Skip to content

COMPARE-II- Vasomotion and Imaging Substudy

Comparison of the Everolimus Eluting (XIENCE-V® or PROMUS® Stent) With the Biolimus A9 Eluting NOBORI® Stent in All-comers: a Randomized Open Label Study The COMPARE II Trial Imaging and Vasomotion Substudy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01329237
Acronym
COMPARE-IT
Enrollment
50
Registered
2011-04-05
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2011-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

drug-eluting stent, coronary endothelial function, coronary imaging

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare strut coverage and neointimal thickness between everolimus eluting (XIENCE-V® or PROMUS® stent) and biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI Stent 14 months after stent implantation and to determine the coronary endothelial function after everolimus eluting (XIENCE-V® or PROMUS® stent) and biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI Stent 14 months after stent implantation by using supine bicycle exercise testing to assess coronary vasomotor response to exercise.

Detailed description

DESIGN: Imaging and vasomotion Substudy: 50 consecutive patients enrolled in the COMPARE II trial at the University of Fribourg Medical Center will undergo follow-up re-angiography 14 months after index procedure with assessment of Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and vasomotion testing. ENDPOINT SUBSTUDY (all at 14 months): Primary endpoint imaging: percentage of uncovered stent struts per lesion and mean neointimal thickness assessed by OCT. vasomotion: coronary vasomotion assessed with quantitative coronary angiography at rest and during supine bicycle exercise.

Interventions

OTHERdynamic physical exercise and OCT imaging

supine dynamic physical exercise during coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography OCT imaging of the coronary stent

Sponsors

University of Freiburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient enrolled in the COMPARE II trial with successful stent implantation and absence of binary restenosis or severe progression of coronary artery disease at 14 months follow-up. * Patient consent to undergo a non-scheduled follow- up angiography with imaging study and bicycle exercise testing

Exclusion criteria

1. Inability to provide informed consent 2. Inability to perform a supine bicycle exercise stress test 3. Binary in stent restenosis of the target vessel 4. Acute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Myocardial Infarction 5. Patients with stent thrombosis following the index procedure 6. Female of childbearing potential ( age ≤ 50 years and last menstruation within the last 12 months ), who did not undergo tubal ligation, ovariectomy or hysterectomy 7. Known intolerance to heparin, contrast material 8. History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy 9. Age ≥ 80 years 10. Hemodynamic instability 11. Renal failure (creatinine clearance ≤ 40 ml/min) 12. OCT / IVUS technically not feasible

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
percentage of uncovered stent struts per lesion assessed by OCTwithin 14 months after percutaneous coronary stent implantation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
coronary vasomotor functionwithin 14 months after stentimplantationcoronary vasomotion assessed with quantitative coronary angiography at rest and during supine bicycle exercise
mean neointimal thickness assessed by OCTwithin 14 months after stent implantation

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactMario Togni, MD
mario.togni@unifr.ch++41-26-426-8130
Backup ContactStéphane Cook, MD
stephane.cook@unifr.ch++41-26-426-8130

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026