Skip to content

Behavioral Science Aspects of Rapid Test Acceptance

Behavioral Science Aspects of Rapid Test Acceptance

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01317784
Acronym
BSARTA
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2011-03-17
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2015-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, HIV, Syphilis

Keywords

diagnosis screening, HIV serodiagnosis, HCV antibodies, serologic tests, Bedside testing, diagnostic test kits, syphilis serodiagnosis

Brief summary

The relevance of this research to public health is to make it possible to test for hepatitis C and syphilis at point of care so that people will receive their results immediately instead of requiring people to wait for at least a week to get their test results. This research will make rapid tests for HIV available that can detect HIV infection earlier and are more accurate than current tests available in the United States.

Detailed description

This application addresses Studies to improve access and utilization of HIV counseling and testing for HIV/AIDS and AIDS-related co-infections such as hepatitis C virus (HCV), other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) that are part of PA-07-307 Drug Abuse Aspects of HIV/AIDS. The only rapid tests that are approved for use in the US currently are for HIV infection. Tests for other conditions such as hepatitis C (HCV) and syphilis are in use in other countries. In response to an Opportunity that the CDC published in the Federal Register, there are now candidate rapid test kits for HCV and syphilis available for experimental use in the US. Different combinations of rapid and standard tests will be offered to participants in a four-arm trial to assess which tests are accepted by the participants. Only a minority of clients at CBRS who have been offered the rapid test for HIV have accepted it. Those who chose rapid HIV tests were more likely to be male, educated, gay, young and White. They were less likely to be Black, or injection drug users. The proposed study has the potential to have a significant impact upon screening for HIV, syphilis, and HCV. Rapid tests have the potential to increase the receipt of test results, particularly among groups that are less likely to return for their results using traditional testing. The candidate tests are designed for Point of Care (either oral fluid and/or whole blood), and thus will require real-time testing, so the trial will be able to evaluate both the accuracy of the tests in settings of intended use and their acceptability to potential clients in real-world situations.

Interventions

DEVICERapid tests for HIV, HCV, HBV, and syphilis

Choice of 16 different rapid tests. Only 12 manufacturer and names are shown because some are used with both blood and oral fluid. When they are used on both specimens, they are counted as two tests.

DEVICEHIV/HCV

Choice of 10 different tests for HIV and hepatitis C.

DEVICEHIV/syphilis

Choice of 7 different tests for HIV and syphilis

DEVICEHIV only

Choice of 4 different tests for HIV only.

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
California State University, Long Beach
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Over 17 years old * Mentally stable * Sober * Able to understand English or Spanish * At least one good vein for phlebotomy * Member of Behavioral Risk Group

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Test choice profileone day (day one of study)Which tests do participants choose to receive when bundled in different combinations?

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Return for standard test resultsone weekIs there a different return for test results rate for the different arms of the study?

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026