Skip to content

The Real-world Firebird 2 Versus Cypher Sirolimus-eluting Stent in Treating Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Post-marketing Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Firebird 2 Versus Cypher Sirolimus-eluting Stents in Treating Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in China

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01328730
Acronym
REFIRE
Enrollment
430
Registered
2011-04-05
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2011-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Stenosis

Keywords

significant stenosis (>70% of lumen stenosis), epicardial coronary arteries.

Brief summary

Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) has been world-widely used in clinical practice in treating patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The efficacy and safety of Cypher SES (Cordis, MA) has been proved by several randomized clinical trials. Here the investigators design a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical study in purpose of identifying the non-inferiority in the efficacy and safety in treating CAD patients by Firebird 2 SES (Microport, Shanghai), comparing with Cypher SES.

Interventions

DEVICEFirebird 2 SES

The FIREBIRD2™ Rapamycin-Eluting CoCr Coronary Stent is the second generation DES of MicroPort, which based on the new cobalt chromium alloy stent platform. It uses polyolefin polymer, which makes the coating property very remarkable.

DEVICECypher SES

The Cypher SES is based on the 316L platform with Controlled-release, nonresorbable, elastomeric polymer coating.

Sponsors

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age \> 18 years * male or un-preganant female * stenosis \> 70% in one of major the epicardial coronary arteries * no contra-indications of stent implantation * singed the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* acute myocardial infarction within one week * have contra-indications of stent implantation or can not tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy * no history of stent implantation within last one-year * received other brand coronary stent during index procedure * with no achievement of informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
in-stent late lumen loss at 9 months' angiographic follow-up9 monthsLate luminal loss was defined as the difference between the minimal luminal diameter immediately after the placement of the stent and the minimal luminal diameter at 9 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
target vessel failure1, and 2 years after index proceduredefined as the occurrence of any of the following within 1 and 2 years after the index procedure: death from cardiac causes, Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, or revascularizationof the target vessel (emergency or elective coronaryartery bypass grafting \[CABG\] or repeated percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty \[PTCA\]).

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026