Osteoarthritis
Conditions
Keywords
total knee arthroplasty, oxidized zirconium, genesis II, femoral component, cobalt chrome
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if there are any clinical or radiographic differences in cemented total knee arthroplasty with an oxidized zirconium and a cobalt-chromium femoral knee component.
Detailed description
Although it has been claimed that total knee arthroplasties with an oxidized zirconium femoral knee component had beneficial wear properties in vitro, there are conflicting clinical results. The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical, subjective, and radiographic results as well as the weight, size and shape of polyethylene wear particles in the patients with an oxidized zirconium and a cobalt-chromium femoral knee component.
Interventions
Oxidized Zirconium femoral component of Genesis II TKR system is used.
Cobalt Chrome Femoral Component of Genesis II TKR system is used
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* End-stage osteoarthritis of the knee joint requiring total knee arthroplasty with bilateral disease
Exclusion criteria
* Inflammatory disease * patient with other Lower extremity disease which may affect functional outcome * Neurologic disease effecting patients lower extremity * Revision surgery * Patient not medically cleared for bilateral surgery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in Knee Society Knee Score | Initial(one day before surgery), and at 3 months, 1 year, then annually after surgery | change in knee score will be compared with initial score, until mean follow up of 20 years. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in the range of motion | Initial(one day before surgery), and at 3 months, 1 year, then annually after surgery | change in the range of motion of knee joint will be compared with the initial value, until mean follow up of 20 years. |
Countries
South Korea