Skip to content

An Observational Follow-up Study of 1st-Line Treatment With Herceptin (Trastuzumab) in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer (Post-HERMINE)

Overall Survival Estimation After a 7 Year Follow-up in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated by Herceptin® as 1st Line Therapy (Post-HERMINE Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01332981
Enrollment
220
Registered
2011-04-11
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2016-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This is an observational follow-up study on the efficacy of 1st-line treatment with Herceptin (trastuzumab) in patients with metastatic breast cancer 7 years after initiation of treatment.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patient, \>/= 18 years of age * Metastatic breast cancer * 1st-line treatment with Herceptin initiated in 2002 * Included in pharmaco-epidemiologic HERMINE study

Exclusion criteria

* Patient died before scheduled follow-up visit (March 2005)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Overall SurvivalUp to 7 yearsThe time between the first infusion of trastuzumab and the date of death from any cause. Participants who were still alive at the end of the post-HERMINE study or lost to follow-up were censored at the last date they were known to be alive.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Time to Progression-Free SurvivalUp to 7 yearsThe Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the treatment start date (date of the first trastuzumab infusion) and the date of the first disease progression or disease-related death. Participants who had not progressed at the end of the post-HERMINE study were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Progression-Free Survival was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier method.
Median Time to ProgressionUp to 7 yearsThe Time to Progression (TTP) was defined as the time between the treatment start date (date of the first trastuzumab infusion) and the date of the first disease progression or disease-related death. Participants who had not progressed at the end of the post-HERMINE study were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. If the cause of death was unknown, the death was considered for this analysis as due to the disease. All participants who did not progress, the death was considered to be due to the disease.
Median Treatment Duration and the Duration of Exposure to TrastuzumabUp to 7 yearsTreatment duration was defined as the time between the first and the last infusion of trastuzumab. Exposure duration was defined only for the participants who continued trastuzumab after HERMINE study, as the sum of treatment duration as part of HERMINE study and of the treatment durations as part of post-HERMINE study taking into account temporary treatment discontinuations. For analyses of treatment and exposure duration , dates of infusion of trastuzumab were missing for 18 participants, so treatment and exposure durations were calculated for only 202 participants.
Prognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalUp to 7 yearsSearch for prognostic factors for OS was performed using Cox regression model. First, all parameters were analyzed in univariate models, and the hypothesis of proportional risks was tested. Significant parameters at 15%-level were retained for the multivariate model. For the multivariate analysis, two models were built for prognostic factors for OS. In the first one (Model 1), a stepwise selection method was used on all parameters that were significant in the univariate analyses, whatever the significance level of the associations between parameters. In the second one (Model 2), a stepwise selection was used on the significant parameters that were not correlated. The significance level for entry was 10% and the significance level for removal was 5%. The variables n°5 and n°6 were found to be significantly associated, thus only the variable n°6 was tested in the Model 2. This variable was not retained by the stepwise selection in the Model 1, contrary to the variable n°5.
Prognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionUp to 7 yearsPrognostic factors for TTP were searched by using Cox regression model. First, all parameters were analysed in univariate models, and the hypothesis of proportional risks was tested. Significant parameters at 15% level were retained for multivariate model. For multivariate analyses, 2 models were built for prognostic factor of TTP. In Model 1, stepwise selection method was used on all parameters that were significant in the univariate analyses, whatever the significance level of the associations between parameters. In Model 2, stepwise selection was used on the significant parameters that were not correlated. The significance level for entry was 10% and the significance level for exit was 5%. Six parameters remained in the Model 1 to search for prognostic factors of TTP. Once the correlated variables were removed, there were only 3 variables left in Model 2: the age was not kept by the stepwise selection. Results below are for Model 1 and similar results were obtained for Model 2

Countries

France

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This post-HERMINE study was an observational, pharmaco-epidemiological, and retrospective study. Among the 102 participants who were alive at the end of the observation period in the HERMINE study, 69 were included in the post-HERMINE study from 31 centers in France. The study was conducted between 23 February 2010 to 15 October 2010.

Pre-assignment details

Overall analysis population was 220. During data check for the participants alive at the end of HERMINE study, it appeared that 1 participant was included twice. Thus, the real no. that started treatment with 1st-line trastuzumab therapy was 220 and not 221. Thus, the no. of participants still alive at the end of HERMINE study was 102 and not 103.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Transtuzumab
Female participants with overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab as first-line treatment since 2002, included in the pharmaco-epidemiological HERMINE study and were still alive at the end of the observation period in March 2005.
220
Total220

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTranstuzumab
Age, Continuous55.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
220 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Median Overall Survival

The time between the first infusion of trastuzumab and the date of death from any cause. Participants who were still alive at the end of the post-HERMINE study or lost to follow-up were censored at the last date they were known to be alive.

Time frame: Up to 7 years

Population: Participants with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer included in HERMINE study and treated with trastuzumab as first line therapy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TranstuzumabMedian Overall Survival2.51 Years
Secondary

Median Time to Progression

The Time to Progression (TTP) was defined as the time between the treatment start date (date of the first trastuzumab infusion) and the date of the first disease progression or disease-related death. Participants who had not progressed at the end of the post-HERMINE study were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. If the cause of death was unknown, the death was considered for this analysis as due to the disease. All participants who did not progress, the death was considered to be due to the disease.

Time frame: Up to 7 years

Population: Participants with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer included in HERMINE study and treated with trastuzumab as first line therapy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TranstuzumabMedian Time to Progression0.85 Years
Secondary

Median Time to Progression-Free Survival

The Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the treatment start date (date of the first trastuzumab infusion) and the date of the first disease progression or disease-related death. Participants who had not progressed at the end of the post-HERMINE study were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Progression-Free Survival was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Up to 7 years

Population: Participants with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer included in HERMINE study and treated with trastuzumab as first line therapy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TranstuzumabMedian Time to Progression-Free Survival0.85 Years
Secondary

Median Treatment Duration and the Duration of Exposure to Trastuzumab

Treatment duration was defined as the time between the first and the last infusion of trastuzumab. Exposure duration was defined only for the participants who continued trastuzumab after HERMINE study, as the sum of treatment duration as part of HERMINE study and of the treatment durations as part of post-HERMINE study taking into account temporary treatment discontinuations. For analyses of treatment and exposure duration , dates of infusion of trastuzumab were missing for 18 participants, so treatment and exposure durations were calculated for only 202 participants.

Time frame: Up to 7 years

Population: Participants with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer included in HERMINE study and treated with trastuzumab as first line therapy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
TranstuzumabMedian Treatment Duration and the Duration of Exposure to TrastuzumabTotal treatment duration, n=2021.19 Years
TranstuzumabMedian Treatment Duration and the Duration of Exposure to TrastuzumabExposure duration, n=2023.98 Years
Secondary

Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival

Search for prognostic factors for OS was performed using Cox regression model. First, all parameters were analyzed in univariate models, and the hypothesis of proportional risks was tested. Significant parameters at 15%-level were retained for the multivariate model. For the multivariate analysis, two models were built for prognostic factors for OS. In the first one (Model 1), a stepwise selection method was used on all parameters that were significant in the univariate analyses, whatever the significance level of the associations between parameters. In the second one (Model 2), a stepwise selection was used on the significant parameters that were not correlated. The significance level for entry was 10% and the significance level for removal was 5%. The variables n°5 and n°6 were found to be significantly associated, thus only the variable n°6 was tested in the Model 2. This variable was not retained by the stepwise selection in the Model 1, contrary to the variable n°5.

Time frame: Up to 7 years

Population: Participants with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer included in HERMINE study and treated with trastuzumab as first line therapy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalScarff-Bloom-Richardson grade, increase >11.55 Hazard Ratio
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalCNS metastases at begining of treatment, Yes/No4.63 Hazard Ratio
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalTime of first metastases and dose (mnths), >1 mnth1.04 Hazard Ratio
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalTime:Diagnosis and 1st metastic relapse <=/>=2 Yrs0.52 Hazard Ratio
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalTime:Diagnosis and 1st metastic relapse <=/>=24 mNA Hazard Ratio
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalLiver metastases at beginning of treatment, Yes/No1.60 Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalTime:Diagnosis and 1st metastic relapse <=/>=24 m0.54 Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalScarff-Bloom-Richardson grade, increase >11.49 Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalTime:Diagnosis and 1st metastic relapse <=/>=2 YrsNA Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalCNS metastases at begining of treatment, Yes/No4.70 Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalLiver metastases at beginning of treatment, Yes/No1.55 Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors for Overall SurvivalTime of first metastases and dose (mnths), >1 mnth1.04 Hazard Ratio
Secondary

Prognostic Factors For Time to Progression

Prognostic factors for TTP were searched by using Cox regression model. First, all parameters were analysed in univariate models, and the hypothesis of proportional risks was tested. Significant parameters at 15% level were retained for multivariate model. For multivariate analyses, 2 models were built for prognostic factor of TTP. In Model 1, stepwise selection method was used on all parameters that were significant in the univariate analyses, whatever the significance level of the associations between parameters. In Model 2, stepwise selection was used on the significant parameters that were not correlated. The significance level for entry was 10% and the significance level for exit was 5%. Six parameters remained in the Model 1 to search for prognostic factors of TTP. Once the correlated variables were removed, there were only 3 variables left in Model 2: the age was not kept by the stepwise selection. Results below are for Model 1 and similar results were obtained for Model 2

Time frame: Up to 7 years

Population: Participants with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer included in HERMINE study and treated with trastuzumab as first line therapy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionNo.of metastatic sites at trtmnt start,1/2/>2, >11.34 Hazard Ratio
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionCNS metastases at start of the treatment Yes/No2.81 Hazard Ratio
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionTime of first metastases and dose (mnths), >1 mnth1.03 Hazard Ratio
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionAge in class ≥50 years old / <50 years old0.69 Hazard Ratio
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionLiver metastases at start of the treatment Yes/No1.44 Hazard Ratio
TranstuzumabPrognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionTime:Diagnosis and 1st metastic relapse <=/>=2 Yrs0.64 Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionNo.of metastatic sites at trtmnt start,1/2/>2, >1NA Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionTime:Diagnosis and 1st metastic relapse <=/>=2 Yrs0.68 Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionCNS metastases at start of the treatment Yes/No3.94 Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionTime of first metastases and dose (mnths), >1 mnthNA Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionLiver metastases at start of the treatment Yes/No1.48 Hazard Ratio
Model 2Prognostic Factors For Time to ProgressionAge in class ≥50 years old / <50 years oldNA Hazard Ratio

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026