Skip to content

The VMVN Study: Virological Monitoring in Viet Nam

Effect of Routine Viral Load Monitoring on Clinical and Immunological Outcomes and Antiretroviral Drug Resistance on Patients Taking First-line Antiretroviral Drugs in Vietnam

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01317498
Acronym
VMVN
Enrollment
650
Registered
2011-03-17
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2018-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AIDS, HIV Infection

Keywords

ART, antiretroviral, treatment, Vietnam, Asia, viral load

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to test the hypothesis that the addition of routine viral load testing to the standard laboratory monitoring of HIV patients on first-line antiretroviral treatment (ART) in Vietnam will result in better clinical outcomes for patients.

Detailed description

The optimal strategy for monitoring antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings (RLS) is unknown. In developed countries, routine monitoring with CD4 count and viral load (VL) testing is standard practice. In RLS, however, limitations in the availability of the technology for VL testing, and in financial resources to pay for VL testing, mean that few developing countries provide VL testing as part of the routine monitoring of patients on ART. Instead, ART is monitored primary by clinical examination with CD4 testing where available. This strategy has been endorsed by the most recent WHO guidelines for ART (WHO, 2010). Standard laboratory monitoring of patients on ART in Vietnam includes CD4 testing every 6 months, where available. In many rural areas of the country, CD4 testing is not available and only clinical monitoring is used. In this study we will test the hypothesis that routine viral monitoring every 6 months for patients on first-line ART will result in significantly higher rates of virological suppression and decrease the incidence of death or new or recurrent AIDS-defining illnesses by 50% within three years.

Interventions

OTHERStandard Care

CD4, liver function and CBC every 6 months

Viral Load test every 6 months

Sponsors

Bach Mai Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>= 18 * Confirmed HIV infection * Not currently taking ART * Meets Vietnam MOH criteria for ART (THROUGH OCTOBER 2011:CD4\<250 cells/mm3, WHO Clinical Stage IV, or WHO clinical stage III with CD4\<350 cells/mm3; FROM NOVEMBER 2011: CD4\<350 cells/mm3, OR WHO Clinical Stage III or IV) * Completes required Vietnam MOH ART adherence training * Signs written informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Any ART use within the previous 3 months * History of treatment failure on first-line ART or known resistance to first-line ART. * Unable or unwilling to give written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Death or new/recurrent AIDS-Defining (WHO Clinical Stage IV) Illnesses3 yearsThe number of deaths and/or new/recurrent WHO Clinical Stage IV clinical illnesses that occur over 3 years of follow-up in each group.
Virological Suppression3 yearsThe percentage of patients in each group who are still on treatment at 3 years who have virological suppression, defined as an HIV viral load below the level of laboratory detection.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resistance mutations3 yearsThe difference in resistance mutation patterns at the diagnosis of virological treatment failure in each group.
Time to identification and diagnosis of treatment failure.3 yearsTo calculate the difference in times in the 2 groups from the first emergence of active viral replication (defined as a detectable viral load) to identification and diagnosis of treatment failure.
Cost-benefit analysis3 yearsTo evaluate and compare the costs and benefits of adding routine VL testing to standard laboratory monitoring for patients on first-line ART in Vietnam. In the event that the trial shows a benefit in the primary outcome of decreased number of deaths plus WHO Stage 4 clinical events, the analysis will evaluate the cost per life saved and the cost per outcome event avoided. The analysis will also include a cost per quality-adjusted life year saved.
Sensitivity and specificity of WHO criteria for treatment failure3 yearsTo determine the sensitivity and specificity of WHO criteria for treatment failure among patients on first-line ARV in Vietnam.
Time from virological treatment failure to switch to second line ART.3 yearsWe will calculate the mean time from virological treatment failure to switch to second line ART in both groups.

Countries

Vietnam

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026