Skip to content

A Study of V419 Given Concomitantly With Prevnar 13™ and RotaTeq™ (V419-006)

A Phase III Randomized, Partially Double-Blind, Active-Comparator-Controlled, Lot-to-Lot Consistency Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of V419 in Healthy Infants When Given at 2, 4, and 6 Months Concomitantly With Prevnar 13™ and RotaTeq ™

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01340937
Enrollment
2808
Registered
2011-04-25
Start date
2011-05-10
Completion date
2013-07-26
Last updated
2018-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bacterial Infections, Virus Diseases

Keywords

Diphtheria, Tetanus, Whooping Cough (pertussis), Poliomyelitis, Hepatitis B infection, Haemophilus influenzae type b infection

Brief summary

This study will determine whether three manufacturing lots of V419 (PR5I) induce similar immune responses to all of the antigens contained in V419 when given concomitantly with Prevnar13™ and RotaTeq™.

Detailed description

This study is partially Double-Blinded in that the participants' parents/guardians, investigator/study site personnel, and Sponsor's representatives will be blinded to the lot of V419 the participant is randomized to receive, but not to the participant's treatment group (V419 or control).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALV419

V419 (Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Adsorbed, Inactivated Poliovirus, Haemophilus b Conjugate \[Meningococcal Outer Membrane Protein Complex\], and Hepatitis B \[Recombinant\] Vaccine) (from one of three lots) 0.5 mL intramuscular injection at 2, 4, and 6 months of age.

BIOLOGICALPENTACEL™

PENTACEL™ 0.5 mL intramuscular injection at 15 months of age in the V419 groups and at 2, 4, 6, and 15 months of age in the control group

BIOLOGICALPrevnar 13™

Prevnar 13™ 0.5 mL intramuscular injection at 2, 4, 6, and 15 months of age

BIOLOGICALRotaTeq™

RotaTeq™ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4, and 6 months of age

Recombivax HB vaccine 0.5 mL intramuscular injection at 2 and 6 months of age

Sponsors

MCM Vaccines B.V.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
46 Days to 89 Days
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

: * Participant is a healthy infant * Participant has received one dose of monovalent hepatitis B vaccine prior to 1 month of age

Exclusion criteria

: * Participant has received more than one dose of monovalent hepatitis B vaccine or hepatitis B based combination vaccine prior to study entry * Participant has been vaccinated with any acellular pertussis or whole cell pertussis based combination vaccines, haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate, poliovirus, pneumococcal conjugate or pneumococcal polysaccharide, rotavirus, measles, mumps, rubella, or varicella vaccines or any combination of the above * Participant has had an illness with fever within 24 hours of study enrollment * Participant was vaccinated with any non-study vaccine (i.e. inactivated, conjugated or live virus vaccine within 30 days prior to enrollment, except for inactivated influenza vaccine, which is permitted 15 days or more prior to enrollment * Participant or his/her mother has hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositivity (by medical history) * Participant has a history of haemophilus influenzae type B, hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, rotavirus, or pneumococcal infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a radioimmunoassay for antibodies to Haemophilus influenza type b capsular polysaccharide polyribosylribitol phosphate.
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis PertactinPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis pertactin.
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Hepatitis B Surface AntigenPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an enhanced chemiluminescence assay for antibodies to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen. The unit of measure is milli International Units/mL (mIU/mL).
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Diphtheria ToxinPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to diphtheria toxin. The unit of measure is International Units/mL (IU/mL).
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous HemagglutininPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin.
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Tetanus ToxinPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for anti-tetanus antibodies.
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis ToxinPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis toxin. The unit of measure is ELISA units/mL (EU/mL).
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis FimbriaePostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis fimbriae.
Geometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 1Postdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 1. The unit of measure is titer (reciprocal of highest dilution with neutralizing activity).
Geometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 2Postdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 2.
Geometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 3Postdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 3.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis ToxinPostdose 4 (Month 16)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis toxin. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous HemagglutininPostdose 4 (Month 16)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis PertactinPostdose 4 (Month 16)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis pertactin. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a radioimmunoassay for antibodies to Haemophilus influenza type b capsular polysaccharide polyribosylribitol phosphate. Response was evaluated for a titer \>=0.15 µg/mL and \>=1.0 µg/mL.
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a multiplex electrochemiluminescence-based detection assay for serotype-specific pneumococcal polysaccharide antibodies. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsUp to 5 days after any infant vaccination (up to 6 months)Solicited injection site reactions: Pain, Erythema, and Swelling. Solicited systemic reactions: Fever, Vomiting, Crying abnormal, Drowsiness, Appetite lost, and Irritability. Grade 3 Solicited injection site reaction: Pain, Cries when injected limb is moved or the movement of the injected limb is reduced; Erythema and Swelling, \>5 cm. Grade 3 Solicited systemic reactions: Fever (Pyrexia), \>=39.5°C rectal; Vomiting, \>=6 episodes per 24 hours or requiring parenteral hydration; Crying abnormal, \>3 hours; Drowsiness (Somnolence), Sleeping most of the time or difficult to wake up; Appetite lost, Refuses \>=3 feeds or refuses most feeds; Irritability, Inconsolable.
Percentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityUp to 5 days after any infant vaccination (up to 6 months)Maximum temperature (all routes) was based on actual temperatures recorded with no adjustments to the measurement route. Maximum temperature (rectal) was required of all participants if the reading by another method was \>=38.0°C.
Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis FimbriaePostdose 4 (Month 16)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis fimbriae. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Hepatitis B Surface AntigenPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an enhanced chemiluminescence assay for antibodies to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen. Response was defined as a titer \>=10 mIU/mL.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Diphtheria ToxinPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to diphtheria toxin. Response was defined as a titer \>=0.1 IU/mL.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Tetanus ToxinPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for anti-tetanus antibodies. Response was defined as a titer \>=0.1 IU/mL.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis ToxinPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis toxin. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4 times the lower limit of quantitation (4X LLOQ) then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous HemagglutininPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis PertactinPostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis pertactin. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis FimbriaePostdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis fimbriae. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 1Postdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 1. Response is defined as a titer \>=8.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 2Postdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 2. Response is defined as a titer \>=8.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 3Postdose 3 (Month 7)Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 3. Response is defined as a titer \>=8.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The infant series of vaccinations were those administered at 2, 4, and 6 months of age; the toddler vaccinations were those administered at 15 months of age. The Interim Period is the time between the last vaccination of the infant series and the time of administration of the toddler vaccination.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
V419 Lot A
V419 (Lot A) 0.5 mL intramuscular injection (IM) at 2, 4, and 6 months of age; Pentacel™ 0.5 mL IM at 15 months of age; Prevnar 13™ 0.5 mL IM at 2, 4, 6, and 15 months of age; and RotaTeq™ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4, and 6 months of age.
800
V419 Lot B
V419 (Lot B) 0.5 mL intramuscular injection (IM) at 2, 4, and 6 months of age; Pentacel™ 0.5 mL IM at 15 months of age; Prevnar 13™ 0.5 mL IM at 2, 4, 6, and 15 months of age; and RotaTeq™ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4, and 6 months of age.
797
V419 Lot C
V419 (Lot C) 0.5 mL intramuscular injection (IM) at 2, 4, and 6 months of age; Pentacel™ 0.5 mL IM at 15 months of age; Prevnar 13™ 0.5 mL IM at 2, 4, 6, and 15 months of age; and RotaTeq™ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4, and 6 months of age.
809
Control
Pentacel™ 0.5 mL IM at 2, 4, 6, and 15 months of age; Prevnar 13™ 0.5 mL IM at 2, 4, 6, and 15 months of age; RotaTeq™ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4, and 6 months of age; and Recombivax HB vaccine 0.5 mL IM at 2 and 6 months of age.
402
Total2,808

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Period 1: Infant SeriesAdverse Event0140
Period 1: Infant SeriesDeath2020
Period 1: Infant SeriesLost to Follow-up20141213
Period 1: Infant SeriesOther protocol criterion not met0110
Period 1: Infant SeriesPhysician Decision2310
Period 1: Infant SeriesProtocol Violation1443
Period 1: Infant SeriesRandomized but not vaccinated0521
Period 1: Infant SeriesWithdrawal by Subject33323015
Period 2: Interim PeriodAdverse Event1010
Period 2: Interim PeriodLost to Follow-up29485323
Period 2: Interim PeriodPhysician Decision0110
Period 2: Interim PeriodProtocol Violation5363
Period 2: Interim PeriodTechnical problems4463
Period 2: Interim PeriodWithdrawal by Subject28231712
Period 3: Toddler VaccinationsLost to Follow-up61478
Period 3: Toddler VaccinationsProtocol Violation0001
Period 3: Toddler VaccinationsTechnical problem1110
Period 3: Toddler VaccinationsWithdrawal by Subject2211

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicV419 Lot AV419 Lot BV419 Lot CControlTotal
Age, Continuous64.6 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
64.4 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
64.7 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
64.3 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
64.5 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
377 Participants366 Participants380 Participants215 Participants1338 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
423 Participants431 Participants429 Participants187 Participants1470 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2,259 / 2,390371 / 397
serious
Total, serious adverse events
94 / 2,39015 / 397

Outcome results

Primary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Diphtheria Toxin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to diphtheria toxin. The unit of measure is International Units/mL (IU/mL).

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Diphtheria Toxin0.37 IU/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Diphtheria Toxin0.36 IU/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Diphtheria Toxin0.38 IU/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Diphtheria Toxin0.40 IU/mL
95% CI: [0.84, 1.07]
95% CI: [0.86, 1.09]
95% CI: [0.9, 1.14]
Primary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an enhanced chemiluminescence assay for antibodies to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen. The unit of measure is milli International Units/mL (mIU/mL).

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen1195.96 mIU/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen1376.86 mIU/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen1414.52 mIU/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen609.08 mIU/mL
95% CI: [0.76, 0.98]
95% CI: [0.74, 0.96]
95% CI: [0.86, 1.11]
Primary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin43.98 EU/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin49.19 EU/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin56.93 EU/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin73.25 EU/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin49.70 EU/mL
95% CI: [0.83, 0.96]
95% CI: [0.72, 0.83]
95% CI: [0.81, 0.94]
Comparison: Secondary analysisp-value: 0.41995% CI: [0.62, 0.73]ANCOVA
Primary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis fimbriae.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae228.78 EU/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae286.74 EU/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae283.28 EU/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae175.65 EU/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae264.61 EU/mL
95% CI: [0.72, 0.85]
95% CI: [0.73, 0.87]
95% CI: [0.93, 1.11]
Comparison: Secondary analysisp-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.37, 1.66]ANCOVA
Primary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis pertactin.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin51.30 EU/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin52.32 EU/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin54.78 EU/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin50.96 EU/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin52.76 EU/mL
95% CI: [0.87, 1.09]
95% CI: [0.83, 1.05]
95% CI: [0.85, 1.08]
Comparison: Secondary analysisp-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.9, 1.17]ANCOVA
Primary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis toxin. The unit of measure is ELISA units/mL (EU/mL).

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin100.83 EU/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin96.82 EU/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin98.52 EU/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin82.45 EU/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin98.72 EU/mL
95% CI: [0.96, 1.1]
95% CI: [0.95, 1.09]
95% CI: [0.92, 1.06]
Comparison: Secondary analysisp-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.11, 1.29]ANCOVA
Primary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate Antigen

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a radioimmunoassay for antibodies to Haemophilus influenza type b capsular polysaccharide polyribosylribitol phosphate.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate Antigen5.51 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate Antigen6.10 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate Antigen6.59 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate Antigen3.76 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate Antigen6.05 µg/mL
95% CI: [0.77, 1.08]
95% CI: [0.72, 1.02]
95% CI: [0.79, 1.12]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.35, 1.98]ANCOVA
Primary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Tetanus Toxin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for anti-tetanus antibodies.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Tetanus Toxin1.59 IU/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Tetanus Toxin1.63 IU/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Tetanus Toxin1.55 IU/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Tetanus Toxin0.89 IU/mL
95% CI: [0.91, 1.04]
95% CI: [0.95, 1.09]
95% CI: [0.98, 1.13]
Primary

Geometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 1

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 1. The unit of measure is titer (reciprocal of highest dilution with neutralizing activity).

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 1579.77 Titer
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 1684.68 Titer
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 1666.18 Titer
ControlGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 1269.95 Titer
95% CI: [0.76, 0.96]
95% CI: [0.79, 0.99]
95% CI: [0.92, 1.15]
Primary

Geometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 2

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 2.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 21212.40 Titer
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 21276.56 Titer
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 21359.78 Titer
ControlGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 2846.14 Titer
95% CI: [0.84, 1.05]
95% CI: [0.82, 1.02]
95% CI: [0.87, 1.09]
Primary

Geometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 3

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 3.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 3901.70 Titer
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 3851.34 Titer
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 3825.31 Titer
ControlGeometric Mean Titer for Antibodies to Poliovirus Type 3784.24 Titer
95% CI: [0.92, 1.22]
95% CI: [0.95, 1.26]
95% CI: [0.9, 1.19]
Secondary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.

Time frame: Postdose 4 (Month 16)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 4.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin106.30 EU/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin121.00 EU/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin101.81 EU/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin104.70 EU/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin112.60 EU/mL
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.79, 0.95]ANCOVA
Secondary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis fimbriae. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.

Time frame: Postdose 4 (Month 16)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 4.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae451.04 EU/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae337.79 EU/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae409.37 EU/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae475.65 EU/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Fimbriae471.52 EU/mL
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.17, 1.46]ANCOVA
Secondary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis pertactin. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.

Time frame: Postdose 4 (Month 16)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 4.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin104.51 EU/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin142.32 EU/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin94.26 EU/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin108.69 EU/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Pertactin111.42 EU/mL
p-value: 0.03595% CI: [0.66, 0.83]ANCOVA
Secondary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis toxin. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.

Time frame: Postdose 4 (Month 16)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 4.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin110.61 EU/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin102.82 EU/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin110.41 EU/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin110.62 EU/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin110.79 EU/mL
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.98, 1.17]Analysis of Covariance
Secondary

Geometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal Serotypes

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a multiplex electrochemiluminescence-based detection assay for serotype-specific pneumococcal polysaccharide antibodies. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had an infant vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 7F (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)2.74 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 23F (n=1254, 190, 412, 419, 423)1.10 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 19A (n=1254, 191, 413, 418, 423)1.60 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 9V (n=1256, 189, 414, 419, 423)1.35 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 5 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)1.49 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 1 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)1.44 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 19F (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)2.18 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 18C (n=1253, 191, 413, 418, 422)1.62 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 6B (n=1255, 190, 414, 419, 422)1.01 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 6A (n=1251, 191, 412, 417, 422)2.57 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 4 (n=1255, 189, 414, 418, 423)1.22 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 3 (n=1255, 191, 414, 418, 423)0.48 µg/mL
V419 Lot AGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 14 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)4.74 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 4 (n=1255, 189, 414, 418, 423)1.22 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 6B (n=1255, 190, 414, 419, 422)1.29 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 23F (n=1254, 190, 412, 419, 423)1.20 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 7F (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)3.08 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 3 (n=1255, 191, 414, 418, 423)0.50 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 19A (n=1254, 191, 413, 418, 423)1.75 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 9V (n=1256, 189, 414, 419, 423)1.35 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 1 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)1.55 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 18C (n=1253, 191, 413, 418, 422)1.82 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 5 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)1.61 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 19F (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)2.26 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 14 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)4.83 µg/mL
V419 Lot BGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 6A (n=1251, 191, 412, 417, 422)2.96 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 6A (n=1251, 191, 412, 417, 422)2.49 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 19F (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)2.24 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 1 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)1.47 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 3 (n=1255, 191, 414, 418, 423)0.48 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 4 (n=1255, 189, 414, 418, 423)1.27 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 5 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)1.49 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 6B (n=1255, 190, 414, 419, 422)1.01 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 7F (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)2.78 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 9V (n=1256, 189, 414, 419, 423)1.40 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 14 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)4.91 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 18C (n=1253, 191, 413, 418, 422)1.69 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 19A (n=1254, 191, 413, 418, 423)1.67 µg/mL
V419 Lot CGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 23F (n=1254, 190, 412, 419, 423)1.16 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 4 (n=1255, 189, 414, 418, 423)1.16 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 6A (n=1251, 191, 412, 417, 422)2.66 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 23F (n=1254, 190, 412, 419, 423)1.07 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 19A (n=1254, 191, 413, 418, 423)1.52 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 5 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)1.49 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 3 (n=1255, 191, 414, 418, 423)0.48 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 19F (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)2.11 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 9V (n=1256, 189, 414, 419, 423)1.30 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 1 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)1.40 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 7F (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)2.75 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 18C (n=1253, 191, 413, 418, 422)1.62 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 6B (n=1255, 190, 414, 419, 422)1.01 µg/mL
ControlGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 14 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)4.85 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 6A (n=1251, 191, 412, 417, 422)2.55 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 9V (n=1256, 189, 414, 419, 423)1.35 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 5 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)1.49 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 14 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)4.47 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 4 (n=1255, 189, 414, 418, 423)1.24 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 23F (n=1254, 190, 412, 419, 423)1.07 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 18C (n=1253, 191, 413, 418, 422)1.55 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 3 (n=1255, 191, 414, 418, 423)0.47 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 19A (n=1254, 191, 413, 418, 423)1.61 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 6B (n=1255, 190, 414, 419, 422)1.01 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 19F (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)2.19 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 7F (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)2.70 µg/mL
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedGeometric Mean Concentration of Antibodies to Pneumococcal SerotypesSerotype 1 (n=1256, 191, 414, 419, 423)1.44 µg/mL
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 1p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.82, 1.04]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 3p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.84, 1.06]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 4p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.89, 1.12]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 5p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.8, 1.07]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 6Ap-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.77, 0.99]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 6Bp-value: 0.05595% CI: [0.64, 0.96]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 7Fp-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.8, 0.99]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 9Vp-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.88, 1.13]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 14p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.82, 1.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 18Cp-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.79, 1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 19Ap-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.8, 1.03]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 19Fp-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.87, 1.08]ANCOVA
Comparison: Pneumococcal Serotype 23Fp-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.77, 1.06]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic Reactions

Solicited injection site reactions: Pain, Erythema, and Swelling. Solicited systemic reactions: Fever, Vomiting, Crying abnormal, Drowsiness, Appetite lost, and Irritability. Grade 3 Solicited injection site reaction: Pain, Cries when injected limb is moved or the movement of the injected limb is reduced; Erythema and Swelling, \>5 cm. Grade 3 Solicited systemic reactions: Fever (Pyrexia), \>=39.5°C rectal; Vomiting, \>=6 episodes per 24 hours or requiring parenteral hydration; Crying abnormal, \>3 hours; Drowsiness (Somnolence), Sleeping most of the time or difficult to wake up; Appetite lost, Refuses \>=3 feeds or refuses most feeds; Irritability, Inconsolable.

Time frame: Up to 5 days after any infant vaccination (up to 6 months)

Population: Participants included in these analyses were All Subjects as Treated population and were defined as all vaccinated participants with safety follow up. This outcome applied only to V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined and Control; therefore, data for the individual V419 lots are not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny decreased appetite47.4 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere injection-site pain5.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere injection-site erythema0.8 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny irritability79.8 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny injection-site swelling34.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere irritability6.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere decreased appetite1.3 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny pyrexia33.2 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere pyrexia1.3 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere injection-site swelling0.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny somnolence73.3 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny injection-site pain72.0 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere somnolence3.0 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny crying abnormal72.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny vomiting24.9 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere crying abnormal12.6 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere vomiting1.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny injection-site erythema40.8 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere vomiting0.8 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny crying abnormal74.8 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny pyrexia47.1 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere injection-site erythema0.3 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny injection-site pain70.0 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere injection-site pain6.0 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny injection-site swelling34.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere injection-site swelling0.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere crying abnormal9.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny decreased appetite48.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere decreased appetite1.4 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny irritability80.7 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere irritability7.8 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere pyrexia1.4 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny somnolence73.2 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsSevere somnolence3.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny vomiting26.7 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection-site or Systemic ReactionsAny injection-site erythema44.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Diphtheria Toxin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to diphtheria toxin. Response was defined as a titer \>=0.1 IU/mL.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Diphtheria Toxin85.05 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Diphtheria Toxin84.80 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Diphtheria Toxin86.41 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Diphtheria Toxin87.71 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Diphtheria Toxin85.42 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-3.74, 4.24]
95% CI: [-5.26, 2.57]
95% CI: [-5.56, 2.28]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-6.02, 2.09]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an enhanced chemiluminescence assay for antibodies to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen. Response was defined as a titer \>=10 mIU/mL.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen99.66 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen100.00 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen100.00 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen98.95 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen99.89 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-1.23, 0.3]
95% CI: [-1.23, 0.32]
95% CI: [-0.64, 0.66]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.2, 2.9]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin85.97 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin87.32 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin89.02 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin92.11 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin87.42 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-5.17, 2.47]
95% CI: [-6.79, 0.67]
95% CI: [-5.37, 1.94]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-7.73, -0.86]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.

Time frame: Postdose 4 (Month 16)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 4.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin95.33 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin95.40 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin96.06 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin94.36 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin95.54 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.41, 3.22]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis fimbriae. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae86.95 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae91.00 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae91.08 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae86.91 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae89.66 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-7.69, -0.63]
95% CI: [-7.75, -0.66]
95% CI: [-3.32, 3.2]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.85, 7.36]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis fimbriae. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.

Time frame: Postdose 4 (Month 16)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 4.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae92.97 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae90.15 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae91.91 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae94.17 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Fimbriae92.84 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.39, 7.4]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis pertactin. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin81.19 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin78.40 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin78.75 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin76.22 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin79.47 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-1.83, 7.39]
95% CI: [-2.21, 7.06]
95% CI: [-5.14, 4.42]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.7, 8.85]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis pertactin. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.

Time frame: Postdose 4 (Month 16)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 4.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin92.16 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin91.09 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin91.28 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin92.08 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Pertactin93.14 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.13, 5.47]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis toxin. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4 times the lower limit of quantitation (4X LLOQ) then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin99.33 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin97.61 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin98.97 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin97.92 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin98.64 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.37, 3.4]
95% CI: [-0.77, 1.63]
95% CI: [-3.03, 0.15]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.59, 3.14]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for antibodies to pertussis toxin. Response was defined as follows: 1) if the predose titer was \<4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>=4X LLOQ; 2) if the predose titer was \>=4X LLOQ then the postdose titer was \>= the predose titer. Analysis for this outcome included only non-inferiority of V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined versus Control.

Time frame: Postdose 4 (Month 16)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 4.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin98.51 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin98.43 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin99.25 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin98.12 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Pertussis Toxin98.18 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.11, 2.58]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 1

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 1. Response is defined as a titer \>=8.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 1100.00 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 1100.00 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 1100.00 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 199.35 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 1100.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-0.61, 0.61]
95% CI: [-0.61, 0.61]
95% CI: [-0.61, 0.61]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.18, 2.36]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 2

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 2. Response is defined as a titer \>=8.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 2100.00 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 2100.00 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 2100.00 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 2100.00 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 2100.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-0.61, 0.61]
95% CI: [-0.61, 0.6]
95% CI: [-0.61, 0.6]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.2, 1.24]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 3

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a Micrometabolic Inhibition Test for neutralizing antibodies to Poliovirus Type 3. Response is defined as a titer \>=8.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 3100.00 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 3100.00 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 3100.00 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 399.67 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Poliovirus Type 3100.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-0.61, 0.61]
95% CI: [-0.61, 0.61]
95% CI: [-0.61, 0.61]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.05, 1.85]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate Antigen

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with a radioimmunoassay for antibodies to Haemophilus influenza type b capsular polysaccharide polyribosylribitol phosphate. Response was evaluated for a titer \>=0.15 µg/mL and \>=1.0 µg/mL.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenTiter >=1 µg/mL86.75 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenTiter >=0.15 µg/mL99.01 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenTiter >=1 µg/mL87.25 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenTiter >=0.15 µg/mL98.32 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenTiter >=1 µg/mL88.40 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenTiter >=0.15 µg/mL97.82 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenTiter >=0.15 µg/mL96.18 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenTiter >=1 µg/mL79.51 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenTiter >=1 µg/mL87.47 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Polyribosylribitol Phosphate AntigenTiter >=0.15 µg/mL98.38 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Equivalence for titer \>=1 µg/mL95% CI: [-4.31, 3.35]
Comparison: Equivalence for titer \>=1 µg/mL95% CI: [-5.38, 2.12]
Comparison: Equivalence for titer \>=1 µg/mL95% CI: [-4.89, 2.58]
Comparison: Non-inferiority for titer \>=1 µg/mLp-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.38, 13.17]Miettinen and Nurminen
Comparison: Non-inferiority for titer \>=0.15 µg/mLp-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.39, 5.12]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Responding to Tetanus Toxin

Participant serum samples were collected for testing with an ELISA for anti-tetanus antibodies. Response was defined as a titer \>=0.1 IU/mL.

Time frame: Postdose 3 (Month 7)

Population: The analysis population included participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, had a vaccination window of 42 to 84 days after the previous dose, and a blood draw sample window for the endpoint of 28 to 51 days after dose 3.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants Responding to Tetanus Toxin99.84 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants Responding to Tetanus Toxin100.00 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot CPercentage of Participants Responding to Tetanus Toxin100.00 Percentage of participants
ControlPercentage of Participants Responding to Tetanus Toxin98.67 Percentage of participants
V419 Lots A, B, and C CombinedPercentage of Participants Responding to Tetanus Toxin99.95 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-0.91, 0.47]
95% CI: [-0.9, 0.47]
95% CI: [-0.63, 0.62]
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.46, 3.33]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by Severity

Maximum temperature (all routes) was based on actual temperatures recorded with no adjustments to the measurement route. Maximum temperature (rectal) was required of all participants if the reading by another method was \>=38.0°C.

Time frame: Up to 5 days after any infant vaccination (up to 6 months)

Population: Participants included in this analyses were All Subjects as Treated population defined as all vaccinated participants with safety follow up and temperature data. This outcome applied only to V419 Lots A, B, and C Combined and Control; therefore, data for the individual V419 lots are not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityAll routes <38.0°C50.8 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityAll routes >=38.0°C and <38.5°C, mild27.2 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityAll routes >=38.5°C and <39.5°C, moderate19.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityAll routes >=39.5°C, severe2.4 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityRectal <38.0°C47.7 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityRectal >=38.0°C and <38.5°C, mild26.5 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityRectal >=38.5°C and <39.5°C, moderate19.0 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot APercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityRectal >=39.5°C, severe2.4 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityRectal >=39.5°C, severe1.3 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityAll routes <38.0°C64.6 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityRectal <38.0°C59.0 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityAll routes >=38.0°C and <38.5°C, mild23.3 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityRectal >=38.5°C and <39.5°C, moderate10.6 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityAll routes >=38.5°C and <39.5°C, moderate10.8 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityRectal >=38.0°C and <38.5°C, mild23.0 Percentage of participants
V419 Lot BPercentage of Participants With Elevated Temperature by SeverityAll routes >=39.5°C, severe1.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Estimated Difference, all routes \<38.0°C95% CI: [-18.8, -8.4]
Comparison: Estimated Difference, all routes \>=38°C and \<38.5°95% CI: [-0.9, 8.3]
Comparison: Estimated Difference, all routes \>=38.5°C and \<39.5°95% CI: [4.8, 11.9]
Comparison: Estimated Difference, all routes \>=39.5°C95% CI: [-0.7, 2.2]
Comparison: Estimated Difference; rectal \<38.0°C95% CI: [-16.6, -5.9]
Comparison: Estimated Difference; rectal \>=38.0°C and \<38.5°C95% CI: [-1.4, 7.8]
Comparison: Estimated Difference, rectal \>=38.5°C and \<39.5°C95% CI: [4.6, 11.6]
Comparison: Estimated Difference, rectal \>=39.5°C95% CI: [-0.7, 2.1]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026