Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of MRgFUS Compared With Myomectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of MRgFUS Procedure Compared With Myomectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01328067
Enrollment
0
Registered
2011-04-04
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2018-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bleeding, Pelvic Pain, Uterine Fibroids

Keywords

MRgFus, Uterine Fibroids, Pelvic Pain, Quality of Life, Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids

Brief summary

The objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ExAblate for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Women, seeking treatment for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata will be eligible for the study.Women who agree to participate will sign an informed consent and will be randomized to ExAblate treatment or myomectomy. All patients will be followed through the 36 month visit. Follow-up visits/telephone calls will be completed at 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months post treatment. Patients will be evaluated by assessing their overall physical and mental health as well as for device/procedure related adverse events.

Interventions

MRgFUS

PROCEDUREMyomectomy

Non-Hysteroscopic Myomectomy

Sponsors

InSightec
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Women age 18 or older 2. Symptomatic uterine fibroids, defined as those resulting in scores of 21 or higher, based on patient responses to questions 1-8 (raw score) of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (UFS-QOL). 3. Women who have given written informed consent 4. Women who are able and willing to attend all study visits 5. Patient is pre or peri-menopausal (within 12 months of last menstrual period) 6. Able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate procedure 7. Uterine fibroids, which are device accessible 8. Fibroid(s) clearly visible on non-contrast MRI. 9. Fibroid(s) enhances on MR contrast imaging

Exclusion criteria

1. Women currently pregnant 2. Uterine size \> 24 cm W/O the cervix 3. More than 4 clinically significant fibroids (per MRI) 4. Prior myomectomy, UAE 5. Allergy to either gadolinium or iodinated contrast 6. Implanted metallic device prohibiting MRI 7. Severe claustrophobia 8. Active pelvic infection 9. Current use of intrauterine contraceptive device 10. Unstable medical conditions requiring additional monitoring during the procedure 11. Bleeding diathesis requiring medical treatment 12. Imaging suggestive of malignant disease of uterus, ovary, or cervix 13. Imaging and suggestive of adenomyosis. 14. Pedunculated submucosal or pedunculated subserosal myoma 15. Size and weight which prohibits subject from fitting in MRI device 16. Unavoidable, scarring, skin folds or irregularity, bowel, pubic bone, IUD, surgical clips or hard implants in the beam path. 17. Hyper intense fibroid relatively to the uterus muscle 18. Women with ovarian dermoid cyst anywhere in the treatment path

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety36 months post treatmentSafety will be evaluated by recording and assessing the incidence and severity of major adverse events from treatment through the 3 years follow-up period.
Efficacy36 months post treatmentComparison between ExAblate treatment and non-Hysteroscopic Myomectomy in terms of treated patients who did not undergo another interventional treatment for recurrence of uterine fibroid symptoms at up to 36 months (3 years).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy36 months post treatment1. Post treatment change in patient's quality of life 2. Post treatment change in pelvic pain 3. Post treatment Change in bleeding 4. Post treatment recovery time

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026