Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of Lumbar Interbody Fusion With MatriTMBONE Associated With Autologous Bone Marrow

Multicentric, Prospective Study of Efficacy and Safety of Lumbar Interbody Fusion With MatriTMBONE Associated With Autologous Marrow

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01335243
Acronym
MatriBone
Enrollment
32
Registered
2011-04-14
Start date
2011-05-01
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2026-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Lumbar Vertebra, Degenerative Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Orthopedic Procedures, Spine, Interbody fusion, Arthrodesis, Lumbar Vertebrae, CT Scan, Spine balance, Instrumented fusion, Posterior fusion, Degenerative spine, painful

Brief summary

The main objective of this clinical study is the estimation of the rate of intersomatic fusion observed 12 months after lumbar interbody fusion by posterior approach with PEEK interbody cage of fusion in PEEK performed with autologous bone of decortication and osseous substitute with a biomaterial (MatriBONE associated with the autologous bone marrow), associated with a posterolateral bone graft performed with MatriBone waxed with bone marrow. Indication is dedicated for patients by painful degenerative osteoarthritis, by narrow lumbar canal and\\or spondylolisthesis.

Detailed description

This clinical study corresponds to a TLIF surgery using a per-operating artificial substitute specific biomaterial: autologous osteoblasts punctured on iliac crest and put on a collagen support waxed with tri-calcium phosphate (which is osteoconductive) to perform a intervertebral body fusion. Biomaterial MATRITM BONE: Device of class III, with marking IT in the indication of arthrodesis. It will be administered during the lumbar interbody fusion's procedure. The material is a matrix of collagen mineralized containing a homogeneous mixture of collagen cleansed of type I+III and an osseous biphasic substitute HA / TCP. The proportion of both constituents is 90 % of osseous substitute for 10 % of collagen en masse. The collagen is reduced in approximately 1 month and the osseous substitute leads to an osseous reshaping in 6 - 9 months approximately. The follow up will last 12 months with 2 visits (6 and 12 months after surgery), 2 CT scan slides before inclusion and at 12 months, classical X-rays before inclusion and at 6 and 12 months, questionnaires (visual analogic scale for pain, and quality of life with OSWESTRY and SF36 scales) before inclusion and at 6 and 12 months, and biological exams (CRP/VS, for inflammation) at each visit.

Interventions

PROCEDUREThe Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) surgery

The TLIF surgery use a per-operating artificial substitute specific biomaterial: autologous osteoblasts punctured on iliac crest and put on a collagen support waxed with tri-calcium phosphate (which is osteoconductive) to perform a intervertebral body fusion.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER
Biom'Up France SAS
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged between 18 and 65 years old. * Body mass index lower than 35 * Degenerative osteoarthritis painful and invalidating degenerative lumbar vertebra for at least 6 months and resistance fighter in the conservative treatment * Narrow lumbar canal and\\or spondylolisthesis with neurological disorder associated with signs of primary instability or induced to neurological liberation * Patient requiring a surgery on a single interbody level. * Given informed consent * Patient with French health system

Exclusion criteria

* For women: no efficient contraception (intra uterine device, or contraceptive pill) * Pregnant or feeding women * Surgery zone local infection local * Lumbar interbody fusion of more than two levels * Spondylolisthesis of high rank (stage 3 or 4 of the classification of Meyerding) * Scoliosis lumbar vertebra gives a complex to (Cobb angle\> 40°) * All surgical contraindications * Severe hyperparathyroidism: calcium \> 2,45 mmol/l and \[PTH\] ≥ 50pg / ml * Uncontrolled diabetes (untreated or non stabilized by treatment) * Long corticoid treatment (more than 6 months and stopped since less than 3 months) * Current Chemotherapy or during the last three months * Antecedent of regional radiotherapy * All contraindication to MatriTM BONE: osteomyelitis, bone degenerative disease or necrosis of surgery site. * Known turned out Osteoporosis untreated (dexa: \> 2 DS) * Subject participating in another research including a period of always current exclusion in the pre-inclusion * Person placed under protection of justice * Severely altered physical and\\or psychological Health, which according to, the investigator, can affect to participant's compliance to the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
patients' proportion which an intervertebral fusion12 monthsThe main assessment criteria of this study are patients' proportion which an intervertebral fusion is documented to CT scanners The intervertebral fusion is documented by the revealing of at least an osseous continuous span of a vertebral level in the other one on one of three CT scan slides centred on the cage.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NOTION OF TOLERANCE: Frequency and gravity of unwanted Adverse Events linked to the procedure and\or the use of the biomaterial12 monthsFrequency and gravity of unwanted Adverse Events linked to the procedure and\\or the use of the biomaterial: O Inflammatory or allergic reaction to the tested product (VS and CRP before inclusion). * Non-union turned out and painful * Invalidating lumbar pain * Infection on the operated site
Evaluation of the pain12 monthsEvaluation of the pain with an analogical visual scale (EVA)
Quality of life evaluation12 yearsQuality of life evaluation by means of OSWESTRY and SF-36 scales

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJean-Charles LE HUEC, PUPH

University Hospital, Bordeaux

STUDY_CHAIRAntoine BENARD, MD

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 19, 2026