Skip to content

A Study of Tocilizumab in Comparison to Etanercept in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors

A Clinical Outcomes Study to Evaluate the Effects of IL-6 Receptor Blockade With Tocilizumab (TCZ) in Comparison With Etanercept (ETA) on the Rate of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01331837
Enrollment
3080
Registered
2011-04-08
Start date
2011-08-02
Completion date
2016-03-25
Last updated
2017-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study will evaluate the rate of cardiovascular events with tocilizumab in comparison to etanercept in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Participants will be randomized to receive intravenous (IV) 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) tocilizumab every 4 weeks or subcutaneous 50 milligrams (mg) etanercept weekly, with or without non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD).

Interventions

DRUGEtanercept

Participants will receive 50 mg etanercept subcutaneously weekly until switch to another RA therapy or up to 4.9 years.

DRUGTocilizumab

Participants will receive 8 mg/kg tocilizumab IV every 4 weeks until switch to another RA therapy or up to 4.9 years.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with moderate to severe RA of greater than or equal to (\>=6) months duration * Inadequate response to at least one non-biologic DMARD * Positive for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) and/or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies at screening * Have C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than (\>) 0.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) at screening or at the baseline visit * Swollen joint count (SJC) \>=8 (66 joint count) and tender joint count (TJC) \>= 8 (68 joint count) during screening or at the baseline visit * History of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) or presence of one or more additional CHD risk factors, including current cigarette smoking, hypertension, low High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, family history of premature CHD, diabetes, presence of extra-articular disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis * At the time of randomization, will have discontinued infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, or certolizumab for \>= 4 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Major surgery (including joint surgery or coronary revascularization) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 1 year of study start * Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA * History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA * Current or recent (within past 3 months) evidence of serious uncontrolled concomitant cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease (myocardial infarction, revascularization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or acute coronary syndrome) * Current or previous (within the past 2 years) evidence of serious uncontrolled concomitant pulmonary (including obstructive pulmonary disease), renal, hepatic, endocrine (including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus) or gastrointestinal disease * Uncontrolled disease states, such as asthma or inflammatory bowel disease where flares are commonly treated with oral or parenteral corticosteroids * Pre-existing central nervous system demyelinating or seizure disorders * History of diverticulitis, diverticulosis requiring treatment or other lower gastrointestinal tract conditions that might predispose to perforations * Current liver disease as determined by the investigator; a history of asymptomatic elevations in liver function tests (LFTs) is not considered an exclusion * Active current infection or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial or other infections, including but not limited to tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial disease, hepatitis B and C, and herpes zoster, but excluding fungal infections of nail beds * Any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with IV antibiotics within four weeks of screening or oral antibiotics within two weeks prior to screening visit * Active tuberculosis (TB) requiring treatment within 3 years prior to baseline * Latent TB diagnosed during screening that has not been appropriately treated * Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of or currently active) * Moderate to severe heart failure * Evidence of active malignant disease, malignancies diagnosed within the previous 10 years (including hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been excised and cured), or breast cancer diagnosed within the previous 20 years * Breast feeding mothers * History of alcohol, drug or chemical abuse within the 6 months prior to screening * Participants with lack of peripheral venous access * Participants with a history of allergic reactions to latex * Previous treatment with non-tumor necrosis factor (non-TNF)-inhibitor biologic therapy * Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks of screening visit * Treatment with any cell depleting therapies within 1 year of baseline * Treatment with IV gamma globulin, plasmapheresis or Prosorba column within 6 months of baseline visit * Immunization with a live/attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to baseline visit * Any previous treatment with alkylating agents, such as cyclophosphamide or chlorambucil, or with total lymphoid irradiation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to First Cardiovascular (CV) Events Adjudication Committee (EAC) (CV-EAC) Adjudicated EventFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsProspective comparison of time to first occurrence of any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke.
Percentage of Patients Reporting a Cardiovascular (CV) Events Adjudication Committee (EAC) (CV-EAC) Adjudicated EventFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsPercentage of patients reporting any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke
Time to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event - Sensitivity AnalysisFrom Baseline up to 4.9 yearsProspective comparison of time to first occurrence of any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke - Sensitivity Analysis
Percentage of Patients With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event - Sensitivity AnalysisFrom Baseline up to 4.9 yearsPercentage of patients with any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke - Sensitivity Analysis
Time to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Excluding Undetermined Cause of Death - Sensitivity AnalysisFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsProspective comparison of time to first occurrence of any component of the composite of CV death (excluding events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke - Sensitivity Analyses
Percentage of Patients With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Excluding Undetermined Cause of Death - Sensitivity AnalysisFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsPercentage of patients with any component of the composite of CV death (excluding events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke - Sensitivity Analyses
Time to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Before Last Direct Contact DateFrom Baseline up to 4.9 yearsProspective comparison of time to first occurrence of any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke before last direct contact date (i.e., latest date of visit, IVRS call, or site call).
Percentage of Participants With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Before Last Direct Contact DateFrom Baseline up to 4.9 yearsPercentage of participants with any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke before last direct contact date (i.e., latest date of visit, IVRS call, or site call).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: All-cause MortalityFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsProspective comparison of time to first occurrence of Individual component of primary endpoint: All-cause mortality
Time to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Myocardial InfarctionFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsProspective comparison of time to first occurrence of Individual component of primary endpoint: non-fatal Myocardial Infarction
Percentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: All-cause MortalityFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsPercentage of patients reporting Individual component of primary endpoint: All-cause mortality
The Time to First Occurrence of an Expanded CV Composite EndpointFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsProspective comparison of the time to first ccurrence of the expanded composite endpoint. The expanded composite endpoint is defined as the CV composite of the primary endpoint with the addition of non-elective coronary revascularization procedures and hospitalization for unstable angina.
Percentages of Participants With an Expanded CV Composite EndpointFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsPercentages of participants with the expanded CV composite endpoint. The expanded composite endpoint is defined as the CV composite of the primary endpoint with the addition of non-elective coronary revascularization procedures and hospitalization for unstable angina.
Percentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Myocardial InfarctionFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsPercentage of patients reporting Individual component of primary endpoint: non-fatal Myocardial Infarction
Time to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Cardiovascular DeathFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsProspective comparison of time to first occurrence of Individual component of primary endpoint: cardiovascular death
Percentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Cardiovascular DeathFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsPercentage of patients reporting Individual component of primary endpoint: cardiovascular death
Time to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal StrokeFrom baseline up to 4.9 yearsProspective comparison of time to first occurrence of Individual component of primary endpoint: non-fatal stroke
Percentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal StrokeFrom baseline up to 4.9 years

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Czechia, Ecuador, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, South Africa, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 3080 patients were enrolled from 353 sites, across 31 countries

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tocilizumab
Participants received 8 mg/kg tocilizumab IV every 4 weeks until switch to another RA therapy or up to 4.9 years.
1,538
Etanercept
Participants received 50 mg etanercept subcutaneously weekly until switch to another RA therapy or up to 4.9 years.
1,542
Total3,080

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath3034
Overall StudyInfo not recorded1016
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up31
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1316

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTocilizumabEtanerceptTotal
Age, Continuous60.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
60.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
60.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1193 Participants1202 Participants2395 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
345 Participants340 Participants685 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
910 / 1,5421,090 / 1,538
serious
Total, serious adverse events
422 / 1,542479 / 1,538

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Before Last Direct Contact Date

Percentage of participants with any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke before last direct contact date (i.e., latest date of visit, IVRS call, or site call).

Time frame: From Baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Before Last Direct Contact Date3.2 Percentage of participants with event
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Before Last Direct Contact Date3.0 Percentage of participants with event
Primary

Percentage of Patients Reporting a Cardiovascular (CV) Events Adjudication Committee (EAC) (CV-EAC) Adjudicated Event

Percentage of patients reporting any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the Intention to treat (ITT) population, i.e. all patients randomized who have taken at least one dose of study medication

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Patients Reporting a Cardiovascular (CV) Events Adjudication Committee (EAC) (CV-EAC) Adjudicated Event5.4 Percentage of patients with event
EtanerceptPercentage of Patients Reporting a Cardiovascular (CV) Events Adjudication Committee (EAC) (CV-EAC) Adjudicated Event5.1 Percentage of patients with event
Primary

Percentage of Patients With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Excluding Undetermined Cause of Death - Sensitivity Analysis

Percentage of patients with any component of the composite of CV death (excluding events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke - Sensitivity Analyses

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Patients With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Excluding Undetermined Cause of Death - Sensitivity Analysis4.8 Percentage of patients with event
EtanerceptPercentage of Patients With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Excluding Undetermined Cause of Death - Sensitivity Analysis4.7 Percentage of patients with event
Primary

Percentage of Patients With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event - Sensitivity Analysis

Percentage of patients with any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke - Sensitivity Analysis

Time frame: From Baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analyses was conducted on the On-treatment (OT) population, i.e. patients who switched from randomized treatment were censored at the time of treatment switching.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Patients With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event - Sensitivity Analysis3.7 Percentage of patients with event
EtanerceptPercentage of Patients With a CV-EAC Adjudicated Event - Sensitivity Analysis3.4 Percentage of patients with event
Primary

Time to First Cardiovascular (CV) Events Adjudication Committee (EAC) (CV-EAC) Adjudicated Event

Prospective comparison of time to first occurrence of any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke.

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the Intention to treat (ITT) population, i.e. all patients randomized who have taken at least one dose of study medication

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TocilizumabTime to First Cardiovascular (CV) Events Adjudication Committee (EAC) (CV-EAC) Adjudicated EventNA Months
EtanerceptTime to First Cardiovascular (CV) Events Adjudication Committee (EAC) (CV-EAC) Adjudicated EventNA Months
Comparison: The analysis assessed in the ITT population the hazard ratio of the primary endpoint in TCZ compared to ETA patients. This was done through a comparison of the hazard functions between TCZ and ETA patients.~A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used in evaluating the relative CV event rate of TCZ over ETA, with the following randomization factors used as strata:~* Previous exposure to anti-TNF (Yes/No)~* History of CV events (Yes/No)95% CI: [0.77, 1.43]
Primary

Time to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Before Last Direct Contact Date

Prospective comparison of time to first occurrence of any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke before last direct contact date (i.e., latest date of visit, IVRS call, or site call).

Time frame: From Baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TocilizumabTime to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Before Last Direct Contact DateNA Months
EtanerceptTime to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Before Last Direct Contact DateNA Months
Comparison: The analysis assessed in the ITT population the hazard ratio of the primary endpoint in TCZ compared to ETA patients. This was done through a comparison of the hazard functions between TCZ and ETA patients.~A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used in evaluating the relative CV event rate of TCZ over ETA, with the following randomization factors used as strata:~* Previous exposure to anti-TNF (Yes/No)~* History of CV events (Yes/No)95% CI: [0.7, 1.56]
Primary

Time to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Excluding Undetermined Cause of Death - Sensitivity Analysis

Prospective comparison of time to first occurrence of any component of the composite of CV death (excluding events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke - Sensitivity Analyses

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TocilizumabTime to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Excluding Undetermined Cause of Death - Sensitivity AnalysisNA Months
EtanerceptTime to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event Excluding Undetermined Cause of Death - Sensitivity AnalysisNA Months
Comparison: The analysis assessed in the ITT population the hazard ratio of the primary endpoint in TCZ compared to ETA patients. This was done through a comparison of the hazard functions between TCZ and ETA patients.~A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used in evaluating the relative CV event rate of TCZ over ETA, with the following randomization factors used as strata:~* Previous exposure to anti-TNF (Yes/No)~* History of CV events (Yes/No)95% CI: [0.73, 1.4]
Primary

Time to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event - Sensitivity Analysis

Prospective comparison of time to first occurrence of any component of the composite of CV death (including events adjudicated as 'Undetermined Cause of Death'), non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke - Sensitivity Analysis

Time frame: From Baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analyses was conducted on the On-treatment (OT) population, i.e. patients who switched from randomized treatment were censored at the time of treatment switching.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TocilizumabTime to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event - Sensitivity AnalysisNA Months
EtanerceptTime to First CV-EAC Adjudicated Event - Sensitivity AnalysisNA Months
Comparison: The analysis assessed in the OT population the hazard ratio of the primary endpoint in TCZ compared to ETA patients. This was done through a comparison of the hazard functions between TCZ and ETA patients.~A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used in evaluating the relative CV event rate of TCZ over ETA, with the following randomization factors used as strata:~* Previous exposure to anti-TNF (Yes/No)~* History of CV events (Yes/No)95% CI: [0.76, 1.62]
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: All-cause Mortality

Percentage of patients reporting Individual component of primary endpoint: All-cause mortality

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: All-cause Mortality4.2 Percentage of patients
EtanerceptPercentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: All-cause Mortality4.2 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Cardiovascular Death

Percentage of patients reporting Individual component of primary endpoint: cardiovascular death

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Cardiovascular Death2.3 Percentage of patients
EtanerceptPercentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Cardiovascular Death2.3 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction

Percentage of patients reporting Individual component of primary endpoint: non-fatal Myocardial Infarction

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Anlysis was conducted on the ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction1.8 Percentage of patients
EtanerceptPercentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction2.0 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Stroke

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Stroke1.6 Percentage of patients
EtanerceptPercentage of Patients With Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Stroke1.0 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentages of Participants With an Expanded CV Composite Endpoint

Percentages of participants with the expanded CV composite endpoint. The expanded composite endpoint is defined as the CV composite of the primary endpoint with the addition of non-elective coronary revascularization procedures and hospitalization for unstable angina.

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentages of Participants With an Expanded CV Composite Endpoint5.5 Percentages of participants
EtanerceptPercentages of Participants With an Expanded CV Composite Endpoint5.4 Percentages of participants
Secondary

The Time to First Occurrence of an Expanded CV Composite Endpoint

Prospective comparison of the time to first ccurrence of the expanded composite endpoint. The expanded composite endpoint is defined as the CV composite of the primary endpoint with the addition of non-elective coronary revascularization procedures and hospitalization for unstable angina.

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TocilizumabThe Time to First Occurrence of an Expanded CV Composite EndpointNA Months
EtanerceptThe Time to First Occurrence of an Expanded CV Composite EndpointNA Months
Comparison: The analysis assessed in the ITT population the hazard ratio of the secondary endpoint in TCZ compared to ETA patients. This was done through a comparison of the hazard functions between TCZ and ETA patients.~A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used in evaluating the relative CV event rate of TCZ over ETA, with the following randomization factors used as strata:~* Previous exposure to anti-TNF (Yes/No)~* History of CV events (Yes/No)95% CI: [0.73, 1.34]
Secondary

Time to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: All-cause Mortality

Prospective comparison of time to first occurrence of Individual component of primary endpoint: All-cause mortality

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TocilizumabTime to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: All-cause MortalityNA Months
EtanerceptTime to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: All-cause MortalityNA Months
Comparison: The analysis assessed in the ITT population the hazard ratio of the secondary endpoint in TCZ compared to ETA patients. This was done through a comparison of the hazard functions between TCZ and ETA patients.~A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used in evaluating the relative CV event rate of TCZ over ETA, with the following randomization factors used as strata:~* Previous exposure to anti-TNF (Yes/No)~* History of CV events (Yes/No)95% CI: [0.7, 1.41]
Secondary

Time to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Cardiovascular Death

Prospective comparison of time to first occurrence of Individual component of primary endpoint: cardiovascular death

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TocilizumabTime to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Cardiovascular DeathNA Months
EtanerceptTime to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Cardiovascular DeathNA Months
Comparison: The analysis assessed in the ITT population the hazard ratio of the secondary endpoint in TCZ compared to ETA patients. This was done through a comparison of the hazard functions between TCZ and ETA patients.~A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used in evaluating the relative CV event rate of TCZ over ETA, with the following randomization factors used as strata:~* Previous exposure to anti-TNF (Yes/No)~* History of CV events (Yes/No)95% CI: [0.64, 1.63]
Secondary

Time to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction

Prospective comparison of time to first occurrence of Individual component of primary endpoint: non-fatal Myocardial Infarction

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Anlysis was conducted on the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TocilizumabTime to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Myocardial InfarctionNA Months
EtanerceptTime to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Myocardial InfarctionNA Months
Comparison: The analysis assessed in the ITT population the hazard ratio of the secondary endpoint in TCZ compared to ETA patients. This was done through a comparison of the hazard functions between TCZ and ETA patients.~A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used in evaluating the relative CV event rate of TCZ over ETA, with the following randomization factors used as strata:~* Previous exposure to anti-TNF (Yes/No)~* History of CV events (Yes/No)95% CI: [0.54, 1.49]
Secondary

Time to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal Stroke

Prospective comparison of time to first occurrence of Individual component of primary endpoint: non-fatal stroke

Time frame: From baseline up to 4.9 years

Population: Analysis was conducted on the ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TocilizumabTime to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal StrokeNA Months
EtanerceptTime to First Occurrence of Individual Component of Primary Endpoint: Non-fatal StrokeNA Months
Comparison: The analysis assessed in the ITT population the hazard ratio of the secondary endpoint in TCZ compared to ETA patients. This was done through a comparison of the hazard functions between TCZ and ETA patients.~A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used in evaluating the relative CV event rate of TCZ over ETA, with the following randomization factors used as strata:~* Previous exposure to anti-TNF (Yes/No)~* History of CV events (Yes/No)95% CI: [0.8, 2.92]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026