Skip to content

Comparison of the Hemostatic Patch to Fibrin Sealant (TachoSil®) in Subjects Undergoing Hepatic Surgery

A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized, Single-Blind Study to Compare the Hemostatic Patch to Fibrin Sealant (TachoSil®) in Subjects Undergoing Hepatic Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01324349
Enrollment
50
Registered
2011-03-29
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2014-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Disease

Keywords

Hepatic, Topical Hemostat

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Covidien's Hemostatic Patch to control bleeding during hepatic surgery. The performance of the Hemostatic Patch will be compared to Control as an adjunct to conventional hemostatic techniques.

Interventions

Topical hemostat

DEVICEFibrin Sealant (TachoSil®)

Topical hemostat

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Major Inclusion Criteria: * Scheduled for non-emergent, hepatic surgery * Presence of an appropriate target bleeding site (TBS) as defined by the protocol Major

Exclusion criteria

* Subject will be undergoing a laparoscopic hepatic procedure where the Hemostatic Patch will be delivered and applied through a trocar * In subjects with documented history of cirrhosis, subject has uncorrected platelet count \<60,000 per mm³ as determined by laboratory tests performed immediately prior to surgery * Subject has severe coagulopathy defined as INR \> 2.0 * Subject has Total Bilirubin \>2.5mg/dL * Subject has an active local infection at the Target Bleeding Site * Study procedure involves a liver transplant recipient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Time to Achieve Hemostasis Following Application of Study Treatment.Intra-operative (day 1)Stopwatches will be provided to document time to hemostasis. Hemostasis will be assessed every 30 seconds until the 5-minute time point, at which point the visual inspection will continue at one-minute intervals up to 10 minutes or until hemostasis is achieved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects to Achieve Hemostasis Within 3 Minutes of Study Treatment ApplicationIntra-operative (day 1)Stopwatches will be provided to document time to hemostasis. Hemostasis will be assessed every 30 seconds until the 5-minute time point, at which point the visual inspection will continue at one-minute intervals up to 10 minutes or until hemostasis is achieved.
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsUp to 30 days post surgery.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects who were scheduled for non-emergent, open hepatic surgery were assessed for potential study eligibility via a screening/baseline assessment performed within 30 days of their scheduled procedure.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects who met the pre-operative eligibility criteria were considered for study participation. During the surgical procedures, subjects who met the intra-operative eligibility criteria were randomized. Subjects who did not meet all criteria were considered screen failures and not randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Veriset Hemostatic Patch
Subject received the topical hemostat Veriset Hemostatic Patch
32
Fibrin Sealant (TachoSil®)
Subject received the topical hemostat TachoSil®
18
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalVeriset Hemostatic PatchFibrin Sealant (TachoSil®)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
24 Participants18 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
26 Participants14 Participants12 Participants
Age, Continuous62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Region of Enrollment
Austria
10 participants6 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
16 participants11 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
24 participants15 participants9 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants19 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants13 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 3210 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 328 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Median Time to Achieve Hemostasis Following Application of Study Treatment.

Stopwatches will be provided to document time to hemostasis. Hemostasis will be assessed every 30 seconds until the 5-minute time point, at which point the visual inspection will continue at one-minute intervals up to 10 minutes or until hemostasis is achieved.

Time frame: Intra-operative (day 1)

Population: Per the study protocol, the ITT population will serve as the primary analysis population for effectiveness. One randomized subject, Subject 1104, did not receive the assigned treatment (TachoSil®).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Veriset Hemostatic PatchMedian Time to Achieve Hemostasis Following Application of Study Treatment.1 Minutes
Fibrin Sealant (TachoSil®)Median Time to Achieve Hemostasis Following Application of Study Treatment.3 Minutes
Comparison: The primary effectiveness endpoint was time to hemostasis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival distribution and to obtain the estimated median time to hemostasis for each treatment. Subjects who did not achieve hemostasis by 10 minutes were to be censored as of that time point. For each treatment, 95% Brookmeyer-Crowley confidence intervals for the median were computed based upon the sign test.p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Subjects to Achieve Hemostasis Within 3 Minutes of Study Treatment Application

Stopwatches will be provided to document time to hemostasis. Hemostasis will be assessed every 30 seconds until the 5-minute time point, at which point the visual inspection will continue at one-minute intervals up to 10 minutes or until hemostasis is achieved.

Time frame: Intra-operative (day 1)

Population: Per the study protocol, the ITT population will serve as the primary analysis population for effectiveness and will be discussed in this report. One randomized subject, Subject 1104, did not receive the assigned treatment (TachoSil).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Veriset Hemostatic PatchNumber of Subjects to Achieve Hemostasis Within 3 Minutes of Study Treatment Application30 Participants
Fibrin Sealant (TachoSil®)Number of Subjects to Achieve Hemostasis Within 3 Minutes of Study Treatment Application12 Participants
Comparison: The secondary effectiveness endpoint was hemostasis within 3 minutes. The number and percentage of subjects who achieved hemostasis within 3 minutes are presented for each treatment group. The proportions of subjects who achieved hemostasis within 3 minutes were compared between treatments using the Suissa and Shuster test. Additionally, a 95% Blyth-Still-Casella confidence interval for the true proportion was computed for each treatment.p-value: 0.033995% CI: [1.9, 47.3]Suissa and Shuster test
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

Time frame: Up to 30 days post surgery.

Population: All treated subjects are included in the Safety population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Veriset Hemostatic PatchNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events23 Participants
Fibrin Sealant (TachoSil®)Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events14 Participants
Comparison: The incidence of subjects experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (defined under this protocol as Adverse Events) was summarized by MedDRA system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) for each treatment group for the safety population. Tests for differences between the two treatments in the proportion of subjects experiencing any adverse event were made using Fisher's Exact Test.p-value: 0.5029Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026