Skip to content

Assessment of Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Non-cancer-related Pain and Opioid-induced Constipation

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NKTR-118 in Patients With Non-Cancer-Related Pain and Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01323790
Enrollment
700
Registered
2011-03-28
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2015-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)

Keywords

Non-Cancer-Related Pain, Opioid-Induced Constipation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect and safety of NKTR-118 treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with non-cancer-related pain, including those patients that have inadequate response to laxative therapy (LIR).

Interventions

12.5 mg oral tablet once daily

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo to NKTR-118

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 84 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provision of written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures. * Self-reported active symptoms of OIC at screening (\<3 SBMs/week and experiencing ≥1 reported symptom of hard/lumpy stools, straining, or sensation of incomplete evacuation/anorectal obstruction in at least 25% of BMs over the previous 4 weeks); and Documented confirmed OIC (\<3 SBMs/week on average over the 2-week OIC confirmation period. * Receiving a stable maintenance opioid regimen consisting of a total daily dose of 30 mg to 1000 mg of oral morphine, or equianalgesic amount(s) of 1 or more other opioid therapies for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to screening for non-cancer-related pain with no anticipated change in opioid dose requirement over the proposed study period as a result of disease progression. * Willingness to stop all laxatives and other bowel regimens including prune juice and herbal products throughout the 2-week OIC confirmation period and the 12-week treatment period, and to use only bisacodyl as rescue medication if a BM has not occurred within at least 72 hours of the last recorded BM.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients receiving Opioid regimen for treatment of pain related to cancer. * History of cancer within 5 years from first study visit with the exception of basal cell cancer and squamous cell skin cancer. * Medical conditions and treatments associated with diarrhea, intermittent loose stools, or constipation. * Other issues to the gastrointestinal tract that could impose a risk to the patient. * Pregnancy or lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug During Weeks 1 to 12Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)Responder was defined as having at least 3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs)/week with at least 1 SBM/week increase over baseline for at least 9 out of the 12 treatment weeks and 3 out of the last 4 treatment weeks during the double-blind treatment period. An SBM is a bowel movement occurring 24 hours or more since the last use of rescue medication.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Days Per Week With at Least 1 SBM During Weeks 1 to 1212 weeks
Change From Baseline in Degree of StrainingBaseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)A single-item straining question was asked via the eDiary: How much did you strain during your bowel movement? Patients responded on a 5 point Likert scale: 1=Not at all; 2=A little bit; 3=A moderate amount; 4=A great deal; 5=An extreme amount. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Scale)Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)Patients rated stool consistency through completion of the BSS after each BM. The 7 stool types are: 1. Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass); 2. Sausage-shaped, but lumpy; 3. Like sausage, but with cracks on its surface; 4. Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; 5. Soft blobs with clear cut edges (passed easily); 6. Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; 7. Watery, no solid pieces. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Response (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug in the LIR Subgroup During Weeks 1 to 12Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)Responder is defined as having at least 3 SBMs/week, with at least 1 SBM/week increase over baseline for at least 9 out of 12 weeks and at least 3 out of the last 4 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Mean Spontaneous Bowel Movements/WeekBaseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)The number of spontaneous bowel movements/week was determined from the patient's eDiary.
Time (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours in the Laxative Inadequate Response (LIR) SubgroupBaseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)Time to first post-dose laxation without the use of rescue laxatives within the last 24 hours was calculated in hours as: Date/Time of first post-dose laxation without rescue - First dose date/time.
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)The PAC-SYM questionnaire is a 12-item questionnaire that evaluates the severity of symptoms of constipation in 3 domains (stool, rectal, and abdominal symptoms) on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) in the 2 weeks (14 days) prior to assessment. Each domain score is the mean of the non-missing items for that domain. The total score is the mean of all non-missing items (ie, symptoms). The range of the domain or total score is 0 (response is 'absent' for each item) to 4 (response is 'very severe' for each item). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Satisfaction DomainBaseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)The PAC-QOL scale is a 28-item self-report instrument designed to evaluate the burden of constipation on patients' everyday functioning and well-being in the 2 weeks (14 days) prior to assessment. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The instrument can be used to generate an overall score, but is also reported to assess 4 specific constipation-related domains including: 1) Worries and concerns (11 items), 2) Physical discomfort (4 items), 3) Psychosocial discomfort (8 items), and 4) Satisfaction (5 items). Each domain score is the mean of the non-missing items for that domain. The total score is the mean of all non-missing items. The range of the domain or total score is 0 (response is 'not at all' for each item) to 4 (response is 'extremely' for each item). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Percent Numbers of Days With a CSBM (Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement)Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)A single-item question on the completeness of evacuation, developed and validated through 1:1 interviews with OIC patients, was asked via the eDiary: Did you feel like your bowels were completely empty after the bowel movement? Patients provided a yes or a no response. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Countries

Belgium, Croatia, Czechia, Hungary, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This multicenter study was conducted in Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, and the United States between 28 March 2011 and 20 September 2012.

Pre-assignment details

The study duration was up to 18 weeks, consisting of an initial screening period lasting up to 2 weeks, a 2-week OIC confirmation period, during which the diagnosis of OIC and stability of the opioid regimen were confirmed, a 12-week treatment period, and a follow-up visit 2 weeks after the last dose of study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NKTR-118 12.5 mg
NKTR-118 12.5 QD, oral treatment
232
NKTR-118 25 mg
NKTR-118 25 mg QD, oral treatment
232
Placebo
Placebo QD, oral treatment
232
Total696

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event112412
Overall StudyDid Not Receive Treatment201
Overall StudyEligibility Criteria Not Fulfilled001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy303
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1199
Overall StudyOther321
Overall StudySevere non-compliance with protocol222
Overall StudyStudy-Specific Withdrawal Criteria033
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject232013

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalNKTR-118 12.5 mgNKTR-118 25 mgPlacebo
Age, Continuous52.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.58
52.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.02
51.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.11
52.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.62
Baseline laxative response status
Laxative Adequate Response (LAR)
14 Participants5 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Baseline laxative response status
Laxative Inadequate Response (LIR)
370 Participants125 Participants124 Participants121 Participants
Baseline laxative response status
Laxative Unknown Response (LUR)
312 Participants102 Participants103 Participants107 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
125 Participants41 Participants40 Participants44 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
559 Participants187 Participants189 Participants183 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
441 Participants149 Participants147 Participants145 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
255 Participants83 Participants85 Participants87 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
90 / 230112 / 23273 / 231
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 2308 / 23212 / 231

Outcome results

Primary

Response (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug During Weeks 1 to 12

Responder was defined as having at least 3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs)/week with at least 1 SBM/week increase over baseline for at least 9 out of the 12 treatment weeks and 3 out of the last 4 treatment weeks during the double-blind treatment period. An SBM is a bowel movement occurring 24 hours or more since the last use of rescue medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized patients, with the exception of patients who were found to have randomized multiple times within the program at different centers.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NKTR-118 12.5 mgResponse (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug During Weeks 1 to 1281 Number of patients
NKTR-118 25 mgResponse (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug During Weeks 1 to 1292 Number of patients
PlaceboResponse (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug During Weeks 1 to 1268 Number of patients
Comparison: Analysis via Cochran Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by response to laxatives at baseline (LIR, LAR, LUR).p-value: 0.20295% CI: [0.911, 1.548]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Analysis via Cochran Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by response to laxatives at baseline (LIR, LAR, LUR).p-value: 0.02195% CI: [1.045, 1.739]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Degree of Straining

A single-item straining question was asked via the eDiary: How much did you strain during your bowel movement? Patients responded on a 5 point Likert scale: 1=Not at all; 2=A little bit; 3=A moderate amount; 4=A great deal; 5=An extreme amount. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized patients who had evaluable data at baseline and post-baseline, with the exception of patients who were found to have randomized multiple times within the program at different centers.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NKTR-118 12.5 mgChange From Baseline in Degree of Straining-0.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
NKTR-118 25 mgChange From Baseline in Degree of Straining-0.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Degree of Straining-0.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response (LIR, non-LIR), treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-0.32, -0.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response (LIR, non-LIR), treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.45, -0.18]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Days Per Week With at Least 1 SBM During Weeks 1 to 12

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized patients who had evaluable data at baseline and post-baseline, with the exception of patients who were found to have randomized multiple times within the program at different centers.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NKTR-118 12.5 mgChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Days Per Week With at Least 1 SBM During Weeks 1 to 122.12 Number of DaysStandard Error 0.12
NKTR-118 25 mgChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Days Per Week With at Least 1 SBM During Weeks 1 to 122.41 Number of DaysStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Number of Days Per Week With at Least 1 SBM During Weeks 1 to 121.73 Number of DaysStandard Error 0.12
Comparison: Analysis via Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.0195% CI: [0.09, 0.69]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.37, 0.98]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Spontaneous Bowel Movements/Week

The number of spontaneous bowel movements/week was determined from the patient's eDiary.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized patients who had evaluable data at baseline and post-baseline, with the exception of patients who were found to have randomized multiple times within the program at different centers.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NKTR-118 12.5 mgChange From Baseline in Mean Spontaneous Bowel Movements/Week2.62 Number of SBMs/weekStandard Error 0.18
NKTR-118 25 mgChange From Baseline in Mean Spontaneous Bowel Movements/Week3.14 Number of SBMs/weekStandard Error 0.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Spontaneous Bowel Movements/Week2.10 Number of SBMs/weekStandard Error 0.18
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response (LIR, non-LIR), treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.02895% CI: [0.06, 0.98]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response (LIR, non-LIR), treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.58, 1.51]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Satisfaction Domain

The PAC-QOL scale is a 28-item self-report instrument designed to evaluate the burden of constipation on patients' everyday functioning and well-being in the 2 weeks (14 days) prior to assessment. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The instrument can be used to generate an overall score, but is also reported to assess 4 specific constipation-related domains including: 1) Worries and concerns (11 items), 2) Physical discomfort (4 items), 3) Psychosocial discomfort (8 items), and 4) Satisfaction (5 items). Each domain score is the mean of the non-missing items for that domain. The total score is the mean of all non-missing items. The range of the domain or total score is 0 (response is 'not at all' for each item) to 4 (response is 'extremely' for each item). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized patients who had evaluable data at baseline and post-baseline, with the exception of patients who randomized multiple times at different centers. MMRM analysis includes all patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment, while the Ns at Week 12 reflect patients providing data at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NKTR-118 12.5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Satisfaction Domain-1.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
NKTR-118 25 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Satisfaction Domain-1.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Satisfaction Domain-0.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.01195% CI: [-0.54, -0.07]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.73, -0.25]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)

The PAC-SYM questionnaire is a 12-item questionnaire that evaluates the severity of symptoms of constipation in 3 domains (stool, rectal, and abdominal symptoms) on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) in the 2 weeks (14 days) prior to assessment. Each domain score is the mean of the non-missing items for that domain. The total score is the mean of all non-missing items (ie, symptoms). The range of the domain or total score is 0 (response is 'absent' for each item) to 4 (response is 'very severe' for each item). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized patients who had evaluable data at baseline and post-baseline, with the exception of patients who randomized multiple times at different centers. MMRM analysis includes all patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment, while the Ns at Week 12 reflect patients providing data at Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NKTR-118 12.5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Abdominal symptoms subscore-0.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
NKTR-118 12.5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Stool symptoms subscore-0.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
NKTR-118 12.5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Rectal symptoms subscore-0.59 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
NKTR-118 12.5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Total score-0.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
NKTR-118 25 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Rectal symptoms subscore-0.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
NKTR-118 25 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Stool symptoms subscore-1.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
NKTR-118 25 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Abdominal symptoms subscore-0.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
NKTR-118 25 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Total score-0.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Stool symptoms subscore-0.66 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Total score-0.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Rectal symptoms subscore-0.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)Abdominal symptoms subscore-0.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.0895% CI: [-0.26, 0.01]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.01195% CI: [-0.32, -0.04]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.55295% CI: [-0.11, 0.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.23695% CI: [-0.06, 0.25]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.09595% CI: [-0.24, 0.02]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.37, -0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-0.44, -0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response, treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.56, -0.21]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent Numbers of Days With a CSBM (Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement)

A single-item question on the completeness of evacuation, developed and validated through 1:1 interviews with OIC patients, was asked via the eDiary: Did you feel like your bowels were completely empty after the bowel movement? Patients provided a yes or a no response. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized patients who had evaluable data at baseline and post-baseline, with the exception of patients who were found to have randomized multiple times within the program at different centers.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NKTR-118 12.5 mgChange From Baseline in Percent Numbers of Days With a CSBM (Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement)23.48 Percent days/weekStandard Error 1.88
NKTR-118 25 mgChange From Baseline in Percent Numbers of Days With a CSBM (Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement)27.20 Percent days/weekStandard Error 1.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent Numbers of Days With a CSBM (Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement)16.76 Percent days/weekStandard Error 1.86
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response (LIR, non-LIR), treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [2.37, 11.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response (LIR, non-LIR), treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.03, 14.84]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Scale)

Patients rated stool consistency through completion of the BSS after each BM. The 7 stool types are: 1. Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass); 2. Sausage-shaped, but lumpy; 3. Like sausage, but with cracks on its surface; 4. Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; 5. Soft blobs with clear cut edges (passed easily); 6. Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; 7. Watery, no solid pieces. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized patients who had evaluable data at baseline and post-baseline, with the exception of patients who were found to have randomized multiple times within the program at different centers.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NKTR-118 12.5 mgChange From Baseline in Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Scale)0.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
NKTR-118 25 mgChange From Baseline in Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Scale)0.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Scale)0.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response (LIR, non-LIR), treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.12, 0.45]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis via MMRM with fixed effects for baseline, baseline laxative response (LIR, non-LIR), treatment and treatment time interaction. Study pooled center is included as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.29, 0.62]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Response (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug in the LIR Subgroup During Weeks 1 to 12

Responder is defined as having at least 3 SBMs/week, with at least 1 SBM/week increase over baseline for at least 9 out of 12 weeks and at least 3 out of the last 4 weeks.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized patients, with the exception of patients who were found to have randomized multiple times within the program at different centers. The LIR subgroup used 1 or more laxative classes for at least 4 days in the 2 weeks prior to entry and reported moderate to very severe symptoms.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NKTR-118 12.5 mgResponse (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug in the LIR Subgroup During Weeks 1 to 1253 Number of patients
NKTR-118 25 mgResponse (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug in the LIR Subgroup During Weeks 1 to 1258 Number of patients
PlaceboResponse (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug in the LIR Subgroup During Weeks 1 to 1238 Number of patients
p-value: 0.07495% CI: [0.967, 1.884]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.01495% CI: [1.078, 2.058]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Time (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized patients, with the exception of patients who were found to have randomized multiple times within the program at different centers.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NKTR-118 12.5 mgTime (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours19.3 Hours
NKTR-118 25 mgTime (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours12.0 Hours
PlaceboTime (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours37.2 Hours
Secondary

Time (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours in the Laxative Inadequate Response (LIR) Subgroup

Time to first post-dose laxation without the use of rescue laxatives within the last 24 hours was calculated in hours as: Date/Time of first post-dose laxation without rescue - First dose date/time.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized patients, with the exception of patients who were found to have randomized multiple times within the program at different centers.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NKTR-118 12.5 mgTime (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours in the Laxative Inadequate Response (LIR) Subgroup12.8 hours
NKTR-118 25 mgTime (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours in the Laxative Inadequate Response (LIR) Subgroup18.1 hours
PlaceboTime (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours in the Laxative Inadequate Response (LIR) Subgroup38.2 hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026