Skip to content

Maverick Total Disc Replacement in a 'Real World' Patient Population

Maverick Total Disc Replacement in a 'Real World' Patient Population - A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01338493
Acronym
Maverick
Enrollment
139
Registered
2011-04-19
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2016-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Disc Disease

Brief summary

The primary purpose of the study is to document the reduction of disability after Maverick total disc replacement surgery in a 'real-world' patient population requiring disc replacement.

Interventions

PROCEDURElumbar spinal arthroplasty + Maverick™

All patients will be subjected to a lumbar spinal arthroplasty. The anterior lumbar spine is approached through either a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal exposure. A complete anterior discectomy is performed and the Maverick™ Artificial Disc System is inserted to replace the damaged lumbar intervertebral disc.

Sponsors

Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies * Foraminal stenosis due to loss of disc height * Back pain and/or leg pain.

Exclusion criteria

* Spondylolisthesis at the affected or adjacent level * Posterior facet joint damage and/or disease at the affected level, including facet osteoarthritis, pars fracture and prior laminectomy * Obesity * Osteoporosis * Metallic allergy to cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys * Psychosis * Infection * Spinal canal stenosis * Overlying thoracolumbar kyphosis * Systemic infection or infection at the site of surgery * Osteopenia, osteoporosis, or osteomalacia to a degree that spinal instrumentation would be contraindicated * Diseases of bone metabolism * Pregnancy * Signs of local inflammation * Fever or Leukocytosis * Grossly distorted anatomy caused by congenital abnormalities * Any other medical or surgical condition which would preclude the potential benefit of spinal implant surgery, such as the presence of congenital abnormalities, elevation of sedimentation rate unexplained by other diseases, elevation of white blood count (WBC), or a marked left shift in the WBC differential count (this also includes: spinal active oncology pathology; not healed fracture at treated or adjacent level) * Any case where the implants or components selected would be too large or too small to achieve a successful result * Any patient in which implant utilization would interfere with anatomical structures or expected physiological performance * Any patient unwilling to follow postoperative instructions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of Disability at 6 Months Versus Baseline Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)6 monthsThe Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) derives from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire, it is used to measure disability for low back pain. The index is scored from 0 to 100; 0 meaning 'no disability' and 100 meaning 'maximum disability'.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relief of Back Pain at 6 Months Versus Baseline Using the Back Pain Intensity Score Assessed on a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)6 monthsBack Pain was documented in a Visual Analogue Scale where the patients marked the location on the 10-centimeter line corresponding to the amount of pain they experienced. 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain

Countries

Canada, France, Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lumbar Spinal Arthroplasty + Maverick™
Patients requiring total disc replacement lumbar spinal arthroplasty + Maverick™: All patients will be subjected to a lumbar spinal arthroplasty. The anterior lumbar spine is approached through either a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal exposure. A complete anterior discectomy is performed and the Maverick™ Artificial Disc System is inserted to replace the damaged lumbar intervertebral disc.
134
Total134

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
12 Months Follow upLost to Follow-up9
6 Months Follow upLost to Follow-up11
6 Months Follow upMissed visit8
DischargeDeath1
DischargeMissed visit1
EnrolledPatient not implanted4
EnrolledWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLumbar Spinal Arthroplasty + Maverick™
Age, Continuous43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Region of Enrollment
Canada
5 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
79 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 134
serious
Total, serious adverse events
57 / 134

Outcome results

Primary

Reduction of Disability at 6 Months Versus Baseline Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) derives from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire, it is used to measure disability for low back pain. The index is scored from 0 to 100; 0 meaning 'no disability' and 100 meaning 'maximum disability'.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Reduction of disability was calculated for patients having available data at both baseline and 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Lumbar Spinal Arthroplasty + Maverick™Reduction of Disability at 6 Months Versus Baseline Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)-25.4 units on a scale
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Relief of Back Pain at 6 Months Versus Baseline Using the Back Pain Intensity Score Assessed on a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Back Pain was documented in a Visual Analogue Scale where the patients marked the location on the 10-centimeter line corresponding to the amount of pain they experienced. 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Reduction of disability was calculated for patients having available data at both baseline and 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Lumbar Spinal Arthroplasty + Maverick™Relief of Back Pain at 6 Months Versus Baseline Using the Back Pain Intensity Score Assessed on a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-4.0 units on a scale
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026