Skip to content

Impact of Probiotics for Reducing Infections in Veterans: The IMPROVE Study

IMpact of PRObiotics for Reducing Infections in VEterans: The IMPROVE Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01321606
Enrollment
113
Registered
2011-03-23
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2018-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anti-biotic Resistance

Keywords

infection, probiotics

Brief summary

The investigators have two hypotheses: (1) The probiotic L. rhamnosus HN001, when compared to placebo, will reduce S. aureus nasal colonization when taken for four weeks. (2) The probiotic L. rhamnosus HN001, when compared to placebo, will reduce S. aureus gastrointestinal colonization when taken for four weeks.

Detailed description

Reducing infections caused by S. aureus is essential. The knowledge that colonization at a few key body sites such as the nose and the gastrointestinal tract is a prerequisite for infection2 ,3 offers an opportunity for therapeutic intervention. Thirty percent of the population has nasal colonization with S. aureus. In the last few years, decolonization agents such as mupirocin topical ointment and oral antibiotics such as doxycycline and rifampin have been studied for their utility in reducing colonization. However, these options have limitations in that recolonization is common, the impact of these interventions on multiple sites of colonization has not been assessed and resistance develops frequently to any of these, especially the oral antibiotics. Resistance in S. aureus has been designated a public health crisis. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) now accounts for 60% of all S. aureus infections. As an example of the growing crisis in S. aureus resistance, it should be noted that the number of MRSA infections rose from 2000 in 1993 to 368,000 in 2005. MRSA infections pose an even greater health and economic burden on the population than those caused by methicillin-sensitive S. aureus.4-8 S. aureus and MRSA infection trends in the VA health system mirror national trends5 and are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in Veterans. A treatment that reduces S. aureus and MRSA colonization, without a risk of promoting antibiotic resistance could represent a breakthrough in decolonization therapy. Probiotics may be one such treatment option. Probiotics are live microorganisms that are available over the counter, widely used as dietary supplements or nutritional foods and represent a low-cost, well tolerated, safe, non-antibiotic based strategy that may have efficacy for decolonization without the attendant risks of promoting antimicrobial resistance.9 Certain probiotics, including Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001, have demonstrated ability to stimulate systemic immune functions, possibly enhancing the body's ability to eradicate S. aureus in the gastrointestinal tract and at sites remote from the gastrointestinal tract such as the nose.10 ,11 The long-term goal of this research is to identify and test novel interventions for reducing infections caused by resistant bacteria. The investigators propose a Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in Veterans to evaluate the efficacy of an oral probiotic, Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001, for reducing S. aureus colonization. This study will produce data, methods, and tools that have widespread relevance and portability, with the potential to reduce healthcare-associated infections.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTLactobacillus rhamnosus HN001

Subjects will be given a pill formulation of a probiotic L. rhamnosus HN001 to be taken once a day, at a dose of 1 x 10\^10 organisms

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTsugar pill (placebo)

Placebo identical to the active product will be given

Sponsors

University of Wisconsin, Madison
CollaboratorOTHER
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Colonized at nasal or gastrointestinal source by S. aureus including MRSA * Age 18 years or older * Able to take oral medications * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Uncontrolled psychiatric illness * On a decolonization protocol for MRSA (e.g mupirocin, tea tree oil) * Current involvement in another investigational trial * Pregnancy * Persistent diarrhea (\> 3 loose stools per day for at least 2 days) * Active infection with S.aureus or MRSA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared to Placebo on Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Colonization of S. Aureus.4 weeksParticipants in the final outcome may be colonized at both GI and Extra-GI sites, thus the total numbers from the outcome cells can be greater than the overall number of participants analyzed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared With Placebo on Phagocytic Functioning of Polymorphonuclear (PMN) and Monocyte Cells4 weeksThis outcome is the mean difference in the % of granulocytes that phagocytized E. coli, from blood samples taken at the beginning and end of the trial. Percent of granulocytes phagocytizing E. coli at baseline is subtracted by percent of granulocytes phagocytizing E. coli at the end of the trial. The mean and standard error are calculated and reported for each study arm. This result

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1: Probiotic
Subjects were given a capsule formulation of a 1x10\^10 colony-forming units of probiotic L. rhamnosus HN001 to be taken once a day, for 4 weeks Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001: Subjects will be given a pill formulation of a probiotic L. rhamnosus HN001 to be taken once a day, at a dose of 1 x 10\^10 organisms
52
Arm 2: Placebo
Placebo composed of identical inactive components to the active product, to be taken once daily for 4 weeks. Placebo pill: composed of identical inactive components to the active product, given to be taken once daily for 4 weeks.
61
Total113

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1: ProbioticArm 2: PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous64.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants56 Participants105 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 1817 / 3217 / 3414 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 182 / 320 / 340 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Oral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared to Placebo on Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Colonization of S. Aureus.

Participants in the final outcome may be colonized at both GI and Extra-GI sites, thus the total numbers from the outcome cells can be greater than the overall number of participants analyzed.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1a: Extra-GI ProbioticOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared to Placebo on Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Colonization of S. Aureus.Endpoint Extra-GI colonization16 Participants
Arm 1a: Extra-GI ProbioticOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared to Placebo on Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Colonization of S. Aureus.Endpoint GI colonization9 Participants
Arm 2a: Extra-GI PlaceboOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared to Placebo on Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Colonization of S. Aureus.Endpoint Extra-GI colonization22 Participants
Arm 2a: Extra-GI PlaceboOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared to Placebo on Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Colonization of S. Aureus.Endpoint GI colonization17 Participants
Arm 1b: GI ProbioticOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared to Placebo on Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Colonization of S. Aureus.Endpoint GI colonization25 Participants
Arm 1b: GI ProbioticOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared to Placebo on Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Colonization of S. Aureus.Endpoint Extra-GI colonization20 Participants
Arm 2b: GI PlaceboOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared to Placebo on Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Colonization of S. Aureus.Endpoint GI colonization24 Participants
Arm 2b: GI PlaceboOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared to Placebo on Gastrointestinal and Extra-gastrointestinal Colonization of S. Aureus.Endpoint Extra-GI colonization19 Participants
Secondary

Oral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared With Placebo on Phagocytic Functioning of Polymorphonuclear (PMN) and Monocyte Cells

This outcome is the mean difference in the % of granulocytes that phagocytized E. coli, from blood samples taken at the beginning and end of the trial. Percent of granulocytes phagocytizing E. coli at baseline is subtracted by percent of granulocytes phagocytizing E. coli at the end of the trial. The mean and standard error are calculated and reported for each study arm. This result

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Some participants were excluded from this analysis due to lack of sample collection, or unusable results because tests did not meet acceptability criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1a: Extra-GI ProbioticOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared With Placebo on Phagocytic Functioning of Polymorphonuclear (PMN) and Monocyte Cells-0.29 Difference in % POS of GranulocytesStandard Error 2.43
Arm 2a: Extra-GI PlaceboOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared With Placebo on Phagocytic Functioning of Polymorphonuclear (PMN) and Monocyte Cells-1.38 Difference in % POS of GranulocytesStandard Error 2.65
Arm 1b: GI ProbioticOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared With Placebo on Phagocytic Functioning of Polymorphonuclear (PMN) and Monocyte Cells1.23 Difference in % POS of GranulocytesStandard Error 2.42
Arm 2b: GI PlaceboOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared With Placebo on Phagocytic Functioning of Polymorphonuclear (PMN) and Monocyte Cells2.61 Difference in % POS of GranulocytesStandard Error 2.83
Secondary

Oral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared With Placebo on Phagocytic Functioning of Polymorphonuclear (PMN) and Monocyte Cells

This outcome is the mean difference in the % of monocytes that phagocytized E. coli, from blood samples taken at the beginning and end of the trial. Percent of monocytes phagocytizing E. coli at baseline is subtracted by percent of monocytes phagocytizing E. coli at the end of the trial. The mean and standard error are calculated and reported for each study arm.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Some participants were excluded from this analysis due to lack of sample collection, or unusable results because tests did not meet acceptability criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1a: Extra-GI ProbioticOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared With Placebo on Phagocytic Functioning of Polymorphonuclear (PMN) and Monocyte Cells-0.54 Difference in % POS of MonocytesStandard Error 0.29
Arm 2a: Extra-GI PlaceboOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared With Placebo on Phagocytic Functioning of Polymorphonuclear (PMN) and Monocyte Cells0.59 Difference in % POS of MonocytesStandard Error 0.32
Arm 1b: GI ProbioticOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared With Placebo on Phagocytic Functioning of Polymorphonuclear (PMN) and Monocyte Cells0.07 Difference in % POS of MonocytesStandard Error 0.33
Arm 2b: GI PlaceboOral L. Rhamnosus HN001 Therapy Compared With Placebo on Phagocytic Functioning of Polymorphonuclear (PMN) and Monocyte Cells0.15 Difference in % POS of MonocytesStandard Error 0.36

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026