Skip to content

A Study of Erlotinib (Tarceva) Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as First-line Treatment in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutations

A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erlotinib (Tarceva®) Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as the First-line Treatment for Stage IIIB/IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients With Mutations in the Tyrosine Kinase Domain of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) in Their Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01342965
Enrollment
217
Registered
2011-04-27
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2015-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

This open-label, randomized, parallel arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of Tarceva (erlotinib) versus gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in their tumours. Patients were randomized to receive either Tarceva 150 mg orally daily or 3-week cycles of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (iv) on Days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 iv on Day 1.

Interventions

DRUGErlotinib

Erlotinib was supplied as tablets.

DRUGChemotherapy

Cisplatin and gemcitabine were locally sourced with commercial products.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult participants, ≥ 18 years of age. * Locally advanced or recurrent (stage IIIB) or metastatic (stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer. * Presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in tumours. * Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria. * European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior exposure to agents directed at the human epidermal receptor (HER) axis (eg, but not limited to erlotinib, gefitinib, cetuximab, or trastuzumab). * Prior chemotherapy or systemic anti-neoplastic therapy for advanced disease. * Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or malabsorption syndrome, or inability to take oral medication, or active gastroduodenal ulcer disease. * Any inflammatory changes of the surface of the eye. * ≥ Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. * History of any other malignancies within 5 years, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal or squamous cell skin cancer. * Brain metastasis or spinal cord compression that has not yet been definitely treated with surgery and/or radiation, or treated but without evidence of stable disease for at least 2 months. * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. * Pregnant, nursing, or lactating women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigator-assessed Duration of Progression-free SurvivalBaseline to the data cut-off date of 20 Jul 2012 (1 year, 4 months)The duration of progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as: (1) At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this may include the baseline sum). The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (2) An unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. When the patient has measurable disease, the overall tumor burden must have increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. When the patient has only non-measurable disease, the increase in overall disease burden should be comparable in magnitude to the increase that would be required to declare PD for measurable disease. (3) The appearance of new malignant lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Disease ControlBaseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)A participant with disease control was defined as a participant with either a complete response (CR), a partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD), as determined using RECIST v1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs taking as reference the Baseline sum longest diameter (SLD). SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest SLD since treatment started. For non-TLs, SD was defined as the persistence of 1 or more lesions. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. A SLD for all TLs will be calculated and reported as the Baseline SLD.
Duration of ResponseBaseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the first documented disease progression (PD) or death, whichever occurs first. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs taking as reference the Baseline SLD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Percentage of Responders as Assessed by the InvestigatorBaseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)A responder was defined as a participant with either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), as determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. A CR was defined as: (1) The disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \< 10 mm. (2) The disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\< 10 mm in the short axis). A PR was defined as: (1) At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. (2) The persistence of 1 or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above normal limits.
Safety: Incidence of Adverse Events36 months
Quality of Life: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Lung (FACIT-L) Questionnaireapproximately 21 months
Overall SurvivalBaseline to the end of the study (3 years, 1 month)Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.

Countries

China, Malaysia, Philippines

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Erlotinib
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
110
Chemotherapy
Participants received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 4 cycles, whichever came first.
107
Total217

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath5857
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up53
Overall StudyOther Reasons- Unspecified4438
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject29

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicErlotinibChemotherapyTotal
Age, Continuous56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.37
55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.37
Sex: Female, Male
Female
68 Participants65 Participants133 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants42 Participants84 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
99 / 11096 / 104
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 11016 / 104

Outcome results

Primary

Investigator-assessed Duration of Progression-free Survival

The duration of progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as: (1) At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this may include the baseline sum). The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (2) An unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. When the patient has measurable disease, the overall tumor burden must have increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. When the patient has only non-measurable disease, the increase in overall disease burden should be comparable in magnitude to the increase that would be required to declare PD for measurable disease. (3) The appearance of new malignant lesions.

Time frame: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 20 Jul 2012 (1 year, 4 months)

Population: Full analysis set: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ErlotinibInvestigator-assessed Duration of Progression-free Survival11.0 Months
ChemotherapyInvestigator-assessed Duration of Progression-free Survival5.5 Months
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the first documented disease progression (PD) or death, whichever occurs first. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs taking as reference the Baseline SLD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.

Time frame: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)

Population: Full analysis set: All randomized participants. Only participants who had a complete response or partial response were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ErlotinibDuration of Response10.8 Months
ChemotherapyDuration of Response4.2 Months
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.

Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (3 years, 1 month)

Population: Full analysis set: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ErlotinibOverall Survival28.9 Months
ChemotherapyOverall Survival27.1 Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control

A participant with disease control was defined as a participant with either a complete response (CR), a partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD), as determined using RECIST v1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs taking as reference the Baseline sum longest diameter (SLD). SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest SLD since treatment started. For non-TLs, SD was defined as the persistence of 1 or more lesions. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. A SLD for all TLs will be calculated and reported as the Baseline SLD.

Time frame: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)

Population: Full analysis set: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With Disease Control91.8 Percentage of participants
ChemotherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Control82.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Responders as Assessed by the Investigator

A responder was defined as a participant with either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), as determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. A CR was defined as: (1) The disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to \< 10 mm. (2) The disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\< 10 mm in the short axis). A PR was defined as: (1) At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. (2) The persistence of 1 or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above normal limits.

Time frame: Baseline to the data cut-off date of 19 Nov 2012 (1 year, 8 months)

Population: Full analysis set: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ErlotinibPercentage of Responders as Assessed by the Investigator68.2 Percentage of responders
ChemotherapyPercentage of Responders as Assessed by the Investigator39.3 Percentage of responders
Secondary

Quality of Life: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Lung (FACIT-L) Questionnaire

Time frame: approximately 21 months

Secondary

Safety: Incidence of Adverse Events

Time frame: 36 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026