Skip to content

HeRO Graft Compared to Permanent Catheters for End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

Prospective Analysis of Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) Vascular Access Graft vs. Cuffed Catheter Access in Hemodialysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01343251
Enrollment
33
Registered
2011-04-28
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2017-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)

Keywords

dialysis, HeRO graft, catheter, chronic renal failure, end stage renal disease, renal insufficiency

Brief summary

The main objective of this research study was to compare the following outcomes between patients with a Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) Graft and patients with a cuffed catheter for dialysis access over one year: quality of life and incidence of bacteremia, vascular interventions, hospitalizations, and death.

Detailed description

All eligible participants who provided informed consent were included in the study. Participants who refused HeRO Graft implantation, or did not have the HeRO Graft implanted for any other reason, were followed in the control group. Several patients did not receive the HeRO graft due to anatomical challenges and failure to complete both steps of the two-stage implant procedure. All consented participants who had an implanted HeRO Graft were followed in the study group. All participants were followed until the study end, withdrawal, loss to follow-up, or death. The analysis included only HeRO Graft patients and control patients who were not lost to follow-up; patients who were lost to follow-up, before data collection, were excluded from analysis. After obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, baseline demographic and clinical data was collected. Following surgery, implant procedure data was collected on study participants who received HeRO Grafts. HeRO Grafts were placed using a 2-step process with initial placement of the ePTFE portion, followed by completion of the graft by placement of the venous outflow component. Following enrollment, outcomes of interest were collected at follow-up visits scheduled weekly for 4 weeks, bi-weekly for 3 months, and monthly to 1 year, for a total of 18 follow-up visits. Study coordinators documented post-operative complications, incidence of thrombosis, hospitalizations, infection incidents, and deaths at each follow-up. Quality of life data were also collected from all participants using the RAND Corporation's Short Form (36) (SF-36) Health Survey. This survey was completed at enrollment and again at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

CryoLife, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ESRD patients requiring hemodialysis * Age ≥ 18 years old * Able to give informed consent * Able to participate in quality of life survey * All patients who are not candidate for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) * Life expectancy 2 years or greater * Willing and able to participate with follow-up examinations

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding females * Disorder that compromises the ability to give informed consent and/or comply with the study procedures * Any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator may pose a safety risk to a subject in the study or which may interfere with the study participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality1 yearCompare mortality rate between study arms

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infection Rate (Percentage of Participants With at Least One Infection)1 yearCompare incidence of infection between study arms
Quality of Life1 yearCompare the RAND Short Form (SF)-36 Health Survey, Total Test Scores at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months between study arms. Total test scores range on a scale from 0-100, with the lower the score equating to more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. The total score is calculated using a methodology described by the RAND Corporation, which assigns a recoded value to each survey item. Recoded items are averaged amongst scales and the total score is an average of the eight sections. (http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/www/external/health/surveys\_tools/mos/mos\_core\_36item\_scoring.pdf).
Intervention Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Required at Least One Intervention While on Study)1 yearCompare vascular intervention rates between study arms. The vascular interventions which were included were: Angioplasty, Thrombectomy, Arteriovenous (AV) Fistulogram/Diagnostic Angiogram, Banding, Access Removal, Access Exchange, Access Revision, Creation of New Access, and any combination of these interventions which were performed simultaneously.
Hospitalization Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized at Least Once While on Study)1 yearCompare incidence of hospitalization (for any reason) between study arms. Reasons for hospitalizations included: infection, cardiac problems, bleeding, vascular access thrombosis, fall (injury), hematuria, fluid overload, peripheral neuropathy, pulmonary embolism, edema, and shortness of breath.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HeRO Graft
patients who are evaluated and receive a HeRO graft implant for hemodialysis
16
Control
control group of non-HeRO patients who are evaluated but do not receive a HeRO graft for any reason
17
Total33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalHeRO GraftControl
Age, Continuous60.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.38
56.69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.08
63.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.49
Region of Enrollment
United States
33 participants16 participants17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants9 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants7 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 1615 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Mortality

Compare mortality rate between study arms

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HeRO GraftMortality18.8 percentage of participants who died
ControlMortality29.4 percentage of participants who died
p-value: 0.48Chi-squared
Secondary

Hospitalization Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized at Least Once While on Study)

Compare incidence of hospitalization (for any reason) between study arms. Reasons for hospitalizations included: infection, cardiac problems, bleeding, vascular access thrombosis, fall (injury), hematuria, fluid overload, peripheral neuropathy, pulmonary embolism, edema, and shortness of breath.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HeRO GraftHospitalization Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized at Least Once While on Study)62.5 Percentage of patients
ControlHospitalization Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized at Least Once While on Study)64.7 Percentage of patients
p-value: 0.9Chi-squared
Secondary

Infection Rate (Percentage of Participants With at Least One Infection)

Compare incidence of infection between study arms

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HeRO GraftInfection Rate (Percentage of Participants With at Least One Infection)25.0 Percentage of Patients
ControlInfection Rate (Percentage of Participants With at Least One Infection)64.7 Percentage of Patients
p-value: 0.02Chi-squared
Secondary

Intervention Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Required at Least One Intervention While on Study)

Compare vascular intervention rates between study arms. The vascular interventions which were included were: Angioplasty, Thrombectomy, Arteriovenous (AV) Fistulogram/Diagnostic Angiogram, Banding, Access Removal, Access Exchange, Access Revision, Creation of New Access, and any combination of these interventions which were performed simultaneously.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HeRO GraftIntervention Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Required at Least One Intervention While on Study)93.8 percentage of participants
ControlIntervention Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Required at Least One Intervention While on Study)64.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.04Chi-squared
Secondary

Quality of Life

Compare the RAND Short Form (SF)-36 Health Survey, Total Test Scores at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months between study arms. Total test scores range on a scale from 0-100, with the lower the score equating to more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. The total score is calculated using a methodology described by the RAND Corporation, which assigns a recoded value to each survey item. Recoded items are averaged amongst scales and the total score is an average of the eight sections. (http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/www/external/health/surveys\_tools/mos/mos\_core\_36item\_scoring.pdf).

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of completed tests varied by time point and study group. The number of completed tests for Test 1, Test 2, Test 3, and Test 4 was 14, 13, 10, and 8 for the HeRO Graft group and 17, 13, 7, and 4 for the Control group, respectively. Only completed tests were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HeRO GraftQuality of LifeTest 1 (Baseline)58.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.49
HeRO GraftQuality of LifeTest 2 (3 Months)56.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.78
HeRO GraftQuality of LifeTest 3 (6 Months)58.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.08
HeRO GraftQuality of LifeTest 4 (12 Months)60.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.06
ControlQuality of LifeTest 4 (12 Months)20.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.67
ControlQuality of LifeTest 1 (Baseline)51.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.78
ControlQuality of LifeTest 3 (6 Months)53.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.49
ControlQuality of LifeTest 2 (3 Months)55.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
p-value: 0.49t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.91t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.67t-test, 2 sided
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026