Skip to content

Effectiveness Study of the Guardian RT in Type 1 Diabetics

The Guard Control Trial - Randomized, Controlled, Muti-centric, Clinical Study to Assess Whether Type 1 Diabetic Patients in Poor Glycemic Control Can Improve Using the Real-time Values of the Guardian RT Versus Conventional Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01331343
Enrollment
156
Registered
2011-04-08
Start date
2004-06-30
Completion date
2005-06-30
Last updated
2011-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Diabetes, Glycemic Control, Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Type 1 diabetic patients using the Guardian RT glucose sensor can improve glycemic control over a 12-week period, compared to patients using self-monitoring blood glucose testing (SMBG) alone.

Detailed description

The long-term benefit of tight glycemic control in diabetics is well documented. HbA1c generally assesses the average/long term quality of glycemic control. On a daily basis, patients assess their glycemic control through finger stick measurements (SMBG), which allows them to adjust their therapy. A device which would provide a patient with a real-time glucose value, as well as high and low alerts, could aid the patient in knowing when to perform confirmatory SMBG tests and intervene so that dangerous glycemic excursions may occur less frequently.

Interventions

DEVICEGuardian RT Telemetered Glucose Monitoring System

Sponsors

Medtronic Diabetes
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 1 Diabetes for at least 12 months * HbA1c must be 8.1% or above at study entry * Intensive Insulin Therapy 3 months prior to study entry

Exclusion criteria

* Impaired hearing or vision (must see screens and hear alarms) * Unable to comply with protocol * Chronic debilitating or psychiatric disturbances

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in Change in A1c (%) between continuous use of CGM and control12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in change in A1c (%) between biweekly use of CGM and control12 weeks
Difference in change in A1c (%) between biweekly use of CGM and continuous use of CGM12 weeks

Countries

France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Slovenia, Sweden, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026