Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Macrolane VRF30 for Volume Restoration and Contouring of the Buttocks

An Open, Post-marketing, Multi-center Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Macrolane VRF30 for Volume Restoration and Contouring of the Buttocks

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01331408
Enrollment
61
Registered
2011-04-08
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2022-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Volume Restoration and Shaping of the Buttocks

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Macrolane for volume restoration and shaping of the buttocks.

Interventions

Injection of Macrolane VRF30 in buttocks. The sum of injected volume of Macrolane VRF30 at initial treatment and touch-up must not exceed 400 ml per Subject

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ≥ 20 years old * willing to undergo augmentation therapy of the buttocks where a maximum total injected volume of 400 ml of the study product is judged by the Investigator to be enough to achieve full correction * understand and comply with the requirements of the study * be willing to understand and comply with the requirements of the study * be willing to abstain from esthetic surgery and esthetical augmentation procedures (other than the study treatment) between the umbilicus and the knees. * be a male or non-pregnant, non breast-feeding female. * give written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions Tumors or pre-malign tissue disorder near or on the area to be treated * scar tissue in the area to be treated * subjects seeking corrections for other body parts then the buttocks anywhere between the umbilicus and the knees * subjects with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) associated lipodystrophy * subjects having undergone liposuction within 6 months prior to inclusion * BMI \<20 or expected instable weight * insufficient tissue cover in the area to be treated * excessive skin laxity in the area to be treated * other injectable implant or permanent implant near or in the area to be treated * previous radiation therapy of tumors near or in the area to be treated * concomitant anticoagulant therapy, anti-platelet therapy or a history of bleeding disorders. * a presence or history of connective tissue diseases * ongoing immunosuppressive therapy * known allergies or hypersensitivity reactions towards anesthetics * previous inflammatory or hypersensitivity reactions towards products containing Hyaluronic acid * any condition which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion use of any investigational drugs or devices within 30 days prior to inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Improvement on the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) at Month 66 MonthsTo evaluate the perceived improvement at 6 months compared to baseline as judged by the Subject using Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS). Percentage of subjects with improved, much improved or very much improved on GEIS, subject's evaluation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Improvement on the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) at Month 11 MonthTo evaluate the perceived improvement at 1 month compared to baseline as judged by the Subject using GEIS. Percentage of subjects with improved, much improved or very much improved on GEIS, subject's evaluation.
Percentage of Participants With Improvement on the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) at Month 1212 MonthsTo Evaluate the Perceived Improvement at 12 Months Compared to Baseline as Judged by the Subject Using GEIS. Percentage of subjects with Improved, Much Improved or Very Much Improved on GEIS, Subject's evaluation.

Countries

Belgium, Spain, Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Macrolane VRF30
Injection of Macrolane VRF30 in buttocks Macrolane VRF30: Injection of Macrolane VRF30 in buttocks. The sum of injected volume of Macrolane VRF30 at initial treatment and touch-up must not exceed 400 ml per Subject
61
Total61

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMacrolane VRF30
Age, Continuous41.3 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 61

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement on the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) at Month 6

To evaluate the perceived improvement at 6 months compared to baseline as judged by the Subject using Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS). Percentage of subjects with improved, much improved or very much improved on GEIS, subject's evaluation.

Time frame: 6 Months

Population: Intention to treat, subjects with available data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Macrolane VRF30Percentage of Participants With Improvement on the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) at Month 680.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement on the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) at Month 1

To evaluate the perceived improvement at 1 month compared to baseline as judged by the Subject using GEIS. Percentage of subjects with improved, much improved or very much improved on GEIS, subject's evaluation.

Time frame: 1 Month

Population: Intention to treat, subjects with available data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Macrolane VRF30Percentage of Participants With Improvement on the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) at Month 191.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement on the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) at Month 12

To Evaluate the Perceived Improvement at 12 Months Compared to Baseline as Judged by the Subject Using GEIS. Percentage of subjects with Improved, Much Improved or Very Much Improved on GEIS, Subject's evaluation.

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: Intention To Treat. Subjects with data available

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Macrolane VRF30Percentage of Participants With Improvement on the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) at Month 1268.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026