Skip to content

A Multi-strain Synbiotic Versus a Multi-strain Probiotic in Premature Infants

A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Multi-strain Synbiotic vs. a Multi-strain Probiotic on Fecal Colonization in the Very Low Birth Weight Infant

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01337921
Enrollment
0
Registered
2011-04-19
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2011-06-16
Last updated
2023-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Feeding; Difficult, Newborn, Necrotizing Enterocolitis

Brief summary

The aims are to 1) compare two probiotic treatments (multi-strain synbiotic vs. multi-strain probiotic) on bifidobacteria fecal colonization counts at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of life, 34 weeks corrected gestation age (CGA) ; 2) compare infants successfully colonized with probiotic organisms to infants not successfully colonized at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of life, 34 weeks CGA on infant outcomes and on stress biomarker patterns at birth, day of life (DOL) 1, DOL 7; 3) determine long-term safety and outcomes of probiotic treatments at 6, 16, and 24 months CGA.

Detailed description

Feeding Intolerance and other GI issues are a major concern in a NICU hospitalized population. Successful colonization with probiotic bacteria is thought to impact the incidence of GI related issues. This study will study the impact of prebiotics on the colonization of a population of VLBW infants in the NICU setting.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTMulti-strain Probiotic

Multi-strain Synbiotic: 1.5 billion CFU of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum,and Bifidobacterium lactis WITH galacto-oligosaccharide(GOS)/fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS) combination at 1g/dL (0.9g/dL GOS/ 0.1g/dL FOS)

Sponsors

University of Nebraska
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* infants with a birth weight \< 1500g * admission to NICU at The Nebraska Medical Center

Exclusion criteria

* infants who have congenital anomalies * have a diagnosis of a congenital metabolic disease * are made a ward of the State or * are born to a mother \< 19 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing a multi-strain synbiotic vs. a multi-strain probiotic on mean bifidobacteria fecal colonization counts1,2, 3, 4 and 34 weeks of ageInfants will be given the synbiotic or probiotic supplementation within the first week of life (upon inititation of enteral feedings) until approximately 34 weeks corrected gestational age.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare trends of stress biomarker levels in relation to demographics and selected standard infant outcomesday of life 1 to day of life 7Interquartile ranges of biomarkers (listed above) will be compared on the demographic data and selected standard infant outcomes (listed above) at each time (DOL 1, 7) and over-time.
Compare the difference between two groups (multi-strain synbiotic vs. multi-strain probiotic) on demographic data and selected standard clinical infant outcomes.From birth to NICU discharge (average 36 weeks corrected gestational age)Two probiotic groups will be compared on demographics: mean \[birth wt(g), birth length(cm), birth hc(cm), GA at birth, 1-& 5- minute APGAR scores\], race, gender, prenatal antibiotics(y/n), and enteral feeding type(breastmilk, formula, both); and on selected infant outcomes: Feeding Intolernce(number of times the feeding care plan is disrupted), NEC(y/n), late-onset sepsis(y/n), IVH(y/n;Grade I-IV), PDA(y/n), CLD(y/n), mean \[endotracheal ventilation(days), inspired oxygen, discharge wt(g),discharge length(cm), discharge hc(cm), days to reach full feedings, length of stay, days on antibiotics\].
Compare the difference between infants successfully colonized with probiotic organisms (>10^2 colonies on a 10^4-fold dilution plate)to infants not successfully colonized on demographics and selected standard clinical outcomes1 week of life to NICU dischargeTwo colonization groups will be compared on demographics: mean\[birth wt(g), birth length(cm),birth hc(cm),GA at birth,1-& 5- minute APGAR scores\],race, gender,prenatal antibiotics(y/n),and enteral feeding type(breastmilk, formula, both); and on selected infant outcomes: Feeding Intolernce(number of times the feeding care plan is disrupted), NEC(y/n), late-onset sepsis(y/n), IVH(y/n;Grade I-IV), PDA(y/n), CLD(y/n), mean \[endotracheal ventilation(days), inspired oxygen, discharge wt(g),discharge length(cm), discharge hc(cm), days to reach full feedings, length of stay, days on antibiotics\].
Compare infants successfully colonized with probiotic organisms(>10^2 colonies on a 10^4-fold dilution plate) to infants not successfully colonized on stress biomarker levelsday of life 1 to day of life 7Interquartile ranges of biomarkers will be compared between the two colonization groups. Biomarkers include: serum cortisol(cord blood), salivary cortisol (DOL 1,7), serum 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (cord blood), urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (DOL 1,7)
Compare the difference between the two probiotic treatment groups (multi-strain synbiotic vs. multi-strain probiotic) on longitudinal neurodevelopmental outcomes.6, 16 & 24 months corrected gestational age.Appropriate Bayley scales conducted by developmental pediatricians will be used for the neurodevelopmental data.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026