Skip to content

Dose Dense Doxorubucin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Eribulin Mesylate for the Adjuvant Treatment of Early Stage Breast Cancer

A Phase II, Single-Arm, Feasibility Study of Dose Dense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide (AC) Followed by Eribulin Mesylate for the Adjuvant Treatment of Early Stage Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01328249
Enrollment
81
Registered
2011-04-04
Start date
2011-03-03
Completion date
2017-10-19
Last updated
2019-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HER2-normal

Keywords

Breast Cancer, HER2-normal Stage I to III invasive breast cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by eribulin mesylate for adjuvant treatment of early stage breast cancer.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, single-arm Phase II trial to assess the feasibility of dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in subjects with early stage (I-III), HER-2 normal breast cancer. A total of 80 adult subjects will be enrolled in order to have 73 subjects who start the eribulin portion of the adjuvant study regimen. After completion of 4 cycles of AC, each subject will begin 4 cycles of eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 intravenously over 2 to 5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of every 21 day cycle.

Interventions

DRUGeribulin mesylate

Dose dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for 4 cycles during the first 8 weeks followed by eribulin mesylate 1.4mg/m2 for 4 cycles during the next 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Eisai Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female subjects aged greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years * Histologically confirmed Stage I to III invasive breast cancer. Subjects may have more than one synchronous primary breast tumor. * HER-2 normal as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or 0 or 1+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. * Subject is a candidate for chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. Adjuvant therapy must begin within 84 days of the final surgical procedure for breast cancer. * Adequate cardiac function, defined by baseline LVEF \>=50 percent (%) by Multiple Gated Acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiogram. * ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. * Adequate renal function as evidenced by serum creatinine less than or equal to (\<=) 1.5 mg/dL or calculated creatinine clearance \>=40 mL/min per the Cockcroft and Gault formula. * Adequate bone marrow function as evidenced by ANC \>=1.5 x 10\^9/L, hemoglobin \>=10.0 g/dL, and platelet count \>=100 x 10\^9/L. * Adequate liver function as evidenced by bilirubin \<=1.5 times the upper limits of normal (ULN) and alkaline phosphatase (AP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \<=3 x ULN. * Females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine or beta-human chorionic gonadotropin serum pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior to Cycle 1, Day 1. A urine pregnancy test should be repeated prior to chemotherapy if not conducted within 72 hours of start of treatment. Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to be abstinent or to use a highly effective method of contraception (e.g., condom + spermicide, condom + diaphragm with spermicide, intrauterine device (IUD), or have a vasectomized partner) having started for at least one menstrual cycle prior to starting study drug and throughout the entire study period and for 30 days (longer if appropriate) after the last dose of study drug. Perimenopausal women must be amenorrheic for at least 12 months to be considered of nonchildbearing potential. Male subjects who are not abstinent or who have undergone a successful vasectomy, who are partners of women of childbearing potential must use, or their partners must use, a highly effective method of contraception (e.g., condom + spermicide, condom + diaphragm with spermicide, IUD) starting for at least one menstrual cycle prior to starting study drug and throughout the entire study period and for 30 days (longer if appropriate) after the last dose of study drug. Subjects with partners using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (as described previously). * Subjects willing and able to comply with the study protocol for the duration of the study and provide written informed consent prior to any study-specific screening procedures with the understanding that the subject may withdraw consent at any time without prejudice.

Exclusion criteria

* Stage IV breast cancer. * Prior chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or biotherapy for current breast cancer. * Nonmalignant systemic disease (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, etc.) that would preclude any of the study therapy drugs. * Subjects with a concurrently active second malignancy other than adequately treated nonmelanoma skin cancers or in situ cervical cancer. * Subjects with known positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status. * Pregnancy or breast feeding at the time of study enrollment. Eligible subjects of reproductive potential (both sexes) must agree to use adequate contraceptive methods during study therapy. * Subjects with known allergy or hypersensitivity to doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, or eribulin mesylate. * Inability to comply with the study and/or follow-up procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With FeasibilityFrom date of first dose, up to 3 years after the last dose of study treatment, or up to approximately 4 years 2 monthsThe regimen was considered feasible if the participant was able to complete the eribulin portion without dose delay or reduction. Dose delay was defined as a delay due to eribulin-related adverse event (AE) for more than 2 days for subsequent doses (cycles after the initiation of full dose of eribulin, except holidays, scheduling difficulties and nonclinical logistical issues). If a participant had more than 1 dose omission, delay or reduction due to eribulin-related AE, these events were collectively counted as one entity in the same participant. Participants were followed for approximately 3 years after the last dose of the study treatment. Feasibility rates were calculated with or without growth factor support. In both cohorts, the percentage of participants who completed the eribulin portion of the regimen without a dose omission, delay or reduction due to eribulin-related AE was estimated via the observed completion rate and an exact 90% confidence interval (CI) was constructed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From date of first dose up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, or up to approximately 4 years 2 monthsSafety assessments consisted of monitoring and recording all AEs and SAEs, clinical laboratory results, vital signs, physical examinations, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and left-ventricular ejection fracture (LVEF) by multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram. An AE was considered a treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) if the AE onset date was on or after the first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after receiving the last dose of study drug. Treatment-related TEAEs included TEAEs that were considered by the Investigator to be possibly or probably related to eribulin mesylate and/or doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, or missing causality. Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Queries (SMQ).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 81 participants were enrolled out of which 2 participants did not receive eribulin mesylate and were excluded from the eribulin-treated analysis sets (79 participants made up the Eribulin-treated Analysis Set and Eribulin-treated Safety Analysis Set).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: Eribulin Mesylate With Filgrastim as Needed
Participants initially received doxorubicin (60 mg/m\^2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m\^2) intravenously (IV) on Day 1, of every 14-day cycle for 4 cycles. Eribulin mesylate was administered following the doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide regimen at a dose of 1.4 mg/m\^2 IV over 2 to 5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for 4 cycles (Cycles 5 to 8). In this Cohort growth factors, subcutaneous pegfilgrastim (6 mg) or filgrastim, could be used with eribulin therapy at the physician's discretion if neutropenia occurred that recovered to Grade ≤2.
55
Cohort 2: Eribulin Mesylate With Prophylactic Filgrastim
Participants initially received doxorubicin (60 mg/m\^2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m\^2) IV on Day 1, of every 14-day cycle for 4 cycles. Eribulin mesylate was administered following the doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide regimen at a dose of 1.4 mg/m\^2 IV over 2 to 5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for 4 cycles (Cycles 5 to 8). In this Cohort filgrastim was used with eribulin therapy at a dose of 300 micrograms for participants ≤60 kg or 480 micrograms for participants \>60 kg, administered subcutaneously on Days 3 and 4 and Days 10 and 11 of each eribulin cycle.
26
Total81

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event30
Overall StudyDisease progression10
Overall StudyMoved before end of treatment visit10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudySubject choice11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1: Eribulin Mesylate With Filgrastim as NeededCohort 2: Eribulin Mesylate With Prophylactic FilgrastimTotal
Age, Continuous49.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.09
50.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33
49.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.12
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants26 Participants81 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 550 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
55 / 5526 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 554 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Feasibility

The regimen was considered feasible if the participant was able to complete the eribulin portion without dose delay or reduction. Dose delay was defined as a delay due to eribulin-related adverse event (AE) for more than 2 days for subsequent doses (cycles after the initiation of full dose of eribulin, except holidays, scheduling difficulties and nonclinical logistical issues). If a participant had more than 1 dose omission, delay or reduction due to eribulin-related AE, these events were collectively counted as one entity in the same participant. Participants were followed for approximately 3 years after the last dose of the study treatment. Feasibility rates were calculated with or without growth factor support. In both cohorts, the percentage of participants who completed the eribulin portion of the regimen without a dose omission, delay or reduction due to eribulin-related AE was estimated via the observed completion rate and an exact 90% confidence interval (CI) was constructed.

Time frame: From date of first dose, up to 3 years after the last dose of study treatment, or up to approximately 4 years 2 months

Population: The eribulin-treated analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of eribulin mesylate at the starting dose of 1.4 mg/m\^2. This was the primary analysis set for the feasibility evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Eribulin Mesylate With Filgrastim as NeededPercentage of Participants With Feasibility70.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Eribulin Mesylate With Prophylactic FilgrastimPercentage of Participants With Feasibility60.0 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.4422Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Safety assessments consisted of monitoring and recording all AEs and SAEs, clinical laboratory results, vital signs, physical examinations, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and left-ventricular ejection fracture (LVEF) by multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram. An AE was considered a treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) if the AE onset date was on or after the first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after receiving the last dose of study drug. Treatment-related TEAEs included TEAEs that were considered by the Investigator to be possibly or probably related to eribulin mesylate and/or doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, or missing causality. Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Queries (SMQ).

Time frame: From date of first dose up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, or up to approximately 4 years 2 months

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all participants who were enrolled, received at least 1 dose of study treatments and had at least 1 post-treatment safety assessment. This was the primary analysis set for all safety evaluations including issues related to cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (AC) or eribulin treatments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Eribulin Mesylate With Filgrastim as NeededNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Alopecia40 Participants
Cohort 1: Eribulin Mesylate With Filgrastim as NeededNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Peripheral neuropathy (SMQ)40 Participants
Cohort 1: Eribulin Mesylate With Filgrastim as NeededNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs6 Participants
Cohort 1: Eribulin Mesylate With Filgrastim as NeededNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)All TEAEs55 Participants
Cohort 1: Eribulin Mesylate With Filgrastim as NeededNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AC-related TEAEs55 Participants
Cohort 1: Eribulin Mesylate With Filgrastim as NeededNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Eribulin-related TEAEs54 Participants
Cohort 1: Eribulin Mesylate With Filgrastim as NeededNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Neutropenia (SMQ)20 Participants
Cohort 1: Eribulin Mesylate With Filgrastim as NeededNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Grade ≥3 TEAEs31 Participants
Cohort 2: Eribulin Mesylate With Prophylactic FilgrastimNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Neutropenia (SMQ)11 Participants
Cohort 2: Eribulin Mesylate With Prophylactic FilgrastimNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AC-related TEAEs26 Participants
Cohort 2: Eribulin Mesylate With Prophylactic FilgrastimNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Grade ≥3 TEAEs18 Participants
Cohort 2: Eribulin Mesylate With Prophylactic FilgrastimNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs4 Participants
Cohort 2: Eribulin Mesylate With Prophylactic FilgrastimNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Alopecia19 Participants
Cohort 2: Eribulin Mesylate With Prophylactic FilgrastimNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)All TEAEs26 Participants
Cohort 2: Eribulin Mesylate With Prophylactic FilgrastimNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Peripheral neuropathy (SMQ)15 Participants
Cohort 2: Eribulin Mesylate With Prophylactic FilgrastimNumber of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Eribulin-related TEAEs23 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026