Skip to content

Study Of Telemedicine Consultation at Home For Older Adults

Study Of Telemedicine Consultation at Home For Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01324687
Enrollment
1537
Registered
2011-03-29
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2017-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Disorders, Telemedicine

Keywords

Telemedicine, Geriatrics

Brief summary

The system of medical care for older adults with acute illnesses often serves them poorly. Many factors limit these patients' access to safe, patient-centered, efficient, high-quality, acute care. These factors include a shortage of geriatricians and primary care physicians; limited availability of timely, acute-illness, patient appointments; emergency department (ED) crowding; interruptions to the continuity of care when patients use the ED; and poor transitions of care from the ambulatory setting to the ED. These conditions foster unnecessary ED use, adverse events in the ED for which older adults are particularly at-risk, and unnecessary medical costs. As the population ages, the magnitude of these problems will only increase. The overarching study goals are to develop and evaluate a telemedicine-enhanced care model that improves access to safe, high-quality, acute illness care for older adults; fosters appropriate use of health services; and reduces unnecessary expenditures. Specifically, this study aims to: 1. Expand the existing pediatric HeA telemedicine network to older adults by providing senior living communities (SLC) with an alternative on-site care option for individuals with an acute illness episode. Hypothesis 1: 90% of requested telemedicine visits will be successfully completed. 2. Evaluate the impact of the HeA telemedicine model on utilization, quality of care, and patient safety. Hypothesis 2: The rate of ED use will be lower at SLCs with access to care via telemedicine, as compared to SLCs without such access to care. Hypothesis 3: Quality of care and patient safety measures will be better for SLC residents with access to telemedicine-enhanced care than for residents without this form of access. 3. Evaluate the economic benefit of the care delivered through the telemedicine network. Hypothesis 4: The net cost of healthcare per patient-month will be less for SLC residents with access to telemedicine-enhanced care than for those without this form of access. 4. Use qualitative methods to identify strategies and assets that promote and conditions that impede the implementation, acceptance, and success of the HeA telemedicine network in SLCs. This knowledge will inform efforts to develop a toolkit to be used to disseminate this technology broadly.

Detailed description

Telemedicine is a potential solution with demonstrated effectiveness in other vulnerable populations. Previous work by members of this research team has shown that telemedicine is an effective health information technology solution to address similar challenges in multiple vulnerable populations, demonstrating both improved access to care and reduced ED visits. The existing telemedicine program in Rochester, Health-e-Access (HeA), has been both successful and sustained, and well accepted by all key stakeholders including patients, families, clinicians, and insurers. This existing program, combined with the experience and multidisciplinary expertise of the investigators research team, creates a unique opportunity to (1) develop a model of care that leverages this technology to improve geriatric acute care, (2) evaluate this model through a prospective cohort study, and (3) identify key barriers and drivers of implementation to promote dissemination.

Interventions

Availability of telemedicine

Sponsors

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
CollaboratorFED
University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Member of the Strong Health Geriatrics Group practice * Consent to participate * Resident of facility with telemedicine established

Exclusion criteria

\- None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emergency Department UseUp to 42 monthsUse of emergency department by individuals with access to care via telemedicine as compared to those without such access to care.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost of CareUp to 36 monthsComparison of cost of care between intervention and control groups.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

We excluded 15 individuals from analysis because they left the facility and the study less than 1 month after starting, and they were significantly different than the rest of the population. We felt that they has been mistakenly accepted into an independent or assisted living and recognized this and moved out to an alternate level of care.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Group without access to telemedicine in the home for acute care issues.
1,058
Telemedicine Care
Cohort with access to telemedicine in the home for acute care issues. Telemedicine care: Availability of telemedicine
479
Total1,537

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalTelemedicine Care
Age, Continuous85 years85 years85 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
36 Participants63 Participants27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1022 Participants1474 Participants452 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1058 participants1537 participants479 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
746 Participants1093 Participants347 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
312 Participants444 Participants132 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1,0580 / 479
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1,0580 / 479

Outcome results

Primary

Emergency Department Use

Use of emergency department by individuals with access to care via telemedicine as compared to those without such access to care.

Time frame: Up to 42 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ControlEmergency Department Use0.1050 Emergency dept use rate per person-month
Telemedicine CareEmergency Department Use0.0885 Emergency dept use rate per person-month
Comparison: Rate ratio of ED use rate of the intervention group as compared to the control group.p-value: 0.01795% CI: [0.7261, 0.9689]GEE / Poisson regression models
Secondary

Cost of Care

Comparison of cost of care between intervention and control groups.

Time frame: Up to 36 months

Population: The cost data was not available from the Finance Office from Rochester General Hospital or Thompson Hospital so this analysis was not performed.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026