Multiple Sclerosis, Optic Neuritis
Conditions
Keywords
Multiple Sclerosis, Optic Neuritis, Ampyra, Dalfampridine, Fampridine, Remote Optic Neuritis, Contrast Sensitivity, Treatment
Brief summary
Fifty subjects will be enrolled in this Phase II, investigator-initiated, randomized and blinded cross-over trial of dalfampridine of 8 weeks duration The study will test the hypothesis that dalfampridine, when administered to subjects with incomplete visual recovery after optic neuritis from MS, will result in symptomatic improvement in visual function. The study will consist of one screening/baseline visit, one visit during treatment with active drug, and one visit on placebo. After the baseline visit, subjects will be randomly assigned to receive study medication or placebo for the first three weeks, followed by a two week wash-out, and then treatment reallocation for the latter three weeks.
Detailed description
Optic neuritis (ON) is the presenting feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) in 15% of cases, and occurs over the disease course in 50% of patients.1-3 Vision remains a major concern for MS patients, as visual dysfunction leads to lower quality of life.4-6 Despite the high prevalence of ON in MS, treatment and management options remain limited. Although intravenous glucocorticoids are employed to aid recovery of an acute episode of ON, no convincing evidence supports their efficacy in altering the degree of long-term recovery.7 Although some individuals with ON can have a dramatic recovery from blindness, ON often impairs visual function permanently. In the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial, 63% reported that vision had not returned to normal after 6 months, and 20% had vision worse than 20/20 after 5 years of follow-up.8, 9 Visual impairment creates difficulties at home and work, leading to decreased independence and impaired mobility within the community. Visual dysfunction in combination with MS impairments within cerebellar and proprioceptive systems can be particularly disabling. Optic neuritis classically impairs one's ability to read print or a computer screen, to drive in bright or low light, and to appreciate colors and contrasts. Unfortunately, when optic neuritis results in lasting impairment, there are no pharmacologic therapies to restore vision. Low vision specialists may provide magnifying glasses, brighter lights, and advice to optimize the position of objects at home and in the workplace. Better treatment options are needed to improve visual function. Ampyra (dalfampridine) is a potassium-channel antagonist, with a mechanism-of-action to improve nerve conduction in demyelinated axons, resulting in an electrophysiologic and clinical benefit.10-22 Demyelinated axons within the anterior visual pathway would be a prime and ideal target to study the effects of Ampyra. In fact, Stefoski et al demonstrated visual function benefit in an open-label study of IV 4-aminopyridine in 12 subjects.21 The optic nerves are a well-defined white-matter tract, commonly affected in MS, and with clear clinical outcome measures. In addition, visual evoked potentials (VEPs) can be included within the study design as a secondary endpoint, to confirm improved nerve conduction. Because VEPs are such a precise, reliable, and accepted measure of demyelination, the anterior visual pathway is the ideal in vivo human system to study the electro-physiologic effects of a therapeutic such as Ampyra. Hypothesis 1: Dalfampridine treatment will improve visual function, measured by the 5% ETDRS contrast sensitivity chart, in subjects with long-term visual impairment secondary to optic neuritis from MS. Hypothesis 2: Dalfampridine treatment will reduce visual evoked potential P100 latency following remote optic neuritis. Hypothesis 3: Dalfampridine treatment will result in an improvement in secondary endpoints, including visual fields, high contrast visual acuity, color vision, and quality of life. The study will be conducted at the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, the institution at which Dr. Naismith is based. The MS patients will come from the 1800 active MS patients in our clinic and the 3500 in the St. Louis area. Fifty subjects will be enrolled in this Phase II, investigator-initiated, randomized and blinded cross-over trial of dalfampridine of 8 weeks duration (Table 1). The study will test the hypothesis that dalfampridine, when administered to subjects with incomplete visual recovery after optic neuritis from MS, will result in symptomatic improvement in visual function. The study will consist of one screening/baseline visit, one visit during treatment with active drug, and one visit on placebo. After the baseline visit, subjects will be randomly assigned to receive study medication or placebo for the first three weeks, followed by a two week wash-out, and then treatment reallocation for the latter three weeks.
Interventions
Weeks 1-3: Dalfampridine 10mg (1 tablet) every 12 hours for 3 weeks. Weeks 4-5: 2 weeks of wash-out. Weeks 5-8: Placebo (sugar pill) 1 tablet every 12 hours for 3 weeks.
Weeks 1-3: Placebo (sugar pill) 1 tablet every 12 hours for 3 weeks. Weeks 4-5: 2 weeks of wash-out. Weeks 6-8: Dalfampridine 10mg (1 tablet) every 12 hours for 3 weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
are: 1. At least one previous clinical episode of optic neuritis, 2. the last episode of ON must have occurred at least 12 months prior to study entry, 3. clinically definite MS, defined by the revised McDonald criteria, 23 4. ages 18-70, 5. visual acuity greater than or equal to 20/30 6. must be able to read at least 2 of the 5 letters on the top line of the 5% ETDRS chart (logMAR 0.96) at 3 meters, 2 meters or 1 meter, and 7. must have sufficient cognitive function to understand the consent process and to reliably perform all clinical assessments
Exclusion criteria
are: 1. Any ophthalmologic condition, other than ON, which can affect vision, including nystagmus in primary position of gaze, 2. history of seizures or spells with altered level of consciousness, 3. pregnancy or breast feeding, 4. an MS exacerbation or use of glucocorticoids within 3 months of entry, 5. a history of moderate to severe renal insufficiency, 6. previous use of 4-aminopyridine, in any formulation, in the prior 4 weeks.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity Scores | Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8) | Per Protocol Analysis to assess differences in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR) Scores at visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 on patients taking Dalfampridine vs Placebo. |
| Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity | Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8) | Per Protocol Analysis to assess difference in number of letters on the EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR) Chart scores at visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 |
| Difference in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR Score) at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 | Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8) | Intent to treat analysis of treatment effect in primary endpoint EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity. Improvement from baseline scores. |
| Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity | Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8) | Intent to treat analysis of treatment effect in primary endpoint EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity. Change in the number of letters able to read while on Dalfampridine and Placebo relative to their baseline scores. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Color Vision Total Error Score From Baseline Based Upon the Farnsworth Munsell Hue 100 Sort Test (FM100). | Visit 1 (Week 0 - baseline), Visit 2 (Week 3 - postintervention 1) and Visit 3 (Week 8 - post intervention 2) | Dalfampridine will change color vision Total Error Scores from baseline on the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Sort Test. Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test requires placing 100 color palettes in the correct order based upon color hue. Scores are determined by the frequency and severity of any displacement in the correct order. One error equates to one misplaced hue, by one step or position. An error score greater than 500 indicates virtually no color discrimination. An error score of 0 indicates no errors in ordering the hues. A Total Error Score of 0 to 128 could be seen in a normal population. |
| Percentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity Chart | Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8) | — |
| Difference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 | Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8) | Difference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 on Dalfampridine vs Placebo. Pelli-Robson is scored based upon the numbers read on the chart converted to LogMAR units. The scale is 0.00 (worst) to 2.35 (best). |
| Dalfampridine Effect on Quality of Life Change From Baseline. | Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8) | Dalfampridine treatment will result in change in quality of life. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire consists of 25 questions characterizing visual function at home and in the community. Score ranges from 100 (best) to 0 (worst). |
| Percentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters) | Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8) | Percentage of eyes that improved by one-line (5 letters) on the 5% contrast sensitivity chart |
| Visual Evoked Potential P100 Latency Per Treatment Arm | Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8) | Visual evoked potential 60min P100 latency on dalfampridine vs. placebo. |
| Odds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field Index | Visit 1 (Week 0 - baseline), Visit 2 (Week 3 - post intervention 1) and Visit 3 (Week 8 - post intervention 2) | The Visual Field Index (VFI) is a global index that assigns a number between 1% to 100% based on an aggregate percentage of visual function, with 100% being a perfect age-adjusted visual field. Probability of falling in the best quartile for visual field (VFI) measures (Q1), relative to the three next quartiles for worse VFIs (Q2-4), while on Dalfampridine vs Placebo. Due to the clustered observations at different times in a cross-over design, the visual field data is not suited to a normal theory model and should not be expressed as a continuous variable. Thus, a categorical model that uses a multinomial distribution for measurement of 4 categories was selected for proper statistical modeling, with results expressed as odds ratios. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects were recruited from the John L Trotter Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Clinic at Washington University and through email blasts from the Gateway (St. Louis) MS Chapter. 53 participants meet the pre-screening criteria and signed an informed consent to be screened for the study.
Pre-assignment details
Patients whose vision did not meet study criteria at the first visit in the affected eye or who had had steroids within 3 months of study entry were considered screen failures (n =7).Treatment group was randomly assigned by the pharmacist using a randomization table generated by a probability model.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine/Placebo Dalfampridine/Placebo: Weeks 1-3: Dalfampridine 10mg (1 tablet) every 12 hours for 3 weeks. Weeks 4-5: 2 weeks of wash-out. Weeks 5-8: Placebo (sugar pill) 1 tablet every 12 hours for 3 weeks. | 20 |
| Group A: Placebo/Dalfampridine Placebo/Dalfampridine: Weeks 1-3: Placebo (sugar pill) 1 tablet every 12 hours for 3 weeks. Weeks 4-5: 2 weeks of wash-out. Weeks 6-8: Dalfampridine 10mg (1 tablet) every 12 hours for 3 weeks. | 18 |
| Total | 38 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Group B: Dalfampridine/Placebo | Group A: Placebo/Dalfampridine | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 18 Participants | 17 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 44.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 | 50.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 | 47.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 |
| Baseline 5% Sloan Chart | 22 Number of Letters | 20 Number of Letters | 21 Number of Letters |
| Clinical Episodes of ON | 1 Number of episodes | 1 Number of episodes | 1 Number of episodes |
| MS Subtype Relapsing Remitting MS (RRMS) | 17 participants | 15 participants | 32 participants |
| MS Subtype Secondary Progressive MS (SPMS) | 3 participants | 3 participants | 6 participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 16 Participants | 13 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 20 participants | 18 participants | 38 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 14 Participants | 14 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 6 Participants | 4 Participants | 10 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 46 | 0 / 46 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 4 / 46 | 0 / 46 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 46 | 0 / 46 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity
Intent to treat analysis of treatment effect in primary endpoint EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity. Change in the number of letters able to read while on Dalfampridine and Placebo relative to their baseline scores.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)
Population: Intent To Treat Population, scores from morning and afternoon were averaged.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity | 3 letters | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Group B: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity | 2.5 letters | Standard Deviation 1 |
Difference in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR Score) at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1
Intent to treat analysis of treatment effect in primary endpoint EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity. Improvement from baseline scores.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)
Population: Intent To Treat Population, scores from morning and afternoon were averaged.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Difference in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR Score) at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 | 0.06 5% Contrast LogMAR Score | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
| Group B: Placebo | Difference in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR Score) at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 | 0.05 5% Contrast LogMAR Score | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity
Per Protocol Analysis to assess difference in number of letters on the EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR) Chart scores at visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)
Population: Per protocol analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity | 2 letters | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Group B: Placebo | Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity | 2 letters | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Group A: Placebo | Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity | 4 letters | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Group A: Dalfampridine | Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function Assessed by Change From Baseline in Raw Letters by EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity | 3 letters | Standard Deviation 1 |
Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity Scores
Per Protocol Analysis to assess differences in EDTRS 5% Contrast Sensitivity (LogMAR) Scores at visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 on patients taking Dalfampridine vs Placebo.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)
Population: Per protocol analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity Scores | -0.04 LogMAR Score | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
| Group B: Placebo | Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity Scores | -0.06 LogMAR Score | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
| Group A: Placebo | Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity Scores | -0.08 LogMAR Score | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
| Group A: Dalfampridine | Efficacy of Dalfampridine on Visual Function by Early Diabetic Treatment Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) 5% Contrast Sensitivity Scores | -0.06 LogMAR Score | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
Changes in Color Vision Total Error Score From Baseline Based Upon the Farnsworth Munsell Hue 100 Sort Test (FM100).
Dalfampridine will change color vision Total Error Scores from baseline on the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Sort Test. Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test requires placing 100 color palettes in the correct order based upon color hue. Scores are determined by the frequency and severity of any displacement in the correct order. One error equates to one misplaced hue, by one step or position. An error score greater than 500 indicates virtually no color discrimination. An error score of 0 indicates no errors in ordering the hues. A Total Error Score of 0 to 128 could be seen in a normal population.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0 - baseline), Visit 2 (Week 3 - postintervention 1) and Visit 3 (Week 8 - post intervention 2)
Population: per protocol
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Changes in Color Vision Total Error Score From Baseline Based Upon the Farnsworth Munsell Hue 100 Sort Test (FM100). | -13.0 FM100 Total Error Score |
| Group B: Placebo | Changes in Color Vision Total Error Score From Baseline Based Upon the Farnsworth Munsell Hue 100 Sort Test (FM100). | -10.6 FM100 Total Error Score |
Dalfampridine Effect on Quality of Life Change From Baseline.
Dalfampridine treatment will result in change in quality of life. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire consists of 25 questions characterizing visual function at home and in the community. Score ranges from 100 (best) to 0 (worst).
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Dalfampridine Effect on Quality of Life Change From Baseline. | 0 NEI VFQ percentage |
| Group B: Placebo | Dalfampridine Effect on Quality of Life Change From Baseline. | 0 NEI VFQ percentage |
Difference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1
Difference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 on Dalfampridine vs Placebo. Pelli-Robson is scored based upon the numbers read on the chart converted to LogMAR units. The scale is 0.00 (worst) to 2.35 (best).
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)
Population: per protocol
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Difference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 | 0.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
| Group B: Placebo | Difference in Pelli- Robson Score at Visits 2 and 3 Relative to Visit 1 | 0.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
Odds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field Index
The Visual Field Index (VFI) is a global index that assigns a number between 1% to 100% based on an aggregate percentage of visual function, with 100% being a perfect age-adjusted visual field. Probability of falling in the best quartile for visual field (VFI) measures (Q1), relative to the three next quartiles for worse VFIs (Q2-4), while on Dalfampridine vs Placebo. Due to the clustered observations at different times in a cross-over design, the visual field data is not suited to a normal theory model and should not be expressed as a continuous variable. Thus, a categorical model that uses a multinomial distribution for measurement of 4 categories was selected for proper statistical modeling, with results expressed as odds ratios.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0 - baseline), Visit 2 (Week 3 - post intervention 1) and Visit 3 (Week 8 - post intervention 2)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Odds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field Index | Baseline (Visit 1) | 77.53 Visual Field Index % of normal vision | Standard Deviation 29.84 |
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Odds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field Index | Post Intervention 1 (Visit 2) | 78.50 Visual Field Index % of normal vision | Standard Deviation 28.3 |
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Odds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field Index | Post Intervention 2 (Visit 3) | 79.71 Visual Field Index % of normal vision | Standard Deviation 28.57 |
| Group B: Placebo | Odds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field Index | Baseline (Visit 1) | 85.38 Visual Field Index % of normal vision | Standard Deviation 86.65 |
| Group B: Placebo | Odds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field Index | Post Intervention 1 (Visit 2) | 86.65 Visual Field Index % of normal vision | Standard Deviation 22.64 |
| Group B: Placebo | Odds Ratio Quartile of Visual Field Index | Post Intervention 2 (Visit 3) | 86.00 Visual Field Index % of normal vision | Standard Deviation 22.75 |
Percentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity Chart
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Percentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity Chart | 9.7 Percentages of eyes that improved |
| Group B: Placebo | Percentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity Chart | 11.1 Percentages of eyes that improved |
| Group A: Placebo | Percentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity Chart | 11.1 Percentages of eyes that improved |
| Group A: Dalfampridine | Percentage of Eyes That Improved by 2 Lines (10 Letters) on the Sloan 5% Contrast Sensitivity Chart | 68.1 Percentages of eyes that improved |
Percentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters)
Percentage of eyes that improved by one-line (5 letters) on the 5% contrast sensitivity chart
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)
Population: Proportion as the Percent of Eyes Improved by 1 Line
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Percentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters) | 11.1 Percent of Eyes |
| Group B: Placebo | Percentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters) | 15.3 Percent of Eyes |
| Group A: Placebo | Percentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters) | 37.5 Percent of Eyes |
| Group A: Dalfampridine | Percentage of Eyes That Improved by One-line (5 Letters) | 36.1 Percent of Eyes |
Visual Evoked Potential P100 Latency Per Treatment Arm
Visual evoked potential 60min P100 latency on dalfampridine vs. placebo.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 3) and Visit 3 (Week 8)
Population: per protocol
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group B: Dalfampridine | Visual Evoked Potential P100 Latency Per Treatment Arm | 121.6 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Group B: Placebo | Visual Evoked Potential P100 Latency Per Treatment Arm | 120.2 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 2.4 |