Skip to content

Broccoli Sprout Extracts Trial to See if NRF2 is Enhanced by Sulforaphane Treatment in Patients With COPD

Enhancing Nrf2 by Sulforaphane Treatment in COPD

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01335971
Acronym
BEST
Enrollment
89
Registered
2011-04-15
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2017-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD

Keywords

COPD, Nrf2, Sulforaphane

Brief summary

Evidence from investigators' group has shown that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients have impairment of antioxidant defenses which are caused by a defect in activity of Nrf2. This trial focuses on sulforaphane, a derivative of cruciferous vegetables, which is a potent stimulator of Nrf2 activity. The investigators want to investigate whether ingestion of sulforaphane by COPD patients will increase Nrf2 activity and expression of downstream antioxidants. Accordingly, the investigators are conducting a placebo-controlled randomized proof of principle trial of two oral doses of sulforaphane, 25 and 150 micromoles, for 4 weeks in 90 COPD patients. The investigators' goal is to establish a safe and tolerable dose of sulforaphane that effects in vivo antioxidants via Nrf2, then the investigators will have a novel candidate treatment for longer-term efficacy trials.

Detailed description

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and is a growing cause of chronic disease internationally. Presently, there are limited treatment options for this disease to modify the progression of airflow obstruction and decrease periodic exacerbations. Recent evidence has emphasized the central role of oxidative stress as a mechanism of COPD pathobiology. Evidence from investigators' group has shown that COPD patients and animals exposed to cigarette smoke have impairment of antioxidant defenses which are caused by a defect in activity of nuclear factor erythroid 2 like 2 (Nrf2), a prolific regulator of anti-oxidant enzymes, glutathione homeostasis, and cytoprotective proteins. Activation of Nrf2 protects mice with chronic smoke exposure from developing emphysema, decreases oxidative stress, increases proteasomal anti-apoptotic cytoprotective responses, improves bacterial phagocytosis and killing, and reverses tobacco-smoke induced corticosteroid resistance. Similarly, in vitro Nrf2 activation in human COPD lung cells has shown improved cytoprotection, improved bacterial clearance, and restoration of steroid sensitivity. This trial focuses on sulforaphane, a derivative of cruciferous vegetables, which is a potent in vitro and in vivo stimulator of Nrf2 activity. The investigators want to investigate whether ingestion of sulforaphane by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients will increase Nrf2 activity and expression of downstream antioxidants in alveolar macrophages and bronchial epithelial cells. Accordingly, the investigators are conducting a placebo-controlled randomized proof of principle trial of two oral doses of sulforaphane, 25 and 150 micromoles, for 4 weeks in 90 COPD patients. Collections of alveolar macrophages by Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial epithelial cells by endobronchial brushings will be performed at baseline and 4 weeks. Other bio-specimens will include nasal epithelial cells, Peripheral Blood Monocyte Collection (PBMCs), and expired breath condensate (EBC). The investigators' goal is to establish a safe and tolerable dose of sulforaphane that effects in vivo antioxidants via Nrf2, then the investigators will have a novel candidate treatment for longer-term efficacy trials. Ancillary studies are proposed to explore the efficacy and mechanisms of sulforaphane to increase bacterial clearance and to restore steroid sensitivity in COPD lung cells.

Interventions

DRUGSulforaphane 25

25 micromoles (4.4 mg) sulforaphane daily by mouth

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTSulforaphane 150

150 micromoles (26.6 mg) sulforaphane daily by mouth

OTHERPlacebo

Microcrystalline cellulose once daily by mouth

Sponsors

Temple University
CollaboratorOTHER
State University of New York at Buffalo
CollaboratorOTHER
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 40 years or greater, either sex * 10 or more pack-years smoking history * Physician diagnosed COPD * Post bronchodilator Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/ forced expiratory vital capacity (FVC) ratio \< 0.70 * FEV1 40-80 % predicted * Willingness to ingest no more than 1 serving of cruciferous vegetables per week during run-in and treatment periods * Ability and willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* COPD exacerbation within preceding 6 weeks requiring treatment * Significant respiratory (other than COPD), cardiovascular, neuropsychiatric, renal, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary disease that would interfere with participation in the study or interpretation of the results. * Acute Myocardial infarction (MI) or Acute Coronary syndrome within 6 prior months * Cancer (other than skin or localized prostate) within preceding 5 years * Child-bearing potential with lack of adequate contraception, Pregnancy or lactation. Acceptable forms of birth control include abstinence, hysterectomy, tubal ligation, two of the following: vasectomy, condom, diaphragm, intrauterine device, oral or implanted contraceptives, or spermicide. * Allergy to local anesthesia * Resting hypoxemia (O2 saturation \< 90%) * Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \< 30 * Liver enzymes four times upper normal * Current use of warfarin for any indication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of AKR1C3 at 4 WeeksBaseline and 4 weeksThe sixth primary design variable is the change from baseline in expression of Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C3 (AKR1C3) in bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) at 4 weeks. Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.
Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of Nrf2 at 4 WeeksBaseline and 4 weeksThe second primary design variable is the change from baseline in nuclear factor erythroid 2 like 2 (Nrf2) expression in bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) at 4 weeks by analysing Nrf2 protein. Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.
Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of NQ01 and Keap1 at 4 WeeksBaseline and 4 weeksThe third primary design variable is the change from baseline in NAD(P)H Quinone Dehydrogenase 1 (NQ01) and Kelch Like ECH Associated Protein 1 (Keap1) expression in bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) at 4 weeks. Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.
Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of HO1 at 4 WeeksBaseline and 4 weeksThe fourth primary design variable is the change from baseline in expression of Heme Oxygenase 1 (HO1) in bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) at 4 weeks. Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.
Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of AKR1C1 at 4 WeeksBaseline and 4 weeksThe fifth primary design variable is the change from baseline in expression of Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C1 (AKR1C1) in bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) at 4 weeks. Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.
Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksBaseline and 4 weeksThe first primary design variable is the change from baseline in nuclear factor erythroid 2 like 2 (Nrf2) expression in alveolar macrophages (AM) at 4 weeks by analysing Nrf2 protein and expression of a panel of Nrf2 regulated genes.Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fold-change in Serum Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Baseline and 4 weeksInflammatory markers were measured in serum samples derived from venipuncture at baseline and 4 weeks in the serum of the participants of the trial.
Fold-change in Inflammatory Marker Concentrations in Bronchial Alveolar Lavage (Follow-up to Baseline) by Treatment GroupBaseline and 4 weeksInflammatory markers were measured in bronchial alveolar lavage samples at baseline and 4 weeks in the participants of this trial who had bronchoalveolar lavage samples obtained.Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage.
Fold-change in Plasma Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Baseline and 4 weeksInflammatory markers were measured in plasma at baseline and 4 weeks. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were measured in nmol malondialdehyde (MDA)/mL.
Fold-change in Isoprostane Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Baseline and 4 weeksIsoprostane, an oxidant stress indicator, was measured in expired breath condensate at baseline and 4 weeks.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Microcrystalline cellulose Placebo: Microcrystalline cellulose once daily by mouth
31
Sulforaphane 25
25 micromoles (4.4 mg) sulforaphane daily by mouth Sulforaphane 25: 25 micromoles (4.4 mg) sulforaphane daily by mouth
29
Sulforaphane 150
150 micromoles (26.6 mg) sulforaphane daily by mouth Sulforaphane 150: 150 micromoles (26.6 mg) sulforaphane daily by mouth
29
Total89

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDid not complete bronchoscopy111
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboSulforaphane 25Sulforaphane 150Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
9 Participants5 Participants10 Participants24 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
22 Participants24 Participants19 Participants65 Participants
Age, Continuous59 years59 years56 years58 years
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) characteristics
10 or more pack years of smoking history
30 participants29 participants29 participants88 participants
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) characteristics
COPD exacerbation in last 12 months
5 participants7 participants7 participants19 participants
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) characteristics
Smoke 10 or more cigarettes a day now
10 participants9 participants10 participants29 participants
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) characteristics
Smoke cigarettes now
20 participants16 participants18 participants54 participants
Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)14.8 mL/mmHg/min15.7 mL/mmHg/min16.3 mL/mmHg/min15.7 mL/mmHg/min
Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score2 units on a scale2 units on a scale2 units on a scale2 units on a scale
Post bronchodilator FEV161 percent predicted54 percent predicted65 percent predicted61 percent predicted
Post bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio0.56 ratio0.52 ratio0.57 ratio0.56 ratio
Pulmonary function measures
Forced residual capacity
3.6 Liters3.6 Liters3.4 Liters3.5 Liters
Pulmonary function measures
Residual volume
2.6 Liters2.6 Liters2.7 Liters2.6 Liters
Pulmonary function measures
Slow vital capacity
3.1 Liters3.0 Liters3.7 Liters3.3 Liters
Pulmonary function measures
Total lung capacity
6.0 Liters5.5 Liters6.3 Liters6.0 Liters
Pulse oximetry (SpO2)95 Percentage of oxyhemoglobin96 Percentage of oxyhemoglobin96 Percentage of oxyhemoglobin96 Percentage of oxyhemoglobin
Region of Enrollment
United States
31 participants29 participants29 participants89 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants12 Participants8 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants17 Participants21 Participants54 Participants
St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire
Activity score
54 units on a scale60 units on a scale50 units on a scale55 units on a scale
St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire
Impacts score
27 units on a scale34 units on a scale26 units on a scale28 units on a scale
St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire
Symptoms score
58 units on a scale55 units on a scale50 units on a scale52 units on a scale
St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire
Total score
43 units on a scale47 units on a scale39 units on a scale40 units on a scale
Use of respiratory medications in prior 2 weeks
Long-acting anticholinergic bronchodilator
7 participants9 participants10 participants26 participants
Use of respiratory medications in prior 2 weeks
Long-acting beta-agonist
2 participants1 participants2 participants5 participants
Use of respiratory medications in prior 2 weeks
Long-acting beta-agonist & inhaled corticosteroid
14 participants13 participants13 participants40 participants
Use of respiratory medications in prior 2 weeks
Short-acting beta-agonist
22 participants21 participants18 participants61 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 3121 / 2918 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 312 / 291 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 Weeks

The first primary design variable is the change from baseline in nuclear factor erythroid 2 like 2 (Nrf2) expression in alveolar macrophages (AM) at 4 weeks by analysing Nrf2 protein and expression of a panel of Nrf2 regulated genes.Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed based on number of individuals with alveolar macrophage samples in which assays could be successfully performed. Assays failed for two participants in the placebo group, one in the 25 micromole group, and one in the 150 micromole group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksNQ010.80 fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksHO10.90 fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksAKR1C10.81 fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksAKR1C31.03 fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksNrf21.14 fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksKeap10.94 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksKeap10.99 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksNQ011.03 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksAKR1C31.02 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksNrf21.05 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksHO10.98 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksAKR1C11.13 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksHO11.06 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksAKR1C10.71 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksKeap11.06 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksAKR1C30.87 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksNQ010.94 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Alveolar Macrophage Expression of Nrf2 and Associated Genes at 4 WeeksNrf21.13 fold change
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of NAD(P)H Quinone Dehydrogenase 1 (NQ01) in alveolar macrophagesp-value: 0.45Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of Heme Oxygenase 1 (HO1) in alveolar macrophagesp-value: 0.4Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C1 (AKR1C1) in alveolar macrophagesp-value: 0.75Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C3 (AKR1C3) in alveolar macrophagesp-value: 0.49Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2 like 2 (Nrf2) in alveolar macrophagesp-value: 0.88Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of Kelch Like ECH Associated Protein 1 (Keap1) in alveolar macrophagesp-value: 0.71Kruskal-Wallis
Primary

Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of AKR1C1 at 4 Weeks

The fifth primary design variable is the change from baseline in expression of Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C1 (AKR1C1) in bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) at 4 weeks. Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed based on number of individuals with alveolar macrophage samples in which assays could be successfully performed. Assays failed for two participants in the placebo group and two in the 150 micromole group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of AKR1C1 at 4 Weeks1.45 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of AKR1C1 at 4 Weeks1.08 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of AKR1C1 at 4 Weeks0.79 fold change
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C1 (AKR1C1) in bronchial epithelial cells.p-value: <0.01Kruskal-Wallis
Primary

Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of AKR1C3 at 4 Weeks

The sixth primary design variable is the change from baseline in expression of Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C3 (AKR1C3) in bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) at 4 weeks. Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed based on number of individuals with bronchial epithelial samples in which assays could be successfully performed. Assays failed for two participants in the placebo group, one participant in the 25 micromole group, and one participant in the 150 micromole group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of AKR1C3 at 4 Weeks1.10 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of AKR1C3 at 4 Weeks1.38 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of AKR1C3 at 4 Weeks0.87 fold change
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C3 (AKR1C3) in bronchial epithelial cells.p-value: 0.06Kruskal-Wallis
Primary

Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of HO1 at 4 Weeks

The fourth primary design variable is the change from baseline in expression of Heme Oxygenase 1 (HO1) in bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) at 4 weeks. Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed based on number of individuals with bronchial epithelial samples in which assays could be successfully performed. Assays failed for one participant in the placebo group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of HO1 at 4 Weeks1.05 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of HO1 at 4 Weeks1.12 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of HO1 at 4 Weeks0.93 fold change
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of Heme Oxygenase 1 (HO1) in bronchial epithelial cellsp-value: 0.53Kruskal-Wallis
Primary

Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of NQ01 and Keap1 at 4 Weeks

The third primary design variable is the change from baseline in NAD(P)H Quinone Dehydrogenase 1 (NQ01) and Kelch Like ECH Associated Protein 1 (Keap1) expression in bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) at 4 weeks. Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed based on number of individuals with bronchial epithelial samples in which assays could be successfully performed. Assays failed for two participants in the placebo group and one in the 150 micromole group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of NQ01 and Keap1 at 4 WeeksNQ011.09 fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of NQ01 and Keap1 at 4 WeeksKEAP11.12 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of NQ01 and Keap1 at 4 WeeksNQ011.12 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of NQ01 and Keap1 at 4 WeeksKEAP11.39 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of NQ01 and Keap1 at 4 WeeksNQ010.96 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of NQ01 and Keap1 at 4 WeeksKEAP10.87 fold change
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of NAD(P)H Quinone Dehydrogenase 1 (NQ01) in bronchial epithelial cellsp-value: 0.69Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of Kelch Like ECH Associated Protein 1 (Keap1) in bronchial epithelial cellsp-value: <0.01Kruskal-Wallis
Primary

Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of Nrf2 at 4 Weeks

The second primary design variable is the change from baseline in nuclear factor erythroid 2 like 2 (Nrf2) expression in bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) at 4 weeks by analysing Nrf2 protein. Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage for primary outcome data.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed based on number of individuals with bronchial epithelial samples in which assays could be successfully performed. Assays failed for one participant in the placebo group and one in the 25 micromole group..

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of Nrf2 at 4 Weeks1.09 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of Nrf2 at 4 Weeks1.06 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Change From Baseline in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression of Nrf2 at 4 Weeks1.06 fold change
Comparison: Applies to gene expression of Nrf2 in bronchial epithelial cellsp-value: 0.68Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Fold-change in Inflammatory Marker Concentrations in Bronchial Alveolar Lavage (Follow-up to Baseline) by Treatment Group

Inflammatory markers were measured in bronchial alveolar lavage samples at baseline and 4 weeks in the participants of this trial who had bronchoalveolar lavage samples obtained.Three participants - one from each treatment group - were unable to complete follow-up bronchoalveolar lavage.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed is based on number of participants that had bronchial alveolar lavage samples available. Samples were missing for two participants in the placebo group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboFold-change in Inflammatory Marker Concentrations in Bronchial Alveolar Lavage (Follow-up to Baseline) by Treatment GroupInterleukin-8 (pg/mg)1.22 fold change
PlaceboFold-change in Inflammatory Marker Concentrations in Bronchial Alveolar Lavage (Follow-up to Baseline) by Treatment GroupSecretory leukoprotease inhibitor (pg/mg)1.51 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Fold-change in Inflammatory Marker Concentrations in Bronchial Alveolar Lavage (Follow-up to Baseline) by Treatment GroupInterleukin-8 (pg/mg)0.94 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Fold-change in Inflammatory Marker Concentrations in Bronchial Alveolar Lavage (Follow-up to Baseline) by Treatment GroupSecretory leukoprotease inhibitor (pg/mg)1.09 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Fold-change in Inflammatory Marker Concentrations in Bronchial Alveolar Lavage (Follow-up to Baseline) by Treatment GroupInterleukin-8 (pg/mg)1.11 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Fold-change in Inflammatory Marker Concentrations in Bronchial Alveolar Lavage (Follow-up to Baseline) by Treatment GroupSecretory leukoprotease inhibitor (pg/mg)1.12 fold change
Comparison: Applies to interleukin-8 resultsp-value: 0.71Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Applies to secretory leukoprotease inhibitor resultsp-value: 0.33Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Fold-change in Isoprostane Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)

Isoprostane, an oxidant stress indicator, was measured in expired breath condensate at baseline and 4 weeks.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed based on number of individuals with expired breath condensate samples in which testing could be successfully performed. Samples were missing for two participants in the 25 micromole group and one participant in the 150 micromole group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboFold-change in Isoprostane Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)1.18 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Fold-change in Isoprostane Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)0.83 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Fold-change in Isoprostane Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)0.64 fold change
p-value: 0.2Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Fold-change in Plasma Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)

Inflammatory markers were measured in plasma at baseline and 4 weeks. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were measured in nmol malondialdehyde (MDA)/mL.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed is based on number of participants that had plasma samples available. Samples were missing for one participant in the 25 micromole group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboFold-change in Plasma Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances0.96 fold change
PlaceboFold-change in Plasma Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Isoprostane (ng/mg)0.89 fold change
PlaceboFold-change in Plasma Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Total antioxidants (mM Trolox equivalents/L)0.97 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Fold-change in Plasma Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances1.05 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Fold-change in Plasma Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Isoprostane (ng/mg)0.90 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Fold-change in Plasma Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Total antioxidants (mM Trolox equivalents/L)0.92 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Fold-change in Plasma Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Isoprostane (ng/mg)0.88 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Fold-change in Plasma Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Total antioxidants (mM Trolox equivalents/L)0.97 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Fold-change in Plasma Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances1.06 fold change
Comparison: Applies to isoprostane results.p-value: 0.8Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Applies to thiobarbituric acid reactive substances results.p-value: 0.35Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Applies to total antioxidants results.p-value: 0.53Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Fold-change in Serum Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)

Inflammatory markers were measured in serum samples derived from venipuncture at baseline and 4 weeks in the serum of the participants of the trial.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed is based on number of participants that had plasma samples available. Samples were missing for one participant in the 25 micromole group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboFold-change in Serum Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Interleukin-8 (pg/mL)1.06 fold change
PlaceboFold-change in Serum Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)0.75 fold change
PlaceboFold-change in Serum Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)C-reactive protein (mg/L)0.99 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Fold-change in Serum Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Interleukin-8 (pg/mL)1.04 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Fold-change in Serum Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)C-reactive protein (mg/L)0.90 fold change
Sulforaphane 25Fold-change in Serum Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)0.90 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Fold-change in Serum Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Interleukin-8 (pg/mL)1.03 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Fold-change in Serum Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)1.12 fold change
Sulforaphane 150Fold-change in Serum Inflammatory Marker Concentrations (Follow-up to Baseline)C-reactive protein (mg/L)1.01 fold change
Comparison: Applies to C-reactive protein concentrationp-value: 0.41Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Applies to Interleukin-6 concentrationp-value: 0.07Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Applies to Interleukin-8 concentrationp-value: 0.65Kruskal-Wallis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026