Skip to content

Milnacipran in Autism and the Functional Locus Coeruleus and Noradrenergic Model of Autism

Milnacipran in Autism and the Functional Locus Coeruleus and Noradrenergic Model of Autism

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01337700
Enrollment
10
Registered
2011-04-19
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2020-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aspergers Syndrome, Asperger Syndrome, Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

ASD, Autism, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Asperger Syndrome, Asperger, PDD, PDD-NOS

Brief summary

Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) include Autistic disorder, Asperger's syndrome and Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS). These are developmental disorders beginning prior to three years of age. Recent Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimates suggest that ASD affects up to 1 in 100 individuals and up to 1 in 50 boys. There are very substantial costs associated with caring for patients with ASD, and ASD has the highest Caregiver Burden Scores of any condition. There are three core symptom domains of ASD, including social deficits, repetitive behaviors and language deficits. Patients can also have associated symptoms of attentional deficits, disruptive behaviors and intellectual disability. There is currently no Food and Drug administration (FDA) approved treatment for the core symptoms of autism, but risperidone and aripiprazole have FDA approval for disruptive behaviors associated with autism. This is a 12 week randomized double blind placebo controlled trial of Milnacipran in adults with ASD or Aspergers Syndrome. Milnacipran is said to play a role in the activation and normalization of the locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system, of which is hypothesized to play a role in behavior adaptations and performance.

Interventions

DRUGMilnacipran

Patients will receive a titrated dose of milnacipran increasing to a maximum of 100mg a day over the 12 week study period. Dosing will be based on a fixed schedule that will be monitored using a side effect profile.

DRUGPlacebo

Subjects will be given placebo tablets at dosing corresponding to the fixed schedule between 12.5mg and 100mg.

Sponsors

Forest Laboratories
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and Female patients * Aged 18-50 years * Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder * intelligence quotient greater than 70

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant subjects * Patients deemed by comprehensive psychiatric interview to have a significant risk of suicide

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleBaseline and Week 12 scoresChange will be measured in each subject's score on the Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale from baseline through study end (week 12).Higher values represent a worse outcome. The raw scores are converted to T-scores for each scale and sub-scale which are then compared against the mean. Higher values represent a worse outcome. A T-score of 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population. A T-score above 65 indicates a moderate to severe problem. For example, Row 1 is the mean of baseline T-scores for the Inattention/ Memory subscale and Row 2 is the mean of week 12 T-scores for the Inattention/ Memory subscale. The difference between these two means is used to measure the change from baseline through week 12 for both the groups.
Change in Hyperactivity as Measured by Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Hyperactivity ScaleBaseline to Endpoint - 12 weeksThe Aberrant Behavior Checklist is an informant-based questionnaire consisting of 58 items subdivided amongst 5 scales: irritability, lethargy and social withdrawal, stereotypic behavior, hyperactivity/non-compliance, and inappropriate speech \[34\]. A score for each item ranges from 0 indicating no problem to 3 indicating severe problem. Scale scores are calculated by summing the items within that scale. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.Reported Data is for change in ABC-H from baseline to endpoint (week 0 to week 12).This data is specifically looking at the hyperactivity scale which is 16 items with each item ranging from 0-3 making total scores 0-48.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scalescreening, baseline, weeks 2,4,6,8,10,12The CGI-I reflects the rater's impression of the subject's current autism severity on a 7-point scale ranging from Much Improved (1) to Much worse (5).
Change in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity Subscalebaseline, weeks 2,4,6,8,10,12This scale has been shown to be a sensitive outcome measure in autism trials of repetitive behaviors. Data for secondary outcome not analyzed due to lack of significance in primary outcomes measured. * scale range: 0 - 40 total, 0 - 7 subclinical, 8-15 mild, 16 - 23 moderate, 24 - 31 severe, 32 - 40 extreme * score interpretation: Higher overall scores reflect increasing symptom severity.
Change in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)baseline, weeks 2,4,6,8,10,12This scale is shown to be sensitive to change in adults with autism, and related to amygdala function. Higher scores mean a better outcome.A clinical tool measuring emotion recognition through facial expression, voice and posture. 1. Child faces 2 (range 0 - 100, higher values reflecting higher % of errors) 2. Adult faces 2 (range 0 - 100, higher values reflecting higher % of errors) 3. Child paralanguage 2 (range 0 - 100, higher values reflecting higher % of errors) 4. Adult paralanguage 2 (range 0 - 100, higher values reflecting higher % of errors) Errors are counted and organized by pre-determined affect and intensity. Subtests considered separately.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Milnacipran
Milnacipran: Patients will receive a titrated dose of milnacipran increasing to a maximum of 100mg a day over the 12 week study period. Dosing will be based on a fixed schedule that will be monitored using a side effect profile.
5
Placebo
Placebo: Subjects will be given placebo tablets at dosing corresponding to the fixed schedule between 12.5mg and 100mg.
5
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMilnacipranTotalPlacebo
Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Hyperactivity Scale (ABC-H)19 units on a scale14.4 units on a scale9.8 units on a scale
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Age, Continuous25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.391
25.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.506
25.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.149
CAARS Hyperactivity/Restlessness T Score55 T score52.9 T score50.8 T score
CAARS Impulsivity/Emotional Labiality T Score55.2 T score52.2 T score49.2 T score
CAARS Inattention/Memory T Score68.6 T score70.2 T score71.8 T score
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Severity of Illness4 units on a scale4.5 units on a scale5 units on a scale
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 54 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Hyperactivity as Measured by Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Hyperactivity Scale

The Aberrant Behavior Checklist is an informant-based questionnaire consisting of 58 items subdivided amongst 5 scales: irritability, lethargy and social withdrawal, stereotypic behavior, hyperactivity/non-compliance, and inappropriate speech \[34\]. A score for each item ranges from 0 indicating no problem to 3 indicating severe problem. Scale scores are calculated by summing the items within that scale. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.Reported Data is for change in ABC-H from baseline to endpoint (week 0 to week 12).This data is specifically looking at the hyperactivity scale which is 16 items with each item ranging from 0-3 making total scores 0-48.

Time frame: Baseline to Endpoint - 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MilnacipranChange in Hyperactivity as Measured by Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Hyperactivity Scale-10.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.46
PlaceboChange in Hyperactivity as Measured by Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Hyperactivity Scale-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.26
Primary

Change in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale

Change will be measured in each subject's score on the Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale from baseline through study end (week 12).Higher values represent a worse outcome. The raw scores are converted to T-scores for each scale and sub-scale which are then compared against the mean. Higher values represent a worse outcome. A T-score of 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population. A T-score above 65 indicates a moderate to severe problem. For example, Row 1 is the mean of baseline T-scores for the Inattention/ Memory subscale and Row 2 is the mean of week 12 T-scores for the Inattention/ Memory subscale. The difference between these two means is used to measure the change from baseline through week 12 for both the groups.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12 scores

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MilnacipranChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleBaseline: T-SCORES- Inattention/Memory68.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 14.83
MilnacipranChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleWeek 12: T-SCORES- Inattention/Memory53.4 T-scoreStandard Deviation 13.05
MilnacipranChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleBaseline: T-SCORES- Hyperactivity/Restlessness55 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.63
MilnacipranChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleWeek 12:T-SCORES -Hyperactivity/Restlessness44.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.76
MilnacipranChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleBaseline: T-SCORES- Impulsivity/Emotional Lability55.2 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.66
MilnacipranChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleWeek 12: T-SCORES- Impulsivity/Emotional Lability47.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.22
PlaceboChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleBaseline: T-SCORES- Impulsivity/Emotional Lability49.2 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.89
PlaceboChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleBaseline: T-SCORES- Inattention/Memory71.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.81
PlaceboChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleWeek 12:T-SCORES -Hyperactivity/Restlessness39.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.56
PlaceboChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleWeek 12: T-SCORES- Inattention/Memory57 T-scoreStandard Deviation 20.22
PlaceboChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleWeek 12: T-SCORES- Impulsivity/Emotional Lability43.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 13.9
PlaceboChange in Score on Conners Adults Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating ScaleBaseline: T-SCORES- Hyperactivity/Restlessness50.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.76
Secondary

Change in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions Scale

The CGI-I reflects the rater's impression of the subject's current autism severity on a 7-point scale ranging from Much Improved (1) to Much worse (5).

Time frame: screening, baseline, weeks 2,4,6,8,10,12

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MilnacipranChange in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions ScaleNo Change3 Participants
MilnacipranChange in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions ScaleMinimally Worse0 Participants
MilnacipranChange in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions ScaleMinimally Improved1 Participants
MilnacipranChange in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions ScaleMuch Worse0 Participants
MilnacipranChange in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions ScaleMuch Improved1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions ScaleMuch Worse0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions ScaleMuch Improved1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions ScaleMinimally Improved1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions ScaleMinimally Worse1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Autism Severity Levels Based on the Clinical Global Impressions ScaleNo Change2 Participants
Secondary

Change in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)

This scale is shown to be sensitive to change in adults with autism, and related to amygdala function. Higher scores mean a better outcome.A clinical tool measuring emotion recognition through facial expression, voice and posture. 1. Child faces 2 (range 0 - 100, higher values reflecting higher % of errors) 2. Adult faces 2 (range 0 - 100, higher values reflecting higher % of errors) 3. Child paralanguage 2 (range 0 - 100, higher values reflecting higher % of errors) 4. Adult paralanguage 2 (range 0 - 100, higher values reflecting higher % of errors) Errors are counted and organized by pre-determined affect and intensity. Subtests considered separately.

Time frame: baseline, weeks 2,4,6,8,10,12

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MilnacipranChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 419.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
MilnacipranChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 817 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.74
MilnacipranChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 219.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
MilnacipranChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 1017.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.77
MilnacipranChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 619.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.08
MilnacipranChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 1218 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
MilnacipranChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Baseline16.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
PlaceboChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 1218.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
PlaceboChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Baseline18.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
PlaceboChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 219 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
PlaceboChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 419.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
PlaceboChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 620 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
PlaceboChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 819.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
PlaceboChange in Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Activity-2 ADULT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: (DANVA2-AF)Week 1020 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Secondary

Change in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity Subscale

This scale has been shown to be a sensitive outcome measure in autism trials of repetitive behaviors. Data for secondary outcome not analyzed due to lack of significance in primary outcomes measured. * scale range: 0 - 40 total, 0 - 7 subclinical, 8-15 mild, 16 - 23 moderate, 24 - 31 severe, 32 - 40 extreme * score interpretation: Higher overall scores reflect increasing symptom severity.

Time frame: baseline, weeks 2,4,6,8,10,12

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MilnacipranChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 611.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.12
MilnacipranChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 810.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.93
MilnacipranChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleBaseline12.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.45
MilnacipranChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 1011.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
MilnacipranChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 411.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.08
MilnacipranChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 1212.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.41
MilnacipranChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 210 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.16
PlaceboChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 1212 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.03
PlaceboChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleBaseline12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
PlaceboChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 212.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
PlaceboChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 413.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.12
PlaceboChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 89.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.99
PlaceboChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 1012.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
PlaceboChange in Repetitive Behaviors Using YBOCS-Compulsion and Rigidity SubscaleWeek 612 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026