Skip to content

Clinical Trial Comparing Decompression With and Without Coflex™ Interlaminar Technology Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Outcome in the Treatment of Degenerative Spinal Stenosis With Concomitant Low Back Pain by Decompression With and Without Additional Stabilization Using the Coflex™ Interlaminar Technology

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01316211
Enrollment
246
Registered
2011-03-16
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2020-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Stenosis

Keywords

Back Pains, Pain, Back, Pains, Back, Backache, Backaches, Back Ache, Ache, Back, Aches, Back, Back Aches, Back Pain without Radiation, Vertebrogenic Pain Syndrome, Pain Syndrome, Vertebrogenic, Pain Syndromes, Vertebrogenic, Syndrome, Vertebrogenic Pain, Syndromes, Vertebrogenic Pain, Vertebrogenic Pain Syndromes, Back Pain with Radiation, Stenosis, spinal, Caudal stenosis, Spondylopathy, Spondylopathies, Low back pain, Lower back pain

Brief summary

A 2 year comparative evaluation of clinical outcome in the treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis with concomitant low back pain by decompression with and without additional stabilization using the coflex® Interlaminar Technology

Detailed description

The coflex® implant for interlaminar stabilization has been in clinical use for more than 10 years and is CE-certified according to the standards and approved in the United States. This was a randomized multicenter study to collect prospective data for potential improvement in the therapy of low back pain during the treatment of spinal stenosis. The study was conducted in Germany.

Interventions

DEVICEImplantation of coflex™ after surgical decompression

The device will be implanted after surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis.

Surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis without stabilization by an additional implant

Sponsors

MDT Medical Device Testing GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
MCRA
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Paradigm Spine
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Radiographic confirmation of clinical symptoms of at least moderate degenerative spinal stenosis, with constriction of the central spinal canal of one or two adjacent segments in the region L3 to L5 with the need for decompression. If necessary additional decompression in the adjacent segment(s) may be performed avoiding any instability in the affected segment. In addition the following may exist (but is not obligatory): * hypertrophy of the facet joints and subarticular recessus stenosis in the relevant segment or * stenosis of the foramen in the relevant segment * and/or stable retrolisthesis up to grade I verified by flexion-/extension X-ray films. 2. Radiographic confirmation of no translatory instability in the main segment as well as in adjacent segments (dynamic translatory instability ≤ 3 mm). 3. VAS back pain score of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm scale (for acute back pain or a period of at least 3 month of back pain before the onset of leg pain). 4. Minimum of 3 months conservative therapy without improvement of symptoms. 5. Age \>40 years. 6. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire score of at least 18/45 (40%) for German sites or 20/50 (40%) for the US sites (The question about sexual life will be excluded). 7. Suitability of the patient for a posterior surgery procedure. 8. Mental and physical ability of patient to follow the protocol according to compliance to time schedule, treatment plan, fill in of CRF pages and further study procedures. 9. Personally signed informed consent form before the start of any study related procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Any of the following will exclude a subject from the study: 1. Preceding fusion or decompression surgery of the lumbar spine or preceding nucleotomy of the segments of concern (also if nucleotomy becomes necessary during surgery). 2. Radiographically confirmed damage of the vertebral body in the segment of concern in the lumbar spine (e.g. osteoporotic compression fracture or because of tumors) 3. Isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis (anterolisthesis; retrolisthesis \> grade I) or spondylolysis (Pars fracture). 4. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (\> 25°). 5. Adipositas (obesity). Defined as a body mass index \>40. 6. Pregnancy, or wish to get pregnant during the course of the study. 7. Known allergy for titanium and titanium alloys. 8. Fluoride infections - both systemic and local. 9. History of severe peripheral neuropathy. 10. Significant peripheral vascular disease (claudication intermittens ≥ stage 2b). 11. M. Paget or osteomalacia or other metabolic bone disorders. 12. Cauda equina syndrome. 13. Communicating diseases, including HIV, active hepatitis 14. Patients who are lawfully kept in an institution. 15. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, will be inappropriate for inclusion into this clinical trial or will not comply with requirements of the study. 16. Subjects who participated in a clinical observation or therapy with X-ray during the last 10 years. 17. Subjects who participate(d) in another clinical trial (within the last 4 weeks) that might influence the safety and effectiveness assessment of this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in ODI From Baseline to 24 MonthsBaseline, 3, 12, and 24 monthsThe ODI, also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire is a questionnaire providing information on back and leg pain and the affects on managing everyday life by dividing questions into 10 sections. For this study, the questions on sexual activity will not be asked. The total possible score for each section is 0-5. The scores are then converted percentages ranging from 0% (minimal disability) to 100% (maximum possible disability).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain From Baseline to 24 MonthsBaseline, 3, 12, and 24 monthsImprovement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back pain (on the 100mm scale) compared to control group. 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Leg Pain From Baseline to 24 MonthsBaseline, 3, 12, and 24 monthsImprovement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain (on the 100mm scale) compared to control group. 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.
Neurological Status - Mean Change in Sensory Deficit From Baseline to 24 MonthsBaseline, 3, 12, and 24 monthsSensory deficits will be assessed at nerves roots from L3, L4, L5, and S1. Grading score ranges from 1=absent to 3=normal.
Assessment of Time to Symptoms Utilizing Walking Distance Test2 yearsDuring this test, a patient has to walk on a treadmill (speed 1.8 km/h \[12\]) for 15 minutes (450 m) on a 0 degree ramp incline. It will be assessed time to first symptoms, time to severe symptoms and nature of symptoms (leg weakness, leg pain, back pain, or generalized fatigue, other). A time of zero will be recorded when symptoms were present at onset. The examination will be stopped after 15 minutes or at the onset of severe symptoms. Definition of severe symptoms is: The level of discomfort that would make patients stop their activities in usual life situations. It is assumed that patients with additional back pain will have more problems in managing the complete walking distance and therefore may stop the walking distance test before the endpoint at 15 minutes
Number of Participants With Adverse Events - Operative Site2 yearsNumber of Participants that experience adverse events related to the operative site from each group.
The Percentage of Patients With Survival Probability as Assessed by Evaluating Treatment Failure in Both Groups..2 yearsTreatment failure is defined as any secondary intervention, severe adverse event or other parameters that define the device as ineffective or not safe. The following events/outcomes were defined as treatment failures: wound revisions, patients with trauma requiring surgical intervention, disc hernia or dura repair, and/or pain management.
Number of Participants With Significant Migration or Expulsion of the Implant2 yearsAssess significant migration, defined as \> 5mm by x-ray images (point of reference is the tip of the U-portion implant identified on the corresponding x-ray image).
Change in Functionality- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) From Baseline to 24 MonthsBaseline, 3, 12, and 24 monthsThe symptom severity scale ranges from 0 to 5 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. Percentage of the maximum reported score for the symptom severity scale was calculated at baseline and 24 months and change in percentage score is reported in the Outcome Measure data table.
Neurological Status - Mean Change in Muscle Strength From Baseline to 24 MonthsBaseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 monthsMuscle strength will be assessed on right/left muscle strength at 6 groups of leg muscles. Score ranges from 0=contraction to 5=normal.
Assessment of Neurological Status Using the Laségue Test or Straight Leg Raise Test- Change From Baseline to 24 MonthsBaseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 monthsThe straight leg raise or a Laségue Test is used to assess a participant's low back pain. A positive outcome is identified if a participant experiences low back pain when the straight leg is at a certain angle (0-90 degrees). A negative test suggests a likely different cause for back pain. The test is performed on both right and left legs.
Number of Participants Receiving Epidural Injections2 yearsEpidural injections at up to 24 months
Neurological Status- Mean Change in Trendelenburg Sign Test From Baseline to 24 Months.Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 monthsTrendelenburg's sign was used to assess the neurological status of a subject. The test was taken for both the left and right sides and assessed as not present/absent (no= corresponding with a value of 1) or present (yes= corresponding to a value of 2). The average of each patient's worst side was calculated. Mean values closer to 1 indicate more patients with an absent Trendelenburg's sign, and a decrease in the mean change indicates more patients improving from a present to absent Trendelenburg's sign.
Neurological Status- Mean Change in Ilio Sacral Joint Affection Test From Baseline to 24 Months.Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 monthsIlio sacral join affection test was used to assess the neurological status of a subject. The test was taken for both the left and right sides and assessed as not present/absent (no= corresponding with a value of 1) or present (yes= corresponding to a value of 2). The average of each patient's worst side was calculated. Mean values closer to 1 indicate more patients with an absent llio sacral joint affection and a decrease in the mean change indicates more patients improving from a present to absent sacral join affection.
Change of Symptoms- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) After 24 Months Compared to Baseline.Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 monthsThe symptom severity scale ranges from 0 to 5 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. Percentage of the maximum reported score for the symptom severity scale was calculated at baseline and 24 months and change in percentage score is reported in the Outcome Measure data table.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

120 patients in the Coflex group and 126 in the control group underwent surgery. 4 Coflex patients and 3 Control patients had to be excluded from full-analysis population, since no follow-up values were recorded and the reason of drop-out did not indicate treatment failure.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Coflex™
Implantation of coflex™ device in assigned patients Implantation of coflex™ after surgical decompression: The device will be implanted after surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis.
116
Surgical Decompression
Surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis without stabilization by an additional implant. Surgical decompression: Surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis without stabilization by an additional implant
123
Total239

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCoflex™Surgical DecompressionTotal
Age, Continuous68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
BMI29.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
29.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
29 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
Height170 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
170 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
170 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
116 participants123 participants239 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants61 Participants126 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants62 Participants113 Participants
Weight84 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
84 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
84 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1161 / 123
other
Total, other adverse events
89 / 11696 / 123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
89 / 11696 / 123

Outcome results

Primary

Change in ODI From Baseline to 24 Months

The ODI, also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire is a questionnaire providing information on back and leg pain and the affects on managing everyday life by dividing questions into 10 sections. For this study, the questions on sexual activity will not be asked. The total possible score for each section is 0-5. The scores are then converted percentages ranging from 0% (minimal disability) to 100% (maximum possible disability).

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coflex™Change in ODI From Baseline to 24 Months-19.0 percentage pointsStandard Deviation 2.1
Surgical DecompressionChange in ODI From Baseline to 24 Months-22.5 percentage pointsStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Assessment of Neurological Status Using the Laségue Test or Straight Leg Raise Test- Change From Baseline to 24 Months

The straight leg raise or a Laségue Test is used to assess a participant's low back pain. A positive outcome is identified if a participant experiences low back pain when the straight leg is at a certain angle (0-90 degrees). A negative test suggests a likely different cause for back pain. The test is performed on both right and left legs.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coflex™Assessment of Neurological Status Using the Laségue Test or Straight Leg Raise Test- Change From Baseline to 24 Months10.8 DegreesStandard Deviation 1.6
Surgical DecompressionAssessment of Neurological Status Using the Laségue Test or Straight Leg Raise Test- Change From Baseline to 24 Months9.6 DegreesStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Assessment of Time to Symptoms Utilizing Walking Distance Test

During this test, a patient has to walk on a treadmill (speed 1.8 km/h \[12\]) for 15 minutes (450 m) on a 0 degree ramp incline. It will be assessed time to first symptoms, time to severe symptoms and nature of symptoms (leg weakness, leg pain, back pain, or generalized fatigue, other). A time of zero will be recorded when symptoms were present at onset. The examination will be stopped after 15 minutes or at the onset of severe symptoms. Definition of severe symptoms is: The level of discomfort that would make patients stop their activities in usual life situations. It is assumed that patients with additional back pain will have more problems in managing the complete walking distance and therefore may stop the walking distance test before the endpoint at 15 minutes

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coflex™Assessment of Time to Symptoms Utilizing Walking Distance Test6.01 minutesStandard Deviation 0.65
Surgical DecompressionAssessment of Time to Symptoms Utilizing Walking Distance Test4.36 minutesStandard Deviation 0.64
Secondary

Change in Functionality- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) From Baseline to 24 Months

The symptom severity scale ranges from 0 to 5 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. Percentage of the maximum reported score for the symptom severity scale was calculated at baseline and 24 months and change in percentage score is reported in the Outcome Measure data table.

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coflex™Change in Functionality- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) From Baseline to 24 Months-3.98 percentage pointsStandard Deviation 0.38
Surgical DecompressionChange in Functionality- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) From Baseline to 24 Months-3.52 percentage pointsStandard Deviation 0.37
Secondary

Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain From Baseline to 24 Months

Improvement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back pain (on the 100mm scale) compared to control group. 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coflex™Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain From Baseline to 24 Months-23.5 mmStandard Deviation 2.8
Surgical DecompressionChange in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain From Baseline to 24 Months-23.1 mmStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Leg Pain From Baseline to 24 Months

Improvement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain (on the 100mm scale) compared to control group. 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coflex™Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Leg Pain From Baseline to 24 Months-24.3 mmStandard Deviation 2.5
Surgical DecompressionChange in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Leg Pain From Baseline to 24 Months-20.6 mmStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Change of Symptoms- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) After 24 Months Compared to Baseline.

The symptom severity scale ranges from 0 to 5 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. Percentage of the maximum reported score for the symptom severity scale was calculated at baseline and 24 months and change in percentage score is reported in the Outcome Measure data table.

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coflex™Change of Symptoms- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) After 24 Months Compared to Baseline.-15.0 percentage pointsStandard Deviation 1.83
Surgical DecompressionChange of Symptoms- Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) After 24 Months Compared to Baseline.-15.10 percentage pointsStandard Deviation 1.75
Secondary

Neurological Status- Mean Change in Ilio Sacral Joint Affection Test From Baseline to 24 Months.

Ilio sacral join affection test was used to assess the neurological status of a subject. The test was taken for both the left and right sides and assessed as not present/absent (no= corresponding with a value of 1) or present (yes= corresponding to a value of 2). The average of each patient's worst side was calculated. Mean values closer to 1 indicate more patients with an absent llio sacral joint affection and a decrease in the mean change indicates more patients improving from a present to absent sacral join affection.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coflex™Neurological Status- Mean Change in Ilio Sacral Joint Affection Test From Baseline to 24 Months.-0.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Surgical DecompressionNeurological Status- Mean Change in Ilio Sacral Joint Affection Test From Baseline to 24 Months.-0.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Secondary

Neurological Status - Mean Change in Muscle Strength From Baseline to 24 Months

Muscle strength will be assessed on right/left muscle strength at 6 groups of leg muscles. Score ranges from 0=contraction to 5=normal.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coflex™Neurological Status - Mean Change in Muscle Strength From Baseline to 24 Months0.002 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.035
Surgical DecompressionNeurological Status - Mean Change in Muscle Strength From Baseline to 24 Months-0.030 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.034
Secondary

Neurological Status - Mean Change in Sensory Deficit From Baseline to 24 Months

Sensory deficits will be assessed at nerves roots from L3, L4, L5, and S1. Grading score ranges from 1=absent to 3=normal.

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coflex™Neurological Status - Mean Change in Sensory Deficit From Baseline to 24 Months0.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.01
Surgical DecompressionNeurological Status - Mean Change in Sensory Deficit From Baseline to 24 Months0.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.01
Secondary

Neurological Status- Mean Change in Trendelenburg Sign Test From Baseline to 24 Months.

Trendelenburg's sign was used to assess the neurological status of a subject. The test was taken for both the left and right sides and assessed as not present/absent (no= corresponding with a value of 1) or present (yes= corresponding to a value of 2). The average of each patient's worst side was calculated. Mean values closer to 1 indicate more patients with an absent Trendelenburg's sign, and a decrease in the mean change indicates more patients improving from a present to absent Trendelenburg's sign.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coflex™Neurological Status- Mean Change in Trendelenburg Sign Test From Baseline to 24 Months.-0.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Surgical DecompressionNeurological Status- Mean Change in Trendelenburg Sign Test From Baseline to 24 Months.-0.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Secondary

Number of Participants Receiving Epidural Injections

Epidural injections at up to 24 months

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Coflex™Number of Participants Receiving Epidural Injections0 Participants
Surgical DecompressionNumber of Participants Receiving Epidural Injections2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events - Operative Site

Number of Participants that experience adverse events related to the operative site from each group.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Coflex™Number of Participants With Adverse Events - Operative Site45 Participants
Surgical DecompressionNumber of Participants With Adverse Events - Operative Site54 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Significant Migration or Expulsion of the Implant

Assess significant migration, defined as \> 5mm by x-ray images (point of reference is the tip of the U-portion implant identified on the corresponding x-ray image).

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Coflex™Number of Participants With Significant Migration or Expulsion of the Implant2 Participants
Secondary

The Percentage of Patients With Survival Probability as Assessed by Evaluating Treatment Failure in Both Groups..

Treatment failure is defined as any secondary intervention, severe adverse event or other parameters that define the device as ineffective or not safe. The following events/outcomes were defined as treatment failures: wound revisions, patients with trauma requiring surgical intervention, disc hernia or dura repair, and/or pain management.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Coflex™The Percentage of Patients With Survival Probability as Assessed by Evaluating Treatment Failure in Both Groups..0.79 percentage of participants
Surgical DecompressionThe Percentage of Patients With Survival Probability as Assessed by Evaluating Treatment Failure in Both Groups..0.76 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026