Skip to content

Influence of Routinely Adding Ultrasound Screening in Medical Department

Influence on Diagnostics and Inpatient Workflow of Routinely Adding Ultrasound Screening by Pocket-size Ultrasound in a Medical Department

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01331187
Enrollment
600
Registered
2011-04-07
Start date
2011-04-01
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2021-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Disease, Dyspnea, Heart Disease, Kidney Disease, Liver Disease

Keywords

Echocardiography, Heart failure, Ultrasonography, pocket-size device, Aorta, Education

Brief summary

Ultrasound (US) is widely used as a diagnostic tool in a hospital setting. In a medical department, diagnosis like heart failure or most kinds of heart diseases, hypervolemia, hypovolemia, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, ascites, diseases in the gall bladder/bile tract, urine tract and venous thrombosis are common. US is the key diagnostic tool in these diagnosis, and on early diagnosis is crucial with respect to the patients well-being and inpatients workflow. 1\. The aim is to study the clinical use of pocket-size US as a screening diagnostic tool in an medical department with respect to inpatients workflow and diagnostics. Method: Patients admitted (in certain preset periods) to Department of medicine will be randomized to routinely adding an ultrasound examination with pocket-size device by residents on call. Time to definitive diagnosis, time to definitive treatment and time to discard will be recorded. US findings will be validated against standard echocardiography, or standard US/CT/MRI performed at the Radiological department.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPocket-size ultrasonography

Routinely adding a ultrasound examination of the heart, pleura, great abdominal vessels, liver/gall bladder and kidneys at patients admittance to hospital

OTHERUsual care

No intervention, except for usual care (goal-directed diagnostics)

Sponsors

Norwegian University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Helse Nord-Trøndelag HF
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients admitted to Dep. of Medicine at Levanger Hospital

Exclusion criteria

* Not able to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to definitive diagnosis3 monthsTime from admittance to definitive diagnosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Test-retest reproducibility3 monthsPocket-sized ultrasound recordings by residents will be validated against reference methods (echocardiography and radiologic examinations by sepcialists)to assess sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of pocket-size ultrasound.
Diagnostic outcome of additional ultrasound examination according to educational level of the performer3 monthsStudy the diagnostic outcome of ultrasound screening related to the educational level and skills of the user
Time to definitive treatment3 monthsTime from admittance to definitive treatment
Time to discharge3 monthsTime from patients admittance to discharge from hospital

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026