Skip to content

Ranibizumab Versus Low-fluence Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Prospective Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Ranibizumab Versus Low-fluence Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01325181
Enrollment
34
Registered
2011-03-29
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2013-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Keywords

Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy, Ranibizumab, Photodynamic therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab injection versus low-fluence PDT in the treatment of chronic CSC.

Detailed description

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is characterized by serous detachment of the neurosensory retina. The pathophysiology of CSC is not certain and various theories are proposed including impaired function of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), choroidal ischemia and choroidal hyperpermeability leading to RPE damage. Acute CSC with monofocal or paucifocal changes of RPE usually shows spontaneous resolution and has a favorable visual outcome. Chronic CSC is characterized by multifocal or diffuse decompensation of RPE associated with persistent detachment of neurosensory retina. This might lead to cystoid macular degeneration, foveal atrophy and damage to the foveal photoreceptor layer, consequently resulting in irreversible significant visual loss. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was proposed for the treatment of chronic CSC. Modified parameters of PDT such as shortening of the time of laser emission and reduction of a total light energy have been suggested to reduce the irreversible damages induced by conventional PDT. Recently, intravitreal injection of antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) was proposed as a new treatment option based on the effect of anti-permeability. Several reports demonstrated acceptable outcomes after intravitreal bevacizumab injection, one of anti-VEGF agent. But the clinical results with ranibizumab are not reported yet. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab injection versus low-fluence PDT in the treatment of chronic CSC.

Interventions

DRUGVerteporfin

a 6mg/m2 infusion of verteporfin(Visudyne; Novartis)over 10 minutes followed by laser delivery

DRUGranibizumab

Consecutive intravitreal injection of ranibizumab(Lucentis®, Novartis) 0.5mg/0.05ml for the first 3 months

Sponsors

Novartis Korea Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Jang Won Heo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 0.0 and 1.0 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) 2. presence of subfoveal fluid persisting for 3 months or more on optical coherence tomography (OCT) 3. presence of leakage and multifocal/diffuse RPE decompensation on fluorescein angiography (FA) 4. choroidal vascular hyperpermeability and abnormal dilation of choroidal vasculature on indocyanine angiography (ICGA)

Exclusion criteria

1. previous treatment, such as laser photocoagulation, PDT, intravitreal injection of steroid or anti-VEGF agent 2. evidence of choroidal neovascularization 3. any other ocular diseases that could affect visual acuity 4. systemic steroid treatment in the previous 12 months 5. media opacity such as cataract that could interfere with adequate acquisition of OCT, FA and ICGA images

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants That Achieved Complete Resolution of Subretinal Fluid on OCT Without Rescue Treatment12 monthsnumber of participants who achieved complete resolution of subretinal fluid on OCT without rescue treatment until the end of the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness on OCT12 monthsthe change from baseline in central foveal thickness measured by OCT throughout the follow-up period
Number of Participants With Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography12 monthsnumber of participants who showed fluorescein leakage after primary or rescue treatment throughout the follow-up period
Change From Baseline in logMAR BCVA12 monthsthe changes from baseline in logMAR BCVA throughout the follow-up period
Number of Participants Who Underwent Rescue Treatment12 monthsnumber of participants who underwent rescue treatment: ranibizumab injections for the low-fluence PDT group and low-fluence PDT for the ranibizumab group
Number of Participants With Adverse Event12 monthsnumber of participants with adverse event throughout the follow-up period including procedure and drug-related adverse events
Change From Baseline in Choroidal Hyperpermeability on Indocyanine Green Angiography12 monthschange from baseline in the status of choroidal perfusion and hyperpermeability on indocyanine green angiography throughout the follow-up period

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Low-fluence PDT18
Ranibizumab16
Total34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRanibizumabLow-fluence PDTTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants18 Participants34 Participants
Age Continuous48.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
51.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
50.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
16 participants18 participants34 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants15 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants That Achieved Complete Resolution of Subretinal Fluid on OCT Without Rescue Treatment

number of participants who achieved complete resolution of subretinal fluid on OCT without rescue treatment until the end of the study

Time frame: 12 months

Population: All study eyes were analyzed using intention to treat principle and the last observation forward method

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Low-fluence PDTNumber of Participants That Achieved Complete Resolution of Subretinal Fluid on OCT Without Rescue Treatment16 participants
RanibizumabNumber of Participants That Achieved Complete Resolution of Subretinal Fluid on OCT Without Rescue Treatment2 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness on OCT

the change from baseline in central foveal thickness measured by OCT throughout the follow-up period

Time frame: 12 months

Secondary

Change From Baseline in Choroidal Hyperpermeability on Indocyanine Green Angiography

change from baseline in the status of choroidal perfusion and hyperpermeability on indocyanine green angiography throughout the follow-up period

Time frame: 12 months

Secondary

Change From Baseline in logMAR BCVA

the changes from baseline in logMAR BCVA throughout the follow-up period

Time frame: 12 months

Secondary

Number of Participants Who Underwent Rescue Treatment

number of participants who underwent rescue treatment: ranibizumab injections for the low-fluence PDT group and low-fluence PDT for the ranibizumab group

Time frame: 12 months

Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Event

number of participants with adverse event throughout the follow-up period including procedure and drug-related adverse events

Time frame: 12 months

Secondary

Number of Participants With Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography

number of participants who showed fluorescein leakage after primary or rescue treatment throughout the follow-up period

Time frame: 12 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026