Skip to content

A Study Of Maraviroc In HIV Co-Infected Subjects With Hepatitis C And/Or Hepatitis B

A Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-controlled Study To Evaluate The Safety Of Maraviroc In Combination With Other Antiretroviral Agents In Hiv-1-infected Subjects Co-infected With Hepatitis C And/or Hepatitis B Virus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01327547
Enrollment
138
Registered
2011-04-01
Start date
2011-05-18
Completion date
2015-03-24
Last updated
2017-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Coinfection

Keywords

HIV coinfection, maraviroc, CCR5 blocker, entry inhibitor, liver disease, viral hepatitis

Brief summary

To describe liver enzyme elevations in patients who are coinfected with HIV and either Hepatitis C (HCV) and/or Hepatitis B (HBV) receiving maraviroc or placebo in combination with their current suppressive anti-HIV drug therapy.

Interventions

DRUGMaraviroc

150mg, 300mg or 600mg twice daily x 144 weeks; dosing dependent on components of the current suppressive anti-HIV therapy

DRUGPlacebo

150mg, 300mg or 600mg twice daily x 144 weeks; dosing dependent on components of the current suppressive anti-HIV therapy

Sponsors

Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
ViiV Healthcare
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV coinfected with HCV and/or HBV. * Undetectable HIV-1 RNA for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit * Treatment with current antiretroviral therapy (3-6 drugs excluding low-dose ritonavir) for at least 5 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Currently receiving maraviroc. * Active opportunistic infections. * ALT and/or AST \>5x upper limit of normal. * Direct bilirubin \>1.5x upper limit of normal. * Severe or decompensated liver disease. * Liver disease unrelated to viral hepatitis infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Abnormalities at Week 4848 weeksPercentage of participants with Grade 3 or Grade 4 ALT abnormalities defined as \>5x upper limit of normal (ULN) for participants whose baseline ALT ≤ULN, or \>3.5x baseline for participants whose baseline ALT \>ULN, up to and including Week 48 in the maraviroc arm versus the placebo arm. The baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Day 1 dosing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities144 weeksTime taken in days to development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT abnormalities defined as \>5x ULN for participants whose baseline ALT ≤ULN, or \>3.5x baseline for participants whose baseline ALT \>ULN, at Week 144.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Associated With a Change From Baseline ALT >100 IU/L144 weeksPercentage of participants who had Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT abnormalities associated with a change from baseline ALT \>100 IU/L during the 144-week period. Baseline will be defined as the last measurement prior to Day 1 dosing.
Time to Development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities at Week 144 Associated With a Change From Baseline ALT >100 IU/L144 weeksTime to development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT abnormalities associated with a change from baseline ALT \>100 IU/L during the 144-week period. Baseline will be defined as the last measurement prior to Day 1 dosing.
Number of Participants With Hy's Law Abnormalities Through Week 144144 weeksHy's law was defined as a total bilirubin \>2x ULN with a simultaneous ALT or aspartate transaminase (AST)\>3x ULN, excluding participants with an alkaline phosphatase\>3x ULN
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Concentration <40 Copies/mL at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48, 96 and 144The Food and Drug Administration (FDA's) snapshot algorithm was used to derive the efficacy endpoint of the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA \<40 copies/mL at Week 48. This algorithm included the missing data imputation method and used the plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration in the visit window only, followed the virology-first principle and considered a participant who had a missing plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration, or switched to a prohibited background anti-retroviral regimen or discontinues from the study or study drug as a failure (MSDF).
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48, 96 and 144Immunologic response (magnitude of change in CD4+ and CD8+ cell counts from baseline) was measured. Baseline value for CD4 and CD8 is defined as the pre-dose measurement taken at Day 1 visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in CD38 Expression on CD4 and CD8 Cells at Weeks 48, 96 and 14448, 96 and 144 weeksPlasma samples were used to determine markers of immune activation namely CD38 expression on CD4 and CD8 cells.
Mean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) - Week 48, 96 and 144.48, 96 and 144 weeksPlasma samples were used to determine markers of immune activation namely CRP.
Mean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: D Dimer - Week 48, 96 and 14448, 96 and 144 weeksPlasma samples were used to determine markers of immune activation namely D-Dimer.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Through Week 144Week 96 and 144Percentage of participants with Grade 3 or Grade 4 ALT abnormalities defined as \>5x upper limit of normal (ULN) for participants whose baseline ALT ≤ULN, or \>3.5x baseline for participants whose baseline ALT \>ULN, up to and including Week 96 and Week 144 in the maraviroc arm versus the placebo arm. The baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Day 1 dosing.
Mean Change From Baseline in Log10 Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA at Week 48, 96 and 14448, 96 and 144 weeksPlasma samples were used to determine HCV RNA using the Roche COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS HCV Taqman assay, RUO version (LOD=15 IU/mL).Baseline value for HCV RNA/HBV DNA is defined as the pre-dose measurement taken at Day 1 visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in Plasma Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA at Week 48, 96 and 14448, 96 and 144 weeksPlasma samples were used to determine HBV DNA using the Roche COBAS Taqman HBV assay. Baseline value for HCV RNA/HBV DNA is defined as the pre-dose measurement taken at Day 1 visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test at Week 48, 96 and 14448, 96 and 144 weeksThe markers of fibrosis assessed in this test comprised hyaluronic acid (CHA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (CTIMP1) and procollagen III N-terminal peptide (CP3NP); these are components of the extracellular matrix and basement sinusoidal membrane of the liver and are elevated during activation of the stellate cell. The ELF tests were performed on an ADVIA Centaur XP and the composite score was calculated as follows: ELF score = 2.278 + 0.851 ln(CHA) + 0.751 ln (CP3NP) + 0.394 ln(CTIMP1). ELF score \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Hepatic Elastography (FibroscanTM) at Week 48, 96 and 14448, 96 and 144 weeksParticipants had transient hepatic elastography using FibroScan technology. It rapidly and non invasively measures hepatic tissue stiffness. Through a probe, a low frequency vibration of low amplitude is transmitted to the liver. The velocity of the wave that is generated during the procedure correlates directly with tissue stiffness as it passes through the liver; the harder or stiffer the liver, the faster the shear wave propagates. Results are reported in kilopascals (kPa). A negative change in the fibroscan values (i.e. decrease in liver stiffness) correlates with a decrease in fibrosis and thus improved outcome.
Absolute Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Baseline and at Week 144Baseline and Week 144Samples were processed and sent to a central reader for scoring for fibrosis and other analyses such as Sirius red and α smooth muscle actin staining for activated stellate cells. Samples were collected, processed, stored and shipped in accordance with the procedure documented in a separate handling document. The Ishak fibrosis scoring system was used to score the fibrosis observed, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 6 (where 0 = no fibrosis, 1 = expansion of some portal areas with or without septa, 2 = expansion of most portal areas with or without septa, 3 = expansion of most portal areas with occasional portal or portal bridging, 4 = expansion of portal areas with marked bridging \[portal-portal and/or portal-central\], 5 = marked bridging with occasional nodules \[incomplete cirrhosis\], 6 = cirrhosis, probable or definitive). The scores for liver biopsies were summarized based upon the availability of liver biopsy results.
Change From Baseline in Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Week 144Week 144Samples were processed and sent to a central reader for scoring for fibrosis and other analyses such as Sirius red and α smooth muscle actin staining for activated stellate cells. Samples were collected, processed, stored and shipped in accordance with the procedure documented in a separate handling document. The Ishak fibrosis scoring system was used to score the fibrosis observed, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 6 (where 0 = no fibrosis, 1 = expansion of some portal areas with or without septa, 2 = expansion of most portal areas with or without septa, 3 = expansion of most portal areas with occasional portal or portal bridging, 4 = expansion of portal areas with marked bridging \[portal-portal and/or portal-central\], 5 = marked bridging with occasional nodules \[incomplete cirrhosis\], 6 = cirrhosis, probable or definitive). The scores for liver biopsies were summarized based upon the availability of liver biopsy results.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized Due to Hepatic Disease Through Week 144144 WeeksHealthcare resource utilization data was collected using the Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire at all study visits except Screening and Baseline. Other components of healthcare resource utilization, including length of hospital stay, type of ward, associated investigative and therapeutic procedures and concomitant medications were captured from primary and secondary data sources.
Summary of Estimated Maraviroc PK ParametersWeek 48Week 4 and Week 48 clinic visits were scheduled such that a trough sample may be taken within a time window of 8-16 hours after the previous dose (Ctrough). Blood samples (4mL) were collected from all participants at the Week 4 and 48 visits.
Exposure-response Relationship Between Change From Baseline in Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Versus MVC Cavg at Week 48Week 48The relationship between change from baseline in liver fibrosis biomarkers (AST, ALT, ALK, BIL, ELF and FSCN) versus MVC Cavg was analyzed using Bayesian methods. P-values were assessed for significance in the relationship between liver fibrosis biomarkers and MVC Cavg. P-value \<0.05 was regarded as significantly related.
Mean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF Beta) - Week 48, 96 and 14448, 96 and 144 weeksPlasma samples were used to determine markers of immune activation namely TGF beta.

Countries

Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Puerto Rico, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In this study, 138 participants were randomized, of which 137 participants received the study drug. Participants were randomized at 37 sites in 9 countries. Five sites received drug and screened subjects but did not randomize any subjects; 2 sites received drug but did not screen any subjects.

Pre-assignment details

One participant who was randomized into the study was withdrawn prior to receiving treatment due to poor venous access.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Maraviroc
Participants who received maraviroc in combination with HAART
70
Placebo
Participants who received placebo in combination with HAART
67
Total137

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event41
Overall StudyBy investigator in subject's interest01
Overall StudyDeath12
Overall StudyDoes Not Meet Entrance Criteria22
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up66
Overall StudyNon-compliance due to alcohol intake01
Overall StudyNon-compliance with study procedures10
Overall StudyNon-Compliance With Study Treatment02
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyRequired prohibited medication20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject37

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMaravirocPlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
18-44 years
26 Participants20 Participants46 Participants
Age, Customized
<18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
45-64 years
42 Participants47 Participants89 Participants
Age, Customized
≥65 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants57 Participants117 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
63 / 7062 / 67
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 7019 / 67

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Abnormalities at Week 48

Percentage of participants with Grade 3 or Grade 4 ALT abnormalities defined as \>5x upper limit of normal (ULN) for participants whose baseline ALT ≤ULN, or \>3.5x baseline for participants whose baseline ALT \>ULN, up to and including Week 48 in the maraviroc arm versus the placebo arm. The baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Day 1 dosing.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set (FAS) which included participants who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MaravirocPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Abnormalities at Week 481.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Abnormalities at Week 481.5 Percentage of participants
Comparison: A stratified analysis was conducted by summarizing the difference in proportions adjusted for the randomization strata formed by crossing levels of stratification variables. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) approach was used. No formal hypothesis test was performed.p-value: 0.459895% CI: [-0.0417, 0.0376]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Absolute Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Baseline and at Week 144

Samples were processed and sent to a central reader for scoring for fibrosis and other analyses such as Sirius red and α smooth muscle actin staining for activated stellate cells. Samples were collected, processed, stored and shipped in accordance with the procedure documented in a separate handling document. The Ishak fibrosis scoring system was used to score the fibrosis observed, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 6 (where 0 = no fibrosis, 1 = expansion of some portal areas with or without septa, 2 = expansion of most portal areas with or without septa, 3 = expansion of most portal areas with occasional portal or portal bridging, 4 = expansion of portal areas with marked bridging \[portal-portal and/or portal-central\], 5 = marked bridging with occasional nodules \[incomplete cirrhosis\], 6 = cirrhosis, probable or definitive). The scores for liver biopsies were summarized based upon the availability of liver biopsy results.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 144

Population: Liver biopsy set consisted of 9 participants (5 MVC and 4 placebo) who had paired baseline and Week 144 liver biopsies that allowed for Ishak fibrosis scoring according to the defined secondary endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MaravirocAbsolute Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Baseline and at Week 144Absolute Values at Baseline2.6 Numerical scoreStandard Deviation 2.3
MaravirocAbsolute Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Baseline and at Week 144Absolute Values at Post-dose (or Week 144)2.2 Numerical scoreStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboAbsolute Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Baseline and at Week 144Absolute Values at Baseline1.5 Numerical scoreStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboAbsolute Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Baseline and at Week 144Absolute Values at Post-dose (or Week 144)1.5 Numerical scoreStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Week 144

Samples were processed and sent to a central reader for scoring for fibrosis and other analyses such as Sirius red and α smooth muscle actin staining for activated stellate cells. Samples were collected, processed, stored and shipped in accordance with the procedure documented in a separate handling document. The Ishak fibrosis scoring system was used to score the fibrosis observed, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 6 (where 0 = no fibrosis, 1 = expansion of some portal areas with or without septa, 2 = expansion of most portal areas with or without septa, 3 = expansion of most portal areas with occasional portal or portal bridging, 4 = expansion of portal areas with marked bridging \[portal-portal and/or portal-central\], 5 = marked bridging with occasional nodules \[incomplete cirrhosis\], 6 = cirrhosis, probable or definitive). The scores for liver biopsies were summarized based upon the availability of liver biopsy results.

Time frame: Week 144

Population: Liver biopsy set consisted of 9 participants (5 MVC and 4 placebo) who had paired baseline and Week 144 liver biopsies that allowed for Ishak fibrosis scoring according to the defined secondary endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MaravirocChange From Baseline in Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Week 144Absolute Values at Baseline3 Numerical score
MaravirocChange From Baseline in Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Week 144Absolute Values at Post-dose (or Week 144)2 Numerical score
MaravirocChange From Baseline in Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Week 144Change from baseline in fibrosis score at Week 1440.0 Numerical score
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Week 144Absolute Values at Post-dose (or Week 144)0 Numerical score
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Week 144Absolute Values at Baseline0 Numerical score
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibrosis Score (Ishak) in Liver Biopsy Samples at Week 144Change from baseline in fibrosis score at Week 1440.0 Numerical score
Secondary

Exposure-response Relationship Between Change From Baseline in Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Versus MVC Cavg at Week 48

The relationship between change from baseline in liver fibrosis biomarkers (AST, ALT, ALK, BIL, ELF and FSCN) versus MVC Cavg was analyzed using Bayesian methods. P-values were assessed for significance in the relationship between liver fibrosis biomarkers and MVC Cavg. P-value \<0.05 was regarded as significantly related.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Participants included in the statistical analysis of PK parameters were those receiving maraviroc treatment at Week 48 who had PK and liver fibrosis biomarker data available.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MaravirocExposure-response Relationship Between Change From Baseline in Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Versus MVC Cavg at Week 480.892 p-value
PlaceboExposure-response Relationship Between Change From Baseline in Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Versus MVC Cavg at Week 480.440 p-value
Maraviroc 600 mgExposure-response Relationship Between Change From Baseline in Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Versus MVC Cavg at Week 480.766 p-value
Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF)Exposure-response Relationship Between Change From Baseline in Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Versus MVC Cavg at Week 480.795 p-value
Fibroscan (FSCN)Exposure-response Relationship Between Change From Baseline in Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Versus MVC Cavg at Week 480.087 p-value
Alkaline Phosphatase (ALK)Exposure-response Relationship Between Change From Baseline in Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Versus MVC Cavg at Week 480.071 p-value
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in CD38 Expression on CD4 and CD8 Cells at Weeks 48, 96 and 144

Plasma samples were used to determine markers of immune activation namely CD38 expression on CD4 and CD8 cells.

Time frame: 48, 96 and 144 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in CD38 Expression on CD4 and CD8 Cells at Weeks 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n=69, 67)-12.2 cell/mm³Standard Deviation 129.82
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in CD38 Expression on CD4 and CD8 Cells at Weeks 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n=69, 67)5.4 cell/mm³Standard Deviation 134.64
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in CD38 Expression on CD4 and CD8 Cells at Weeks 48, 96 and 144Week 144(n=69, 67)23.4 cell/mm³Standard Deviation 169.5
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in CD38 Expression on CD4 and CD8 Cells at Weeks 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n=69, 67)43.0 cell/mm³Standard Deviation 135.71
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in CD38 Expression on CD4 and CD8 Cells at Weeks 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n=69, 67)47.4 cell/mm³Standard Deviation 186.74
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in CD38 Expression on CD4 and CD8 Cells at Weeks 48, 96 and 144Week 144(n=69, 67)50.7 cell/mm³Standard Deviation 219.95
Comparison: The above analysis is for CD38 expression on CD4 and CD8 cells at Week 48. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.015395% CI: [-101.2, -10.92]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for CD38 expression on CD4 and CD8 cells for Week 96. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.094795% CI: [-97.72, 7.87]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for CD38 expression on CD4 and CD8 cells for Week 144. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.359595% CI: [-93.74, 34.24]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144

Immunologic response (magnitude of change in CD4+ and CD8+ cell counts from baseline) was measured. Baseline value for CD4 and CD8 is defined as the pre-dose measurement taken at Day 1 visit.

Time frame: Week 48, 96 and 144

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD4+ (week 48, n=69, 67)3.1 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 142.58
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD8+ (week 96, n=69, 67)-2.7 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 228.92
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD4+ (week 144, n=69, 67)17.2 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 184.86
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD8+ (week 48, n=69, 67)7.8 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 229.53
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD4+ (week 96, n=69, 67)5.1 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 146.64
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD8+ (week 144, n=69, 67)12.6 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 293.82
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD4+ (week 144, n=69, 67)41.7 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 200
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD4+ (week 96, n=69, 67)49.7 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 177.18
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD8+ (week 48, n=69, 67)28.9 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 293.18
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD8+ (week 96, n=69, 67)62.6 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 376.67
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD8+ (week 144, n=69, 67)44.1 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 387.61
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ Cell Counts at Week 48, 96 and 144CD4+ (week 48, n=69, 67)42.0 Cells/µLStandard Deviation 166.35
Comparison: The above analysis is for CD4+ cells at week 48. Results are from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, hepatitis B virus status (HBV), Protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen.p-value: 0.117495% CI: [-92.72, 10.49]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for CD8+ cells at Week 48. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, hepatitis B virus status (HBV), Protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen.p-value: 0.59395% CI: [-103.05, 59.12]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for CD4+ cells at Week 96. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, hepatitis B virus status (HBV), Protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen.p-value: 0.066995% CI: [-99.93, 3.41]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for CD8+ cells at Week 96. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, hepatitis B virus status (HBV), Protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen.p-value: 0.179995% CI: [-161.07, 30.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for CD4+ cells at Week 144. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, hepatitis B virus status (HBV), Protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen.p-value: 0.385995% CI: [-90.71, 35.29]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for CD8+ cells at Week 144. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, hepatitis B virus status (HBV), Protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen.p-value: 0.557195% CI: [-138.93, 75.21]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test at Week 48, 96 and 144

The markers of fibrosis assessed in this test comprised hyaluronic acid (CHA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (CTIMP1) and procollagen III N-terminal peptide (CP3NP); these are components of the extracellular matrix and basement sinusoidal membrane of the liver and are elevated during activation of the stellate cell. The ELF tests were performed on an ADVIA Centaur XP and the composite score was calculated as follows: ELF score = 2.278 + 0.851 ln(CHA) + 0.751 ln (CP3NP) + 0.394 ln(CTIMP1). ELF score \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis.

Time frame: 48, 96 and 144 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 70, 67)0.4 ELF scoreStandard Deviation 0.73
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 70, 67)0.4 ELF scoreStandard Deviation 0.72
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 70, 67)0.2 ELF scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 70, 67)0.1 ELF scoreStandard Deviation 0.71
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 70, 67)0.4 ELF scoreStandard Deviation 0.58
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Test at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 70, 67)0.4 ELF scoreStandard Deviation 0.69
Comparison: Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline at Week 48 as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.520195% CI: [-0.15, 0.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline at Week 96 as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.465795% CI: [-0.28, 0.13]ANCOVA
Comparison: Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline at Week 144 as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.808795% CI: [-0.25, 0.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Log10 Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA at Week 48, 96 and 144

Plasma samples were used to determine HCV RNA using the Roche COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS HCV Taqman assay, RUO version (LOD=15 IU/mL).Baseline value for HCV RNA/HBV DNA is defined as the pre-dose measurement taken at Day 1 visit.

Time frame: 48, 96 and 144 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Log10 Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 45, 45)-3.2 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 0.6
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Log10 Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 45, 45)-3.2 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 0.5
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Log10 Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 45, 45)-3.1 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 0.57
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Log10 Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 45, 45)-3.2 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 0.68
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Log10 Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 45, 45)-3.4 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 0.81
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Log10 Plasma Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 45, 45)-3.3 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 0.72
Comparison: The above analysis is change for baseline in Log10 plasma HCV RNA at 48 Weeks. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.802495% CI: [-0.22, 0.28]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is change for baseline in Log10 plasma HCV RNA at 96 Weeks. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.26695% CI: [-0.12, 0.43]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is change for baseline in Log10 plasma HCV RNA at 144 Weeks. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.285595% CI: [-0.12, 0.41]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) - Week 48, 96 and 144.

Plasma samples were used to determine markers of immune activation namely CRP.

Time frame: 48, 96 and 144 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participants who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) - Week 48, 96 and 144.Week 96 (n=70, 67)0.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.16
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) - Week 48, 96 and 144.Week 144 (n=70, 67)0.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.99
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) - Week 48, 96 and 144.Week 48 (n=70, 67)0.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 8.18
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) - Week 48, 96 and 144.Week 96 (n=70, 67)-0.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 3.32
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) - Week 48, 96 and 144.Week 48 (n=70, 67)3.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 26.66
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) - Week 48, 96 and 144.Week 144 (n=70, 67)-0.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.28
Comparison: The above analysis is for C-reactive protein cells at Week 48. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.447695% CI: [-9.11, 4.05]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for C-reactive protein cells at Week 96. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.301295% CI: [-0.61, 1.96]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for C-reactive protein cells at Week 144. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.419695% CI: [-1.33, 3.17]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: D Dimer - Week 48, 96 and 144

Plasma samples were used to determine markers of immune activation namely D-Dimer.

Time frame: 48, 96 and 144 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: D Dimer - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 68, 65)-101.1 ng/dLStandard Deviation 753.24
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: D Dimer - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 68, 65)-88.1 ng/dLStandard Deviation 740.14
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: D Dimer - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 68, 65)-97.4 ng/dLStandard Deviation 768.98
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: D Dimer - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 68, 65)-20.4 ng/dLStandard Deviation 215.62
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: D Dimer - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 68, 65)-23.1 ng/dLStandard Deviation 201.55
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: D Dimer - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 68, 65)9.8 ng/dLStandard Deviation 358.07
Comparison: The above analysis is for D-Dimer cells at Week 48. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.990495% CI: [-48.66, 49.26]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for D-Dimer cells at Week 96. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.769795% CI: [-62.44, 84.18]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for D-Dimer cells at Week 144. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.581695% CI: [-112.21, 63.23]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF Beta) - Week 48, 96 and 144

Plasma samples were used to determine markers of immune activation namely TGF beta.

Time frame: 48, 96 and 144 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF Beta) - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 67, 66)64.1 ng/LStandard Deviation 4857.31
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF Beta) - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 67, 66)-227.5 ng/LStandard Deviation 4417.59
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF Beta) - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 67, 66)792.0 ng/LStandard Deviation 6772.41
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF Beta) - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 67, 66)-165.0 ng/LStandard Deviation 2584.89
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF Beta) - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 67, 66)-296.5 ng/LStandard Deviation 2200.97
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Markers of Immune Activation: Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF Beta) - Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 67, 66)1275.4 ng/LStandard Deviation 5044.79
Comparison: The above analysis is for TGF-beta cells at Week 48. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.378695% CI: [-617.33, 1613.41]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for TGF-beta cells at Week 96. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.438895% CI: [-539.61, 1237.01]ANCOVA
Comparison: The above analysis is for TGF-beta cells at Week 144. Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.855995% CI: [-2060.81, 1713.68]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Plasma Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA at Week 48, 96 and 144

Plasma samples were used to determine HBV DNA using the Roche COBAS Taqman HBV assay. Baseline value for HCV RNA/HBV DNA is defined as the pre-dose measurement taken at Day 1 visit.

Time frame: 48, 96 and 144 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Plasma Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 15, 10)-2.6 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 1.55
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Plasma Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 15, 14)-3.3 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 0.94
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in Plasma Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 15, 15)-3.4 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 0.96
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Plasma Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 15, 10)-3.0 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 0.11
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Plasma Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 15, 14)-3.0 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Plasma Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 15, 15)-3.0 Log10 valuesStandard Deviation 0
Comparison: Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline at Week 48 as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.777895% CI: [-0.93, 1.23]ANCOVA
Comparison: Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline at Week 96 as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.999195% CI: [-0.1, 0.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline at Week 144 as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.727595% CI: [-0.16, 0.11]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Hepatic Elastography (FibroscanTM) at Week 48, 96 and 144

Participants had transient hepatic elastography using FibroScan technology. It rapidly and non invasively measures hepatic tissue stiffness. Through a probe, a low frequency vibration of low amplitude is transmitted to the liver. The velocity of the wave that is generated during the procedure correlates directly with tissue stiffness as it passes through the liver; the harder or stiffer the liver, the faster the shear wave propagates. Results are reported in kilopascals (kPa). A negative change in the fibroscan values (i.e. decrease in liver stiffness) correlates with a decrease in fibrosis and thus improved outcome.

Time frame: 48, 96 and 144 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in the Hepatic Elastography (FibroscanTM) at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 25, 28)-1.3 kPaStandard Deviation 2.41
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in the Hepatic Elastography (FibroscanTM) at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 25, 28)-0.8 kPaStandard Deviation 2.95
MaravirocMean Change From Baseline in the Hepatic Elastography (FibroscanTM) at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 25, 28)-1.7 kPaStandard Deviation 2.45
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Hepatic Elastography (FibroscanTM) at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 48 (n= 25, 28)0.4 kPaStandard Deviation 5.71
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Hepatic Elastography (FibroscanTM) at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 96 (n= 25, 28)0.4 kPaStandard Deviation 5.7
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Hepatic Elastography (FibroscanTM) at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 144 (n= 25, 28)-0.3 kPaStandard Deviation 4.39
Comparison: Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline at Week 48 as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.141795% CI: [-4.31, 0.63]ANCOVA
Comparison: Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline at Week 96 as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.267995% CI: [-4.01, 1.14]ANCOVA
Comparison: Results are from an ANCOVA model with change from baseline at Week 144 as the response variable and the following fixed effect model terms: treatment (Maraviroc or placebo), baseline value of the response variable, HBV, PI-based regimen.p-value: 0.136695% CI: [-3.45, 0.49]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Hy's Law Abnormalities Through Week 144

Hy's law was defined as a total bilirubin \>2x ULN with a simultaneous ALT or aspartate transaminase (AST)\>3x ULN, excluding participants with an alkaline phosphatase\>3x ULN

Time frame: 144 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MaravirocNumber of Participants With Hy's Law Abnormalities Through Week 1440 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Hy's Law Abnormalities Through Week 1440 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized Due to Hepatic Disease Through Week 144

Healthcare resource utilization data was collected using the Healthcare Resource Utilization Questionnaire at all study visits except Screening and Baseline. Other components of healthcare resource utilization, including length of hospital stay, type of ward, associated investigative and therapeutic procedures and concomitant medications were captured from primary and secondary data sources.

Time frame: 144 Weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MaravirocPercentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized Due to Hepatic Disease Through Week 144Not Hospitalized71.4 Percentage of participants
MaravirocPercentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized Due to Hepatic Disease Through Week 144Hospitalized due to Hepatic Disease at least once10.0 Percentage of participants
MaravirocPercentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized Due to Hepatic Disease Through Week 144Hospitalized, but not due to Hepatic Disease95.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized Due to Hepatic Disease Through Week 144Not Hospitalized70.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized Due to Hepatic Disease Through Week 144Hospitalized due to Hepatic Disease at least once5.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized Due to Hepatic Disease Through Week 144Hospitalized, but not due to Hepatic Disease95.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Associated With a Change From Baseline ALT >100 IU/L

Percentage of participants who had Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT abnormalities associated with a change from baseline ALT \>100 IU/L during the 144-week period. Baseline will be defined as the last measurement prior to Day 1 dosing.

Time frame: 144 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MaravirocPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Associated With a Change From Baseline ALT >100 IU/LGrade 32.8 Percentage of participants
MaravirocPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Associated With a Change From Baseline ALT >100 IU/LGrade 41.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Associated With a Change From Baseline ALT >100 IU/LGrade 34.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Associated With a Change From Baseline ALT >100 IU/LGrade 40.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Through Week 144

Percentage of participants with Grade 3 or Grade 4 ALT abnormalities defined as \>5x upper limit of normal (ULN) for participants whose baseline ALT ≤ULN, or \>3.5x baseline for participants whose baseline ALT \>ULN, up to and including Week 96 and Week 144 in the maraviroc arm versus the placebo arm. The baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to Day 1 dosing.

Time frame: Week 96 and 144

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MaravirocPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Through Week 144at Week 961.4 Percentage of participants
MaravirocPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Through Week 144at Week 1442.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Through Week 144at Week 963.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities Through Week 144at Week 1444.5 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-0.0653, 0.0319]
95% CI: [-0.0805, 0.0452]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Concentration <40 Copies/mL at Week 48, 96 and 144

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA's) snapshot algorithm was used to derive the efficacy endpoint of the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA \<40 copies/mL at Week 48. This algorithm included the missing data imputation method and used the plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration in the visit window only, followed the virology-first principle and considered a participant who had a missing plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration, or switched to a prohibited background anti-retroviral regimen or discontinues from the study or study drug as a failure (MSDF).

Time frame: Week 48, 96 and 144

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. For calculating proportions at the analysis timepoint of interest, ie week 144, LOCF was used if the value at that timepoint was missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MaravirocPercentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Concentration <40 Copies/mL at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 9667.1 Percentage of participants
MaravirocPercentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Concentration <40 Copies/mL at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 14458.6 Percentage of participants
MaravirocPercentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Concentration <40 Copies/mL at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 4877.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Concentration <40 Copies/mL at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 9670.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Concentration <40 Copies/mL at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 14467.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Concentration <40 Copies/mL at Week 48, 96 and 144Week 4879.1 Percentage of participants
Comparison: A stratified analysis was conducted by summarizing the difference in proportions adjusted for the randomization strata formed by crossing levels of stratification variables. The CMH approach was used. No formal hypothesis test was performed. Week 48 data presented here.95% CI: [-0.1484, 0.1185]
Comparison: A stratified analysis was conducted by summarizing the difference in proportions adjusted for the randomization strata formed by crossing levels of stratification variables. The CMH approach was used. No formal hypothesis test was performed. Week 96 data presented here.95% CI: [-0.1784, 0.1274]
Comparison: A stratified analysis was conducted by summarizing the difference in proportions adjusted for the randomization strata formed by crossing levels of stratification variables. The CMH approach was used. No formal hypothesis test was performed. Week 144 data presented here.95% CI: [-0.2421, 0.0761]
Secondary

Summary of Estimated Maraviroc PK Parameters

Week 4 and Week 48 clinic visits were scheduled such that a trough sample may be taken within a time window of 8-16 hours after the previous dose (Ctrough). Blood samples (4mL) were collected from all participants at the Week 4 and 48 visits.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Participants included in the statistical analysis of PK parameters were those receiving maraviroc treatment at Week 48 who had PK data available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MaravirocSummary of Estimated Maraviroc PK ParametersCmin127.2 ng/mL
MaravirocSummary of Estimated Maraviroc PK ParametersCmax496 ng/mL
MaravirocSummary of Estimated Maraviroc PK ParametersCavg262 ng/mL
PlaceboSummary of Estimated Maraviroc PK ParametersCmin61.3 ng/mL
PlaceboSummary of Estimated Maraviroc PK ParametersCavg166 ng/mL
PlaceboSummary of Estimated Maraviroc PK ParametersCmax258 ng/mL
Maraviroc 600 mgSummary of Estimated Maraviroc PK ParametersCmin69.2 ng/mL
Maraviroc 600 mgSummary of Estimated Maraviroc PK ParametersCmax915 ng/mL
Maraviroc 600 mgSummary of Estimated Maraviroc PK ParametersCavg309 ng/mL
Secondary

Time to Development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities

Time taken in days to development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT abnormalities defined as \>5x ULN for participants whose baseline ALT ≤ULN, or \>3.5x baseline for participants whose baseline ALT \>ULN, at Week 144.

Time frame: 144 weeks

Population: Time taken in days to development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT abnormalities defined as \>5x ULN for participants whose baseline ALT ≤ULN, or \>3.5x baseline for participants whose baseline ALT \>ULN, at Week 144. The median time to development was not estimable due to too few events reported under each treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MaravirocTime to Development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT AbnormalitiesNA Days
PlaceboTime to Development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT AbnormalitiesNA Days
Secondary

Time to Development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities at Week 144 Associated With a Change From Baseline ALT >100 IU/L

Time to development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT abnormalities associated with a change from baseline ALT \>100 IU/L during the 144-week period. Baseline will be defined as the last measurement prior to Day 1 dosing.

Time frame: 144 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed on the FAS which included participant who had received at least one dose of study drug. LOCF was used if the value at that time-point was missing, ie., week 48, 96 and 144. The median time to development was not estimable due to too few events reported under each treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MaravirocTime to Development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities at Week 144 Associated With a Change From Baseline ALT >100 IU/LNA Days
PlaceboTime to Development of Grade 3 and Grade 4 ALT Abnormalities at Week 144 Associated With a Change From Baseline ALT >100 IU/LNA Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026