Skip to content

Continuous Saphenous Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Continuous Saphenous Nerve Block (Adductor Channel) and Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01332045
Enrollment
40
Registered
2011-04-08
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2012-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Brief summary

Our study will compare the use of continuous saphenous nerve block performed at the adductor canal in addition to Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) versus a Sham block in addition to LIA for total knee replacement. The investigators hypothesize that the saphenous nerve block performed at the level of the adductor canal in addition to LIA provides better pain relief than the LIA alone without significantly compromising muscle strength and physiotherapy, enabling patients to mobilize early with reduced opioid consumption and les side effects. The investigators will enroll a total of 40 patients (20 patients will receive continuous saphenous nerve block in addition to LIA and 20 will receive the sham block and LIA). Until discharge, the investigators will record patients' pain scores, opioid consumption, side effects and physical therapy progress. If our study proves that the continuous saphenous nerve block in addition to LIA can effectively reduce postoperative pain scores to an acceptable level with better physical therapy progress and less opioid consumption, it could be seen as a more attractive alternative to LIA alone or other traditionally used methods of postoperative pain control that compromises muscle strength and physiotherapy.

Interventions

Postoperative intermittent boluses of 15 Ml Ropivacaine 7,5 mg/Ml every 12 hours for three days

PROCEDURESaline boluses in nerve catheter

A nerve catheter will be placed in the adductor canal using saline instead of Ropivacaine for intermittent boluses.

Sponsors

Henning Lykke Andersen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA I-III * Age: 40-75 * Unilateral TKA * Use of Spinal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to any of the study medications * Intolerance to morphine * Contraindication to a spinal anesthetic * Intraoperative use of any volatile anesthetic * Chronic opioid use * ASA Class 4-5 * Rheumatoid arthritis or Diabetes mellitus with neuropathy * Liver or kidney failure * BMI above 40 * Severe COPD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain scores3 days postoperativeVAS pain scores

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Opioid consumption3 days postoperative
physical therapy progress3 days postoperative

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026