Skip to content

Lactated Ringer Versus Albumin in Early Sepsis Therapy

Ringer Versus Albumin In Septic Patients: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01337934
Acronym
RASP
Enrollment
360
Registered
2011-04-19
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2018-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock, Severe Sepsis

Keywords

Septic shock, Sepsis, Albumin, Lactated Ringer

Brief summary

The use of albumin in critical ill patients is a matter of controversy. A large randomized controlled trial reported that albumin was as safe and effective as crystalloid solution for fluid replacement in intensive care unit, although the last one was less expensive. In Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines there are no preference for crystalloids over colloids. But recently, a retrospective analysis of patients with severe sepsis from SAFE study reported that the use of albumin in these patients would be superior, regarding reduction of mortality. The aim of this study is determine whether the use of albumin improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Interventions

Lactated Ringer

DRUGAlbumin

Albumin 4%

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age equal or higher than 18 years-old * Severe sepsis or septic shock into 6 hours of evolution * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Shock from other causes * Adverse reactions to human albumin * Previous fluid resuscitation during current disease * Previous use of albumin in the last 72 hours * Religion objection * Enrollment in another study * Traumatic brain injury * Hepatic cirrhosis * End stage renal disease * Plasmapheresis * End of life patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mortality in 7 days for any causeday 7

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ICU length of stayday 28
hospital length of stayday 28
ventilator-free daysday 28
Evaluation of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scorefrom day 1 until day 7 of care in ICU
days free of vasopressorday 28
Mortality in 28-days28 days after randomization
Needing of renal replacement therapyday 28

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026