Skip to content

Benefits of Post-Pyloric Feeding Tubes in Critically Ill Patients

Benefits of Post-Pyloric Feeding Tubes in Critically Ill Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01343316
Enrollment
21
Registered
2011-04-28
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2013-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Keywords

Enteral Feeds, Supplemental Feeds, Transpyloric Tube, Nasogastric Tube

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the benefit of feeding critically-ill patients beyond the stomach (post-pyloric). Furthermore, because of the advent of two new post-pyloric feeding tubes (Tiger 2 and Syncro BlueTube) designed to improve post-pyloric placement, the investigators will be evaluating the benefits of those two tubes as well.

Interventions

DEVICETranspyloric feeding tubes (Nasogastric Tube (NG tube), Tiger2, Syncro BlueTube)

To determine the benefits of utilizing one type of transpyloric tube over another.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients admitted to the ICU who are deemed by the attending critical care physician to warrant tube feeds and expected to receive tube feeds for more than three days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To determine whether transpyloric feeds are superior to transgastric feeds with regard to ability to give calories and meet nutritional goals.one yearTo determine the time to goal calories. To determine the number and qualitative aspect of tracheal aspirations. To determine the time to initiate tube feeds once the decision has been made to place a tube, the number of x-rays required for placement, the time required for placement, the number of times tube needs to be replaced.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To determine the benefits of utilizing one type of transpyloric tube over another. One placed in the transpyloric position magnetically; the other propelled by peristalsis itself.one yearBenefits include shorter time to appropriate placement and quicker time to goal tube feed rate.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026