Skip to content

Efficacy of Mesalamine in Diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (dIBS)

Randomized, Double-blind, Cross-over Study of the Efficacy of Mesalamine in Diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (dIBS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01327300
Acronym
IBS
Enrollment
7
Registered
2011-04-01
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2014-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Keywords

Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Irritable Bowel Syndrome Treatment, Mesalamine, Anti-inflammatory drugs, 5-ASA drugs, Apriso ™

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find whether treating patients with diarrhea predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) with an anti-inflammatory drug called Mesalamine will help improve their symptoms of diarrhea, bloating and abdominal pain.

Detailed description

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder affecting about 20% of the United States population and comprising almost 50% of referrals to gastroenterology practices. Although the pathophysiology of IBS is poorly understood, more recently, both inflammation and an increased intestinal permeability have been identified as potential factors in the etiology of diarrhea-predominant IBS patients(dIBS). Despite the potential of an inflammatory etiology for IBS, few studies have examined the efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents such as mesalamine in patients with IBS. The primary objective of our study is to determine the efficacy of Apriso™ (Salix Pharmaceuticals Inc), a long-acting mesalamine, in the treatment of patients with dIBS. Apriso™, is a mesalamine approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on October 31, 2008 for the maintenance of remission in patients with active, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. The investigators will perform a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial of mesalamine compared to placebo in patients with dIBS. This study will analyze both the objective and subjective measures of improvement in IBS symptoms. The subjective measures will include improvements in the overall symptom severity scores and the Global Improvement Scale (GIS) and the objective measures will include histological measures of inflammation as well as improvements in the intestinal membrane permeability of treated subjects. The investigators will demonstrate that during the 12 weeks treatment period with mesalamine, subjects will have improvements in their overall symptom scores, GIS scores, and will have a reduction in intestinal inflammation and also prohibit a likely improvement in Intestinal membrane permeability.

Interventions

DRUGMesalamine

Apriso is a 5-ASA drug with Intellicor ™ extended-release delivery technology. A 1.5 gram dosage of Apriso (equaling four 375 mg capsules) once a day will be administered orally for a period of 12 weeks followed by a 3 week wash out prior to crossing over to the placebo arm.

OTHERPlacebo

4 capsules (.375 gm sugar pill capsules) administered orally once a day. This group will receive the placebo for 12 weeks then a wash out for 3 weeks prior to crossing over to the drug arm.

Sponsors

University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female aged 18-65 years old * Functional Bowel Disorder Severity Index Score above 37 * Normal complete blood count, liver function studies and renal function studies * Serologies done to rule out Celiac Spure or patient has prior negative EGD with small bowel biopsies which have been negative * Infectious diarrhea ruled out by stool studies * Negative colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* Any history of chronic liver disease, heart disease, pulmonary or renal disease * Abnormal EKG * Women with positive pregnancy tests * Patient on steroids, antacids, or warfarin or chronic pain conditions other than fibromyalgia * Patients who drink over 2oz alcohol/day on a regular basis Any other causes for diarrhea such as IBD, microscopic colitis, celiac disease, history of abdominal obstruction, pancreatitis, ileus, or any gastrointestinal bleeding. * Patients with active malignancy in the past five years * Patient with any history of hypersensitivity reactions to salicylate containing medications due to cross-sensitivity with mesalamine or allergy to mesalamine medications in the past * Any subjects with fibromyalgia will be excluded from the pain testing portion only * History of Phenylketonuria due to the aspartame contained in Apriso

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in GIS Scores Between Baseline and After a 12 Week Intervention With Mesalamine or PlaceboBaseline and at 12 weeks post-interventionPatients rated the severity of their GI symptoms. The GIS scale goes from 1 to 7 with 1 being the worse and 7 as the best score showing improvement in symptoms. The GIS was performed at week one and at week 12 during each of the interventions. The comparisons below list the mean difference for each intervention from baseline (BL) with standard deviations then we list the p-value for the differences of baseline to intervention are reported using the Mann-Whitney test with a two-tailed p value provided.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Had Evidence of Increased Levels of Pathologic Indicators of Colonic Mucosal Inflammation at 12 Weeks Compared to Baseline.For 2 times: First time: at the time of patient recruitment in the study Second time: after the completion of first 12-week treatment period, all of which are during the time period from 02/25/2010 to 02/01/2012 (up to 2 years)Colonoscopy/flexible sigmoidoscopy will be performed and mucosal biopsies will be obtained. Each biopsy was stained for activated t lymphocytes, mast cells and eosinophils . CD117 staining was done for Mast cells. H and E staining was used to identify lymphocytes and eosinophils. Each path specimen was then noted to have increased versus normal number of these inflammatory cells.
Functional Bowel Disorder Severity Index (FBDSI)An FBDSI score is administered at the beginning of each 12-week treatment period (baseline) and at the end of each 12-week treatment period.Subjects rate pain on a standardized scale. This is a standardized test used to evaluate patients with IBS. Baseline values are compared to 12 weeks after mesalamine and 12 weeks after placebo treatments. The FBDSI is score is interpreted as such: Severity of IBS is rated as none (0 points), mild (1-36 points), moderate as 37-110 points and severe as \>110 points. Therefore patients can have a score higher than 110.
IBS - Quality of Life (IBS-QOL)Score.at the time of recruitment and after completion of each 12-week treatment period, all of which are during the time period from 03/25/2010 to 02/01/2012 (up to 2 years)A questionnaire is given to each patient and was completed at baseline then after 12 weeks of intervention with mesalamine and then placebo in the cross-over study. The IBS-QOL comprises 34 items with 5-point response scales (0 to 4) that cover eight dimensions of HRQL: dysphoria (8 items), interference with activity (7 items), body image (4 items), health worry (3 items),food avoidance (3 items), social reaction (4 items), sexual concerns (2 items) and relationships (3 items). Higher values indicate better HRQL after converting the raw score on the IBS-QOL into 0 to 100 points.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)at the time of recruitment and after completion of each 12-week treatment period, all of which are during the time period from 03/25/2010 to 02/01/2012 (up to 2 years)A questionnaire is given to each patient with scoring done on a Likert scale ranking from 0-42 which combines anxiety and depression scales. Each of these are scored from 0-21 depending on anxiety versus the depression parameters. Comparison of change in HADs after 12 weeks of intervention with either mesalamine or placebo is provided here with only the total value provided-range is from 0-42. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 3 with zero being none at all or occasional and 3 as most of the time. The scale used is a Likert scale and therefore the data returned from the HADS is ordinal. The best score for the HADS therefore is a 0 with the worst score a 42 for combined anxiety and depression scores. For the subscales of depression and anxiety, the best score is a 0 and the worst is a 21. This data is not provided here. Data below includes the change from baseline in the HADS scores.
Intestinal Permeability TestingAt the completion of each 12-week treatment period, all of which are during the time period from 03/25/2010 to 02/01/2012 (up to 2 years)Ability of test substances to permeate the intestinal mucosa. The Lactulose/Mannitol test (Genova Diagnostics®, Ashville, NC) directly measures the ability of mannitol and lactulose to permeate the intestinal mucosa. Patient ingests 5 grams of lactulose and 2 grams of mannitol dissolved in a 100 ml of water. Urine is then collected for 24 hours and the ratio of the urinary excretion of lactulose to mannitol is measured. This testing is performed only after completion of each treatment period , after 12 weeks of mesalamine and after 12 weeks of placebo. Normal ratio of lactulose/mannitol is any value \<0.7. An abnormal ratio is defined as \>0.7 ratio. The lactulose is measured in the urine as g/kg and the urinary excretion of mannitol is also measures as g/kg.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from the gastroenterology specialty clinics at the University of Florida or by referral from other primary care physicians. Recruitment was from 2011 until March, 2012

Pre-assignment details

A washout period of 3 weeks was given between treatment periods with 2 weeks prior to recruitment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
All participants were randomized to receive both mesalamine and placebo.
7
Total7

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Washout (3 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants
Age, Continuous32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 50 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in GIS Scores Between Baseline and After a 12 Week Intervention With Mesalamine or Placebo

Patients rated the severity of their GI symptoms. The GIS scale goes from 1 to 7 with 1 being the worse and 7 as the best score showing improvement in symptoms. The GIS was performed at week one and at week 12 during each of the interventions. The comparisons below list the mean difference for each intervention from baseline (BL) with standard deviations then we list the p-value for the differences of baseline to intervention are reported using the Mann-Whitney test with a two-tailed p value provided.

Time frame: Baseline and at 12 weeks post-intervention

Population: The first part of the analysis compares the differences between baseline and mesalamine to baseline and placebo. The P value provided below list the comparison of baseline-placebo to baseline-mesalamine using the Mann-Whitney statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MesalamineChanges in GIS Scores Between Baseline and After a 12 Week Intervention With Mesalamine or Placebo2.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
PlaceboChanges in GIS Scores Between Baseline and After a 12 Week Intervention With Mesalamine or Placebo2.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.49
Comparison: The GIS scoring system is from 1-7 with one being a worse outcome and 7 the better outcome.~Comparisons below list the p values for comparison of difference in GIS between baseline and mesalamine.p-value: 0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparisons of mean difference in GIS scores between baseline and placebo is made below.p-value: 0.008t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Functional Bowel Disorder Severity Index (FBDSI)

Subjects rate pain on a standardized scale. This is a standardized test used to evaluate patients with IBS. Baseline values are compared to 12 weeks after mesalamine and 12 weeks after placebo treatments. The FBDSI is score is interpreted as such: Severity of IBS is rated as none (0 points), mild (1-36 points), moderate as 37-110 points and severe as \>110 points. Therefore patients can have a score higher than 110.

Time frame: An FBDSI score is administered at the beginning of each 12-week treatment period (baseline) and at the end of each 12-week treatment period.

Population: Change in Functional Bowel Disorder Severity Index (FBDSI)after 12 weeks of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MesalamineFunctional Bowel Disorder Severity Index (FBDSI)-14.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 61.5
PlaceboFunctional Bowel Disorder Severity Index (FBDSI)17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 71
Comparison: The FBDSI score is based on the severity of abdominal pian. Severity is rated as the following:~None= 0 points Mild= (1-36) Moderate =(37-110) Severe= (\>110 points)p-value: 0.67t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: See prior description of the FBDSI score. Change in the FBDSI after 12 weeks of intervention is made using a two sided t-test.p-value: 0.77t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

A questionnaire is given to each patient with scoring done on a Likert scale ranking from 0-42 which combines anxiety and depression scales. Each of these are scored from 0-21 depending on anxiety versus the depression parameters. Comparison of change in HADs after 12 weeks of intervention with either mesalamine or placebo is provided here with only the total value provided-range is from 0-42. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 3 with zero being none at all or occasional and 3 as most of the time. The scale used is a Likert scale and therefore the data returned from the HADS is ordinal. The best score for the HADS therefore is a 0 with the worst score a 42 for combined anxiety and depression scores. For the subscales of depression and anxiety, the best score is a 0 and the worst is a 21. This data is not provided here. Data below includes the change from baseline in the HADS scores.

Time frame: at the time of recruitment and after completion of each 12-week treatment period, all of which are during the time period from 03/25/2010 to 02/01/2012 (up to 2 years)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MesalamineHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)HADS score- change from baseline c/w 12 weeks1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
MesalamineHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)HADS Score-end of 12 weeks14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
PlaceboHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)HADS score- change from baseline c/w 12 weeks-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
PlaceboHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)HADS Score-end of 12 weeks13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Comparison: Comparison of the change in HADS score of baseline to 12 weeks of mesalamine is made.p-value: 0.71t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of change in HADS score between baseline and after 12 weeks of placebo is made.p-value: 0.57t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

IBS - Quality of Life (IBS-QOL)Score.

A questionnaire is given to each patient and was completed at baseline then after 12 weeks of intervention with mesalamine and then placebo in the cross-over study. The IBS-QOL comprises 34 items with 5-point response scales (0 to 4) that cover eight dimensions of HRQL: dysphoria (8 items), interference with activity (7 items), body image (4 items), health worry (3 items),food avoidance (3 items), social reaction (4 items), sexual concerns (2 items) and relationships (3 items). Higher values indicate better HRQL after converting the raw score on the IBS-QOL into 0 to 100 points.

Time frame: at the time of recruitment and after completion of each 12-week treatment period, all of which are during the time period from 03/25/2010 to 02/01/2012 (up to 2 years)

Population: Data are the mean change in IBS-QOL between baseline and intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MesalamineIBS - Quality of Life (IBS-QOL)Score.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.1
PlaceboIBS - Quality of Life (IBS-QOL)Score.-12.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.2
Comparison: For the IBS QOL we compared the change in IBS-Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) after 12 weeks of mesalamine.p-value: 0.61t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of change in IBS-Quality of Life (IBS-QOL)from baseline after 12 weeks of intervention was made.p-value: 0.33t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Intestinal Permeability Testing

Ability of test substances to permeate the intestinal mucosa. The Lactulose/Mannitol test (Genova Diagnostics®, Ashville, NC) directly measures the ability of mannitol and lactulose to permeate the intestinal mucosa. Patient ingests 5 grams of lactulose and 2 grams of mannitol dissolved in a 100 ml of water. Urine is then collected for 24 hours and the ratio of the urinary excretion of lactulose to mannitol is measured. This testing is performed only after completion of each treatment period , after 12 weeks of mesalamine and after 12 weeks of placebo. Normal ratio of lactulose/mannitol is any value \<0.7. An abnormal ratio is defined as \>0.7 ratio. The lactulose is measured in the urine as g/kg and the urinary excretion of mannitol is also measures as g/kg.

Time frame: At the completion of each 12-week treatment period, all of which are during the time period from 03/25/2010 to 02/01/2012 (up to 2 years)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
MesalamineIntestinal Permeability Testing0.07 ratio
PlaceboIntestinal Permeability Testing0.04 ratio
Comparison: Comparison of the lactulose/mannitol ratio is made after a 12 week intervention with mesalamine to 12 weeks of placebo.p-value: 0.55t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had Evidence of Increased Levels of Pathologic Indicators of Colonic Mucosal Inflammation at 12 Weeks Compared to Baseline.

Colonoscopy/flexible sigmoidoscopy will be performed and mucosal biopsies will be obtained. Each biopsy was stained for activated t lymphocytes, mast cells and eosinophils . CD117 staining was done for Mast cells. H and E staining was used to identify lymphocytes and eosinophils. Each path specimen was then noted to have increased versus normal number of these inflammatory cells.

Time frame: For 2 times: First time: at the time of patient recruitment in the study Second time: after the completion of first 12-week treatment period, all of which are during the time period from 02/25/2010 to 02/01/2012 (up to 2 years)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MesalamineNumber of Participants Who Had Evidence of Increased Levels of Pathologic Indicators of Colonic Mucosal Inflammation at 12 Weeks Compared to Baseline.Increased Activated T lymphocytes-CD32 participants
MesalamineNumber of Participants Who Had Evidence of Increased Levels of Pathologic Indicators of Colonic Mucosal Inflammation at 12 Weeks Compared to Baseline.Increased Mast cells-CD 117 Positive staining2 participants
MesalamineNumber of Participants Who Had Evidence of Increased Levels of Pathologic Indicators of Colonic Mucosal Inflammation at 12 Weeks Compared to Baseline.Increased eosinophil counts3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Had Evidence of Increased Levels of Pathologic Indicators of Colonic Mucosal Inflammation at 12 Weeks Compared to Baseline.Increased Activated T lymphocytes-CD33 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Had Evidence of Increased Levels of Pathologic Indicators of Colonic Mucosal Inflammation at 12 Weeks Compared to Baseline.Increased Mast cells-CD 117 Positive staining2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Had Evidence of Increased Levels of Pathologic Indicators of Colonic Mucosal Inflammation at 12 Weeks Compared to Baseline.Increased eosinophil counts3 participants
Comparison: Correlation coefficients were used for each of three biomarkers in relation to other biomarkers and to the questionnaires and patient's symptoms.p-value: 0.873Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: The study tested three biomarkers and symptom domains at baseline and the end of 12 weeks of placebo using the Mann-Whitney test, as well as correlations between domains with Pearson's linear correlation coefficient.p-value: 0.81Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026