Skip to content

A Clinical Comparison of Marketed Lens Care Solutions With Avaira Lens Brand

A Clinical Comparison of Marketed Lens Care Solutions With Avaira Lens Brand

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01335750
Enrollment
32
Registered
2011-04-14
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2020-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Corneal Staining

Keywords

corneal staining

Brief summary

This study is a clinical comparison of the biocompatibility of several multipurpose solutions, Renu Fresh, Optifree Replenish, and ClearCare, and saline as a control solution among adapted hydrogel contact lens wearers wearing Avaira (enfilcon A) contact lenses at one research site.

Interventions

OTHERMultipurpose Solution #1

B&L Renu Fresh Multipurpose Solution

OTHERMultipurpose Solution #2

Optifree Replenish Multipurpose Solution

OTHERMutlipurpose Solution #3

Ciba ClearCare Multipurpose Solution

OTHERMultipurpose Solution #4

Saline Solution

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Informed Consent and HIPAA document read, signed, and dated. * Visual acuity correctable to 20/30 (Snellen) or better in each eye at distance with hydrogel or silicone hydrogel contact lenses. * Successfully wearing hydrogel or silicone hydrogel contact lenses on a daily wear basis for at least two weeks prior to the study.

Exclusion criteria

* History of hypersensitivity * Evidence or history of epithelial herpes simplex keratitis (dendritic keratitis; vaccinia, active or recent varicella, viral disease of the cornea and/or conjunctiva and/or eyelids; bacterial infection of the eye; and/or fungal disease of the eye * One functional eye or a monofit eye * Ocular conditions such as active acute blepharitis, conjunctival infections, and iritis * Type 2 (macropunctate) or greater corneal staining in any region in either eye as observed by slit-lamp at Visit 1 of each study period * Sum of the type of corneal staining greater than or equal to 4 across entire cornea in either eye as observed by slit-lamp at Visit 1 of each study period * Conjunctival staining covering greater than or equal to 20% in 2 or more corneal regions in either eye as observed by slit-lamp at Visit 1 of each study period * Conjunctival injection greater than Grade 2 (moderate-diffuse redness) in either eye as observed by slit-lamp at Visit 1 of each study period * Abnormal lenticular opacity in the visual axis of the lens in either eye * Use of concomitant topical Rx or over-the-counter (OTC) ocular medications * History of seasonal allergies with significant ocular side effects which may have an adverse impact on contact lens wear * Pregnant or lactating females

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corneal Staining SeverityBaseline, 2 Hour Period, 4 Hour PeriodSeverity of staining was recorded for each region using a scale of 0-none to 4-patch \>/=1mm. Analysis of staining was performed by averaging the scores from the five regions for each eye, then identifying the subject's worse eye at each visit. Mean total severity was calcuated from all identified eyes for each visit.
Corneal Staining AreaBaseline, 2 Hour Period, 4 Hour PeriodAnalysis of staining area was performed by averaging the values from the five regions for each eye and then identifying the subject's worse eye at each visit. Mean total area was calculated from all identified eyes for each visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective ComfortVisit 1: Baseline; Visit 2: 2 hours, Visit 3: 4 hoursSubjective comfort ratings 0-100 (0=causes pain, 100=excellent comfort)
Subjective DrynessVisit 1: Baseline; Visit 2: 2 hours, Visit 3: 4 hoursSubjective dryness ratings 0-100 (0=extremely dry, 100=extremely moist)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Multipurpose Solution
To obtain results of a clinical comparison of several multipurpose contact lens solutions among adapted hydrogel lens users wearing Avaira contact lenses
32
Total32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMultipurpose Solution
Age, Continuous32 Years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Corneal Staining Area

Analysis of staining area was performed by averaging the values from the five regions for each eye and then identifying the subject's worse eye at each visit. Mean total area was calculated from all identified eyes for each visit.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 Hour Period, 4 Hour Period

Population: Analysis of staining area was performed by averaging the values from the five regions for each eye and then identifying the subject's worse eye at each visit. Mean total area was calculated from all identified eyes for each visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Multipurpose Solution #1Corneal Staining Area2 Hour Period1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Multipurpose Solution #1Corneal Staining Area3 Hour Period0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Multipurpose Solution #1Corneal Staining AreaBaseline0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Multipurpose Solution #2Corneal Staining AreaBaseline0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Multipurpose Solution #2Corneal Staining Area3 Hour Period10.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.4
Multipurpose Solution #2Corneal Staining Area2 Hour Period17.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
Multipurpose Solution #3Corneal Staining Area2 Hour Period0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Multipurpose Solution #3Corneal Staining AreaBaseline0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Multipurpose Solution #3Corneal Staining Area3 Hour Period0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Multipurpose Solution #4Corneal Staining AreaBaseline0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Multipurpose Solution #4Corneal Staining Area3 Hour Period0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Multipurpose Solution #4Corneal Staining Area2 Hour Period0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Primary

Corneal Staining Severity

Severity of staining was recorded for each region using a scale of 0-none to 4-patch \>/=1mm. Analysis of staining was performed by averaging the scores from the five regions for each eye, then identifying the subject's worse eye at each visit. Mean total severity was calcuated from all identified eyes for each visit.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 Hour Period, 4 Hour Period

Population: Severity of staining was recorded for each region using a scale of 0-none to 4-patch \>/=1mm. Analysis of staining was performed by averaging the scores from the five regions for each eye, then identifying the subject's worse eye at each visit. Mean total severity was calcuated from all identified eyes for each visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Multipurpose Solution #1Corneal Staining SeverityBaseline0.01 units on a scale
Multipurpose Solution #1Corneal Staining Severity3 Hour Period0.06 units on a scale
Multipurpose Solution #1Corneal Staining Severity2 Hour Period0.10 units on a scale
Multipurpose Solution #2Corneal Staining SeverityBaseline0.01 units on a scale
Multipurpose Solution #2Corneal Staining Severity3 Hour Period0.59 units on a scale
Multipurpose Solution #2Corneal Staining Severity2 Hour Period0.76 units on a scale
Multipurpose Solution #3Corneal Staining Severity2 Hour Period0.05 units on a scale
Multipurpose Solution #3Corneal Staining SeverityBaseline0.02 units on a scale
Multipurpose Solution #3Corneal Staining Severity3 Hour Period0.06 units on a scale
Multipurpose Solution #4Corneal Staining SeverityBaseline0.01 units on a scale
Multipurpose Solution #4Corneal Staining Severity3 Hour Period0.06 units on a scale
Multipurpose Solution #4Corneal Staining Severity2 Hour Period0.06 units on a scale
Secondary

Subjective Comfort

Subjective comfort ratings 0-100 (0=causes pain, 100=excellent comfort)

Time frame: Visit 1: Baseline; Visit 2: 2 hours, Visit 3: 4 hours

Population: Subjective comfort ratings 0-100 (0=causes pain, 100=excellent comfort)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Multipurpose Solution #1Subjective ComfortBaseline82.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Multipurpose Solution #1Subjective Comfort4 Hour Period80.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
Multipurpose Solution #1Subjective Comfort2 Hour Period83.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Multipurpose Solution #2Subjective ComfortBaseline80.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Multipurpose Solution #2Subjective Comfort4 Hour Period78.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.7
Multipurpose Solution #2Subjective Comfort2 Hour Period81.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Multipurpose Solution #3Subjective Comfort2 Hour Period85.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Multipurpose Solution #3Subjective ComfortBaseline84.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Multipurpose Solution #3Subjective Comfort4 Hour Period83.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
Multipurpose Solution #4Subjective ComfortBaseline84.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Multipurpose Solution #4Subjective Comfort4 Hour Period85.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Multipurpose Solution #4Subjective Comfort2 Hour Period83.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Secondary

Subjective Dryness

Subjective dryness ratings 0-100 (0=extremely dry, 100=extremely moist)

Time frame: Visit 1: Baseline; Visit 2: 2 hours, Visit 3: 4 hours

Population: Subjective dryness ratings 0-100 (0=extremely dry, 100=extremely moist)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Multipurpose Solution #1Subjective Dryness4 Hour Period81.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Multipurpose Solution #1Subjective DrynessBaseline84.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Multipurpose Solution #1Subjective Dryness2 Hour Period82.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
Multipurpose Solution #2Subjective Dryness2 Hour Period76.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Multipurpose Solution #2Subjective DrynessBaseline81.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Multipurpose Solution #2Subjective Dryness4 Hour Period76.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
Multipurpose Solution #3Subjective Dryness4 Hour Period81.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Multipurpose Solution #3Subjective DrynessBaseline85.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
Multipurpose Solution #3Subjective Dryness2 Hour Period83.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Multipurpose Solution #4Subjective Dryness2 Hour Period81.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Multipurpose Solution #4Subjective DrynessBaseline85.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Multipurpose Solution #4Subjective Dryness4 Hour Period83.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026