Skip to content

Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of PTH Analog Tablets in Postmenopausal Women

A Double Blind, Randomized, Repeat Dose Parallel Group Study of Recombinant Human Parathyroid Hormone Analog Tablets, or Placebo Tablets, Compared to Open Label Forsteo® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01321723
Enrollment
97
Registered
2011-03-23
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2013-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Keywords

Osteoporosis, Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Bone Diseases, Bone Density Conservation Agents

Brief summary

This study is designed to provide information about the bone anabolic properties and absorption profile of Unigene's PTH Analog when administered as oral tablets over a period of 24 weeks to postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Detailed description

The choice of a 24-week treatment period was based on published studies of PTH which demonstrate its potential to produce a statistically significant increase in BMD in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis within that observation period.

Interventions

DRUGPTH analog

A recombinant 1-31 amino acid fragment of PTH.

DRUGPlacebo
DRUGForsteo (Teriparatide)

A recombinant 1-34 amino acid fragment of PTH.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Unigene Laboratories Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
45 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy postmenopausal women (45-80 years old) with a diagnosis of osteoporosis

Exclusion criteria

* Use of estrogen or hormone replacement therapy * Use of bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate or denosumab * Use of parathyroid analogues or other bone metabolic agents * Medical conditions which might alter bone metabolism * Any known clinically significant disease affecting calcium metabolism or history of metabolic disorders including Paget's disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, or osteomalacia * Impairment of thyroid function

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
% Change From Baseline BMD in L1-L4 Axial Lumbar Spine at Week 2424 weeks from baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption Marker (CTx-1) at Week 2424 weeks from baselineSerum collagen type I (CTx-1) fragments generated during osteoclastic bone turnover are biomarkers for bone resorption. β-CrossLaps electrochemiluminescent sandwich immunoassay was used.
Systemic Absorption of PTH at Week 2424 weeksAUC: (PTH analog tablets timepoints - baseline to 5.75 hours) (Forsteo injection timepoints - baseline to 2 hours)
% Change From Baseline in Bone Formation Marker (P1NP) at Week 2424 weeks from baseline

Countries

Denmark, Estonia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Forsteo (Teriparatide)
Teriparatide : 20 mcg SC Injection, once daily
32
PTH Analog Tablets
PTH analog : 5 mg tablets, once daily
33
Placebo
Placebo : matching tablets, once daily
32
Total97

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event352
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject202

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicForsteo (Teriparatide)PTH Analog TabletsPlaceboTotal
Age Continuous66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.99
67.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.95
66.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.09
66.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.77
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants33 Participants32 Participants97 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 3230 / 3321 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 322 / 332 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

% Change From Baseline BMD in L1-L4 Axial Lumbar Spine at Week 24

Time frame: 24 weeks from baseline

Population: mITT Population: all subjects who received at least one dose of treatment and at least one post-baseline BMD value. Missing data imputation for patients who completed Week 12 but not the full 24-week period, data was imputed using the LOCF. No data imputation was performed for Week 24, if the Week 12 data was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forsteo (Teriparatide)% Change From Baseline BMD in L1-L4 Axial Lumbar Spine at Week 245.07 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 3.543
PTH Analog Tablets% Change From Baseline BMD in L1-L4 Axial Lumbar Spine at Week 242.21 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 2.503
Placebo% Change From Baseline BMD in L1-L4 Axial Lumbar Spine at Week 24-0.17 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 2.739
Secondary

% Change From Baseline in Bone Formation Marker (P1NP) at Week 24

Time frame: 24 weeks from baseline

Population: mITT Population: all subjects who received at least one dose of treatment and at least one post-baseline BMD value. Missing data imputation for patients who completed Week 12 but not the full 24-week period, data was imputed using the LOCF. No data imputation was performed for Week 24, if the Week 12 data was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forsteo (Teriparatide)% Change From Baseline in Bone Formation Marker (P1NP) at Week 24210.07 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 202.613
PTH Analog Tablets% Change From Baseline in Bone Formation Marker (P1NP) at Week 2412.05 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 37.055
Placebo% Change From Baseline in Bone Formation Marker (P1NP) at Week 24-1.75 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 27.459
Secondary

% Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption Marker (CTx-1) at Week 24

Serum collagen type I (CTx-1) fragments generated during osteoclastic bone turnover are biomarkers for bone resorption. β-CrossLaps electrochemiluminescent sandwich immunoassay was used.

Time frame: 24 weeks from baseline

Population: mITT Population: all subjects who received at least one dose of treatment and at least one post-baseline BMD value. Missing data imputation for patients who completed Week 12 but not the full 24-week period, data was imputed using the LOCF. No data imputation was performed for Week 24, if the Week 12 data was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forsteo (Teriparatide)% Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption Marker (CTx-1) at Week 24113.32 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 102.932
PTH Analog Tablets% Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption Marker (CTx-1) at Week 2412.72 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 36.547
Placebo% Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption Marker (CTx-1) at Week 2415.13 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 23.94
Secondary

Systemic Absorption of PTH at Week 24

AUC: (PTH analog tablets timepoints - baseline to 5.75 hours) (Forsteo injection timepoints - baseline to 2 hours)

Time frame: 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forsteo (Teriparatide)Systemic Absorption of PTH at Week 24152 pg* hr/mLStandard Deviation 65.7
PTH Analog TabletsSystemic Absorption of PTH at Week 24165 pg* hr/mLStandard Deviation 180
Post Hoc

Number of Participants With AEs as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Overall Summary of Adverse Events - Each subject with an event is counted only once although they may have several events.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Forsteo (Teriparatide)Number of Participants With AEs as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability23 participants
PTH Analog TabletsNumber of Participants With AEs as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability30 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With AEs as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability21 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026