Skip to content

Ampyra for Optic Neuritis in Multiple Sclerosis

Dalfampridine After Optic Neuritis to Improve Visual Function in Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01337986
Enrollment
53
Registered
2011-04-19
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2020-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Optic Neuritis

Keywords

Multiple Sclerosis, Optic Neuritis, Ampyra, Dalfampridine, Fampridine, Remote Optic Neuritis, Contrast Sensitivity, Treatment

Brief summary

Fifty subjects will be enrolled in this Phase II, investigator-initiated, randomized and blinded cross-over trial of dalfampridine of 8 weeks duration The study will test the hypothesis that dalfampridine, when administered to subjects with incomplete visual recovery after optic neuritis from MS, will result in symptomatic improvement in visual function. The study will consist of one screening/baseline visit, one visit during treatment with active drug, and one visit on placebo. After the baseline visit, subjects will be randomly assigned to receive study medication or placebo for the first three weeks, followed by a two week wash-out, and then treatment reallocation for the latter three weeks.

Detailed description

Optic neuritis (ON) is the presenting feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) in 15% of cases, and occurs over the disease course in 50% of patients.1-3 Vision remains a major concern for MS patients, as visual dysfunction leads to lower quality of life.4-6 Despite the high prevalence of ON in MS, treatment and management options remain limited. Although intravenous glucocorticoids are employed to aid recovery of an acute episode of ON, no convincing evidence supports their efficacy in altering the degree of long-term recovery.7 Although some individuals with ON can have a dramatic recovery from blindness, ON often impairs visual function permanently. In the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial, 63% reported that vision had not returned to normal after 6 months, and 20% had vision worse than 20/20 after 5 years of follow-up.8, 9 Visual impairment creates difficulties at home and work, leading to decreased independence and impaired mobility within the community. Visual dysfunction in combination with MS impairments within cerebellar and proprioceptive systems can be particularly disabling. Optic neuritis classically impairs one's ability to read print or a computer screen, to drive in bright or low light, and to appreciate colors and contrasts. Unfortunately, when optic neuritis results in lasting impairment, there are no pharmacologic therapies to restore vision. Low vision specialists may provide magnifying glasses, brighter lights, and advice to optimize the position of objects at home and in the workplace. Better treatment options are needed to improve visual function. Ampyra (dalfampridine) is a potassium-channel antagonist, with a mechanism-of-action to improve nerve conduction in demyelinated axons, resulting in an electrophysiologic and clinical benefit.10-22 Demyelinated axons within the anterior visual pathway would be a prime and ideal target to study the effects of Ampyra. In fact, Stefoski et al demonstrated visual function benefit in an open-label study of IV 4-aminopyridine in 12 subjects.21 The optic nerves are a well-defined white-matter tract, commonly affected in MS, and with clear clinical outcome measures. In addition, visual evoked potentials (VEPs) can be included within the study design as a secondary endpoint, to confirm improved nerve conduction. Because VEPs are such a precise, reliable, and accepted measure of demyelination, the anterior visual pathway is the ideal in vivo human system to study the electro-physiologic effects of a therapeutic such as Ampyra. Hypothesis 1: Dalfampridine treatment will improve visual function, measured by the 5% ETDRS contrast sensitivity chart, in subjects with long-term visual impairment secondary to optic neuritis from MS. Hypothesis 2: Dalfampridine treatment will reduce visual evoked potential P100 latency following remote optic neuritis. Hypothesis 3: Dalfampridine treatment will result in an improvement in secondary endpoints, including visual fields, high contrast visual acuity, color vision, and quality of life. The study will be conducted at the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, the institution at which Dr. Naismith is based. The MS patients will come from the 1800 active MS patients in our clinic and the 3500 in the St. Louis area. Fifty subjects will be enrolled in this Phase II, investigator-initiated, randomized and blinded cross-over trial of dalfampridine of 8 weeks duration (Table 1). The study will test the hypothesis that dalfampridine, when administered to subjects with incomplete visual recovery after optic neuritis from MS, will result in symptomatic improvement in visual function. The study will consist of one screening/baseline visit, one visit during treatment with active drug, and one visit on placebo. After the baseline visit, subjects will be randomly assigned to receive study medication or placebo for the first three weeks, followed by a two week wash-out, and then treatment reallocation for the latter three weeks.

Interventions

DRUGDalfampridine/Placebo

Weeks 1-3: Dalfampridine 10mg (1 tablet) every 12 hours for 3 weeks. Weeks 4-5: 2 weeks of wash-out. Weeks 5-8: Placebo (sugar pill) 1 tablet every 12 hours for 3 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo/Dalfampridine

Weeks 1-3: Placebo (sugar pill) 1 tablet every 12 hours for 3 weeks. Weeks 4-5: 2 weeks of wash-out. Weeks 6-8: Dalfampridine 10mg (1 tablet) every 12 hours for 3 weeks.

Sponsors

Acorda Therapeutics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

are: 1. At least one previous clinical episode of optic neuritis, 2. the last episode of ON must have occurred at least 12 months prior to study entry, 3. clinically definite MS, defined by the revised McDonald criteria, 23 4. ages 18-70, 5. visual acuity greater than or equal to 20/30 6. must be able to read at least 2 of the 5 letters on the top line of the 5% ETDRS chart (logMAR 0.96) at 3 meters, 2 meters or 1 meter, and 7. must have sufficient cognitive function to understand the consent process and to reliably perform all clinical assessments

Exclusion criteria

are: 1. Any ophthalmologic condition, other than ON, which can affect vision, including nystagmus in primary position of gaze, 2. history of seizures or spells with altered level of consciousness, 3. pregnancy or breast feeding, 4. an MS exacerbation or use of glucocorticoids within 3 months of entry, 5. a history of moderate to severe renal insufficiency, 6. previous use of 4-aminopyridine, in any formulation, in the prior 4 weeks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity ScoresVisit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)Per Protocol Analysis to assess differences in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR) Scores at visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 on patients taking Dalfampridine vs Placebo.
Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast SensitivityVisit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)Per Protocol Analysis to assess difference in number of letters on the EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR) Chart scores at visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1
Difference in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR Score) at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)Intent to treat analysis of treatment effect in primary endpoint EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity. Improvement from baseline scores.
Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast SensitivityVisit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)Intent to treat analysis of treatment effect in primary endpoint EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity. Change in the number of letters able to read while on Dalfampridine and Placebo relative to their baseline scores.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Color Vision Total Error Score From Baseline Based Upon the Farnsworth Munsell Hue 100 Sort Test (FM100).Visit 1 (Week 0 - baseline), Visit 2 (Week 3 - postintervention 1) and Visit 3 (Week 8 - post intervention 2)Dalfampridine will change color vision Total Error Scores from baseline on the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Sort Test. Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test requires placing 100 color palettes in the correct order based upon color hue. Scores are determined by the frequency and severity of any displacement in the correct order. One error equates to one misplaced hue, by one step or position. An error score greater than 500 indicates virtually no color discrimination. An error score of 0 indicates no errors in ordering the hues. A Total Error Score of 0 to 128 could be seen in a normal population.
Percentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity ChartVisit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)
Difference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)Difference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 on Dalfampridine vs Placebo. Pelli-Robson is scored based upon the numbers read on the chart converted to LogMAR units. The scale is 0.00 (worst) to 2.35 (best).
Dalfampridine Effect on Quality of Life Change From Baseline.Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)Dalfampridine treatment will result in change in quality of life. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire consists of 25 questions characterizing visual function at home and in the community. Score ranges from 100 (best) to 0 (worst).
Percentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters)Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)Percentage of eyes that improved by one-line (5 letters) on the 5% contrast sensitivity chart
Visual Evoked Potential P100 Latency Per Treatment ArmVisit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)Visual evoked potential 60min P100 latency on dalfampridine vs. placebo.
Odds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field IndexVisit 1 (Week 0 - baseline), Visit 2 (Week 3 - post intervention 1) and Visit 3 (Week 8 - post intervention 2)The Visual Field Index (VFI) is a global index that assigns a number between 1% to 100% based on an aggregate percentage of visual function, with 100% being a perfect age-adjusted visual field. Probability of falling in the best quartile for visual field (VFI) measures (Q1), relative to the three next quartiles for worse VFIs (Q2-4), while on Dalfampridine vs Placebo. Due to the clustered observations at different times in a cross-over design, the visual field data is not suited to a normal theory model and should not be expressed as a continuous variable. Thus, a categorical model that uses a multinomial distribution for measurement of 4 categories was selected for proper statistical modeling, with results expressed as odds ratios.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from the John L Trotter Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Clinic at Washington University and through email blasts from the Gateway (St. Louis) MS Chapter. 53 participants meet the pre-screening criteria and signed an informed consent to be screened for the study.

Pre-assignment details

Patients whose vision did not meet study criteria at the first visit in the affected eye or who had had steroids within 3 months of study entry were considered screen failures (n =7).Treatment group was randomly assigned by the pharmacist using a randomization table generated by a probability model.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group B: Dalfampridine/Placebo
Dalfampridine/Placebo: Weeks 1-3: Dalfampridine 10mg (1 tablet) every 12 hours for 3 weeks. Weeks 4-5: 2 weeks of wash-out. Weeks 5-8: Placebo (sugar pill) 1 tablet every 12 hours for 3 weeks.
20
Group A: Placebo/Dalfampridine
Placebo/Dalfampridine: Weeks 1-3: Placebo (sugar pill) 1 tablet every 12 hours for 3 weeks. Weeks 4-5: 2 weeks of wash-out. Weeks 6-8: Dalfampridine 10mg (1 tablet) every 12 hours for 3 weeks.
18
Total38

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event22
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation03

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup B: Dalfampridine/PlaceboGroup A: Placebo/DalfampridineTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
Age, Continuous44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
47.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Baseline 5% Sloan Chart22 Number of Letters20 Number of Letters21 Number of Letters
Clinical Episodes of ON1 Number of episodes1 Number of episodes1 Number of episodes
MS Subtype
Relapsing Remitting MS (RRMS)
17 participants15 participants32 participants
MS Subtype
Secondary Progressive MS (SPMS)
3 participants3 participants6 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants13 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants18 participants38 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants14 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 460 / 46
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 460 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 460 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity

Intent to treat analysis of treatment effect in primary endpoint EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity. Change in the number of letters able to read while on Dalfampridine and Placebo relative to their baseline scores.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)

Population: Intent To Treat Population, scores from morning and afternoon were averaged.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: DalfampridineChange From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity3 lettersStandard Deviation 1
Group B: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity2.5 lettersStandard Deviation 1
Primary

Difference in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR Score) at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1

Intent to treat analysis of treatment effect in primary endpoint EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity. Improvement from baseline scores.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)

Population: Intent To Treat Population, scores from morning and afternoon were averaged.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: DalfampridineDifference in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR Score) at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 10.06 5% Contrast LogMAR ScoreStandard Deviation 0.02
Group B: PlaceboDifference in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR Score) at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 10.05 5% Contrast LogMAR ScoreStandard Deviation 0.02
Comparison: Null hypothesis: there will be no difference in the change relevant to baseline (visit 1) in EDTRS 5% contrast sensitivity with dalfampridine vs placebo.p-value: 0.64Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Null hypothesis for period effect: there will be no difference in the change relevant to baseline (visit 1) in EDTRS 5% contrast sensitivity for those who started on dalfampridine and crossed over to placebo, compared to those who started on placebo and crossed over to dalfampridine.p-value: 0.11Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity

Per Protocol Analysis to assess difference in number of letters on the EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR) Chart scores at visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)

Population: Per protocol analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: DalfampridineEfficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity2 lettersStandard Deviation 1
Group B: PlaceboEfficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity2 lettersStandard Deviation 1
Group A: PlaceboEfficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity4 lettersStandard Deviation 1
Group A: DalfampridineEfficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity3 lettersStandard Deviation 1
Primary

Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity Scores

Per Protocol Analysis to assess differences in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR) Scores at visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 on patients taking Dalfampridine vs Placebo.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)

Population: Per protocol analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: DalfampridineEfficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity Scores-0.04 LogMAR ScoreStandard Deviation 0.02
Group B: PlaceboEfficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity Scores-0.06 LogMAR ScoreStandard Deviation 0.02
Group A: PlaceboEfficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity Scores-0.08 LogMAR ScoreStandard Deviation 0.02
Group A: DalfampridineEfficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity Scores-0.06 LogMAR ScoreStandard Deviation 0.02
Comparison: Per protocol Analysisp-value: 0.84Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Change in EDTRS between Visits 2 and 3.p-value: 0.29Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Changes in Color Vision Total Error Score From Baseline Based Upon the Farnsworth Munsell Hue 100 Sort Test (FM100).

Dalfampridine will change color vision Total Error Scores from baseline on the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Sort Test. Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test requires placing 100 color palettes in the correct order based upon color hue. Scores are determined by the frequency and severity of any displacement in the correct order. One error equates to one misplaced hue, by one step or position. An error score greater than 500 indicates virtually no color discrimination. An error score of 0 indicates no errors in ordering the hues. A Total Error Score of 0 to 128 could be seen in a normal population.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0 - baseline), Visit 2 (Week 3 - postintervention 1) and Visit 3 (Week 8 - post intervention 2)

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group B: DalfampridineChanges in Color Vision Total Error Score From Baseline Based Upon the Farnsworth Munsell Hue 100 Sort Test (FM100).-13.0 FM100 Total Error Score
Group B: PlaceboChanges in Color Vision Total Error Score From Baseline Based Upon the Farnsworth Munsell Hue 100 Sort Test (FM100).-10.6 FM100 Total Error Score
p-value: 0.94Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Dalfampridine Effect on Quality of Life Change From Baseline.

Dalfampridine treatment will result in change in quality of life. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire consists of 25 questions characterizing visual function at home and in the community. Score ranges from 100 (best) to 0 (worst).

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group B: DalfampridineDalfampridine Effect on Quality of Life Change From Baseline.0 NEI VFQ percentage
Group B: PlaceboDalfampridine Effect on Quality of Life Change From Baseline.0 NEI VFQ percentage
p-value: 0.39Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Difference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1

Difference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 on Dalfampridine vs Placebo. Pelli-Robson is scored based upon the numbers read on the chart converted to LogMAR units. The scale is 0.00 (worst) to 2.35 (best).

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: DalfampridineDifference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 10.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.02
Group B: PlaceboDifference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 10.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.02
p-value: 0.72Regression, Linear
Secondary

Odds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field Index

The Visual Field Index (VFI) is a global index that assigns a number between 1% to 100% based on an aggregate percentage of visual function, with 100% being a perfect age-adjusted visual field. Probability of falling in the best quartile for visual field (VFI) measures (Q1), relative to the three next quartiles for worse VFIs (Q2-4), while on Dalfampridine vs Placebo. Due to the clustered observations at different times in a cross-over design, the visual field data is not suited to a normal theory model and should not be expressed as a continuous variable. Thus, a categorical model that uses a multinomial distribution for measurement of 4 categories was selected for proper statistical modeling, with results expressed as odds ratios.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0 - baseline), Visit 2 (Week 3 - post intervention 1) and Visit 3 (Week 8 - post intervention 2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: DalfampridineOdds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field IndexBaseline (Visit 1)77.53 Visual Field Index % of normal visionStandard Deviation 29.84
Group B: DalfampridineOdds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field IndexPost Intervention 1 (Visit 2)78.50 Visual Field Index % of normal visionStandard Deviation 28.3
Group B: DalfampridineOdds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field IndexPost Intervention 2 (Visit 3)79.71 Visual Field Index % of normal visionStandard Deviation 28.57
Group B: PlaceboOdds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field IndexBaseline (Visit 1)85.38 Visual Field Index % of normal visionStandard Deviation 86.65
Group B: PlaceboOdds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field IndexPost Intervention 1 (Visit 2)86.65 Visual Field Index % of normal visionStandard Deviation 22.64
Group B: PlaceboOdds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field IndexPost Intervention 2 (Visit 3)86.00 Visual Field Index % of normal visionStandard Deviation 22.75
p-value: 0.0495% CI: [1.02, 2.1]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity Chart

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group B: DalfampridinePercentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity Chart9.7 Percentages of eyes that improved
Group B: PlaceboPercentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity Chart11.1 Percentages of eyes that improved
Group A: PlaceboPercentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity Chart11.1 Percentages of eyes that improved
Group A: DalfampridinePercentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity Chart68.1 Percentages of eyes that improved
p-value: 0.93Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters)

Percentage of eyes that improved by one-line (5 letters) on the 5% contrast sensitivity chart

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)

Population: Proportion as the Percent of Eyes Improved by 1 Line

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group B: DalfampridinePercentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters)11.1 Percent of Eyes
Group B: PlaceboPercentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters)15.3 Percent of Eyes
Group A: PlaceboPercentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters)37.5 Percent of Eyes
Group A: DalfampridinePercentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters)36.1 Percent of Eyes
p-value: 0.34Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Visual Evoked Potential P100 Latency Per Treatment Arm

Visual evoked potential 60min P100 latency on dalfampridine vs. placebo.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group B: DalfampridineVisual Evoked Potential P100 Latency Per Treatment Arm121.6 millisecondsStandard Deviation 2.4
Group B: PlaceboVisual Evoked Potential P100 Latency Per Treatment Arm120.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 2.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026