Skip to content

Effects of Different Strategy of Fluids Administration on Acid/Base Disorders and Inflammatory Mediators

Effects of Different Strategy of Fluids Administration on Acid/Base Disorders and Inflammatory Mediators

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01320891
Enrollment
40
Registered
2011-03-23
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2017-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Large Bowel Cancer

Keywords

general anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery

Brief summary

Aim of the study is to ascertain whether a different strategy of fluids administration can be responsible of differences in terms of acid/base disorders (Stewart approach), pro-inflammatory and inflammatory mediators. Hence two groups of patients will be treated either with not-balanced solutions (Normal Saline) or balanced solutions

Interventions

BEHAVIORALbalanced solutions

during the general anaesthesia until 8 o'clock of the day after the operation the subject will receive only balanced fluids that means balanced crystalloid and colloids dissolved in balanced solution. 12 ml /Kg/h during operation time. ratio 3:1 between crystalloid and colloid.

BEHAVIORALnot balanced

during the operation time until the 8 o'clock of the day after the operation, the subjects will receive only normal saline and colloid dissolved in normal saline.

Sponsors

B. Braun Melsungen AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Università degli Studi di Ferrara
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with diagnosis of large bowel cancer * Age \> 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

Emergency surgery for bowel punch or intestinal occlusion * Massive bleeding * Therapy with corticosteroid or nonsteroid antiinflammatory substances * Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 200 micromol /l) * Cardiac insufficiency (NYHA III-IV) * Altered liver function (ALT \> 40 U/l AST \>40 U/l) * Preoperative anaemia ( Hb \< 10 g/dl ) * Allergy to hydrossietilic starches * Patient rejection to share the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
acid/base disorderT0: anaesthesia induction (control value) T1: end of surgery T2: 1h after the end of surgery T3: 24h after the beginning of surgerythe investigators assess difference in acid base disorders between the two groups measuring emogas analyses data and blood electrolites levels at the same time (two days)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pro/antiinflammatory cytokineT0: anaesthesia induction (control value) T1:end of surgery T2: 1h after the end of surgery T3: 24h after the beginning of surgery-MMP-9 total and active, TIMP-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, mieloperossidasis, ROS, MCP-3 will be measured during the observation period. (two days)

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026