Skip to content

Atazanavir/Ritonavir, Once Daily + Raltegravir, Twice Daily, Switch Study in HIV-1-Infected Patients

An Open-Label, Randomized Study Evaluating a Switch From a Regimen of Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Regimen Plus Any Third Agent to Either a Regimen of Atazanavir/Ritonavir Once Daily and Raltegravir Twice Daily or to a Regimen of Atazanavir/Ritonavir Once Daily and Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Once Daily in Virologically Suppressed HIV-1 Infected Subjects With Safety and/or Tolerability Issues on Their Present Treatment Regimen.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01332227
Acronym
SPARTAN
Enrollment
132
Registered
2011-04-11
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2015-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV, Combination Therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether HIV-1-infected patients, who are virologically suppressed on a regimen of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus any third agent but are experiencing safety and/or tolerability issues, will maintain virologic suppression after switching to a regimen of heat-stable ritonavir boosted atazanavir, 300/100 mg, once daily plus raltegravir, 400 mg, twice daily.

Detailed description

Allocation: Randomized nonstratified Intervention model: Parallel versus comparator

Interventions

DRUGAtazanavir

Capsules, Oral, 300mg, Once daily, 48 weeks

DRUGRitonavir (heat-stable)

Tablets, Oral, 100 mg, Once daily, 48 weeks

DRUGRaltegravir

Tablets, Oral, 400 mg, Twice daily, 48 weeks

Tablets, Oral, 300/200 mg, Once daily, 48 weeks

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria * Current treatment regimen of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus any third agent for at least 3 months immediately prior to screening * Virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL) for at least 3 months immediately prior to screening * Virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA \<40 c/mL) using the Abbott m2000rt® polymerase chain reaction assay during screening period * Treatment-related safety and/or tolerability issues to a regimen consisting of 2 NRTIs plus any third agent Key

Exclusion criteria

* History of switch in highly active antiretroviral therapy due to virologic failure * History of genotypic resistance to any component of the study regimen (atazanavir, raltegravir, tenofovir/emtricitabine) * History of exposure to atazanavir/ritonavir or raltegravir prior to entering the study * Experiencing safety and/or tolerability issues to tenofovir/emtricitabine or raltegravir * Switch of any component of HIV antiretroviral medication regimen in the last 3 months immediately prior to or during the screening period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <40 c/mL at Week 24From Day 1 to Week 24HIV-1 RNA level was measured with the Abbott m2000rt® polymerase chain reaction assay. Response rates were assessed using an intent-to-treat algorithm, with numerator representing patients meeting the response criteria, and denominator representing all randomized patients. Randomized patients not meeting the criteria for treatment failure (eg, discontinuation of study therapy or virologic rebound at or before Week 24) were considered responders. Virologic rebound was defined as 2 consecutive on-treatment HIV-1 RNA levels ≥40 c/mL or the last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL followed by discontinuation. Patients who experienced treatment failure or had missing Week 24 HIV-1 RNA levels were considered failures. RNA=ribonucleic acid; HIV=human immunodeficiency virus.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Virologic Rebound at Weeks 24 and 48Day 1 to Weeks 28 and 48Viral genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles were assessed for virologic rebound (HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL). Only patients with HIV-1 RNA levels ≥500 c/mL met the criteria for resistance testing. Genotypic substitutions at baseline were summarized for virologic rebound. The genotypic resistance profile presented patients with genotypable isolates, those with protease inhibitor substitutions from genotypable isolates, those with integrase substitutions from genotypable isolates, and those with selected reverse transcriptase substitutions from genotypable isolates using the most current version of the International AIDS Society-USA list and Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. Newly emergent genotypic substitutions were summarized analogously for virologic rebound without baseline phenotypic resistance to atazanavir, ritonavir, or raltegravir, using all on-treatment isolates.
Number of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 24Day 1 to Week 24Viral genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles were assessed for virologic rebound (HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL). Only patients with HIV-1 RNA levels ≥500 c/mL met the criteria for resistance testing. Genotypic substitutions at baseline were summarized for virologic rebound. The genotypic resistance profile presented patients with genotypable isolates, those with protease inhibitor substitutions from genotypable isolates, those with integrase substitutions from genotypable isolates, and those with selected reverse transcriptase substitutions from genotypable isolates using the most current version of the International AIDS Society-USA list and Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. Newly emergent genotypic substitutions were summarized analogously for virologic rebound without baseline phenotypic resistance to atazanavir, ritonavir, or raltegravir, using all on-treatment isolates. pts=patients
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <40 c/mL at Week 48From Day 1 to Week 48Percentages of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels \<40 c/mL were summarized at each scheduled visit. Longitudinal plots were created to display proportion versus visit week through Weeks 24 and 48 with error bars representing 95% confidence intervals.
Number of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEsDay 1 to Week 48AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Related=having certain, probable, possible, or unknown relationship to study drug.
Mean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48From Baseline to Week 48LD=low-density lipoprotein; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.
Number of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 48Day 1 to Week 48Viral genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles were assessed for virologic rebound (HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL). Only patients with HIV-1 RNA levels ≥500 c/mL met the criteria for resistance testing. Genotypic substitutions at baseline were summarized for virologic rebound. The genotypic resistance profile presented patients with genotypable isolates, those with protease inhibitor substitutions from genotypable isolates, those with integrase substitutions from genotypable isolates, and those with selected reverse transcriptase substitutions from genotypable isolates using the most current version of the International AIDS Society-USA list and Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. Newly emergent genotypic substitutions were summarized analogously for virologic rebound without baseline phenotypic resistance to atazanavir, ritonavir, or raltegravir, using all on-treatment isolates. pts=patients

Countries

France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of 132 patients enrolled, 109 were randomized to receive treatment, and 23 patients were not randomized for the following reasons: 10 did not meet study criteria; 5 withdrew consent; 3 were lost to follow-up, and 5 withdrew for other reasons.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Raltegravir
Patients received atazanavir, 300-mg capsules, and ritonavir, 100-mg tablets, orally once daily and raltegravir, 400-mg tablets, twice daily for 48 weeks.
72
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/Emtricitabine
Patients received atazanavir, 300-mg capsules, plus ritonavir, 100-mg tablets, and tenofovir/emtricitabine, 300/200-mg tablets, orally once daily for 48 weeks.
37
Total109

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event41
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy31
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyPatient began prohibited medication01
Overall StudyPatient moved from area10
Overall StudyPoor compliance/noncompliance11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject51

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirAtazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineTotal
Age, Continuous44.0 Years44.0 Years44.0 Years
Age, Customized
65-85 years
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Age, Customized
< 65 years
69 Participants36 Participants105 Participants
Cardiovascular disease risk factors
Current smoker
27 Participants11 Participants38 Participants
Cardiovascular disease risk factors
Diabetes mellitus
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Cardiovascular disease risk factors
Family history of premature coronary heart disease
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Cardiovascular disease risk factors
Hypertension
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Cardiovascular disease risk factors
Previous smoker
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants13 Participants42 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
38 Participants23 Participants61 Participants
Mean CD4 count587.7 Cells/mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 252.09
630.9 Cells/mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 270.02
601.5 Cells/mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 257.48
Median CD4 count588.5 Cells/mm^3639.5 Cells/mm^3593.0 Cells/mm^3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
54 Participants24 Participants78 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants6 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants31 Participants89 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 7223 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 721 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <40 c/mL at Week 24

HIV-1 RNA level was measured with the Abbott m2000rt® polymerase chain reaction assay. Response rates were assessed using an intent-to-treat algorithm, with numerator representing patients meeting the response criteria, and denominator representing all randomized patients. Randomized patients not meeting the criteria for treatment failure (eg, discontinuation of study therapy or virologic rebound at or before Week 24) were considered responders. Virologic rebound was defined as 2 consecutive on-treatment HIV-1 RNA levels ≥40 c/mL or the last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL followed by discontinuation. Patients who experienced treatment failure or had missing Week 24 HIV-1 RNA levels were considered failures. RNA=ribonucleic acid; HIV=human immunodeficiency virus.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Week 24

Population: All patients who received study drug and who had an HIV-1 RNA measurement at the analysis week.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirPercentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <40 c/mL at Week 2480.6 Percentage of participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabinePercentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <40 c/mL at Week 2494.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48

LD=low-density lipoprotein; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 48

Population: All participants who received study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirMean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48Fasting total cholesterol11.7 mg/dLStandard Error 5.239
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirMean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48Fasting non-HDL cholesterol9.0 mg/dLStandard Error 4.983
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirMean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48Fasting HDL cholesterol2.7 mg/dLStandard Error 2.055
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirMean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48Fasting triglycerides14.7 mg/dLStandard Error 16.667
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirMean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48Fasting LDL cholesterol7.7 mg/dLStandard Error 3.986
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineMean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48Fasting triglycerides-17.6 mg/dLStandard Error 16.994
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineMean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48Fasting total cholesterol-10.2 mg/dLStandard Error 4.769
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineMean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48Fasting LDL cholesterol-5.4 mg/dLStandard Error 4.691
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineMean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48Fasting HDL cholesterol-0.3 mg/dLStandard Error 1.915
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineMean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48Fasting non-HDL cholesterol-9.8 mg/dLStandard Error 4.43
Secondary

Number of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 24

Viral genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles were assessed for virologic rebound (HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL). Only patients with HIV-1 RNA levels ≥500 c/mL met the criteria for resistance testing. Genotypic substitutions at baseline were summarized for virologic rebound. The genotypic resistance profile presented patients with genotypable isolates, those with protease inhibitor substitutions from genotypable isolates, those with integrase substitutions from genotypable isolates, and those with selected reverse transcriptase substitutions from genotypable isolates using the most current version of the International AIDS Society-USA list and Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. Newly emergent genotypic substitutions were summarized analogously for virologic rebound without baseline phenotypic resistance to atazanavir, ritonavir, or raltegravir, using all on-treatment isolates. pts=patients

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 24

Population: Patients who received study drug, who had an HIV-1 RNA measurement at the analysis week and who experienced virologic rebound.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 24Genotypable (GI)/phenotypable isolates (PI)4 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 24Emergent genotypic substitutions in GI pts (n=4,0)4 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 24Phenotypic resistance in PI pts (n=4,0)1 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 24Genotypable (GI)/phenotypable isolates (PI)0 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 24Emergent genotypic substitutions in GI pts (n=4,0)0 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 24Phenotypic resistance in PI pts (n=4,0)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 48

Viral genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles were assessed for virologic rebound (HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL). Only patients with HIV-1 RNA levels ≥500 c/mL met the criteria for resistance testing. Genotypic substitutions at baseline were summarized for virologic rebound. The genotypic resistance profile presented patients with genotypable isolates, those with protease inhibitor substitutions from genotypable isolates, those with integrase substitutions from genotypable isolates, and those with selected reverse transcriptase substitutions from genotypable isolates using the most current version of the International AIDS Society-USA list and Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. Newly emergent genotypic substitutions were summarized analogously for virologic rebound without baseline phenotypic resistance to atazanavir, ritonavir, or raltegravir, using all on-treatment isolates. pts=patients

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 48

Population: Participants with virologic rebound

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 48Genotypable (GI)/phenotypable isolates (PI)5 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 48Emergent genotypic substitutions in GI pts (n=5,0)5 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 48Phenotypic resistance in PI pts (n=5,0)1 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 48Genotypable (GI)/phenotypable isolates (PI)0 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 48Emergent genotypic substitutions in GI pts (n=5,0)0 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 48Phenotypic resistance in PI pts (n=5,0)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Virologic Rebound at Weeks 24 and 48

Viral genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles were assessed for virologic rebound (HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL). Only patients with HIV-1 RNA levels ≥500 c/mL met the criteria for resistance testing. Genotypic substitutions at baseline were summarized for virologic rebound. The genotypic resistance profile presented patients with genotypable isolates, those with protease inhibitor substitutions from genotypable isolates, those with integrase substitutions from genotypable isolates, and those with selected reverse transcriptase substitutions from genotypable isolates using the most current version of the International AIDS Society-USA list and Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. Newly emergent genotypic substitutions were summarized analogously for virologic rebound without baseline phenotypic resistance to atazanavir, ritonavir, or raltegravir, using all on-treatment isolates.

Time frame: Day 1 to Weeks 28 and 48

Population: All patients who received study drug and who had an HIV-1 RNA measurement at the analysis week.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Participants With Virologic Rebound at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24: Virologic rebound7 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Participants With Virologic Rebound at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48: Virologic rebound9 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Participants With Virologic Rebound at Weeks 24 and 48Week 24: Virologic rebound1 Participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Participants With Virologic Rebound at Weeks 24 and 48Week 48: Virologic rebound1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEs

AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Related=having certain, probable, possible, or unknown relationship to study drug.

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 48

Population: All participants who received study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEsSAEs4 Particpants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEsTreatment-emergent AEs leading to discontinuation3 Particpants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEsRelated SAEs1 Particpants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEsTreatment-emergent AEs51 Particpants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirNumber of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEsDeaths0 Particpants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEsTreatment-emergent AEs28 Particpants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEsDeaths0 Particpants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEsSAEs1 Particpants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEsRelated SAEs0 Particpants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabineNumber of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEsTreatment-emergent AEs leading to discontinuation1 Particpants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <40 c/mL at Week 48

Percentages of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels \<40 c/mL were summarized at each scheduled visit. Longitudinal plots were created to display proportion versus visit week through Weeks 24 and 48 with error bars representing 95% confidence intervals.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Week 48

Population: All patients who received study drug and who had an HIV-1 RNA measurement at the analysis week.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + RaltegravirPercentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <40 c/mL at Week 4869.4 Percentage of participants
Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/EmtricitabinePercentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <40 c/mL at Week 4886.5 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026