Skip to content

Ethanol-Free Clobetasol Propionate Foam 0.05% (Olux-E Foam) vs Vehicle Foam in the Treatment of Chronic Hand Dermatitis.

Ethanol-Free Clobetasol Propionate Foam 0.05% (Olux-E Foam) vs Vehicle Foam in the Treatment of Chronic Hand Dermatitis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01323673
Enrollment
125
Registered
2011-03-25
Start date
2010-11-15
Completion date
2011-03-29
Last updated
2018-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dermatitis, Chronic

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine how clobetasol proprionate foam works against a placebo foam in the treatment of hand dermatitis.

Detailed description

Topical corticosteroids have anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive and antiproliferative properties. Clobetasol propionate foam 0.05% (Olux-E), a Class 1 corticosteroid, is formulated in an ethanol free petrolatum base that provides the benefits of a super-potent corticosteroid combined with moisturizing ingredients in the treatment of corticosteroid responsive dermatoses. The current study is designed to show efficacy and safety in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic hand dermatitis.

Interventions

2 times a day, 14 total days study treatment

2 times a day, 14 total days of study treatment

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Stiefel, a GSK Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed informed consent * Male or female at least 12 years of age at time of consent and at time of first dose. * Able to complete the study and to comply with study instructions. * Moderate to severe hand dermatitis. * Chronic hand dermatitis diagnosis must be at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Female who is pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or breast feeding. * Currently diagnosed with allergic contact dermatitis. * Participated in a previous study of the same study product. * Had any major illness within 30 days before the screening/baseline visit. * Considered immunocompromised. * Has a clinically relevant history of or current evidence of abuse of alcohol or other drugs. * Considered unable or unlikely to attend the necessary visits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Grades in the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 15Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15The investigator rated chronic hand dermatitis of the participants' target hand using the 5-point ISGA: 0=clear, minor residual discoloration, no erythema (redness of skin)/induration (skin hardening)/papulation (eruption of small, rounded solid bumps on skin), no oozing/crusting; 1=almost clear, trace faint pink erythema, no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; 2=mild, faint pink erythema, mild induration/papulation; 3=moderate, pink-red erythema, moderate induration/papulation, some oozing/crusting; 4=Severe, bright-red erythema, severe induration/papulation, oozing/crusting.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 2 Grades in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and to Day 8Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, and Day 8The investigator rated chronic hand dermatitis of the participants' target hand using the 5-point ISGA: 0=clear, minor residual discoloration, no erythema (redness of skin)/induration (skin hardening)/papulation (eruption of small, rounded solid bumps on skin), no oozing/crusting; 1=almost clear, trace faint pink erythema, no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; 2=mild, faint pink erythema, mild induration/papulation; 3=moderate, pink-red erythema, moderate induration/papulation, some oozing/crusting; 4=Severe, bright-red erythema, severe induration/papulation, oozing/crusting.
Number of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and and to Day 8Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, and Day 8The investigator rated chronic hand dermatitis of the participants' target hand using the 5-point ISGA: 0=clear, minor residual discoloration, no erythema (redness of skin)/induration (skin hardening)/papulation (eruption of small, rounded solid bumps on skin), no oozing/crusting; 1=almost clear, trace faint pink erythema, no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; 2=mild, faint pink erythema, mild induration/papulation; 3=moderate, pink-red erythema, moderate induration/papulation, some oozing/crusting; 4=Severe, bright-red erythema, severe induration/papulation, oozing/crusting.
Number of Participants With an ISGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Days 3, 8, and 15The investigator rated chronic hand dermatitis of the participants' target hand using the 5-point ISGA: 0=clear, minor residual discoloration, no erythema (redness of skin)/induration (skin hardening)/papulation (eruption of small, rounded solid bumps on skin), no oozing/crusting; 1=almost clear, trace faint pink erythema, no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; 2=mild, faint pink erythema, mild induration/papulation; 3=moderate, pink-red erythema, moderate induration/papulation, some oozing/crusting; 4=Severe, bright-red erythema, severe induration/papulation, oozing/crusting.
Number of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 15Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15The investigator rated chronic hand dermatitis of the participants' target hand using the 5-point ISGA: 0=clear, minor residual discoloration, no erythema (redness of skin)/induration (skin hardening)/papulation (eruption of small, rounded solid bumps on skin), no oozing/crusting; 1=almost clear, trace faint pink erythema, no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; 2=mild, faint pink erythema, mild induration/papulation; 3=moderate, pink-red erythema, moderate induration/papulation, some oozing/crusting; 4=Severe, bright-red erythema, severe induration/papulation, oozing/crusting.
Number of Participants With an SGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Days 3, 8, and 15On Days 1, 3, 8, and 15 prior to the investigator assessment, participants rated chronic hand dermatitis of the target hand using the 5-point SGA: 0=skin is clear; 1=dermatitis in minimal, there may be a few light-pink areas; 2=dermatitis is mild, there may be occasional light-pink areas; 3=dermatitis is moderate, there may be easily noticeable pink-red areas; 4=dermatitis is severe, there may be deep or bright-red areas that may be warm to the touch.
Percent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Baseline (Day 1) and Days 3, 8, and 15On Days 1, 3, 8, and 15, participants assessed the pruritis (itching), stinging (piercing pain), burning, and pain of the target hand. Participants were instructed to assess the level/severity of the indicated symptoms over the previous 24 hours using a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (unbearable). Percent change from baseline was calculated as value at Days 3, 8, and 15 minus the value at Baseline divided by the Baseline value \* 100.
Number of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the Subject Global Assessment (SGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Days 3, 8, and 15Baseline (Day 1) and Days 3, 8, and 15On Days 1, 3, 8, and 15 prior to the investigator assessment, participants rated chronic hand dermatitis of the target hand using the 5-point SGA: 0=skin is clear; 1=dermatitis in minimal, there may be a few light-pink areas; 2=dermatitis is mild, there may be occasional light-pink areas; 3=dermatitis is moderate, there may be easily noticeable pink-red areas; 4=dermatitis is severe, there may be deep or bright-red areas that may be warm to the touch.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Olux-E Foam
Olux-E foam containing 0.05% clobestasol propionate, applied twice daily (morning and evening \[BD\]) for two weeks using the smallest amount of study product necessary to cover all affected areas, up to a maximum dosage of 50 grams (g) per week
62
Vehicle Foam
Vehicle foam without the active ingredient clobestasol propionate, applied BD for two weeks using the smallest amount of study product necessary to cover all affected areas, up to a maximum dosage of 50 g per week
63
Total125

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVehicle FoamTotalOlux-E Foam
Age, Continuous47.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
49.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
51.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 participants4 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 participants3 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
7 participants16 participants9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiracial
2 participants3 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
50 participants99 participants49 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants70 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants55 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 625 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 620 / 63

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Grades in the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 15

The investigator rated chronic hand dermatitis of the participants' target hand using the 5-point ISGA: 0=clear, minor residual discoloration, no erythema (redness of skin)/induration (skin hardening)/papulation (eruption of small, rounded solid bumps on skin), no oozing/crusting; 1=almost clear, trace faint pink erythema, no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; 2=mild, faint pink erythema, mild induration/papulation; 3=moderate, pink-red erythema, moderate induration/papulation, some oozing/crusting; 4=Severe, bright-red erythema, severe induration/papulation, oozing/crusting.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants who were dispensed study product. Missing values were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF, i.e., the last available observation, including Baseline, for a participant was used to estimate subsequent missing data points).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Grades in the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 1526 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Grades in the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 1518 participants
p-value: 0.151Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 15

The investigator rated chronic hand dermatitis of the participants' target hand using the 5-point ISGA: 0=clear, minor residual discoloration, no erythema (redness of skin)/induration (skin hardening)/papulation (eruption of small, rounded solid bumps on skin), no oozing/crusting; 1=almost clear, trace faint pink erythema, no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; 2=mild, faint pink erythema, mild induration/papulation; 3=moderate, pink-red erythema, moderate induration/papulation, some oozing/crusting; 4=Severe, bright-red erythema, severe induration/papulation, oozing/crusting.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

Population: ITT Population. Missing values were imputed using LOCF (i.e., the last available observation, including Baseline, for a participant was used to estimate subsequent missing data points).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 1545 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 1538 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and and to Day 8

The investigator rated chronic hand dermatitis of the participants' target hand using the 5-point ISGA: 0=clear, minor residual discoloration, no erythema (redness of skin)/induration (skin hardening)/papulation (eruption of small, rounded solid bumps on skin), no oozing/crusting; 1=almost clear, trace faint pink erythema, no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; 2=mild, faint pink erythema, mild induration/papulation; 3=moderate, pink-red erythema, moderate induration/papulation, some oozing/crusting; 4=Severe, bright-red erythema, severe induration/papulation, oozing/crusting.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, and Day 8

Population: ITT Population. Missing values were imputed using LOCF (i.e., the last available observation, including Baseline, for a participant was used to estimate subsequent missing data points).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and and to Day 8Day 324 participants
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and and to Day 8Day 836 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and and to Day 8Day 314 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and and to Day 8Day 832 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the Subject Global Assessment (SGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Days 3, 8, and 15

On Days 1, 3, 8, and 15 prior to the investigator assessment, participants rated chronic hand dermatitis of the target hand using the 5-point SGA: 0=skin is clear; 1=dermatitis in minimal, there may be a few light-pink areas; 2=dermatitis is mild, there may be occasional light-pink areas; 3=dermatitis is moderate, there may be easily noticeable pink-red areas; 4=dermatitis is severe, there may be deep or bright-red areas that may be warm to the touch.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Days 3, 8, and 15

Population: ITT Population. Missing values were imputed using LOCF (i.e., the last available observation, including Baseline, for a participant was used to estimate subsequent missing data points).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the Subject Global Assessment (SGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Days 3, 8, and 15Day 328 participants
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the Subject Global Assessment (SGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Days 3, 8, and 15Day 844 participants
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the Subject Global Assessment (SGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Days 3, 8, and 15Day 1551 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the Subject Global Assessment (SGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Days 3, 8, and 15Day 325 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the Subject Global Assessment (SGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Days 3, 8, and 15Day 835 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 1 Grade in the Subject Global Assessment (SGA) (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Days 3, 8, and 15Day 1533 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 2 Grades in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and to Day 8

The investigator rated chronic hand dermatitis of the participants' target hand using the 5-point ISGA: 0=clear, minor residual discoloration, no erythema (redness of skin)/induration (skin hardening)/papulation (eruption of small, rounded solid bumps on skin), no oozing/crusting; 1=almost clear, trace faint pink erythema, no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; 2=mild, faint pink erythema, mild induration/papulation; 3=moderate, pink-red erythema, moderate induration/papulation, some oozing/crusting; 4=Severe, bright-red erythema, severe induration/papulation, oozing/crusting.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, and Day 8

Population: ITT Population. Missing values were imputed using LOCF (i.e., the last available observation, including Baseline, for a participant was used to estimate subsequent missing data points).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 2 Grades in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and to Day 8Day 32 participants
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 2 Grades in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and to Day 8Day 1512 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 2 Grades in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and to Day 8Day 33 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an Improvement of at Least 2 Grades in the ISGA (Target Hand) Score From Baseline to Day 3 and to Day 8Day 1511 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With an ISGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15

The investigator rated chronic hand dermatitis of the participants' target hand using the 5-point ISGA: 0=clear, minor residual discoloration, no erythema (redness of skin)/induration (skin hardening)/papulation (eruption of small, rounded solid bumps on skin), no oozing/crusting; 1=almost clear, trace faint pink erythema, no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting; 2=mild, faint pink erythema, mild induration/papulation; 3=moderate, pink-red erythema, moderate induration/papulation, some oozing/crusting; 4=Severe, bright-red erythema, severe induration/papulation, oozing/crusting.

Time frame: Days 3, 8, and 15

Population: ITT Population. Missing values were imputed using LOCF (i.e., the last available observation, including Baseline, for a participant was used to estimate subsequent missing data points).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an ISGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 32 participants
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an ISGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 811 participants
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an ISGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 1524 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an ISGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 32 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an ISGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 89 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an ISGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 1517 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With an SGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15

On Days 1, 3, 8, and 15 prior to the investigator assessment, participants rated chronic hand dermatitis of the target hand using the 5-point SGA: 0=skin is clear; 1=dermatitis in minimal, there may be a few light-pink areas; 2=dermatitis is mild, there may be occasional light-pink areas; 3=dermatitis is moderate, there may be easily noticeable pink-red areas; 4=dermatitis is severe, there may be deep or bright-red areas that may be warm to the touch.

Time frame: Days 3, 8, and 15

Population: ITT Population. Missing values were imputed using LOCF (i.e., the last available observation, including Baseline, for a participant was used to estimate subsequent missing data points).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an SGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 37 participants
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an SGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 816 participants
Olux-E FoamNumber of Participants With an SGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 1532 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an SGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 34 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an SGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 810 participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With an SGA (Target Hand) Score of 0 or 1 at Days 3, 8, and 15Day 1514 participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15

On Days 1, 3, 8, and 15, participants assessed the pruritis (itching), stinging (piercing pain), burning, and pain of the target hand. Participants were instructed to assess the level/severity of the indicated symptoms over the previous 24 hours using a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (unbearable). Percent change from baseline was calculated as value at Days 3, 8, and 15 minus the value at Baseline divided by the Baseline value \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Days 3, 8, and 15

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants contributing data at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pruritus, Day 15, n=60, 59-65.7 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 38.25
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Stinging, Day 3, n=57, 60-27.8 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.86
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pain, Day 3, n=56, 58-22.9 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 54.8
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Stinging, Day 8, n=56, 58-49.2 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 47.25
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pruritus, Day 8, n=57, 57-48.3 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 46.38
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Stinging, Day 15, n=58, 59-63.1 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.63
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pain, Day 8, n=57, 56-40.2 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 52.25
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Burning, Day 3, n=57, 59-26.4 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.77
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Burning, Day 15, n=59, 60-63.2 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 45.46
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Burning, Day 8, n=55, 58-49.7 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 49.87
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pain, Day 15, n=60, 59-60.6 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.76
Olux-E FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pruritus, Day 3, n=58, 58-29.4 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 38.66
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pain, Day 15, n=60, 59-35.5 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 57.54
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pruritus, Day 8, n=57, 57-20.3 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 62.98
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Burning, Day 3, n=57, 59-10.4 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 84.39
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Burning, Day 8, n=55, 58-26.1 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 61.75
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pain, Day 3, n=56, 58-21.0 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 81.02
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pain, Day 8, n=57, 56-21.5 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 76.75
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pruritus, Day 15, n=60, 59-25.3 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 58.18
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Stinging, Day 3, n=57, 60-1.84 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 85.43
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Stinging, Day 8, n=56, 58-22.9 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 59.17
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Stinging, Day 15, n=58, 59-28.9 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 48.48
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Burning, Day 15, n=59, 60-31.1 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 55.67
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Pruritus, Stinging, Burning, and Pain Scores (Target Hand) at Days 3, 8, and 15Pruritus, Day 3, n=58, 58-11.5 Percent change in scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 52.76

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026