovarian Failure | Through Day 180 Post Transplant | Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Ovarian failure rate is based on FSH measured at 180 days after HCT; to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on the incidence of ovarian failure (i.e. FSH \>40 IU/L) after transplant. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels | Baseline | Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels. |
| Comparison of Number of Patients Who Resumed Menstrual Cycles | Day 365 Post Transplant | Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who resumed menses after hematopoietic cell transplant |
| Comparison of Lutineizing Hormone (LH) Levels | Baseline | Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study. |
| Comparison of Number of Patients Who Stopped Menstrual Bleeding | From Baseline Through Day 365 | Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who stopped menstrual bleeding; to determine how the effect of GnRH agonists are at suppressing menses during hematopoietic cell transplant |
| Comparison of Leuprolide Hormone (LH) Levels | 2 years | Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study. |
| Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant | Day Prior to Transplant | Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average AMH levels after receiving transplant. |
| Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels | Day 100 | Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide Long-acting leuprolide 11.25 mg intramuscularly (IM) pre-HCT and 3 months post-HCT PLUS Short-acting leuprolide 0.2 mg subcutaneously (SQ) daily for 14 days for patients who undergo myeloablative allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Leuprolide: Long-acting leuprolide 11.25 mg intramuscularly (IM) pre-transplant (HCT) and 3 months post-HCT PLUS Short-acting leuprolide 0.2 mg subcutaneously (SQ) daily for 14 days
hematopoietic cell transplant: Conventional bone marrow transplant regimen. | 7 |
| Observational Arm Women undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic HCT will be observed. Progestin contraceptives, Norethindrone acetate, and any other hormone methods can be used according to the prescription guidelines except for GnRH agonists to suppress menses.
reduced intensity allogeneic HCT: A reduced-intensity conditioning transplant is a bone marrow or cord blood transplant (also called a BMT) that uses less intense treatment to prepare for transplant than a standard transplant does. While a standard transplant uses the pre-transplant treatment to destroy most of the disease cells, a reduced-intensity transplant relies on the donor's immune cells to fight disease. | 10 |
| Total | 17 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Observational Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 7 Participants | 10 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 3 / 7 | 0 / 10 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 7 | 0 / 10 |
Outcome results
Comparison of Number of Patients With Ovarian Failure
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Ovarian failure rate is based on FSH measured at 180 days after HCT; to determine the effect of GnRH agonists on the incidence of ovarian failure (i.e. FSH \>40 IU/L) after transplant.
Time frame: Through Day 180 Post Transplant
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Number of Patients With Ovarian Failure | 3 Participants |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Number of Patients With Ovarian Failure | 1 Participants |
Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average AMH levels after receiving transplant.
Time frame: Day 180 after Transplant
Population: Four patients on the Observational and 10 patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up AMH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant | 0.08 ng/ml | Standard Deviation 0 |
Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average AMH levels after receiving transplant.
Time frame: Day Prior to Transplant
Population: Six patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up AMH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant | 0.6 ng/ml | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Levels After Transplant | 6.4 ng/ml | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels | 9.3 IU/L | Standard Deviation 8 |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels | 4.4 IU/L | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.
Time frame: Day 100
Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. One patient on the Interventional arm and 7 on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels | 18.4 IU/L | Standard Deviation 19.5 |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels | 9.1 IU/L | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. All 7 patients on the Interventional arm and 8 patients on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels | 7.1 IU/L | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. Three patients on the Interventional arm and 8 patients on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels | 61.5 IU/L | Standard Deviation 97.6 |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels | 48.8 IU/L | Standard Deviation 84.5 |
Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average FSH levels.
Time frame: Day 180
Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. One patient on the Interventional arm and 7 on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels | 47.0 IU/L | Standard Deviation 40.1 |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels | 4.7 IU/L | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
Comparison of Leuprolide Hormone (LH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up FSH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. All 7 patients on the Interventional arm and 8 patients on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Leuprolide Hormone (LH) Levels | 5.6 IU/L | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Time frame: Day 100
Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up LH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. One patient on the Interventional arm and 7 on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels | 2.4 IU/L | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels | 6.4 IU/L | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up LH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. Three patients on the Interventional arm and 8 patients on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels | 31.9 IU/L | Standard Deviation 36.1 |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels | 27.8 IU/L | Standard Deviation 41.6 |
Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Time frame: Day 180
Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up LH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis. One patient on the Interventional arm and 7 on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels | 31.1 IU/L | Standard Deviation 32 |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Levels | 4.3 IU/L | Standard Deviation 3 |
Comparison of Lutineizing Hormone (LH) Levels
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational average LH levels during study.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Four patients on the Observational arm never had any follow-up LH levels drawn and were removed from this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Lutineizing Hormone (LH) Levels | 19.8 IU/L | Standard Deviation 30.2 |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Lutineizing Hormone (LH) Levels | 6.8 IU/L | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
Comparison of Number of Patients Who Resumed Menstrual Cycles
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who resumed menses after hematopoietic cell transplant
Time frame: Day 365 Post Transplant
Population: Only 6 of the 10 patients that started on the Observational Arm were evaluable. The 2 patients were lost to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Number of Patients Who Resumed Menstrual Cycles | 2 Participants |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Number of Patients Who Resumed Menstrual Cycles | 4 Participants |
Comparison of Number of Patients Who Stopped Menstrual Bleeding
Comparison of treatment arms; interventional versus observational. Count of patients who stopped menstrual bleeding; to determine how the effect of GnRH agonists are at suppressing menses during hematopoietic cell transplant
Time frame: From Baseline Through Day 365
Population: Five patients on the Interventional arm and 10 patients on the Observational arm were lost to follow-up by Day 365.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional - Received Leuprolide | Comparison of Number of Patients Who Stopped Menstrual Bleeding | 2 Participants |
| Observational Arm | Comparison of Number of Patients Who Stopped Menstrual Bleeding | 0 Participants |