Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Milnacipran in Pediatric Patients With Primary Fibromyalgia

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Milnacipran in Pediatric Patients With Primary Fibromyalgia

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01328002
Acronym
MyFi
Enrollment
116
Registered
2011-04-04
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2019-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Fibromyalgia

Keywords

Fibromyalgia, Pediatric Fibromyalgia, Adolescent Fibromyalgia, milnacipran, Savella, loss of therapeutic response, Forest Research Institute, Pain, Fatigue, Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors, Randomized Withdrawal

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of milnacipran in pediatric patients aged 13 to 17 years with primary fibromyalgia.

Detailed description

* 8 weeks open-label treatment period with milnacipran. * Followed by randomization to 8-weeks double blind treatment period for eligible patients

Interventions

DRUGMilnacipran

Maximum tolerated dose (50, 75, or 100 mg/day tablets) was determined during the open label phase of the study. Oral administration, twice daily dosing

DRUGPlacebo

matching placebo tablets daily

Sponsors

Cypress Bioscience, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Forest Laboratories
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of primary fibromyalgia * 13-17 years of age * To be eligible for screening, have average pain rating in the previous week of at least 3 but no more than 9 on an 11-point numeric rating scale * To be eligible to enter into the open-label treatment period, have a 1-week mean of daily pain ratings of at least 3 but no more than 9 (11-point numeric rating scale) in the week before Baseline (Visit 2) * To be eligible for randomization and entry into the double-blind treatment period, have a decrease of at least 50% in 1-week mean of daily pain ratings (11-point numeric rating scale) before Randomization (Visit 7) compared with the 1-week mean of daily pain ratings, in the week before Baseline (Visit 2) * Unsatisfactory response to nonpharmacologic fibromyalgia treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe psychiatric illness * Severe renal impairment * Evidence of active liver disease * Pregnant or breastfeeding * Significant risk of suicidality * Unable, unwilling or inadvisable to discontinue prohibited medications * History of alcohol abuse or drug abuse or dependence, within previous year * Current systemic infection * Autoimmune disease * History of seizure disorder (other than febrile seizures)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to First Loss of Therapeutic Response (LTR) Following Randomization to Milnacipran or Placebo.Change from Visit 7 (Week 8) to Visit 10 (Week 16)During the open-label period, 20 patients out of 116 enrolled had a reduction from baseline (Visit 2) of at least 50% in their pain, were classified as responders and were randomized (Visit 7). A Loss of Therapeutic Response was said to occur if, during the double-blind treatment period, any of the following occurred: • A worsening of fibromyalgia requiring an alternate treatment OR • An increase in 1-week mean of daily pain ratings (11-point numeric rating scale) to greater than 70% of Baseline (Visit 2) OR • Withdrawal from the study for any reason except withdrawals due to extenuating circumstances

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)Change from Visit 7 (Week 8) to Visit 10 (Week 16)The wording of the PGIS assessment was as follows: Considering all aspects of your illness, how do you evaluate the severity of your fibromyalgia? The possible responses to this question were 1. Normal, not at all ill 2. Borderline ill 3. Mildly ill 4. Moderately ill 5. Severely ill 6. Extremely ill

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited over a 12 month period from April of 2011 to April of 2012 at 47 study sites in the United States.

Pre-assignment details

116 patients took at least 1 dose of open-label investigational product; 20 patients were randomized to receive double-blind treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Open-Label Milnacipran
Maximum tolerated dose (50, 75, or 100 mg/day tablets) determined during the open label treatment phase. Oral administration, twice daily dosing
116
Total116

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-Blind PeriodAdverse Event10
Double-Blind PeriodLack of Efficacy10
Open-Label PeriodAdverse Event80
Open-Label PeriodInclusion/exclusion criteria not met660
Open-Label PeriodLack of Efficacy30
Open-Label PeriodLost to Follow-up60
Open-Label PeriodOther Reason20
Open-Label PeriodProtocol Violation20
Open-Label PeriodWithdrawal by Subject90

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOpen-Label Milnacipran
Age, Continuous15.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Age, Customized
13 years old
10 Participants
Age, Customized
14 years old
21 Participants
Age, Customized
15 years old
21 Participants
Age, Customized
16 years old
23 Participants
Age, Customized
17 years old
41 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
116 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
98 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
62 / 1164 / 66 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1160 / 61 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Time to First Loss of Therapeutic Response (LTR) Following Randomization to Milnacipran or Placebo.

During the open-label period, 20 patients out of 116 enrolled had a reduction from baseline (Visit 2) of at least 50% in their pain, were classified as responders and were randomized (Visit 7). A Loss of Therapeutic Response was said to occur if, during the double-blind treatment period, any of the following occurred: • A worsening of fibromyalgia requiring an alternate treatment OR • An increase in 1-week mean of daily pain ratings (11-point numeric rating scale) to greater than 70% of Baseline (Visit 2) OR • Withdrawal from the study for any reason except withdrawals due to extenuating circumstances

Time frame: Change from Visit 7 (Week 8) to Visit 10 (Week 16)

Population: The Open-Label Safety Population consists of 116 patients who took at least 1 dose of open-label milnacipran. 20 patients who were randomized to a treatment group (Randomized Population) took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment (Double-blind Safety Population) and were analyzed as randomized (Double-blind Intent-to-Treat \[ITT\] Population).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime to First Loss of Therapeutic Response (LTR) Following Randomization to Milnacipran or Placebo.NA Days
MilnacipranTime to First Loss of Therapeutic Response (LTR) Following Randomization to Milnacipran or Placebo.7.0 DaysStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)

The wording of the PGIS assessment was as follows: Considering all aspects of your illness, how do you evaluate the severity of your fibromyalgia? The possible responses to this question were 1. Normal, not at all ill 2. Borderline ill 3. Mildly ill 4. Moderately ill 5. Severely ill 6. Extremely ill

Time frame: Change from Visit 7 (Week 8) to Visit 10 (Week 16)

Population: The Open-Label Safety Population consists of 116 patients who took at least 1 dose of open-label milnacipran. 20 patients were randomized to a treatment group (Randomized Population) took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment (Double-blind Safety Population) and were analyzed as randomized (Double-blind Intent-to-Treat \[ITT\] Population).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
MilnacipranPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026