Neoplasms
Conditions
Keywords
T Cell Receptor, Sarcoma, Cell Therapy, T Cell Therapy, Previously treated, NY-ESO-1, Metastatic, Immuno-oncology
Brief summary
The purpose of this early (pilot) clinical trial is to test the effects (both good and bad) of chemotherapy and adoptive immunotherapy with T cells engineered to recognize NY-ESO-1 peptide in patients with unresectable, metastatic or recurrent synovial sarcoma.
Detailed description
Design * Patients will undergo apheresis at the enrolling institution. PBMC will be shipped to a central manufacturer for gene transduction, activation and expansion, then cryopreserved and shipped back to the enrolling institution. * The trial seeks to enroll up to 65 patients, that is, up to 20 patients in Cohort 1 and up to 15 patients in Cohorts 2-4. Depending on the cohort patients are enrolled in, patients will undergo lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide with or without fludarabine. * Cohort 1: Complete * Cohort 2: Up to 15 patients may be enrolled to achieve at least 10 evaluable patients treated with NY-ESO-1ᶜ²⁵⁹T. Patients will undergo lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine on Days -3 and -2, and without fludarabine on Days -5 and -4. * Cohort 3: Up to 15 patients may be enrolled to achieve at least 10 evaluable patients treated with NY-ESO-1ᶜ²⁵⁹T. Patients will undergo lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide only on Days -3 and -2. (Cohort Complete) * Cohort 4: Up to 15 patients may be enrolled to achieve at least 5 evaluable patients treated with NY-ESO-1ᶜ²⁵⁹T. Patients will undergo lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine on Days -7 to -5. On Day 0, patients ≥40 kg will receive the minimum cell dose of at least 1x10⁹ transduced NY-ESO-1ᶜ²⁵⁹T cells with a maximum of 6x10⁹ transduced cells. The target dose for this protocol is 5x10⁹ transduced NY-ESO-1ᶜ²⁵⁹T cells. Patients \<40 kg will be dosed per body weight with a minimum 0.025x10⁹ transduced cells/kg, with a target dose of 0.125 x10⁹ transduced cells/kg. * Patients will be monitored for toxicity, antitumor effects and immune endpoints. * Patients who have a confirmed response, or have stable disease for \>3 months then progress may receive a 2nd T cell infusion, provided eligibility criteria are met. The 2nd treatment cell infusion will be administered in the same manner as the first. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria may receive a 2nd infusion of NY-ESO-1ᶜ²⁵⁹T no sooner than 60 days and no later than 2 years following completion of the first treatment.
Interventions
DRUGNY-ESO-1(c259)T Cells
Lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by infusion with NY-ESO-1(c259) transduced autologous T cells. Subjects will receive one infusion of NY-ESO-1 genetically engineered T cells on Day 0.
DRUGFludarabine
Fludarabine will be used as lymphodepleting chemotherapy.
DRUGCyclophosphamide
Cyclophosphamide will be used as lymphodepleting chemotherapy.
Sponsors
GlaxoSmithKline
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Synovial sarcoma that has been treated with standard chemotherapy containing ifosfamide and/or doxorubicin and remains: unresectable or metastatic or progressive/persistent or recurrent disease * Measurable disease * Patients must have proven positive tumor sample for NY-ESO-1 as follows: * Cohort 1 -Positive expression is defined as 2+ and/or 3+ by immunohistochemistry in ≥ 50% of cells. * Cohort 2 -Positive expression is defined as ≥1+ by immunohistochemistry in ≥1% cells, but not to exceed 2+ and/or 3+ in ≥ 50% of cells. * Cohort 3 -Positive expression is defined as 2+ and/or 3+ by immunohistochemistry in ≥ 50% of cells. * Cohort 4 -Positive expression is defined as 2+ and/or 3+ by immunohistochemistry in ≥ 50% of cells. * HLA-A\*02:01, HLA-A\*02:05, and/or HLA-A\*02:06 by high resolution testing at a local or central laboratory * Weigh more than 18 kg * All previous cytotoxic chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, or immune therapy must be washed out 3 weeks before apheresis and must be completed at least 3 weeks prior to pre-infusion lymphodepletive chemotherapy. * Systemic corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive therapy should be washed out 2 weeks before apheresis and must be completed at least 2 weeks prior to pre-infusion lymphodepletive chemotherapy. * Biologic or other approved molecular targeted small molecule inhibitors should be washed out 1 week or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before apheresis and must be completed at least 1 week or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to pre-infusion lymphodepletive chemotherapy. * Any grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity of any previous therapy must have resolved to grade 2 or less prior to apheresis and any grade 3 or 4 toxicity must have resolved to grade 2 or less prior to pre-infusion lymphodepletive chemotherapy. * ECOG 0-1, or for children ≤10 years of age, Lansky \> 60 * Life expectancy \> 3 months * Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40% or fractional shortening ≥ 28% * T. bilirubin \< 2 mg/dl (Patients with Gilbert Syndrome total bilirubin \<3xULN and direct bilirubin ≤ 35%) * AST, ALT ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal * ANC ≥ 1.0 x 10⁹/L * Platelets ≥ 75 x 10⁹/L * Age-adjusted normal serum creatinine or a creatinine clearance ≥ 40 ml/min * Ability to give informed consent for patients greater than 18 years of age. For patients less than 18 years of age the legal guardian must give informed consent. * Male patients must be willing to practice birth control (including abstinence) during and for 4 months after treatment. Female patients must be willing to practice birth control (including abstinence) during treatment and for 4 months after gene modified cells are no longer detected in body.
Exclusion criteria
* Active HIV, HBV, HCV or HTLV 1/2 infection (due to increased risk of complications during lymphodepleting regimen and confounding effects on the immune system). Active hepatitis B or C infection is defined by seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HbSAg) or hepatitis C antibody.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Up to 4.5 years | ORR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) relative to the total number of participants in the analysis population per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version (v)1.1 as determined by the local investigators. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Grade Results for Hematology Parameters | Up to 4.5 years | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters. No data collected separately for this outcome measure as any abnormal value would be recorded as an adverse event. |
| Concentration of Cytokines in CRS by CRS Status: Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Up to Week 4 | CRS is a potentially life-threatening toxicity that is observed following administration of antibodies and adoptive T-cell therapies for cancer. Serum samples were collected to analyze the concentration of cytokines using the electrochemiluminescent tagged detection antibodies. The correlation between cytokines and cytokine release syndrome was considered between participants who had serious CRS vs no CRS or Non-serious CRS. There were only 4 participants across the whole study that had serious CRS and cytokine data was available for 3 of these participants. Due to the limited number of participants that had serious CRS no statistical correlations in cytokine levels and CRS could be performed. A listing of the levels of cytokines for the 3 participants with serious CRS is available/provided. |
| Concentration of Cytokines in CRS by CRS Status: Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Up to Week 4 | CRS is a potentially life-threatening toxicity that is observed following administration of antibodies and adoptive T-cell therapies for cancer. Serum samples were collected to analyze the concentration of cytokines using the electrochemiluminescent tagged detection antibodies. The correlation between cytokines and cytokine release syndrome was considered between participants who had serious CRS vs no CRS or Non-serious CRS. There were only 4 participants across the whole study that had serious CRS and cytokine data was available for 3 of these participants. Due to the limited number of participants that had serious CRS no statistical correlations in cytokine levels and CRS could be performed. A listing of the levels of cytokines for the 3 participants with serious CRS is available/provided. |
| Time to Maximum Persistence of NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T Cells | Up to 4.5 years | Time to maximum persistence is defined as date of maximum persistence for infusion visit minus date of first T cell infusion visit plus 1. Median and full range of time to maximum persistence are presented. |
| Duration of Overall Response | Up to 4.5 years | Duration of overall response (DOR) is defined as the time from first documented evidence of confirmed CR or confirmed PR until first documented date of disease progression or death due to any cause or surgical resection or start of prohibited medications. Duration of overall response was evaluated per RECIST v1.1. Median and full range of DOR are presented. |
| Progression Free Survival | Up to 4.5 years | Progression free survival is defined as the interval between the date of first T cell infusion and the earliest documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause or surgical resection or start of prohibited medications. Progression free survival was evaluated per RECIST v1.1. Median and inter-quartile range (first quartile and third quartile) of progression free survival are presented. |
| Best Overall Response | Up to 4.5 years | Best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of treatment (first T cell infusion) until disease progression/recurrence. Response categories from best to worst are confirmed CR, confirmed PR, stable disease (SD) and confirmed progressive disease (PD). Best overall response is a stable disease, if CR or PR are unconfirmed. Data for number of participants with CR, PR, SD and PD are presented. |
| Overall Survival | Up to 4.5 years | Overall survival is defined as the interval between the date of the first T-cell infusion and date of death from any cause. Median and inter-quartile range (first quartile and third quartile) of overall survival are presented. |
| Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Up to 5 years | An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that; results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, other situations judged by physician, is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Number of participants who had non-SAEs and SAEs are presented. |
| Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Grade Results for Clinical Chemistry Parameters | Up to 4.5 years | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. No data collected separately for this outcome measure as any abnormal value would be recorded as an adverse event. |
| Number of Participants With at Least One Confirmed Positive Post-Baseline Anti-infused (NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T) Cell Antibody Result | Up to 4.5 years | Serum samples were collected for the determination of anti-infused (NY-ESO-1 genetically engineered T) cell antibodies (ATA) using a validated electrochemiluminescent (ECL) immunoassay. The assay involved screening, confirmation and titration steps. If serum samples tested positive in the screening assay, they were considered 'potentially positive' and were further analyzed for the specificity using the confirmation assay. A participant was considered to have a confirmed positive ATA result if they have a positive screening assay result and a positive confirmation assay result. |
| Concentration of Cytokines in Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) by CRS Status: Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Up to Week 4 | CRS is a potentially life-threatening toxicity that is observed following administration of antibodies and adoptive T-cell therapies for cancer. Serum samples were collected to analyze the concentration of cytokines using the electrochemiluminescent tagged detection antibodies. The correlation between cytokines and cytokine release syndrome was considered between participants who had serious CRS vs no CRS or Non-serious CRS. There were only 4 participants across the whole study that had serious CRS and cytokine data was available for 3 of these participants. Due to the limited number of participants that had serious CRS no statistical correlations in cytokine levels and CRS could be performed. A listing of the levels of cytokines for the 3 participants with serious CRS is available/provided. |
| Concentration of Cytokines in CRS by CRS Status: Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Up to Week 4 | CRS is a potentially life-threatening toxicity that is observed following administration of antibodies and adoptive T-cell therapies for cancer. Serum samples were collected to analyze the concentration of cytokines using the electrochemiluminescent tagged detection antibodies. The correlation between cytokines and cytokine release syndrome was considered between participants who had serious CRS vs no CRS or Non-serious CRS. There were only 4 participants across the whole study that had serious CRS and cytokine data was available for 3 of these participants. Due to the limited number of participants that had serious CRS no statistical correlations in cytokine levels and CRS could be performed. A listing of the levels of cytokines for the 3 participants with serious CRS is available/provided. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Confirmed CR | Up to 4.5 years | Participants were planned to be evaluated for confirmed CR according to RECIST v1.1, after receiving a second dose of NY-ESO-1 genetically engineered T cell infusion. The results for this outcome measure will never be posted. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram, Echocardiogram and Multigated Acquisition Scan Findings | Up to 4.5 years | Abnormal electrocardiogram, echocardiogram and multigated acquisition scan findings were planned to be evaluated. Clinical significance was based on the medical and scientific judgement of the investigator or qualified designee. The results for this outcome measure will never be posted. |
| Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | Up to Day 21 (from first dose) | DLT was planned to be evaluated. An event was to be considered a DLT if it occurred within the first 21 days of treatment, and met one of the protocol defined DLT criteria. The results for this outcome measure will never be posted. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This study was designed to determine whether New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1 (NY-ESO-1) specific genetically engineered T cells recognized a human leukocyte antigens (HLA-A2) binding peptide from NY-ESO-1 induced antitumor responses in participants with synovial sarcoma.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 50 participants were enrolled in this study. Out of 50 participants, 45 participants received NY-ESO-1 genetically engineered T cell infusion.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A Participants with high tumor expression of NY-ESO-1 underwent lymphodepletion with regimen A (lymphodepleting chemotherapeutic agents; cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine on Days -3 and -2, intravenously \[IV\] and only fludarabine on Days -5 and -4, IV). Participants received one infusion of NY-ESO-1 genetically engineered T cells on Day 0. High tumor NY-ESO-1 expression was defined as 2+ or 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in \>=50% cells. | 15 |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A Participants with low tumor expression of NY-ESO-1 underwent lymphodepletion with regimen A (lymphodepleting chemotherapeutic agents; cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine on Days -3 and -2, IV and only fludarabine on Days -5 and -4, IV). Participants received one infusion of NY-ESO-1 genetically engineered T cells on Day 0. Low tumor NY-ESO-1 expression was defined as \>=1+ by IHC in \>=1% cells but not to exceed 2+ or 3+ in \>=50% cells.. | 14 |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B Participants with high tumor expression of NY-ESO-1 underwent lymphodepletion with regimen B (lymphodepleting chemotherapeutic agent; cyclophosphamide only on Days -3 and -2, IV). Participants received one infusion of NY-ESO-1 genetically engineered T cells on Day 0. High tumor NY-ESO-1 expression was defined as 2+ or 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in \>=50% cells. | 5 |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C Participants with high tumor expression of NY-ESO-1 underwent lymphodepletion with regimen C (lymphodepleting chemotherapeutic agents; reduced dose of cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine on Days -7 to -5, IV). Participants received one infusion of NY-ESO-1 genetically engineered T cells on Day 0. High tumor NY-ESO-1 expression was defined as 2+ or 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in \>=50% cells. | 16 |
| Total | 50 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Disease progression before treatment | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 28.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 | 33.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.18 | 25.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.73 | 41.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8 | 33.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Missing | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 13 Participants | 11 Participants | 4 Participants | 15 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 7 Participants | 2 Participants | 8 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 8 Participants | 25 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 12 / 15 | 13 / 14 | 4 / 5 | 8 / 16 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 15 / 15 | 13 / 14 | 5 / 5 | 15 / 16 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 9 / 15 | 7 / 14 | 4 / 5 | 6 / 16 |
Outcome results
Primary
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) relative to the total number of participants in the analysis population per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version (v)1.1 as determined by the local investigators.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population comprised of all participants who received NY-ESO-1 genetically engineered T cell infusion
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 50 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 30.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 20 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 26.7 Percentage of Participants |
Secondary
Best Overall Response
Best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of treatment (first T cell infusion) until disease progression/recurrence. Response categories from best to worst are confirmed CR, confirmed PR, stable disease (SD) and confirmed progressive disease (PD). Best overall response is a stable disease, if CR or PR are unconfirmed. Data for number of participants with CR, PR, SD and PD are presented.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Population: mITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Best Overall Response | Progressive disease | 1 Participants |
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Best Overall Response | Partial response | 5 Participants |
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Best Overall Response | Not evaluable | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Best Overall Response | Stable disease | 5 Participants |
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Best Overall Response | Complete response | 1 Participants |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Best Overall Response | Stable disease | 7 Participants |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Best Overall Response | Progressive disease | 1 Participants |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Best Overall Response | Not evaluable | 1 Participants |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Best Overall Response | Partial response | 4 Participants |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Best Overall Response | Complete response | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Best Overall Response | Stable disease | 3 Participants |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Best Overall Response | Complete response | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Best Overall Response | Partial response | 1 Participants |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Best Overall Response | Progressive disease | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Best Overall Response | Not evaluable | 1 Participants |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Best Overall Response | Progressive disease | 1 Participants |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Best Overall Response | Partial response | 4 Participants |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Best Overall Response | Complete response | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Best Overall Response | Stable disease | 10 Participants |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Best Overall Response | Not evaluable | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Concentration of Cytokines in CRS by CRS Status: Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A
CRS is a potentially life-threatening toxicity that is observed following administration of antibodies and adoptive T-cell therapies for cancer. Serum samples were collected to analyze the concentration of cytokines using the electrochemiluminescent tagged detection antibodies. The correlation between cytokines and cytokine release syndrome was considered between participants who had serious CRS vs no CRS or Non-serious CRS. There were only 4 participants across the whole study that had serious CRS and cytokine data was available for 3 of these participants. Due to the limited number of participants that had serious CRS no statistical correlations in cytokine levels and CRS could be performed. A listing of the levels of cytokines for the 3 participants with serious CRS is available/provided.
Time frame: Up to Week 4
Population: mITT Population.
Secondary
Concentration of Cytokines in CRS by CRS Status: Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B
CRS is a potentially life-threatening toxicity that is observed following administration of antibodies and adoptive T-cell therapies for cancer. Serum samples were collected to analyze the concentration of cytokines using the electrochemiluminescent tagged detection antibodies. The correlation between cytokines and cytokine release syndrome was considered between participants who had serious CRS vs no CRS or Non-serious CRS. There were only 4 participants across the whole study that had serious CRS and cytokine data was available for 3 of these participants. Due to the limited number of participants that had serious CRS no statistical correlations in cytokine levels and CRS could be performed. A listing of the levels of cytokines for the 3 participants with serious CRS is available/provided.
Time frame: Up to Week 4
Population: mITT Population
Secondary
Concentration of Cytokines in CRS by CRS Status: Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C
CRS is a potentially life-threatening toxicity that is observed following administration of antibodies and adoptive T-cell therapies for cancer. Serum samples were collected to analyze the concentration of cytokines using the electrochemiluminescent tagged detection antibodies. The correlation between cytokines and cytokine release syndrome was considered between participants who had serious CRS vs no CRS or Non-serious CRS. There were only 4 participants across the whole study that had serious CRS and cytokine data was available for 3 of these participants. Due to the limited number of participants that had serious CRS no statistical correlations in cytokine levels and CRS could be performed. A listing of the levels of cytokines for the 3 participants with serious CRS is available/provided.
Time frame: Up to Week 4
Population: mITT Population.
Secondary
Concentration of Cytokines in Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) by CRS Status: Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A
CRS is a potentially life-threatening toxicity that is observed following administration of antibodies and adoptive T-cell therapies for cancer. Serum samples were collected to analyze the concentration of cytokines using the electrochemiluminescent tagged detection antibodies. The correlation between cytokines and cytokine release syndrome was considered between participants who had serious CRS vs no CRS or Non-serious CRS. There were only 4 participants across the whole study that had serious CRS and cytokine data was available for 3 of these participants. Due to the limited number of participants that had serious CRS no statistical correlations in cytokine levels and CRS could be performed. A listing of the levels of cytokines for the 3 participants with serious CRS is available/provided.
Time frame: Up to Week 4
Population: mITT Population.
Secondary
Duration of Overall Response
Duration of overall response (DOR) is defined as the time from first documented evidence of confirmed CR or confirmed PR until first documented date of disease progression or death due to any cause or surgical resection or start of prohibited medications. Duration of overall response was evaluated per RECIST v1.1. Median and full range of DOR are presented.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Population: mITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Duration of Overall Response | 31.0 Weeks |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Duration of Overall Response | 8.6 Weeks |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Duration of Overall Response | 32.1 Weeks |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Duration of Overall Response | 16.4 Weeks |
Secondary
Number of Participants With at Least One Confirmed Positive Post-Baseline Anti-infused (NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T) Cell Antibody Result
Serum samples were collected for the determination of anti-infused (NY-ESO-1 genetically engineered T) cell antibodies (ATA) using a validated electrochemiluminescent (ECL) immunoassay. The assay involved screening, confirmation and titration steps. If serum samples tested positive in the screening assay, they were considered 'potentially positive' and were further analyzed for the specificity using the confirmation assay. A participant was considered to have a confirmed positive ATA result if they have a positive screening assay result and a positive confirmation assay result.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Population: mITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Number of Participants With at Least One Confirmed Positive Post-Baseline Anti-infused (NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T) Cell Antibody Result | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Number of Participants With at Least One Confirmed Positive Post-Baseline Anti-infused (NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T) Cell Antibody Result | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Number of Participants With at Least One Confirmed Positive Post-Baseline Anti-infused (NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T) Cell Antibody Result | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Number of Participants With at Least One Confirmed Positive Post-Baseline Anti-infused (NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T) Cell Antibody Result | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that; results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, other situations judged by physician, is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Number of participants who had non-SAEs and SAEs are presented.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population comprised of all participants who were enrolled in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Non-SAE | 15 Participants |
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAE | 9 Participants |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAE | 7 Participants |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Non-SAE | 13 Participants |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Non-SAE | 5 Participants |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAE | 4 Participants |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Non-SAE | 15 Participants |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAE | 6 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Grade Results for Clinical Chemistry Parameters
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. No data collected separately for this outcome measure as any abnormal value would be recorded as an adverse event.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Population: mITT Population
Secondary
Number of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Grade Results for Hematology Parameters
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters. No data collected separately for this outcome measure as any abnormal value would be recorded as an adverse event.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Population: mITT Population
Secondary
Overall Survival
Overall survival is defined as the interval between the date of the first T-cell infusion and date of death from any cause. Median and inter-quartile range (first quartile and third quartile) of overall survival are presented.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Population: mITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Overall Survival | 80.7 Weeks |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Overall Survival | 43.1 Weeks |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Overall Survival | 86.4 Weeks |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Overall Survival | 105.3 Weeks |
Secondary
Progression Free Survival
Progression free survival is defined as the interval between the date of first T cell infusion and the earliest documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause or surgical resection or start of prohibited medications. Progression free survival was evaluated per RECIST v1.1. Median and inter-quartile range (first quartile and third quartile) of progression free survival are presented.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Population: mITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Progression Free Survival | 15.4 Weeks |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Progression Free Survival | 13.1 Weeks |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Progression Free Survival | 8.6 Weeks |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Progression Free Survival | 22.4 Weeks |
Secondary
Time to Maximum Persistence of NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T Cells
Time to maximum persistence is defined as date of maximum persistence for infusion visit minus date of first T cell infusion visit plus 1. Median and full range of time to maximum persistence are presented.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Population: mITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Time to Maximum Persistence of NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T Cells | 8.0 Days |
| Cohort 2: Low NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen A | Time to Maximum Persistence of NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T Cells | 8.0 Days |
| Cohort 3: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen B | Time to Maximum Persistence of NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T Cells | 8.0 Days |
| Cohort 4: High NY-ESO-1 Expression Treated With Regimen C | Time to Maximum Persistence of NY-ESO-1 Genetically Engineered T Cells | 9 Days |
Other Pre-specified
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram, Echocardiogram and Multigated Acquisition Scan Findings
Abnormal electrocardiogram, echocardiogram and multigated acquisition scan findings were planned to be evaluated. Clinical significance was based on the medical and scientific judgement of the investigator or qualified designee. The results for this outcome measure will never be posted.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Population: mITT Population. This was an other pre-specified outcome measure. The results for this outcome measure will never be posted.
Other Pre-specified
Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
DLT was planned to be evaluated. An event was to be considered a DLT if it occurred within the first 21 days of treatment, and met one of the protocol defined DLT criteria. The results for this outcome measure will never be posted.
Time frame: Up to Day 21 (from first dose)
Population: mITT Population. This was an other pre-specified outcome measure. The results for this outcome measure will never be posted.
Other Pre-specified
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed CR
Participants were planned to be evaluated for confirmed CR according to RECIST v1.1, after receiving a second dose of NY-ESO-1 genetically engineered T cell infusion. The results for this outcome measure will never be posted.
Time frame: Up to 4.5 years
Population: mITT Population. This was an other pre-specified outcome measure. The results for this outcome measure will never be posted.