Skip to content

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Percutaneous Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Trial

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Percutaneous Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01319747
Acronym
VATCAT
Enrollment
77
Registered
2011-03-22
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2024-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

atrial, fibrillation, pvi, vats, ablation

Brief summary

Recent studies demonstrated that radiofrequency isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVI) and surgically video assisted thorascopic pulmonary vein isolation (VATS-PVI) are acceptable or even superior alternatives to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with symptomatically paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data comparing effectiveness in both interventions are limited. The investigators want to compare the effectiveness of PVI and VATS-PVI. Secondary objectives are to compare the duration of hospitalization, quality of Life, cost and to compare the satisfaction of the patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPVI

For catheter ablation, we used irrigated 4mm RF-ablation catheters, at a maximum power of 30-35Watt, an irrigation rate of 20 mL/min. PV isolation was performed by wide circumferential ablation, encircling all ipsilateral PVs.

PROCEDUREVATS-PVI

A bilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage (LAA) excision is performed under general anaesthesia and double-lumen endotracheal ventilation.

Sponsors

Medisch Spectrum Twente
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients \> 18 years of age * Documented, symptomatic, episodes of paroxysmal or persistent AF * During the last 6 months patients must have at least 2 documented episodes of AF, despite the use of at least 1 anti arrhythmic drug. * Able of providing informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Unwillingness to use or contra-indications for vitamin K antagonists * Severely enlarged left atrium (\>50 mm) on echocardiography * Prior AF ablation or AF surgery * Intracardiac thrombus * Prior heart surgery or pulmonary disease hampering thoracoscopic surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence of AFone yearThe percentage of patients without a recurrence of AF, without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), within a follow-up period of at least 12 months after a stabilisation period of 90 days after the initial procedure. An episode of AF is defined as an episode of at least 30 seconds duration.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment impactone yearSecondary objectives include the duration and cost of hospitalization, discomfort during admission, assessment and experienced AF burden during follow-up of procedural impact on the patient and time to recurrence after intervention. A complication register will also be kept.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026