Skip to content

A Multiple Dose Study of PF-04950615 (RN316) in Subjects on High Doses of Statins

A Phase 2, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Study To Assess The Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Pf-04950615 Following Multiple Intravenous Doses In Hypercholesterolemic Subjects On High Doses Of Atorvastatin, Rosuvastatin Or Simvastatin.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01342211
Enrollment
93
Registered
2011-04-27
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2017-10-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyslipidemia, Hypercholesterolemia

Keywords

PF-04950615, RN316

Brief summary

This study will investigate the effect of PF-04950615, a new investigational lipid lowering agent, on LDL-C and other lipids.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Intravenous placebo monthly during treatment phase.

DRUGStatin

Single daily dose of atorvastatin (40 or 80 mg), rosuvastatin (20 or 40 mg) or simvastatin (40 or 80 mg) from Day 1 to Day 141/ET.

Intravenous 10mg/mL based on weight monthly during treatment phase.

DRUGSatin

Single daily dose of atorvastatin (40 or 80 mg), rosuvastatin (20 or 40 mg) or simvastatin (40 or 80 mg) from Day 1 to Day 141/ET.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* On a stable daily dose of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin or simvastatin. * Lipids meet the following criteria at screening and prior to dosing: Fasting LDL-C greater than 100 mg/dL and fasting TG less than 400 mg/dL

Exclusion criteria

* History of a cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event or procedure during the past year. * Poorly controlled type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. * Poorly controlled hypertension.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Day 85Baseline, Day 85Baseline value was calculated as the average of Day 7 and Day 1 measurements collected prior to study drug administration.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 29, 57, 85
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 29, 57, 85
Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline, Day 29, 57, 85Lipid parameters included: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1). Baseline value was calculated as the average of Day 7 and Day 1 measurements collected prior to study drug administration.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline, Day 29, 57, 85Lipid parameters included: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1). Baseline value was calculated as the average of Day 7 and Day 1 measurements collected prior to study drug administration.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Day 1 up to Day 141An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs are events between first dose of study drug and up to Day 141 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Treatment related: a TEAE deemed related to the study drug by the investigator. TEAEs included SAEs (TESAEs) as well as non-serious AEs which occurred during the study. The participants with TEAEs, SAEs and treatment-related TEAEs were reported.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersDay 1 up to Day 141Criteria for clinical significant vital signs: maximum increase or decrease from baseline in supine systolic blood pressure (BP) greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), maximum increase or decrease from baseline in supine diastolic BP of \>=20 mmHg. Criteria for clinically significant ECG parameters: maximum increase of \>=25 percent (%) for baseline value of \>200 millisecond (msec) and maximum increase of \>=50% for baseline value of less than or equal to (\<=) 200 msec for PR and QRS interval; maximum increase from baseline of \>30 to \<=60 msec and maximum increase from baseline of \>60 msec for QT interval corrected using the Fridericia's formula (QTCF).
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA)Day 1 up to Day 141Human serum ADA samples of participants who received PF-04950615 (RN316) were analyzed for the presence of anti-PF-04950615 (RN316) antibodies by using the semi quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results with titer value \>=4.32 nanogram per milliliter of anti-PF-04950615 antibodies were counted as positive. Number of participants with presence of anti-PF-04950615 antibodies were reported in this outcome measure.
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityDay 1 up to Day 141An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Investigator assessed TEAEs as mild (did not interfere with participant's usual function), moderate (interfered to some extent with participant's usual function) or severe (interfered significantly with participant's usual function). TEAEs are events between first dose of study drug and up to Day 141 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesDay 1 up to Day 141Hematology (hemoglobin\[hgb\],hematocrit,red blood cell\[RBC\]\<0.8\*lower limit of normal\[LLN\],mean cell\[MC\] volume,MC hgb,MC hg concentration \<0.9\*LLN, greater than\[\>\] 1.1\*upper limit of normal\[ULN\], platelet \<0.5\*LLN,\>1.75\*ULN, white blood cell\[WBC\]\<0.6\*LLN,\>1.5\*ULN,neutrophil,lymphocyte \<0.8\*LLN,\>1.2\*ULN,eosinophil,basophil,monocyte \>1.2\*ULN);chemistry(total, direct, indirect bilirubin\[BR\]\>1.5\*ULN,aspartate aminotransferase\[AT\],alanine AT,alkaline phosphatase,gamma-glutyl transferase\>3.0\*ULN,protein,lactate dehydrogenase \<0.8\*LLN,\>1.2\*ULN,creatinine,blood urea nitrogen\>1.3\*ULN,uric acid \>1.2\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate\<0.9\*LLN,\>1.1\*ULN, sodium\<0.95\*LLN,\>1.05\*ULN,glucose\[GL\]\<0.6\*LLN,\>1.5\*ULN,amylase,lipase \>1.5\*ULN,creatinine kinase\>2.0\*ULN);urinalysis(pH \<4.5,\>8,specific gravity\<1.003 , \>1.030, GL,ketone,protein,hgb,BR,nitrite,leukocyte greater than or equal to \[\>=\]1, RBC, WBC \>=20);coagulation(prothrombin\[PT\],PT international ratio,partial thromboplastin time\>1.1\*ULN).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Baseline, Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127, 141Baseline value was calculated as the average of Day 7 and Day 1 measurements collected prior to study drug administration.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Baseline, Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127, 141Baseline value was calculated as the average of Day 7 and Day 1 measurements collected prior to study drug administration.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received intravenous infusion of placebo (normal saline) on Day 1, 29 and 57 along with atorvastatin or simvastatin (40 or 80 milligram \[mg\]) or rosuvastatin (20 or 40 mg) tablet orally once daily from Day 1 to 141.
19
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kg
Participants received intravenous infusion of PF-04950615 (RN316) 0.25 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) on Day 1, 29 and 57 along with atorvastatin or simvastatin (40 or 80 mg) or rosuvastatin (20 or 40 mg) tablet orally once daily from Day 1 to 141.
17
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kg
Participants received intravenous infusion of PF-04950615 (RN316) 1.0 mg/kg on Day 1, 29 and 57 along with atorvastatin or simvastatin (40 or 80 mg) or rosuvastatin (20 or 40 mg) tablet orally once daily from Day 1 to 141.
18
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kg
Participants received intravenous infusion of PF-04950615 (RN316) 3.0 mg/kg on Day 1, 29 and 57 along with atorvastatin or simvastatin (40 or 80 mg) or rosuvastatin (20 or 40 mg) tablet orally once daily from Day 1 to 141.
19
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kg
Participants received intravenous infusion of PF-04950615 (RN316) 6.0 mg/kg on Day 1, 29 and 57 along with atorvastatin or simvastatin (40 or 80 mg) or rosuvastatin (20 or 40 mg) tablet orally once daily from Day 1 to 141.
17
Total90

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event00001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up00010
Overall StudyRandomized, but not Treated02001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject00010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboPF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgTotal
Age, Continuous59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants9 Participants11 Participants11 Participants8 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants8 Participants7 Participants8 Participants9 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 1913 / 1713 / 1811 / 1911 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 191 / 171 / 180 / 190 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Day 85

Baseline value was calculated as the average of Day 7 and Day 1 measurements collected prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 85

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed the Day 85 visit or dropped out prematurely, whichever was earlier. Here 'N' (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Day 85-8.91 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.075
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Day 85-13.11 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.786
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Day 85-8.63 percent changeStandard Deviation 30.394
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Day 85-47.20 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.021
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Day 85-56.48 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.289
Comparison: Analysis was performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with fixed effects for treatment, background statin, treatment by background statin interaction, and baseline.p-value: 0.566195% CI: [-25.09, 13.83]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with fixed effects for treatment, background statin, treatment by background statin interaction, and baseline.p-value: 0.80895% CI: [-21.08, 16.49]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with fixed effects for treatment, background statin, treatment by background statin interaction, and baseline.p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-56.47, -18.97]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with fixed effects for treatment, background statin, treatment by background statin interaction, and baseline.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-68.08, -30.14]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85

Lipid parameters included: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1). Baseline value was calculated as the average of Day 7 and Day 1 measurements collected prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 29, 57, 85

Population: Efficacy analysis set. 'number analyzed' = participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm. Results for change at Day 85 in lipid parameters ApoB and ApoA1 were not reported because data was not collected for ApoB and ApoA1 at Day 85 due to an inadvertent omission in the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: ApoA11.68 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 10.546
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: TG8.66 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 46.865
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: Non-HDL-C-11.06 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 26.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: HDL-C-0.74 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 5.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: ApoB-5.05 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 16.119
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: Non-HDL-C156.63 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 30.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: TC-13.97 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 28.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: TC-10.97 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 24.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: TG136.18 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 58.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: TG2.97 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 59.087
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: HDL-C0.08 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 5.219
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: ApoB106.74 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 19.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: TC202.82 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 27.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: ApoA1-2.59 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 15.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: ApoA1140.32 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 21.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: ApoB-8.94 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 14.355
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: HDL-C0.87 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 5.627
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: TG-1.24 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 61.405
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29:TC-10.66 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 31.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: Non-HDL-C-13.24 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 29.52
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: Non-HDL-C-11.53 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 33.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: HDL-C46.18 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 10.235
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: Non-HDL-C-13.56 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 28.17
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: ApoA1-0.13 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 14.02
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: TG-3.72 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 31.384
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: TC-5.67 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 18.777
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: HDL-C2.23 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 8.113
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29:TC-9.97 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 29.104
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: ApoA1153.76 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 22.73
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: ApoB-9.56 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 18.155
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: TC202.03 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 27.1
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: ApoA12.06 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 17.117
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: ApoB-1.07 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 12.384
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: Non-HDL-C150.50 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 29.03
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: TG-25.97 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 49.96
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: TC-20.56 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 31.99
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: Non-HDL-C-22.38 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 34.45
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: Non-HDL-C-7.90 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 21.123
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: TG137.62 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 87.56
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: HDL-C3.59 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 7.265
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: HDL-C1.81 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 9.377
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: HDL-C51.53 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 14.084
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: TG-11.37 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 36.99
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: ApoB105.76 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 18.21
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: Non-HDL-C-22.74 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 14.91
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: HDL-C49.11 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 13.291
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: TC205.11 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 22.64
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: Non-HDL-C156.00 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 24.08
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: TG162.83 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 85.68
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: ApoB109.83 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 23.61
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: ApoA1146.44 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 20.35
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: HDL-C0.79 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 5.041
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29:TC-21.94 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 15.93
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: TG-37.03 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 66.12
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: ApoB-13.24 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 15.63
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: ApoA14.29 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 11.751
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: HDL-C2.83 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 8.004
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: TC-8.20 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 39.052
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: Non-HDL-C-11.03 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 39.49
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: TG-15.73 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 95.34
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: ApoB-3.87 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 27.302
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: ApoA18.47 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 18.917
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: HDL-C1.44 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 5.739
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: TC-11.56 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 43.45
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: Non-HDL-C-13.00 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 40.28
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: TG-9.39 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 63.159
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: HDL-C4.50 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 4.624
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: TC202.66 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 37.98
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: TC-51.33 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 52.08
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29:TC-81.00 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 49.61
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: TG-6.58 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 58.104
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: Non-HDL-C-54.50 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 55.71
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: Non-HDL-C-85.50 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 48.59
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: Non-HDL-C-68.39 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 54.01
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: TG-4.47 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 74.402
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: ApoA1143.11 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 20.31
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: ApoB-29.07 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 31.83
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: ApoB102.84 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 22.06
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: ApoA18.39 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 20.448
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: TG118.05 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 47.08
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: HDL-C50.24 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 11.724
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: HDL-C5.50 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 7.31
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: Non-HDL-C152.42 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 38.89
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: TC-62.89 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 52.73
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: ApoB-47.13 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 23.85
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: ApoA111.67 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 14.892
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: TG-18.97 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 48.88
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: HDL-C3.17 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 7.462
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: TC206.91 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 35.96
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: ApoA110.12 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 14.168
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: TG172.47 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 86.49
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: TC-79.21 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 52.81
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29:TC-111.68 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 28.7
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: TC-79.97 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 55.39
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: Non-HDL-C-117.68 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 25.9
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: ApoA17.29 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 12.875
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: Non-HDL-C-84.09 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 54.92
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: HDL-C6.00 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 6.072
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: HDL-C4.82 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 7.671
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: Non-HDL-C162.15 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 37.82
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: TG-46.94 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 65.2
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: TG-26.71 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 49.54
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: ApoA1141.29 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 16.25
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: TG-40.12 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 73.83
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 85: Non-HDL-C-84.79 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 52.95
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: HDL-C4.88 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 7.167
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 57: ApoB-45.90 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 36.6
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: ApoB109.06 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 29.49
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Change at Day 29: ApoB-67.40 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 22.03
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Baseline: HDL-C44.76 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 8.189
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA)

Human serum ADA samples of participants who received PF-04950615 (RN316) were analyzed for the presence of anti-PF-04950615 (RN316) antibodies by using the semi quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results with titer value \>=4.32 nanogram per milliliter of anti-PF-04950615 antibodies were counted as positive. Number of participants with presence of anti-PF-04950615 antibodies were reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 141

Population: Analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of PF-04950615 (RN316).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA)0 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA)3 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA)1 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA)1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities

Hematology (hemoglobin\[hgb\],hematocrit,red blood cell\[RBC\]\<0.8\*lower limit of normal\[LLN\],mean cell\[MC\] volume,MC hgb,MC hg concentration \<0.9\*LLN, greater than\[\>\] 1.1\*upper limit of normal\[ULN\], platelet \<0.5\*LLN,\>1.75\*ULN, white blood cell\[WBC\]\<0.6\*LLN,\>1.5\*ULN,neutrophil,lymphocyte \<0.8\*LLN,\>1.2\*ULN,eosinophil,basophil,monocyte \>1.2\*ULN);chemistry(total, direct, indirect bilirubin\[BR\]\>1.5\*ULN,aspartate aminotransferase\[AT\],alanine AT,alkaline phosphatase,gamma-glutyl transferase\>3.0\*ULN,protein,lactate dehydrogenase \<0.8\*LLN,\>1.2\*ULN,creatinine,blood urea nitrogen\>1.3\*ULN,uric acid \>1.2\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate\<0.9\*LLN,\>1.1\*ULN, sodium\<0.95\*LLN,\>1.05\*ULN,glucose\[GL\]\<0.6\*LLN,\>1.5\*ULN,amylase,lipase \>1.5\*ULN,creatinine kinase\>2.0\*ULN);urinalysis(pH \<4.5,\>8,specific gravity\<1.003 , \>1.030, GL,ketone,protein,hgb,BR,nitrite,leukocyte greater than or equal to \[\>=\]1, RBC, WBC \>=20);coagulation(prothrombin\[PT\],PT international ratio,partial thromboplastin time\>1.1\*ULN).

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 141

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here 'N' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities18 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities15 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities17 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities18 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities14 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

Criteria for clinical significant vital signs: maximum increase or decrease from baseline in supine systolic blood pressure (BP) greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), maximum increase or decrease from baseline in supine diastolic BP of \>=20 mmHg. Criteria for clinically significant ECG parameters: maximum increase of \>=25 percent (%) for baseline value of \>200 millisecond (msec) and maximum increase of \>=50% for baseline value of less than or equal to (\<=) 200 msec for PR and QRS interval; maximum increase from baseline of \>30 to \<=60 msec and maximum increase from baseline of \>60 msec for QT interval corrected using the Fridericia's formula (QTCF).

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 141

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine systolic BP: Maximum increase >=30mmHg2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine diastolic BP: Maximum increase >=20mmHg2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine systolic BP: Maximum decrease >=30mmHg1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine diastolic BP: Maximum decrease >=20mmHg1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR interval: >=25/50% increase0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQRS interval: >=25/50% increase0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTCF: Maximum increase >30 to <=60 msec1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTCF: Maximum increase >60 msec0 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine systolic BP: Maximum decrease >=30mmHg3 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQRS interval: >=25/50% increase0 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine systolic BP: Maximum increase >=30mmHg4 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine diastolic BP: Maximum decrease >=20mmHg4 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine diastolic BP: Maximum increase >=20mmHg2 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTCF: Maximum increase >60 msec0 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR interval: >=25/50% increase0 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTCF: Maximum increase >30 to <=60 msec3 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTCF: Maximum increase >30 to <=60 msec3 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTCF: Maximum increase >60 msec0 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine diastolic BP: Maximum decrease >=20mmHg1 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQRS interval: >=25/50% increase0 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine systolic BP: Maximum decrease >=30mmHg0 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine diastolic BP: Maximum increase >=20mmHg2 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine systolic BP: Maximum increase >=30mmHg3 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR interval: >=25/50% increase0 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine diastolic BP: Maximum increase >=20mmHg2 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine systolic BP: Maximum decrease >=30mmHg2 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine diastolic BP: Maximum decrease >=20mmHg4 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR interval: >=25/50% increase0 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQRS interval: >=25/50% increase0 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTCF: Maximum increase >60 msec0 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine systolic BP: Maximum increase >=30mmHg3 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTCF: Maximum increase >30 to <=60 msec1 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine diastolic BP: Maximum decrease >=20mmHg2 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTCF: Maximum increase >60 msec0 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine systolic BP: Maximum decrease >=30mmHg3 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTCF: Maximum increase >30 to <=60 msec2 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine systolic BP: Maximum increase >=30mmHg0 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQRS interval: >=25/50% increase0 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersSupine diastolic BP: Maximum increase >=20mmHg0 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR interval: >=25/50% increase0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs are events between first dose of study drug and up to Day 141 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Treatment related: a TEAE deemed related to the study drug by the investigator. TEAEs included SAEs (TESAEs) as well as non-serious AEs which occurred during the study. The participants with TEAEs, SAEs and treatment-related TEAEs were reported.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 141

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAEs3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TESAEs0 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TESAEs1 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs13 participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAEs4 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TESAEs1 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs13 participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAEs2 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs11 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAEs2 participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TESAEs0 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TESAEs0 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs11 participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment related TEAEs3 participants
Secondary

Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Investigator assessed TEAEs as mild (did not interfere with participant's usual function), moderate (interfered to some extent with participant's usual function) or severe (interfered significantly with participant's usual function). TEAEs are events between first dose of study drug and up to Day 141 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 141

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityMild24 adverse events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeveritySevere0 adverse events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityModerate2 adverse events
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityModerate16 adverse events
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityMild18 adverse events
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeveritySevere1 adverse events
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityModerate13 adverse events
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityMild30 adverse events
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeveritySevere1 adverse events
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityMild18 adverse events
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeveritySevere0 adverse events
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityModerate12 adverse events
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityModerate10 adverse events
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeverityMild17 adverse events
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by SeveritySevere0 adverse events
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Time frame: Day 29, 57, 85

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed the Day 85 visit or dropped out prematurely, whichever was earlier. 'N' = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 5711.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 2915.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 8516.7 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 570 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 2925.0 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 8518.8 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 5726.7 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 2911.8 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 8522.2 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 2988.9 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 8566.7 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 5755.6 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 5776.5 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 29100 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 30 Percent Decrease in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Day 8582.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 29: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.543695% CI: [0.32, 8.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 29: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.74295% CI: [0.12, 4.63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 29: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.000295% CI: [4.73, 167.62]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 29: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.000195% CI: [7.88, 643.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.32195% CI: [0.01, 4.74]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.378695% CI: [0.39, 12.27]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.014495% CI: [1.5, 38.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.000795% CI: [3.59, 116.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.862695% CI: [0.21, 6.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.623795% CI: [0.3, 7.51]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.007295% CI: [1.76, 36.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.000595% CI: [3.73, 113.2]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)

Time frame: Day 29, 57, 85

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed the Day 85 visit or dropped out prematurely, whichever was earlier. 'N' = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 29 <70 mg/dL5.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 29 <100 mg/dL47.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 57 <70 mg/dL0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 57 <100 mg/dL47.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 85 <70 mg/dL5.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 85 <100 mg/dL33.3 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 85 <70 mg/dL0 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 85 <100 mg/dL50.0 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 29 <70 mg/dL6.3 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 57 <70 mg/dL0 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 57 <100 mg/dL13.3 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 29 <100 mg/dL18.8 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 57 <100 mg/dL53.3 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 85 <70 mg/dL11.1 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 29 <70 mg/dL11.8 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 57 <70 mg/dL0 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 29 <100 mg/dL35.3 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 85 <100 mg/dL33.3 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 57 <100 mg/dL66.7 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 29 <100 mg/dL94.4 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 57 <70 mg/dL44.4 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 85 <100 mg/dL88.9 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 85 <70 mg/dL66.7 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 29 <70 mg/dL77.8 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 85 <70 mg/dL64.7 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 57 <70 mg/dL76.5 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 29 <100 mg/dL100 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 85 <100 mg/dL76.5 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 57 <100 mg/dL88.2 percentage of participants
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Less Than (<) 70 and <100 Milligram Per Deciliter (mg/dL)Day 29 <70 mg/dL100 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 29, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.899895% CI: [0.1, 13.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 29, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.527395% CI: [0.22, 19.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 29, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.000495% CI: [5.93, 490.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 29, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [18.65, 4214.35]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 29, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.08695% CI: [0.06, 1.21]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 29, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.430895% CI: [0.15, 2.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 29, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.012795% CI: [1.57, 43.56]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 29, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.009695% CI: [1.89, 97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.951995% CI: [0.02, 61.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.97495% CI: [0.02, 58]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.027395% CI: [1.46, 549.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.002295% CI: [5.5, 2384.03]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.068495% CI: [0.04, 1.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.906895% CI: [0.29, 3.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.223595% CI: [0.61, 8.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 57, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.01295% CI: [1.59, 42.82]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.544995% CI: [0.01, 9.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.558595% CI: [0.22, 16.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.002295% CI: [3, 147.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85, \<70 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [3.15, 165.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.37595% CI: [0.48, 7.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.91495% CI: [0.28, 4.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.003695% CI: [2.09, 43.57]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Day 85, \<100 mg/dL: The standard logistic regression model was used to assess treatment effect.p-value: 0.014995% CI: [1.42, 26.1]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85

Lipid parameters included: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1). Baseline value was calculated as the average of Day 7 and Day 1 measurements collected prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 29, 57, 85

Population: Efficacy analysis set. 'number analyzed' = participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm. Results for percent change at Day 85 for ApoB and ApoA1 were not reported because data was not collected for ApoB and ApoA1 at Day 85 due to an inadvertent omission in the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: ApoB-4.09 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.429
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: TC-5.03 percent changeStandard Deviation 15.148
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29:Non-HDL-C-7.14 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.758
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: TG9.83 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.146
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: HDL-C1.98 percent changeStandard Deviation 11.164
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: ApoA11.24 percent changeStandard Deviation 7.493
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: HDL-C-1.09 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.708
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: TC-6.91 percent changeStandard Deviation 13.742
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: Non-HDL-C-8.34 percent changeStandard Deviation 18.789
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: TG5.90 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.384
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: ApoB-8.32 percent changeStandard Deviation 13.214
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: ApoA1-1.70 percent changeStandard Deviation 11.575
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: HDL-C0.87 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.121
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: TC-5.44 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.468
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: Non-HDL-C-6.78 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.417
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: TG6.16 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.923
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: TC-9.45 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.947
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: TG-2.62 percent changeStandard Deviation 21.43
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: Non-HDL-C-4.26 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.999
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: Non-HDL-C-13.11 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.428
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: TC-2.27 percent changeStandard Deviation 8.829
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: ApoB-7.67 percent changeStandard Deviation 15.315
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: TG-0.50 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.358
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: TC-3.88 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.148
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: HDL-C5.88 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.764
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: HDL-C3.58 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.489
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: ApoA11.50 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.896
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29:Non-HDL-C-7.57 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.933
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: TG-8.14 percent changeStandard Deviation 37.105
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: ApoA10.57 percent changeStandard Deviation 9.918
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: ApoB-0.61 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.068
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: HDL-C4.96 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.618
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: TC-5.52 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.658
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: TG-15.79 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.131
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: ApoB-11.27 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.177
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: ApoA12.88 percent changeStandard Deviation 7.949
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: HDL-C6.01 percent changeStandard Deviation 15.077
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: TC-3.85 percent changeStandard Deviation 18.857
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: Non-HDL-C-8.48 percent changeStandard Deviation 24.291
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: Non-HDL-C-6.97 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.977
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: TG1.66 percent changeStandard Deviation 53.893
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: ApoB-1.51 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.582
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: ApoA15.31 percent changeStandard Deviation 11.15
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: HDL-C3.00 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.481
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: HDL-C0.27 percent changeStandard Deviation 9.02
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: TG-1.90 percent changeStandard Deviation 37.939
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: TC-10.62 percent changeStandard Deviation 7.813
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29:Non-HDL-C-14.75 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.32
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: TG-5.70 percent changeStandard Deviation 53.271
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: TG-4.22 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.18
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: ApoB-27.25 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.265
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: TC-28.78 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.023
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: ApoA16.81 percent changeStandard Deviation 15.094
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: ApoA18.75 percent changeStandard Deviation 11.114
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: HDL-C10.67 percent changeStandard Deviation 13.967
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: TG-15.94 percent changeStandard Deviation 34.219
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: HDL-C9.34 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.291
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29:Non-HDL-C-54.06 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.588
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: TC-24.17 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.496
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: ApoB-44.93 percent changeStandard Deviation 18.32
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: Non-HDL-C-34.84 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.588
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: Non-HDL-C-41.28 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.815
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: HDL-C6.78 percent changeStandard Deviation 15.755
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: TC-38.54 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.844
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: HDL-C10.70 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.738
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: TG-10.76 percent changeStandard Deviation 32.71
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: Non-HDL-C-50.16 percent changeStandard Deviation 32.255
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: ApoB-61.17 percent changeStandard Deviation 9.142
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: TC-53.52 percent changeStandard Deviation 7.45
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: TC-37.36 percent changeStandard Deviation 21.167
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: ApoB-40.06 percent changeStandard Deviation 29.448
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: TG-14.11 percent changeStandard Deviation 40.324
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: ApoA15.55 percent changeStandard Deviation 9.613
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: Non-HDL-C-50.78 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.254
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: HDL-C12.96 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.116
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: ApoA17.81 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.152
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 57: HDL-C11.06 percent changeStandard Deviation 15.39
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 85: TC-36.55 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.15
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29: TG-22.55 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.973
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Day 29, 57 and 85Percent change at Day 29:Non-HDL-C-73.23 percent changeStandard Deviation 9.029
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141

Baseline value was calculated as the average of Day 7 and Day 1 measurements collected prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127, 141

Population: Efficacy analysis set. 'number analyzed' = participants who were evaluable for specified time points for each arm. Results for change at Day 85 in Lp(a) was not reported because data was not collected for Lp(a) at Day 85 due to an inadvertent omission in the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Baseline37.46 mg/dLStandard Deviation 34.809
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 1412.48 mg/dLStandard Deviation 13.753
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 127-3.25 mg/dLStandard Deviation 28.197
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 571.50 mg/dLStandard Deviation 11.677
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 293.30 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.837
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 711.27 mg/dLStandard Deviation 13.458
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 992.22 mg/dLStandard Deviation 14.847
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 994.71 mg/dLStandard Deviation 15.625
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 71-0.84 mg/dLStandard Deviation 10.351
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 292.49 mg/dLStandard Deviation 17.63
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Baseline61.05 mg/dLStandard Deviation 50.109
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 1272.11 mg/dLStandard Deviation 11.218
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 57-2.11 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.274
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 141-0.72 mg/dLStandard Deviation 15.353
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 71-9.26 mg/dLStandard Deviation 24.021
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Baseline63.66 mg/dLStandard Deviation 50.594
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 292.79 mg/dLStandard Deviation 21.729
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 570.86 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22.192
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 99-1.70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 10.73
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 127-0.59 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.654
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 1410.84 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.11
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 57-3.44 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.032
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 994.89 mg/dLStandard Deviation 24.93
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 29-5.42 mg/dLStandard Deviation 17.801
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 1413.93 mg/dLStandard Deviation 14.947
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 127-6.45 mg/dLStandard Deviation 37.106
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Baseline66.29 mg/dLStandard Deviation 79.992
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 71-4.57 mg/dLStandard Deviation 16.857
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 57-11.70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 23.474
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 141-5.52 mg/dLStandard Deviation 36.935
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 127-8.11 mg/dLStandard Deviation 31.751
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 99-17.52 mg/dLStandard Deviation 37.185
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 29-14.08 mg/dLStandard Deviation 15.693
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Baseline59.73 mg/dLStandard Deviation 72.611
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Change at Day 71-15.45 mg/dLStandard Deviation 34.324
Other Pre-specified

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141

Baseline value was calculated as the average of Day 7 and Day 1 measurements collected prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127, 141

Population: Efficacy analysis set. 'number analyzed' = participants who were evaluable for specified time points for each arm. Results for percent change at Day 85 in Lp(a) was not reported because data was not collected for Lp(a) at Day 85 due to an inadvertent omission in the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 2911.56 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.846
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 575.13 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.258
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 71-3.14 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.897
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 990.20 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.623
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 127-0.08 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.026
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 1417.37 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.842
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 1271.84 percent changeStandard Deviation 15.518
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 141-2.41 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.15
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 2914.10 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.815
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 71-3.43 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.579
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 992.66 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.043
PF-04950615 0.25 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 57-0.02 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.398
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 99-3.46 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.6
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 127-0.14 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.16
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 294.23 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.161
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 71-21.42 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.676
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 571.38 percent changeStandard Deviation 21.771
PF-04950615 1.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 141-1.27 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.554
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 99-6.58 percent changeStandard Deviation 5.693
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 57-10.60 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.427
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 71-18.77 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.309
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 1410.50 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.445
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 127-11.44 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.828
PF-04950615 3.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 29-21.34 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.694
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 127-12.93 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.915
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 71-25.95 percent changeStandard Deviation 29.676
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 57-23.43 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.739
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 141-2.41 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.08
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 99-25.39 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.064
PF-04950615 6.0 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at Day 29, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 141Percent change at Day 29-29.90 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.427

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026