Skip to content

Graft Patency Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Via Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery

Graft Patency Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Via Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01334866
Acronym
MICS
Enrollment
91
Registered
2011-04-13
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2013-04-30
Last updated
2013-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arteriosclerosis of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Keywords

Minimally invasive coronary surgery, Coronary artery bypass grafting, MICS CABG

Brief summary

This clinical study has been developed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting via Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery (MICS); a minimally invasive coronary bypass procedure that is done on a beating heart via a smaller chest incision, thus avoiding the invasiveness of the standard procedure.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMinimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgery

The MICS CABG procedure can bridge the gap between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and standard sternotomy. The key components are direct vision, creating anastomoses with traditional instruments and proximal aortic location.

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiovascular
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \> or equal to 18 and \< or equal to 80 years of age * Suitable minimally invasive coronary surgery (MICS) candidate for non-emergent first time, single or multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (on pump or off pump) * Left ventricle ejection fraction \>30% * Willing and able to provide written informed consent and comply with study requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Severe cerebrovascular disease within 90 days of surgery including history of prior stroke. * Previous cardiac surgery procedures such as CABG revisions, surgical ablations or valve replacements * Congestive heart failure with a New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV * History of renal insufficiency (i.e. prior serum creatinine of \>2mg/dl) and/or requiring dialysis * Uncontrolled diabetes (i.e. \>2 serum glucose concentrations of \>350 mg/dl) * Severe uncontrolled systemic hypertension (i.e. systolic pressure \>160 mmHg) * Peripheral/systemic active infection excluding the patient from cardiac surgery * Life expectancy of less than 1 year due to other illness such as cancer or pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease * Participation in another investigational protocol that may confound the results of this study * Female of child bearing potential and lactating or intends to become pregnant during the study * Severe distal disease and small posterior lateral targets

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical Success (Graft Patency) in a MICS ApproachAt time of procedure (day 1)For each subject, the endpoint for technical success (graft patency) in a MICS approach is defined as acceptable flow for graft size for an anastamosis. This will be characterized by the surgeon's assessment/angiography after the graft is complete.
Procedural Success in a MICS ApproachAt time of procedure (day 1)A successful procedure can be defined as a procedures not requiring conversion (sternotomy). This will be characterized by whether the graft procedure can be completed through the minimally invasive thoracotomy without having to convert to a sternotomy in order to complete the grafting.
Patency of the Index Graft at 6 Months6 months post-procedureFor each subject, the endpoint is the percent of stenosis collected on the subject's 6 month angiography form. This will be characterized for each graft using the FitzGibbon scoring system based on the 64-Slice CT Angiography results. The FitzGibbon Scoring system is as follows: A:Excellent graft with unimpaired runoff (\< 50% stenosis) B:Stenosis reducing caliber of proximal or distal anastomoses or trunk to \<50% of the grafted coronary artery. O:Occluded (100% stenosed)
Composite Major Adverse Event Rate (Early)During procedure (day 1) and within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer (throughout 6 month evaluation)During procedure and within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer. The adverse events will include: * Major hemorrhage/bleeding requiring surgical intervention * Aortic complications * Graft vessel revision (GVR) * Transient ischemic attacks (TIA) * Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA)/stroke * Myocardial infarction (MI) * Death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite Major Adverse Event Rate (Late)After 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer through the 6-Month evaluationCharacterize the composite major adverse event rate after 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer through the 6-Month evaluation. The major adverse events will include: * Major hemorrhage/bleeding requiring surgical intervention * Aortic complications * Graft vessel revision (GVR) * Transient ischemic attacks (TIA) * Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA)/stroke * Myocardial infarction (MI) * Death

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 91 subjects were enrolled, with 89 subjects receiving the study treatment. The first subject was enrolled on December 30, 2009 and the last subject was enrolled on October 4, 2012. Of the 89 subjects treated with the study procedure, 72 subjects completed the 6 month follow-up primary endpoint visit.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Study Completion Cohort
91 subjects were enrolled, with 89 subjects receving the study treatment. Of the 89 subjects treated with the study procedure, 72 subjects completed the 6 month follow-up primary endpoint visit.
91
Total91

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3
Overall Studymedically necessary post-procedure1
Overall Studymedically necessary prior to procedure2
Overall StudyPhysician Decision3
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStudy Completion Cohort
Age Continuous64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Region of Enrollment
Canada
46 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
81 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
46 / 89
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 89

Outcome results

Primary

Composite Major Adverse Event Rate (Early)

During procedure and within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer. The adverse events will include: * Major hemorrhage/bleeding requiring surgical intervention * Aortic complications * Graft vessel revision (GVR) * Transient ischemic attacks (TIA) * Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA)/stroke * Myocardial infarction (MI) * Death

Time frame: During procedure (day 1) and within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer (throughout 6 month evaluation)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingComposite Major Adverse Event Rate (Early)2.2 percentage of subjects
Primary

Patency of the Index Graft at 6 Months

For each subject, the endpoint is the percent of stenosis collected on the subject's 6 month angiography form. This will be characterized for each graft using the FitzGibbon scoring system based on the 64-Slice CT Angiography results. The FitzGibbon Scoring system is as follows: A:Excellent graft with unimpaired runoff (\< 50% stenosis) B:Stenosis reducing caliber of proximal or distal anastomoses or trunk to \<50% of the grafted coronary artery. O:Occluded (100% stenosed)

Time frame: 6 months post-procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingPatency of the Index Graft at 6 MonthsGrade A90.9 percentage of grafts
Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingPatency of the Index Graft at 6 MonthsGrade B0.6 percentage of grafts
Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingPatency of the Index Graft at 6 MonthsGrade O8.5 percentage of grafts
Primary

Procedural Success in a MICS Approach

A successful procedure can be defined as a procedures not requiring conversion (sternotomy). This will be characterized by whether the graft procedure can be completed through the minimally invasive thoracotomy without having to convert to a sternotomy in order to complete the grafting.

Time frame: At time of procedure (day 1)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingProcedural Success in a MICS Approach100 percentage of subjects
Primary

Technical Success (Graft Patency) in a MICS Approach

For each subject, the endpoint for technical success (graft patency) in a MICS approach is defined as acceptable flow for graft size for an anastamosis. This will be characterized by the surgeon's assessment/angiography after the graft is complete.

Time frame: At time of procedure (day 1)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingTechnical Success (Graft Patency) in a MICS Approach100 percentage of grafts
Secondary

Composite Major Adverse Event Rate (Late)

Characterize the composite major adverse event rate after 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer through the 6-Month evaluation. The major adverse events will include: * Major hemorrhage/bleeding requiring surgical intervention * Aortic complications * Graft vessel revision (GVR) * Transient ischemic attacks (TIA) * Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA)/stroke * Myocardial infarction (MI) * Death

Time frame: After 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer through the 6-Month evaluation

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingComposite Major Adverse Event Rate (Late)0 percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026