Skip to content

Effects of LDX on Functioning of College Students With ADHD

Effects of Vyvanse on the Behavioral, Academic, and Psychosocial Functioning of College Students With ADHD

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01342445
Enrollment
50
Registered
2011-04-27
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2025-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a prodrug stimulant, on the behavioral, academic, and psychosocial functioning of college students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Twenty-five college students with ADHD from two universities (University of Rhode Island and Lehigh University) completed a within-subject, placebo-controlled research trial. Dependent measures tapping behavioral, psychosocial, and academic functioning were completed on a weekly basis across five conditions (baseline, placebo, and 30-mg, 50-mg, and 70-mg lisdexamfetamine).

Detailed description

Objective: Evaluate stimulant medication on symptoms and functioning for college students with ADHD using double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. Method: Participants included 24 college students with ADHD and 26 college students without psychopathology. Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) examined for ADHD participants over five weekly phases (no-drug baseline, placebo, 30, 50, & 70-mg LDX per day). Self-report rating scales of functioning and direct assessment of ADHD symptoms, verbal learning/memory, and adverse side-effects were collected (baseline only for control students).

Interventions

DRUGlisdexamfetamine dimesylate

30-mg, 50-mg, 70-mg administered for one week in context of double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design

DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Lehigh University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Rhode Island
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 28 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition-text revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for ADHD based on self- and parent-report using questionnaires and clinical interview

Exclusion criteria

* significant cardiac condition based on medical history and/or physical examination * significant substance abuse based on self-report and toxicology screen at intake * significant symptoms of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or thought disorder based on initial diagnostic interview

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Short Version (CAARS)after receiving Placebo or LDX for 1 weekCAARS ADHD Index, adult self-report measure of ADHD symptoms. T-scores (mean = 50; standard deviation = 10) for all subscales on the short version were used as dependent measures with higher scores representing greater ADHD symptomatology (and ultimately a worse outcome in this study).
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult (BRIEF-A)after receiving Placebo or LDX for 1 weekBRIEF-A is a standardized self-report measure that captures adults' views of their own self-regulation in their everyday environment. Metacognition Index T-scores (mean = 50; standard deviation = 10) were used as dependent measures with higher scores representing greater deficit in planning/organizational skills critical for college success.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from student disabilities and health service offices at two univer- sities in the Northeastern United States (one public and one private).

Pre-assignment details

Almost all participants completed all stages of the trial. One participant withdrew from the study after a possible adverse reaction.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ADHD Participants
All participants completed the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Short Form (CAARS) and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning-Adult Version (BRIEF) at baseline and were randomly assigned to one of six medication orders using placebo, 30-mg, 50 and 70 mg LDX in the context of a double-blind, crossover design, with repeated measures at the end of each drug phase. Phase orders (following baseline) were assigned in a counterbalanced fashion across participants. To avoid starting any participant with the highest dosage, the 50-mg condition always preceded the 70-mg condition.
24
Healthy Controls
All participants completed the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Short Form (CAARS) and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning-Adult Version (BRIEF) at baseline only and received no drug.
26
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyExperienced side effects02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicADHD ParticipantsHealthy ControlsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
24 Participants26 Participants50 Participants
Age, Continuous20.17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
20.17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
BRIEF65.41 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.661
44.31 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.62
54.86 T score
Conners Adult Rating Scale58.04 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.51
36.12 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.98
47.08 T score
Father's level of education
Bachelor's degree
11 participants7 participants18 participants
Father's level of education
Graduate degree
5 participants9 participants14 participants
Father's level of education
HS diploma or equivalent
6 participants6 participants12 participants
Father's level of education
Less than high school (HS)
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Father's level of education
Some college
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Father's level of education
Training program or certificate
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Mother's level of education
Bachelor's degree
9 participants8 participants17 participants
Mother's level of education
Graduate degree
6 participants9 participants15 participants
Mother's level of education
HS diploma or equivalent
3 participants3 participants6 participants
Mother's level of education
Less than high school (HS)
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Mother's level of education
Some college
5 participants4 participants9 participants
Mother's level of education
Training program or certificate
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Pacific Islander
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Indian
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White non-Hispanic
22 participants21 participants43 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants26 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants12 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants14 Participants29 Participants
Year in College
Freshman
3 participants5 participants8 participants
Year in College
Junior
4 participants7 participants11 participants
Year in College
Senior
10 participants8 participants18 participants
Year in College
Sophomore
7 participants6 participants13 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 242 / 240 / 240 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 240 / 240 / 240 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult (BRIEF-A)

BRIEF-A is a standardized self-report measure that captures adults' views of their own self-regulation in their everyday environment. Metacognition Index T-scores (mean = 50; standard deviation = 10) were used as dependent measures with higher scores representing greater deficit in planning/organizational skills critical for college success.

Time frame: after receiving Placebo or LDX for 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult (BRIEF-A)65.91 T scoreStandard Deviation 13.023
LDX 30-mgBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult (BRIEF-A)59.23 T scoreStandard Deviation 14.088
LDX 50-mgBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult (BRIEF-A)57.64 T scoreStandard Deviation 14.012
LDX 70-mgBehavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult (BRIEF-A)54.91 T scoreStandard Deviation 13.219
Comparison: This was a within-subject crossover design with all participants going through a no-drug baseline followed by placebo and three dosages of LDX, with the latter four conditions in a randomly assigned, counterbalanced order. The comparison condition was the placebo condition.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Primary

Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Short Version (CAARS)

CAARS ADHD Index, adult self-report measure of ADHD symptoms. T-scores (mean = 50; standard deviation = 10) for all subscales on the short version were used as dependent measures with higher scores representing greater ADHD symptomatology (and ultimately a worse outcome in this study).

Time frame: after receiving Placebo or LDX for 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboConners Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Short Version (CAARS)50.59 T scoreStandard Deviation 10.975
LDX 30-mgConners Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Short Version (CAARS)46.86 T scoreStandard Deviation 9.939
LDX 50-mgConners Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Short Version (CAARS)47.32 T scoreStandard Deviation 10.092
LDX 70-mgConners Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Short Version (CAARS)45.36 T scoreStandard Deviation 10.79
Comparison: This was a within-subject crossover design with all participants going through a no-drug baseline followed by placebo and three dosages of LDX, with the latter four conditions in a randomly assigned, counterbalanced order. The comparison condition was the placebo condition.p-value: <0.001ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026